|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
2 Department of Internal Medicine Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism & Nutrition, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cobelli{at}dei.unipd.it.
The dual tracer method conventionally has been used for assessment of postprandial fluxes, i.e. appearance in plasma of ingested glucose (Rameal), glucose production (EGP) and disposal (Rd). To quantify the magnitude of errors affecting the calculations and their dependence on model assumptions, this method was assessed in comparison with the triple tracer method, which provides model-independent estimates. To this purpose, the dual tracer protocol was performed twice in 8 normals, with [1-13C]glucose to trace ingested glucose and [6,6-2H2]glucose constantly infused. A third tracer, [6-3H]glucose, was infused at variable rates to render the calculation of Rameal and EGP virtually model-independent. The dual tracer method analysed with a one-compartment model performed poorly, since Rameal peak was significantly lower and delayed compared to triple tracer reference, resulting in a significantly lower estimation of the amount of absorbed glucose (9036±558 vs 11316±823 µmol/kg, p=0.0117). EGP showed a paradoxical pattern, with an initial overshoot followed by a rapid decay to negative values, resulting in a significant underestimation of EGP suppression (57±3 vs. 65 ± 4%, p=0.0117). A two-compartment model performed better but did not overcome the limitations of the dual tracer approach, since amount of absorbed glucose was still significantly underestimated (10231±661 vs 12169±838 µmol/kg, p=0.0117) and EGP still showed a paradoxical behaviour. Rd, estimated from Rameal and EGP, was significantly underestimated with the dual tracer method, irrespectively of adopted model. We conclude that three suitably infused tracers are required for accurate assessment of postprandial Rameal, EGP and, thus, of Rd.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Vella and R. A. Rizza Application of Isotopic Techniques Using Constant Specific Activity or Enrichment to the Study of Carbohydrate Metabolism Diabetes, October 1, 2009; 58(10): 2168 - 2174. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Basu, C. Dalla Man, R. Basu, G. Toffolo, C. Cobelli, and R. A. Rizza Effects of Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Secretion, Insulin Action, Glucose Effectiveness, and Postprandial Glucose Metabolism Diabetes Care, May 1, 2009; 32(5): 866 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Vella, P. Shah, A. Basu, and R. A. Rizza Prandial Insulin and the Systemic Appearance of Meal-Derived Glucose in People With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, November 1, 2008; 31(11): 2230 - 2231. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ravikumar, J. Gerrard, C. Dalla Man, M. J. Firbank, A. Lane, P. T. English, C. Cobelli, and R. Taylor Pioglitazone Decreases Fasting and Postprandial Endogenous Glucose Production in Proportion to Decrease in Hepatic Triglyceride Content Diabetes, September 1, 2008; 57(9): 2288 - 2295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hovorka, H. Jayatillake, E. Rogatsky, V. Tomuta, T. Hovorka, and D. T. Stein Calculating glucose fluxes during meal tolerance test: a new computational approach Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2007; 293(2): E610 - E619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cobelli, G. M. Toffolo, C. D. Man, M. Campioni, P. Denti, A. Caumo, P. Butler, and R. Rizza Assessment of beta-cell function in humans, simultaneously with insulin sensitivity and hepatic extraction, from intravenous and oral glucose tests Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2007; 293(1): E1 - E15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Basu, C. Dalla Man, M. Campioni, A. Basu, K. S. Nair, M. D. Jensen, S. Khosla, G. Klee, G. Toffolo, C. Cobelli, et al. Two Years of Treatment With Dehydroepiandrosterone Does Not Improve Insulin Secretion, Insulin Action, or Postprandial Glucose Turnover in Elderly Men or Women Diabetes, March 1, 2007; 56(3): 753 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |