AJP - Endo AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (February 24, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.91013.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/5/E1076    most recent
91013.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Permana, P. A
Right arrow Articles by Reaven, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Permana, P. A
Right arrow Articles by Reaven, P.
Submitted on December 19, 2008
Revised on February 2, 2009
Accepted on February 19, 2009

Pioglitazone reduces inflammatory responses of human adipocytes to factors secreted by monocytes/macrophages

Paska A Permana1*, Weiyang Zhang1, Martin Wabitsch2, Pamela Fischer-Posovszky2, William C. Duckworth3, and Peter Reaven4

1 Phoenix VA Health Care System
2 University of Ulm
3 University of Nebraska Medical Center
4 Hayden VA Medical Center, Phoenix

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Paska.Permana{at}va.gov.

Infiltration of monocyte-derived macrophages into adipose tissue may contribute to tissue and systemic inflammation and insulin resistance. We hypothesized that pioglitazone could specifically reduce inflammatory response of adipocytes to factors released by monocytes/ macrophages. We show that macrophage-factors (M{psi}-factors) greatly increased the expression levels of pro-inflammatory adipokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules in human subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (SAT and VAT) as well as in adipocytes (up to several hundred fold of control). Compared with SAT, VAT show enhanced basal and M{psi}-factor-induced inflammatory responses. M{psi}-factors also induced greater lipolysis in adipocytes as assessed by glycerol concentrations released from the cells (196±13 vs. 56±7 µM in control, P<0.05). Pretreatment of adipose tissue or adipocytes with pioglitazone reduced the above responses to M{varphi}-factors (by 13-86%, P<0.05) and prevented M{psi}-factor-suppression of adiponectin expression. Furthermore, pioglitazone pre-treatment of both adipocytes and macrophages tended to further reduce inflammatory responses of adipocytes to M{psi}-factors and monocyte adhesion to M{psi}-factor-activated adipocytes. In support of these in vitro data, media conditioned by monocytes isolated from impaired glucose tolerant subjects who had received pioglitazone treatment (compared with placebo) induced lower concentrations of pro-inflammatory adipokines and glycerol (100±7 vs.150±15 µM, P<0.05) released from adipocytes. In summary, pioglitazone decreases inflammatory responses in adipose tissue/cells induced by monocytes/macrophages by acting on either or both cell types. These beneficial effects of pioglitazone may attenuate pro-inflammatory responses resulting from monocyte/macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue and suppress tissue inflammation resulting from the interaction between both cell types.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.