AJP - Endo AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (June 18, 2002). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00075.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/4/E702    most recent
00075.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nass, R.
Right arrow Articles by Thorner, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nass, R.
Right arrow Articles by Thorner, M. O.

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print June 18, 2002
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 10.1152/ajpendo.00075.2002
Submitted on February 21, 2002
Accepted on June 8, 2002

IGF-I Does Not Affect The Net Increase in GH Release in Response to Arginine

Ralf Nass1*, Susan S. Pezzoli1, Ian M. Chapman1, James Patrie2, Raymond L. Hintz3, Mark L. Hartman4, and Michael O. Thorner1

1 Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
2 Department of Health Evaluation Sciencess, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
3 Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
4 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rmn9a{at}virginia.edu.

Arginine stimulates growth hormone (GH) secretion, possibly by inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) release. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) inhibits GH secretion via effects at the pituitary and/or hypothalamus. We hypothesized that if the dominant action of IGF-I is to suppress GH release at the level of the pituitary, then the arginine-induced net increase in GH concentration would be unaffected by an IGF-I infusion. Eight healthy young adults (3 women, 5 men) were studied on day 2 of a 47-h fast for 12 h (35h-47h) on 4 occasions. Saline (Sal) or 10 µg/kg/h recombinant human IGF-I was infused iv for 5 h from 37-42 h of the 47-h fast. Arginine (Arg) (30g iv) or Sal was infused over 30 min during the IGF-I or Sal infusion from 40 to 40.5 h of the fast. Subjects received the following combinations of treatments in random order: 1.) Sal + Sal; 2.) Sal + Arg; 3.) IGF-I + Sal; 4.) IGF-I + Arg. Peak GH concentration on the IGF-I + Arg day was ~45 % of that on the Sal + Arg day. The effect of arginine on net GH release was calculated as ([Sal + Arg] - [Sal + Sal]) -([IGF-I + Arg] - [IGF-I + Sal]). There was no significant effect of IGF-I on net arginine-induced GH release over control conditions. These findings suggest that the negative feedback effect of IGF-I on GH secretion is primarily mediated at the pituitary level and/or at the hypothalamus through a mechanism different from the stimulatory effect of arginine.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2002 by the American Physiological Society.