|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY
Facultades de Farmacia y Medicina, Universidad CEU (Centro de Estudios Universitarios) San Pablo, Madrid, Spain
Submitted 4 February 2008 ; accepted in final form 15 September 2008
Insulin resistance plays a role in the pathogenesis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes. The glucose clamp is considered the gold standard for determining in vivo insulin sensitivity, both in human and in animal models. However, the clamp is laborious, time consuming and, in animals, requires anesthesia and collection of multiple blood samples. In human studies, a number of simple indexes, derived from fasting glucose and insulin levels, have been obtained and validated against the glucose clamp. However, these indexes have not been validated in rats and their accuracy in predicting altered insulin sensitivity remains to be established. In the present study, we have evaluated whether indirect estimates based on fasting glucose and insulin levels are valid predictors of insulin sensitivity in nonpregnant and 20-day-pregnant Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats. We have analyzed the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and the fasting glucose-to-insulin ratio (FGIR) by comparing them with the insulin sensitivity (SIClamp) values obtained during the hyperinsulinemic-isoglycemic clamp. We have performed a calibration analysis to evaluate the ability of these indexes to accurately predict insulin sensitivity as determined by the reference glucose clamp. Finally, to assess the reliability of these indexes for the identification of animals with impaired insulin sensitivity, performance of the indexes was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats. We found that HOMA-IR, QUICKI, and FGIR correlated significantly with SIClamp, exhibited good sensitivity and specificity, accurately predicted SIClamp, and yielded lower insulin sensitivity in pregnant than in nonpregnant rats. Together, our data demonstrate that these indexes provide an easy and accurate measure of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy in the rat.
homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; fasting glucose-to-insulin ratio; hyperinsulinemic isoglycemic clamp; calibration model
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Muniyappa, H. Chen, R. H. Muzumdar, F. H. Einstein, X. Yan, L. Q. Yue, N. Barzilai, and M. J. Quon Comparison between surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity/resistance and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp estimates in rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2009; 297(5): E1023 - E1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Aziz, L. S. Kenney, B. Goulet, and E.-S. Abdel-Aal Dietary Starch Type Affects Body Weight and Glycemic Control in Freely Fed but Not Energy-Restricted Obese Rats J. Nutr., October 1, 2009; 139(10): 1881 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mather Surrogate measures of insulin resistance: of rats, mice, and men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2009; 296(2): E398 - E399. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |