AJP - Endo Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (September 11, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00260.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/5/E1341    most recent
00260.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cristina, C.
Right arrow Articles by Becu-Villalobos, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cristina, C.
Right arrow Articles by Becu-Villalobos, D.
Submitted on April 25, 2007
Accepted on September 5, 2007

Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 in hyperplastic pituitaries of D2R knockout female mice

Carolina Cristina1, Graciela Diaz-Torga2, Adrian Gongora3, Maria Clara Guida4, Maria Ines Perez-Millan4, Alberto Baldi3, and Damasia Becu-Villalobos4*

1 Lab.Pituitary Regulation, IBYME-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Buenos Aires, Argentina
2 Lab.Pituitary Regulation, IBYME-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Buenos Aires, United States
3 Patologia y Farmacologia Molecular, IBYME-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
4 Lab.Pituitary Regulation, IBYME-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dbecu{at}dna.uba.ar.

Dopamine D2 Receptor knockout female mice (KO) develop chronic hyperprolactinemia and pituitary hyperplasia. Our objective was to study the expression of the mitogen fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) and its receptor, FGFR1, comparatively in pituitaries from KO and wildtype (WT) female mice. We also evaluated FGF2 subcellular localization, and FGF2 effects on pituitary function. FGF2-induced prolactin release showed a similar response pattern in both genotypes, even though basal and FGF2 stimulated release was higher in KO. FGF2 stimulated pituitary cellular proliferation (MTS assay and 3[H]-thymidine incorporation), with no differences between genotypes. FGF2 concentration (measured by ELISA) in whole pituitaries or cultured cells was lower in KO (P<0.00001 and 0.00014). Immunofluorescence histochemistry showed less FGF2 in pituitaries from KO females, and revealed a distinct FGF2 localization pattern between genotypes, being predominantly nuclear in KO and cytosolic in WT pituitaries. Finally, FGF2 could not be detected in the conditioned media from pituitary cultures of both genotypes. FGFR1 levels (Western blot and immunohistochemistry) were higher in pituitaries of KO. Basal concentration of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) was lower in KO cells (P= 0.018). But, when stimulated with FGF2, a significantly higher increment of ERK phosphorylation was evidenced in KO cells (P ≤ 0.02). We conclude that disruption of the D2R caused and overall decrease in pituitary FGF2 levels, with an increased distribution in the nucleus, and increased FGFR1 levels. These results are important in the search for reliable prognostic indicators for patients with pituitary dopamine resistant prolactinomas, which will make tumor-specific therapy possible.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.