AJP - Endo Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283: E799-E808, 2002. First published June 18, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00105.2002
0193-1849/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/4/E799    most recent
00105.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Melby, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Melby, C. L.
Vol. 283, Issue 4, E799-E808, October 2002

Behavioral, metabolic, and molecular correlates of lower insulin sensitivity in Mexican-Americans

Richard C. Ho1, Kevin P. Davy2, Matthew S. Hickey2, Scott A. Summers3, and Christopher L. Melby1

Departments of 1 Food Science and Human Nutrition, 2 Health and Exercise Science, and 3 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523

We determined whether lower insulin sensitivity persists in young, nonobese, nondiabetic Mexican-American [MA; n = 13, 27.0 ± 2.0 yr, body mass index (BMI) 23.0 ± 0.7] compared with non-Hispanic white (NHW; n = 13, 24.8 ± 1.5 yr, BMI 22.8 ± 0.6) males and females after accounting for cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal O2 uptake), abdominal fat distribution (computed tomography scans), dietary intake (4-day records), and skeletal muscle insulin-signaling protein abundance from muscle biopsies (Western blot analysis). MA were significantly less insulin sensitive compared with their NHW counterparts when estimated by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (MA: 1.53 ± 0.22 vs. NHW: 0.87 ± 0.16, P < 0.05) and the revised quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (MA: 0.45 ± 0.08 vs. NHW: 0.58 ± 0.19, P = 0.05). However, skeletal muscle protein abundance of insulin receptor-beta (IRbeta ), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p85 subunit, Akt1, Akt2, and GLUT4 were not significantly different. Differences in indexes of insulin sensitivity lost significance after percent dietary intake of palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, and skeletal muscle protein abundance of IRbeta were accounted for. We conclude that differences in insulin sensitivity between nonobese, nondiabetic MA and NHW persist after effects of chronic and acute exercise and total and abdominal fat distribution are accounted for. These differences may be mediated, in part, by dietary fat intake.

cardiorespiratory fitness; insulin-signaling proteins





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online