|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
2 Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Integrative Physiology, Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
3 Pierce Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gronfier{at}lyon.inserm.fr.
It has been shown in animal studies that exposure to brief pulses of bright light can phase shift the circadian pacemaker, and that the resetting action of light is most efficient during the first minutes of light exposure. In humans, multiple consecutive days of exposure to brief bright light pulses have been shown to phase shift the circadian pacemaker. The aim of the present study was to determine if a single sequence of brief bright light pulses administered during the early biological night would phase delay the human circadian pacemaker. Twenty-one healthy young subjects underwent a 6.5 h light exposure session, in one of three randomly assigned conditions: 1) continuous bright light of ~9,500 lux; 2) intermittent bright light (six 15-min bright light pulses of ~9,500 lux separated by 60 min of very dim light of < 1 lux); 3) continuous very dim light of < 1 lux. Twenty subjects were included in the analysis. Core body temperature (CBT) and melatonin were used as phase markers of the circadian pacemaker. Phase delays of CBT and melatonin rhythms in response to intermittent bright light pulses were comparable to those measured after continuous bright light exposure, even though the total exposure to the intermittent bright light represented only 23% of the 6.5 h continuous exposure. These results demonstrate that a single sequence of intermittent bright light pulses can phase delay the human circadian pacemaker and shows that intermittent pulses have a greater resetting efficacy on a per minute basis than does continuous exposure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Comas, D.G.M. Beersma, K. Spoelstra, and S. Daan Circadian Response Reduction in Light and Response Restoration in Darkness: A "Skeleton" Light Pulse PRC Study in Mice (Mus musculus) J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 2007; 22(5): 432 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Dean II, A. Fletcher, S. R. Hursh, and E. B. Klerman Developing Mathematical Models of Neurobehavioral Performance for the "Real World" J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 2007; 22(3): 246 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Goel An arousing, musically enhanced bird song stimulus mediates circadian rhythm phase advances in dim light Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): R822 - R827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Goel Late-night presentation of an auditory stimulus phase delays human circadian rhythms Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): R209 - R216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |