AJP - Endo Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (June 8, 2004). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00104.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/5/E962    most recent
00104.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heshka, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silva, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heshka, S.
Submitted on March 3, 2004
Accepted on June 1, 2004

Three-Compartment Model: Critical Evaluation Based Upon Neutron Activation Analysis

Analiza M. Silva1, Wei Shen2, ZiMian Wang2, John F. Aloia3, Miriam E. Nelson4, Steven B. Heymsfield2*, Luis B. Sardinha1, and Stanley Heshka2

1 Exercise and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Human Movement-Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
2 New York Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University Institute of Human Nutrition, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
3 Department of Medicine, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA
4 John Hancock Center for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: SBH2{at}Columbia.edu.

There is renewed interest in Siri's classic three-compartment (3C) body composition model, requiring body volume (BV) and total body water (TBW) estimates, as dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and in vivo neutron activation (IVNA) systems cannot accommodate subjects with severe obesity. However, the 3C model assumption of a constant mineral (M) to total body protein (TBPro) ratio ({alpha}) and related residual mass density (DRES) based on cadaver analyses might not be valid across groups differing in sex, race, age, and weight. The aim of this study was to derive new 3C model coefficients in vivo and to compare these estimates to those derived by Siri. Healthy adults (n=323) were evaluated with IVNA and DXA and the measured components used to derive {alpha} and DRES. For all subjects combined, {alpha} and DRES (mean ± SD, 0.351 ± 0.043; 1.565 ± 0.023 kg/L) were similar to Siri's proposed values of 0.35 and 1.565 kg/L, respectively. However, {alpha} and DRES varied significantly as a function of sex, race, weight, and age. Expected errors in percent body fat arising by application of Siri's model were illustrated in a second group of 264 adults, including some whose size exceeded DXA limits, but whose BV and TBW had been measured by hydrodensitometry and 2H2O dilution, respectively. Extrapolation of predictions by newly developed models to very high weights allowed percent fat error estimation when Siri's model is applied in morbidly obese subjects. The present study results provide a critical evaluation of potential errors in the classic 3C model and present new formulas for use in selected populations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.