|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-cell function in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance
1 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
2 Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ferranni{at}ifc.cnr.it.
The mechanisms by which the entero-insular axis influences
-cell function have not been investigated in detail. We performed oral and isoglycemic intravenous (IV) glucose administration in subjects with normal (NGT, n=11) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, n=10), using C-peptide deconvolution to calculate insulin secretion rates, and mathematical modeling to quantitate
-cell function. The incretin effect was taken to be the ratio of oral to IV responses. In NGT, incretin-mediated insulin release (OGTT/IV ratio=1.59±0.18, p=0.004) amounted to 18±2 nmol.m-2 (or 32±4% of the oral response), and its time-course matched that of total insulin secretion. Both
-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio=1.52±0.26, p=0.02), rate sensitivity (or the response to glucose rate-of-change, OGTT/IV ratio=2.22±0.37, p=0.06) and glucose-independent potentiation were markedly higher with oral than IV glucose. In IGT,
-cell glucose sensitivity (75±14 vs 156±28 pmol.min-1.m-2.mM-1 of NGT, p=0.01) and potentiation were impaired on the OGTT. The incretin effect was not significantly different from NGT in terms of: plasma GLP-1 and GIP responses, total insulin secretion, and enhancement of
-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio=1.73±0.24, p=ns vs NGT). However, the time-courses of incretin-mediated insulin secretion and potentiation were altered, with a predominance of glucose-induced vs incretin-mediated stimulation. We conclude that, under physiologic circumstances incretin-mediated stimulation of insulin secretion results from an enhancement of all dynamic aspects of
-cell function, particularly
-cell glucose sensitivity. In IGT,
-cell function is inherently impaired, whereas the incretin effect is only partially affected.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Muscelli, A. Mari, A. Casolaro, S. Camastra, G. Seghieri, A. Gastaldelli, J. J. Holst, and E. Ferrannini Separate Impact of Obesity and Glucose Tolerance on the Incretin Effect in Normal Subjects and Type 2 Diabetic Patients Diabetes, May 1, 2008; 57(5): 1340 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. K. Knop, T. Vilsboll, P. V. Hojberg, S. Larsen, S. Madsbad, A. Volund, J. J. Holst, and T. Krarup Reduced Incretin Effect in Type 2 Diabetes: Cause or Consequence of the Diabetic State? Diabetes, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1951 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Salinari, A. Bertuzzi, M. Manco, and G. Mingrone NEFA-glucose comodulation model of beta-cell insulin secretion in 24-h multiple-meal test Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1890 - E1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |