AJP - Endo Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292: E49-E53, 2007. First published August 1, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00485.2005
0193-1849/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/E49    most recent
00485.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B.

Metabolically active portion of fat-free mass: a cellular body composition level modeling analysis

ZiMian Wang,1 Stanley Heshka,1 Jack Wang,1 Dympna Gallagher,1 Paul Deurenberg,2 Zhao Chen,3 and Steven B. Heymsfield1

1Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; and 2Nutrition Consultant, Singapore; 3Mel and Enid Zuckerman Arizona College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Submitted 5 October 2005 ; accepted in final form 17 March 2006

The proportion of fat-free mass (FFM) as body cell mass (BCM) is highly related to whole body resting energy expenditure. However, the magnitude of BCM/FFM may have been underestimated in previous studies. This is because Moore's equation [BCM (kg) = 0.00833 x total body potassium (in mmol)], which was used to predict BCM, underestimates BCM by ~11%. The aims of the present study were to develop a theoretical BCM/FFM model at the cellular level and to explore the influences of sex, age, and adiposity on the BCM/FFM. Subjects were 112 adults who had the following measurements: total body water by 2H2O or 3H2O dilution; extracellular water by NaBr dilution; total body nitrogen by in vivo neutron activation analysis; and bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. FFM was calculated using a multicomponent model and BCM as the difference between FFM and the sum of extracellular fluid and solids. The developed theoretical model revealed that the proportion of BCM to FFM is mainly determined by water distribution (i.e., E/I, the ratio of extracellular to intracellular water). A significant correlation (r = 0.90, P < 0.001) was present between measured and model-predicted BCM/FFM for all subjects pooled. Measured BCM/FFM [mean (SD)] was 0.584 ± 0.041 and 0.529 ± 0.041 for adult men and women (P < 0.001), respectively. A multiple linear regression model showed that there are independent significant associations of sex, age, and fat mass with BCM/FFM.

body cell mass; extracellular water; intracellular water; nutrition status; total body potassium



Address for correspondence: ZM. Wang, Obesity Research Center, 1090 Amsterdam Ave., 14th Floor, New York, NY 10025 (e-mail: ZW28{at}Columbia.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.