HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 294/1/E15    most recent 00645.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Muniyappa, R. Articles by Quon, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Muniyappa, R. Articles by Quon, M. J.

REVIEWS

Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage

Diabetes Unit, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Submitted 4 October 2007 ; accepted in final form 21 October 2007

ABSTRACT

Insulin resistance contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetes and is a hallmark of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and many cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, quantifying insulin sensitivity/resistance in humans and animal models is of great importance for epidemiological studies, clinical and basic science investigations, and eventual use in clinical practice. Direct and indirect methods of varying complexity are currently employed for these purposes. Some methods rely on steady-state analysis of glucose and insulin, whereas others rely on dynamic testing. Each of these methods has distinct advantages and limitations. Thus, optimal choice and employment of a specific method depends on the nature of the studies being performed. Established direct methods for measuring insulin sensitivity in vivo are relatively complex. The hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp and the insulin suppression test directly assess insulin-mediated glucose utilization under steady-state conditions that are both labor and time intensive. A slightly less complex indirect method relies on minimal model analysis of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Finally, simple surrogate indexes for insulin sensitivity/resistance are available (e.g., QUICKI, HOMA, 1/insulin, Matusda index) that are derived from blood insulin and glucose concentrations under fasting conditions (steady state) or after an oral glucose load (dynamic). In particular, the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) has been validated extensively against the reference standard glucose clamp method. QUICKI is a simple, robust, accurate, reproducible method that appropriately predicts changes in insulin sensitivity after therapeutic interventions as well as the onset of diabetes. In this Frontiers article, we highlight merits, limitations, and appropriate use of current in vivo measures of insulin sensitivity/resistance.

glucose clamp; quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; minimal model; homeostatis model assessment

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Mills, H. C. Furr, and S. A. Tanumihardjo Retinol to Retinol-Binding Protein (RBP) Is Low in Obese Adults due to Elevated apo-RBP Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2008; 233(10): 1255 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Apovian, S. Bigornia, M. Mott, M. R. Meyers, J. Ulloor, M. Gagua, M. McDonnell, D. Hess, L. Joseph, and N. Gokce Adipose Macrophage Infiltration Is Associated With Insulin Resistance and Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Obese Subjects Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2008; 28(9): 1654 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]