AJP - Endo Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (February 14, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00205.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/2/E221    most recent
00205.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pepperell, J. R
Right arrow Articles by Merino, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pepperell, J. R
Right arrow Articles by Merino, M.
Submitted on May 9, 2005
Accepted on January 26, 2006

Localized Accumulation of Angiotensin II and Production of Angiotensin-(1-7) in Rat Luteal Cells, and Effects on Steroidogenesis

John R Pepperell1*, Gabor Nemeth2, Yuji Yamada2, Frederick Naftolin2, and Maricruz Merino3

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Pathology, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, USA
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, CT, USA
3 Department of Pediatrics, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jpeppere{at}wihri.org.

These studies aim to investigate subcellular distribution of angiotensin II (Ang II) in rat luteal cells, identify other bioactive angiotensin peptides, and investigate a role for angiotensin peptides in luteal steroidogenesis. Confocal microscopy showed Ang II distributed within the cytoplasm, and nuclei of luteal cells. HPLC analysis showed peaks that eluted with the same retention times as Ang-(1-7), Ang II and Ang III. Their relative concentrations were: Ang II ≥ Ang-(1-7) >> Ang III, and accumulation was modulated by quinapril, an inhibitor of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), Z-proprolinal (ZPP) an inhibitor of prolyl endopeptidase (PEP), and parachloromercurylsulfonic acid (PCMS) a sulfhydryl protease inhibitor. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) a serine protease inhibitor did not affect peptide accumulation. Quinapril, ZPP, PCMS, PMSF, losartan, the angiotensin receptor type 1 (AT1), and PD123319, the AT2, receptor antagonists were used in progesterone production studies. ZPP significantly reduced LH-dependent progesterone production (p < 0.05). Quinapril plus ZPP had a greater inhibitory effect on LH-stimulated progesterone than either inhibitor alone, but this was not reversed by exogenous Ang II or Ang-(1-7). Both PCMS and PMSF acutely blocked LH-stimulated progesterone, and PCMS blocked LH-sensitive cyclic AMP accumulation. Losartan inhibited progesterone production in permeabilized, but not intact luteal cells that was reversed by Ang II. PD123319 had no significant effect on luteal progesterone production in either intact or permeabilized cells. These data suggest that steroidogenesis may be modulated by angiotensin peptides that act in part through intracellular AT1 receptors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.