AJP - Endo Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (April 14, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.90972.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/6/E1311    most recent
90972.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richey, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bergman, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richey, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bergman, R. N.
Submitted on December 8, 2008
Revised on March 23, 2009
Accepted on April 10, 2009

Rimonabant Prevents Additional Accumulation of Visceral and Subcutaneous Fat During High-Fat Feeding In Dogs

Joyce M. Richey1*, Orison O. Woolcott2, Darko Stefanovski3, L. Nicole Harrison2, Dan Zheng1, Maya Lottati2, Isabel R Hsu, Stella P Kim1, Morvarid Kabir1, Karyn J Catalano4, Jenny D. Chiu2, Viorica Ionut1, Cathryn Kolka2, Vahe Mooradian2, and Richard N. Bergman5

1 Keck School of Medicine of USC
2 University of Southern California
3 Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
4 Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California
5 University of Southern California Medical School

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jrichey{at}usc.edu.

We investigated whether rimonabant, a type 1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, reduces visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in dogs maintained on a hypercaloric high-fat diet (HHFD). To determine whether energy expenditure contributed to body weight changes we also calculated resting metabolic rate. Twenty male dogs received either rimonabant (1.25 mg · kg-1 · d-1, orally; n = 11) or placebo (n = 9) for 16 weeks, concomitant with a HHFD. VAT, SAT and non-fat tissue were measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Resting metabolic rate was assessed by indirect calorimetry. By week 16 of treatment, rimonabant dogs lost 2.5% of their body weight (P = 0.029), while in placebo dogs body weight increased by 6.2% (P < 0.001). Rimonabant reduced food intake (P = 0.027), concomitant with a reduction of SAT by 19.5% (P < 0.001). In contrast with the VAT increase with placebo (P < 0.01), VAT did not change with rimonabant. Non-fat tissue remained unchanged in both groups. Body weight loss was not associated with either resting metabolic rate (R2 = 0.24; P = 0.154) or food intake (R2 = 0.24; P = 0.166). In conclusion, rimonabant reduced body weight together with a reduction in abdominal fat, mainly due to SAT loss. Body weight changes were not associated with either resting metabolic rate or food intake. The findings provide evidence of a peripheral effect of rimonabant to reduce adiposity and body weight, possibly through a direct effect on adipose tissue.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.