AJP - Endo Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (June 12, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00153.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/2/E604    most recent
00153.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sloth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Astrup, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sloth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Astrup, A.
Submitted on March 8, 2007
Accepted on June 1, 2007

The effect of subcutaneous injections of PYY1-36 and PYY3-36 on appetite, ad libitum energy intake and plasma free fatty acids concentration in obese males

Birgitte Sloth1*, Louise Davidsen1, Jens Juul Holst2, Anne Flint1, and Arne Astrup1

1 Department of Human Nutrition, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
2 The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bsl{at}life.ku.dk.

Background: Intraveneous (i.v) PYY3-36 infusions have been reported to reduce energy intake (EI) in humans, whereas few studies exist on effects of PYY1-36. The aim of the present study was to examine effects of subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of PYY1-36 and PYY3-36 on appetite, ad libitum EI, plasma concentrations of PYY and free fatty acids (FFA) in obese males. Method: Twenty-four males (BMI: 27-40 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to 2 groups receiving s.c. injections of either PYY1-36 or PYY3-36 in a blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating, cross-over study. Subjects were studied 5 days in succession, with escalating doses of PYY1-36 (saline, 50, 100, 150, and 200 pmol PYY1-36/kg lean body mass (LBM)), or PYY3-36 (saline, 25, 50, 75, and 100 pmol PYY3-36/kg LBM), respectively. Results: PYY injections resulted in dose-dependent increases in plasma PYY levels but no effect on EI in either the PYY1-36 or the PYY3-36 group. However, increasing doses of PYY3-36, but not PYY1-36, resulted in increased ratings of satiety and decreased ratings of hunger, thirst and prospective food consumption. Although not dose dependent significant elevation of plasma FFA was seen after injection of PYY3-36, but not PYY1-36. Conclusion: Although s.c. administration of PYY was well-tolerated it remains to be determined if high dose PYY3-36 is sufficient in reducing EI in long term trials and if so, if the reduction in EI occurs without nausea. PYY1-36 is unlikely to be important in regulating energy intake. The PYY3-36 administrations caused a non-dose dependent mobilisation of FFA, likely through a direct effect.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. Yang, X. Liu, E. L. Ding, M. Xu, S. Wu, L. Liu, X. Sun, and F. B. Hu
Impaired Ghrelin Response after High-Fat Meals Is Associated with Decreased Satiety in Obese and Lean Chinese Young Adults
J. Nutr., July 1, 2009; 139(7): 1286 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. H. Tschop and E. Ravussin
Peptide YY: obesity's cause and cure?
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1131 - E1133.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.