|
|
||||||||
agonist1Wenner-Gren Institute, The Arrhenius Laboratories, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; and 2Translational Biomedicine, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
Submitted 18 January 2008 ; accepted in final form 14 May 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activation pathway could competently recruit BAT, independently of sympathetic stimulation. We continuously treated primary cultures of mouse brown (pre)adipocytes with the potent peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
) agonist rosiglitazone. In rosiglitazone-treated cultures, morphological signs of adipose differentiation and expression levels of the general adipogenic marker aP2 were manifested much earlier than in control cultures. Importantly, in the presence of the PPAR
agonist the brown adipocyte phenotype was significantly enhanced: UCP1 was expressed even in the absence of norepinephrine, and PPAR
expression and norepinephrine-induced PGC-1
mRNA levels were significantly increased. However, the augmented levels of PPAR
could not explain the brown-fat promoting effect of rosiglitazone, as this effect was still evident in PPAR
-null cells. In continuously rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes, mitochondriogenesis, an essential part of BAT recruitment, was significantly enhanced. Most importantly, these mitochondria were capable of thermogenesis, as rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes responded to the addition of norepinephrine with a large increase in oxygen consumption. This thermogenic response was not observable in rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes originating from UCP1-ablated mice; hence, it was UCP1 dependent. Thus the PPAR
pathway represents an alternative, potent, and fully competent mechanism for BAT recruitment, which may be the cellular explanation for the enigmatic recruitment in prehibernation and prenatal states.
brown fat; rosiglitazone; norepinephrine; mitochondria; thermogenesis; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
However, a chronic sympathetic drive cannot explain all physiological conditions demonstrating enhanced recruitment of BAT. For instance, in precocial newborns, BAT is fully recruited already at birth (37, 40, 41). It is highly unlikely that an increased chronic sympathetic stimulation could drive BAT recruitment during intrauterine life at 37°C, because this would enhance the heat load of the mother. Thus this condition indicates the existence of an alternative, potent and fully competent nonadrenergic mechanism for recruitment of BAT. Also, the process of preparation for hibernation represents a recruitment process where the adrenergic pathway would be contraindicated, since during the time when BAT is recruited, i.e., in late summer, hibernators accumulate reserves of fat for the winter. Sympathetically activated BAT would utilize these winter reserves of fat. Recruitment of brown fat cells in certain hibernators has also been directly demonstrated to be nonadrenergic (5, 10). Thus a nonsympathetically mediated mechanism of UCP1 induction and/or recruitment of BAT must exist to explain these conditions of recruitment.
Sympathetic (adrenergic) stimulation of brown adipocytes results in a very large increase in UCP1 expression (42). As UCP1 mRNA levels may be nearly undetectable in unstimulated cells, the relative NE-induced increase is difficult to determine, but quantitative PCR analysis indicates a nearly 1,000-fold rise in UCP1 levels within a few hours (unpublished observations). Nonsympathetically driven recruitment in brown fat cells must also include a similar activation of UCP1 gene expression. An induction of UCP1 gene expression has been observed in cultured brown adipocytes upon acute treatment with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
) ligands (2, 16, 25), but the increases reported as yet have been modest, a 5- to 10-fold increase in UCP1 mRNA level. However, although the PPAR
ligand-induced increases thus may be
100-fold lower than those observed with adrenergic stimulation, the observations as such indicate the possibility that an endogenous activator of the PPAR
pathway could competently recruit brown fat cells without concomitant adrenergic stimulation. PPAR
is a central transcriptional regulator of differentiation of both brown and white adipose cells (48) and is absolutely required for BAT development (1, 12) as well as for survival of mature brown adipocytes (24, 26). Accordingly, in mice with impaired PPAR
function, brown adipocyte recruitment is impaired, and nonshivering thermogenic capacity after cold acclimation is decreased (21).
PPAR
is expressed not only in differentiated brown adipocytes but also in brown preadipocytes (33). Such primary cultures of brown adipocytes have been frequently used as an in vitro model system to recapitulate the process of differentiation in vivo. The cells do not express UCP1 in the absence of adrenergic stimulation (42). Thus the mere presence of PPAR
is insufficient in itself to activate UCP1 gene expression, but the absence of an endogenous ligand of PPAR
could conceivably explain the lack of UCP1 expression. We have therefore here continuously treated cultures of brown (pre)adipocytes with the potent PPAR
agonist rosiglitazone. This markedly accelerated the differentiation of the adipocytes. We found that the brown adipocytes in which PPAR
was constantly activated express UCP1 maximally. The resulting high levels of UCP1 protein were incorporated into mitochondria since the brown adipocytes become capable of responding to NE stimulation with a large increase in oxygen consumption: thermogenesis. Thus the presence of continuously active PPAR
was sufficient to enable thermogenically competent recruitment of brown adipocytes in primary culture.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
22 °C) for at least 24 h after arrival. At the age of 3–4 wk, mice were killed by CO2, and the BAT was isolated from the interscapular, cervical, and auxiliary depots, principally as described by Rehnmark et al. (42). The pooled tissue pieces were minced in DMEM and transferred to a digestion solution with 0.2% (wt/vol) collagenase (type II; Sigma) in a buffer consisting of 0.1 M HEPES (pH 7.4), 123 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 4.5 mM glucose, and 1.5% (wt/vol) BSA. The digestion was performed for 30 min at 37°C with continuous vortex mixing. The cell suspension was filtered through a 250-µm pore-size nylon filter (Sintab, Oxie, Sweden) into sterile 15-ml tubes. The filtered suspension was kept on ice for 20 min to let the mature adipocytes float up. The top layer of the suspension was removed, and the rest of the suspension was filtered through a 25-µm pore-size nylon filter (Sintab) and centrifuged at 700 g for 10 min, to pellet preadipocytes. The pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of DMEM and centrifuged at 700 g for 10 min. The pellet was then suspended in culture medium (0.5 ml/animal). The cells were cultured in six-well plates (10 cm2/well; Corning; 12-well plates for cAMP determination); 1.8 ml of culture medium were added to each well before 0.2 ml of cell suspension were added. The culture medium was DMEM with 10% (vol/vol) newborn calf serum (Invitrogen or Hyclone), 2.4 nM insulin, 25 µg/ml sodium ascorbate, 10 mM HEPES, 4 mM glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin and supplemented or not (as indicated) with 1 µM rosiglitazone maleate (Alexis Biochemicals). The cells were grown at 37°C in an atmosphere of 8% CO2 in air with 80% humidity. The cells were washed in DMEM, and the medium was changed on the first day and then every second day. The new medium was prewarmed to 37°C before being changed. The medium was not changed on the day the cells were harvested. The experiments were performed on different days of culture, as indicated in each individual experiment.
Analysis of mRNA levels.
After the experiments, the medium was discarded and the cells were harvested from each well with 1 ml Ultraspec (Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, TX), as described in the manufacturer's protocol. The RNA obtained was examined by Northern blotting, principally as described previously (33), but the gels were run for 5 to 6 h. The membranes were probed consecutively for aP2, PPAR
, PGC-1
, UCP1 and PPAR
mRNAs, and 18S rRNA after being stripped in-between by repeated washing with boiling 0.2% (wt/vol) SDS.
Analysis of protein levels. Brown adipocytes were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and then harvested in a modified RIPA buffer {50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF [protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete-Mini, Roche Diagnostics)], 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1 mM NaF}. Cells were lysed on ice for 15 min and then centrifuged at 14,000 g for 15 min. The concentration of proteins in the supernatant was determined using the method of Lowry. An equal volume of reducing sample buffer [62.5 mM Tris·HCl, pH 6.8, 2% (wt/vol) SDS, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 100 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1% (wt/vol) bromphenol blue] was added to each sample. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE in ordinary 12% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/bis-acrylamide = 37.5/1) or, where indicated, in highly porous 12% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/bis-acrylamide = 175/1) with high-resolution capacity. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) in 48 mM Tris·HCl, 39 mM glycine, 0.037 (wt/vol) SDS, and 15% (vol/vol) methanol using a semi-dry electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad Trans-Blot SD; Bio-Rad Laboratories) at 1.2 mA/cm2 for 90 min. After transfer, the membrane was stained with Ponceau S for examination of equal loading of proteins. After being washed, the membrane was blocked in 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline-Tween for 1 h at room temperature and probed with the indicated antibodies overnight at 4°C. The immunoblot was visualized with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL kit, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) in a charge-coupled device camera (Fuji Film).
Antibodies used were as follows: PPAR antibody (Santa Cruz Laboratories, sc-7273) diluted 1:1,000, which reacts with PPAR
, PPARβ/
, and PPAR
; UCP1 antibody (rabbit polyclonal, raised against COOH-terminal decapeptide), diluted 1:3,000; COX4 antibody (Santa Cruz Laboratories, sc-58348), diluted 1:1,000; and CPT-1M antibody (Nordic BioSite, C1385-45), diluted 1:1,000.
cAMP determinations. Brown adipocytes were cultured in 12-well plates for 7 days. Control and continuously rosiglitazone-treated cells were treated for 10 min with 1 µM NE or water. Control cells were also treated for 10 min with 1 µM rosiglitazone or vehicle. After 10 min, the medium was removed, 0.25 ml of 75% ethanol were added to each well, and the cells were scraped off. The wells were washed with 0.25 ml of 75% ethanol, and the combined suspensions were dried in a Speedvac centrifuge. The dried samples were dissolved in 100 µl of the buffer 1 provided with the cAMP (3H) assay system from GE Healthcare (TRK 432), sonicated briefly, and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. Two 25 µl-aliquots of the supernatant were analyzed for every sample according to the description in the assay system; for every treatment, duplicate wells were used.
Analysis of PPAR by immunocytochemistry. Brown adipocytes were cultured as described above except that 18 x 18-mm coverslips were placed in the wells. Cells were cultured for 7 days in the absence or presence of 1 µM rosiglitazone. The cells were then washed twice with PBS and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with PBS and then exposed to 5% glycine in PBS to quench unspecific fluorescence. Cells were then washed three times with PBS and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in water for 15 min at room temperature. Then, the cells were washed three times with PBS and blocked with 8% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with PBS and incubated with 1:300 diluted anti-PPAR antibody in 4% BSA in PBS overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed three times with PBS and incubated with anti-mouse-AlexaFluor 488-labeled secondary antibody (Molecular Probes), diluted 1:1,000 in 4% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, coverslips were mounted on microscopic slides with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Molecular Probes). The cells were examined with a Zeiss fluorescence microscope.
Analysis of mitochondrial content by MitoTracker Green staining. Brown adipocytes were cultured on coverslips (as described above) for 7 days. The cells were then washed twice with PBS and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with PBS and then exposed to 5% glycine in PBS to quench unspecific fluorescence. Cells were then washed three times with PBS and incubated with 50 nM MitoTracker Green (Molecular probes) in PBS for 20 min. After being washed with PBS, coverslips were mounted on microscopic slides with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Molecular Probes). The cells were examined with a Zeiss fluorescence microscope.
Oxygen consumption. Brown adipocytes were cultured in 6-well plates for 7 days. Then, the cells in four wells were simultaneously trypsinized for 3–5 min, pooled, and centrifuged for 2 min at 700 g. The cells were resuspended in 1.4 ml of culture medium (see above) supplemented with 4% fatty acid-free BSA. Oxygen consumption rates of brown adipocytes were monitored with a Clark-type oxygen electrode (Yellow Springs Instrument). Approximately 1.2 ml of cell suspension were added to a magnetically stirred oxygen electrode chamber thermostated to 37°C. The chamber was closed, and the cells were incubated for 3–4 min to determine the basal respiratory rate. Then NE was added (at 1 µM final concentration) with a Hamilton syringe through a small hole in the cover of the chamber. The output signal from the oxygen electrode amplifier was electronically time-differentiated and collected every 0.5 s by a Power-Lab/ADInstrument (application program Chart, version 4.1.1.). The Chart data files were transferred to the KaleidaGraph MacIntosh application and converted to absolute values based on an oxygen content of 217 nmol of O2/1 ml of water, on the calibrated electronic differentiation constants, and on the amount of protein used (2 parallel wells of brown adipocytes on the same plate were used for determination of protein amount). For calculation of stable oxygen consumption rates, the mean values during 1 min were obtained from these recordings.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
agonist rosiglitazone and examined the parameters of brown adipocyte differentiation.
Chronic rosiglitazone treatment accelerates and augments differentiation of brown adipocytes in primary culture.
Brown preadipocytes have the ability to grow and differentiate in culture in a spontaneous but highly reproducible way (42). When grown under control conditions, the fibroblast-like preadipocytes proliferate until they are confluent (at days 4–5) and then differentiate to become mature, lipid-laden brown adipocytes. On day 7,
80–90% of cells visibly represent mature brown adipocytes (Fig. 1A), based on lipid accumulation.
|
-agonist rosiglitazone from the time of plating, morphological signs of adipose conversion were observed already on days 3 and 4; on day 7, nearly 100% of the cells visibly represented mature adipocytes (Fig. 1A). As seen, compared with adipocytes differentiated under control conditions, brown adipocytes grown in the presence of PPAR
agonists were larger, with more pronounced lipid droplets.
To characterize the differentiation state of brown adipocytes at the molecular level, Northern blot analysis was performed to examine the expression of general adipogenic genes (aP2 and PPAR
; Fig. 1, B–D), as well as brown (as opposed to white)-adipocyte-related genes (PGC-1
, UCP1, and PPAR
; Figs. 2 and 3, A–C) during the differentiation of control and rosiglitazone-treated cultures. Although these latter genes have also been shown to increase in traditional white-fat depots after chronic PPAR
agonist treatment in vivo (44), their mRNA levels are more than an order of magnitude lower in white fat than in brown fat (and may represent the presence of brown adipocytes in these depots; Ref. 22).
|
|
agonist in the brown preadipocyte cultures significantly increased the aP2 mRNA levels (Fig. 1C), much above control levels already at day 4, in accordance with aP2 being a PPAR
-target gene.
PPAR
itself may also be considered as an adipocyte marker, although PPAR
mRNA is expressed not only in mature brown adipocytes but already in brown preadipocytes (Fig. 1D; Ref. 33), indicating that the fibroblast-like undifferentiated precursor cells are already determined for their adipocyte destiny. The chronic presence of rosiglitazone in the cultures downregulated PPAR
mRNA expression (Fig. 1D), principally as expected (23, 49).
The sympathetic neurotransmitter NE is both the most important and most well-studied factor that influences the brown adipocyte (8). Therefore, cultures grown as above for different numbers of days in the absence or presence of rosiglitazone were acutely treated with 1 µM NE, 2 h before harvest. NE treatment did not significantly influence the mRNA levels of aP2, either in control or in rosiglitazone-treated cells (Fig. 1C). As shown in Fig. 1D, PPAR
mRNA levels were markedly decreased upon NE-treatment of control cultures. The NE-induced downregulation of PPAR
mRNA levels was observed in proliferative (days 4 and 5), as well as in differentiating (days 6 and 7) cells (Fig. 1D; Ref. 33); thus there was no switch in the qualitative response between preadipocytes and mature adipocytes concerning adrenergic regulation of PPAR
mRNA levels. In chronic rosiglitazone-treated cells, NE did not influence PPAR
mRNA levels. It is notable that the PPAR
mRNA levels were downregulated to similar, stable levels (
50% of the maximal expression level) by either the PPAR
agonist or NE (or both). The maintenance of these PPAR
mRNA levels is probably necessary to sustain survival of brown adipocytes in culture (24, 26).
In contrast to the general adipogenic markers aP2 and PPAR
, the brown adipocyte-related gene PGC-1
and the brown adipocyte-specific marker UCP1 were barely or not expressed in control brown adipocytes (Fig. 2, B and C), as reported earlier for UCP1 (42). As expected, in the control cultures, acute NE stimulation markedly induced expression of both PGC-1
and UCP1 (Fig. 2, B and C). The NE-induced mRNA levels of PGC-1
and UCP1 progressively increased during differentiation.
However, these brown-fat characteristics were much promoted when the cells were grown in the presence of rosiglitazone. As shown in Fig. 2B, the PGC-1
mRNA levels were somewhat augmented by chronic rosiglitazone treatment. Acute NE stimulation of these rosiglitazone-treated cultures caused a significant increment of PGC-1
expression (Fig. 2C).
The most striking feature of brown adipocytes continuously treated with rosiglitazone was, however, that they expressed UCP1 in the absence of NE stimulation, at levels several times higher than the corresponding levels induced by acute NE (Fig. 2C). Concurrent NE treatment also further increased UCP1 expression, but in day 7 cells, the UCP1 mRNA level could not be further enhanced by NE (Fig. 2C); i.e., the chronic presence of rosiglitazone was sufficient to induce full differentiation of the cells in this respect in the absence of any adrenergic stimulation. There is thus convergence of the adrenergic and the PPAR
stimulation at this late step, and the question could be raised as to whether this was caused by early convergence: could rosiglitazone, e.g., by itself increase cAMP levels and through this cause UCP1 gene expression through classical pathways? We therefore examined cAMP levels in these cell cultures. We found low levels of cAMP in nontreated cells (
3 pmol/well), and the level was increased >10-fold after of 10 min NE stimulation (to 35 pmol/well). However, neither acute nor chronic treatment with rosiglitazone affected the cAMP levels in the cell cultures (not shown). Thus rosiglitazone did not induce UCP1 gene expression through early convergence with the classical cAMP pathway.
As seen, the acquisition of both general adipogenic and brown-fat specific characteristics of cultured brown preadipocytes was markedly accelerated by the continuous treatment with rosiglitazone (cf. Ref. 46). In terms of morphological (lipid accumulation) and gene expression features (the expression of aP2 and UCP1), the majority of rosiglitazone-treated cells already after 4 days in culture represented mature brown adipocytes. Most importantly, brown adipocytes grown in the presence of rosiglitazone expressed UCP1 even in the absence of NE stimulation. We also examined whether another PPAR
agonist, ciglitazone (30 µM), could similarly induce high UCP1 gene expression in the absence of adrenergic stimulation. This was the case (not shown), but quantitatively the level reached was somewhat lower than that observed with rosiglitazone. These experiments indicate that the effects on UCP1 gene expression are not limited to rosiglitazone but that probably any potent PPAR
agonist is able to induce high UCP1 gene expression in the absence of adrenergic stimulation. Thus rosiglitazone treatment not only promoted differentiation and enhanced NE-stimulated UCP1 gene expression in young cultures but could also, in itself, in the absence of NE, induce UCP1 gene expression to its full extent (Fig. 2). These results should be contrasted with earlier observations in which chronic treatment of the brown adipocyte-like HIB-1B adipocytes with rosiglitazone (46) or darglitazone (39) was shown only to promote responsiveness of the UCP1 gene to later NE stimulation, and that acute treatment of primary brown adipocytes with pioglitazone (16), ciglitazone, or rosiglitazone (our unpublished results) induced UCP1 expression but not to its full extent; UCP1 gene expression was still highly responsive to NE stimulation.
The results obtained here can be seen as support for the hypothesis that physiologically the expression of UCP1 in nonsympathetically stimulated BAT may be explainable by the presence of ligand-activated PPAR
, i.e., by PPAR
that is maintained in an active state because of the presence of endogenous (still unknown) PPAR
ligands. Published in vivo studies have to date only investigated the effects of treatment in animals already sympathetically stimulated by exposure to a normal ambient temperature (rodent BAT is constantly sympathetically activated even at normal ambient temperatures). Positive responses were clearly seen on tissue hyperplasia and hypertrophy (4), but the effect on specific UCP1 expression reported in vivo has been absent or small. Thus the specific levels of UCP1 mRNA and protein (i.e., expressed per mRNA or protein units, respectively) were unchanged or only slightly increased (
60% as a mean of the articles quoted below) in BAT of rodents treated with PPAR
agonists (2, 7, 9, 15–17, 28–31, 36, 44, 46, 47) (however, total UCP1 content in BAT of treated animals was somewhat more increased,
2-fold, due to tissue enlargement). In two recent investigations, robust 3-fold increases in specific UCP1 gene expression were reported (15, 29), demonstrating that also in vivo PPAR
agonists have the ability to affect UCP1 gene expression. However, even threefold increases are marginal compared with the
1,000-fold increase in UCP1 gene expression seen here in the cell culture system (estimated from quantitative PCR measurements of RNA from cultures grown as those examined in Fig. 2C, day 7). Thus, in vivo, the true potency of PPAR
agonists to increase UCP1 gene expression seems to be masked, perhaps due to continuous exposure of the receptor to endogenous ligands or simply to the effect of the concomitant sympathetic activation. Indeed, we have observed that in cell cultures continuously stimulated with NE (as is the case for brown fat in vivo at normal ambient temperatures) for 7 days, additional chronic stimulation with rosiglitazone was unable to further increase UCP1 gene expression, implying that experimental conditions in vivo preclude any observation of the true potential of PPAR
agonists.
Rosiglitazone effects on brown adipocytes are not mediated by PPAR
.
Brown adipose tissue is a unique tissue in that it coexpresses high levels of all three PPAR receptors (
, β/
, and
; Ref. 6). PPAR
is only found in brown and not in white adipose tissue (14, 20), and it has been reported to be expressed only after brown adipocyte differentiation has commenced (49). The distal enhancer of the UCP1 gene contains a PPAR responsive element that can bind either PPAR
or PPAR
(27), and both PPAR
and PPAR
agonists can induce UCP1 expression (2).
Surprisingly, we observed a very low expression of PPAR
in cultured brown adipocytes both at the mRNA (Fig. 3, A and B) and the protein level (Fig. 3C). However, upon chronic exposure to rosiglitazone, gene expression was dramatically augmented (Fig. 3, A and B) so that the PPAR
protein now represented the dominant PPAR isoform (Fig. 3C). Importantly, these changes in PPAR transcriptional machinery were not followed by alteration of their cellular localization, i.e., these PPAR proteins remained located in nuclei (Fig. 3D; both the dominant PPAR
isoform and the repressed PPAR
isoform are recognized by the antibody). The absence of translocation of PPAR nuclear receptors into the cytoplasm under any of the circumstances studied indicates their active transcriptional role in brown adipocytes (43), as nuclear receptor translocation to the cytoplasm would evidently abolish the ability to control gene expression (52).
Based on these results, and the general concept that PPAR
is a transcription factor regulating lipid catabolism (11), it could be suggested that the rosiglitazone effect on the differentiation of brown adipocytes was mediated through this induction of PPAR
. To address this question, we utilized primary cultures of brown adipocytes originating from PPAR
-null mice. As shown in Fig. 3, E and F, expression of the general adipogenic marker aP2 did not differ between mature brown adipocytes originating from wild-type and PPAR
-null mice. Importantly, the UCP1 gene was responsive to rosiglitazone and NE treatment in both control and PPAR
-null brown adipocytes (Fig. 3, E and G). Therefore, since the PPAR
-null brown adipocytes were able to differentiate in the same way as were the wild-type cells, the rosiglitazone-induced increase in PPAR
mRNA was not essential for the mechanism by which rosiglitazone increased UCP1 gene expression.
Chronically rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes are competent in demonstrating NE-induced UCP1-mediated respiration (thermogenesis).
Thermogenesis (heat production) takes place in the mitochondria. Thermogenic responses in brown-fat mitochondria (34) and brown-fat cells (35) are fully UCP1 dependent. Physiologically, UCP1 is the only protein capable of mediating adaptive nonshivering thermogenesis in the cold (19), and it is essential for the recruitment of adaptive adrenergic nonshivering thermogenesis (18). However, mitochondrial biogenesis is also an essential part of BAT recruitment (3). Importantly, the UCP1 protein is rapidly degraded unless incorporated into mitochondria (38). If PPAR
activation is a competent alternative pathway for BAT recruitment, it is essential that PPAR
activation also increases the mitochondrial complement. Rosiglitazone has been shown to induce mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial remodeling in white fat of ob/ob mice (51) and in fully differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes (50). Therefore, we examined whether the continuous rosiglitazone treatment was capable of increasing mitochondrial biogenesis in the cultured brown adipocytes and whether it enhanced mitochondrial brown fat-specific characteristics.
To estimate the amount of mitochondria, we used MitoTracker green, a membrane potential-independent mitochondrial-specific fluorescent dye. We compared mitochondrial staining in untreated and cultures continuously treated with rosiglitazone. In untreated cells, there was only a very faint staining with MitoTracker Green (Fig. 4A, left). However, cultures treated with rosiglitazone showed cells with intense staining, indicating a dramatic enhancement of mitochondrial biogenesis in these cells (Fig. 4A, right; it may be noted that in these cells, mitochondrial staining is often distinctly localized). Also, an increased content of subunit 4 of cytochrome oxidase (COX4) in the rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes (Fig. 4, B and C) demonstrates that these cells have enhanced respiratory capacity.
|
agonist altered brown adipocyte mitochondria in both a quantitative (enhanced number) and, what is perhaps more important, a qualitative (remodelling) way.
The data presented in Fig. 2, A and C, clearly demonstrate that the presence of a PPAR
agonist enabled brown adipocytes differentiating in culture to fully express mRNA for the brown-fat cell-defining gene UCP1, but this may not necessarily result in high amounts of UCP1 protein (cf. Ref. 38). However, importantly, these very high levels of UCP1 mRNA were indeed reflected in remarkably high levels of UCP1 protein (Fig. 4, F and G). Thus rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes were well endowed with the cellular effectors of thermogenesis: an increased number of mitochondria and a relative increase in the mitochondrial proteins crucial for thermogenesis (UCP1), respiratory activity (COX4), and lipid substrate oxidation (CPT-1M).
The most crucial test of whether PPAR
activation truly represents a complete alternative recruitment pathway must, however, be that the brown adipocytes can display NE-induced thermogenesis. The thermogenic capacity of BAT is reflected in the ability of isolated brown adipocytes to respond to an addition of NE with an extremely large increase in oxygen consumption (thermogenesis) (8). To examine the thermogenic capacity of brown adipocytes differentiated in culture, we measured oxygen consumption of cells under basal conditions (before NE addition) and after stimulation with NE, as exemplified in Fig. 5A. The basal oxygen consumption rates of untreated and continuously rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes were similar (Fig. 5B). However, these cells responded very differently to the addition of NE (Fig. 5B): control brown adipocytes (that do not contain UCP1 protein; Fig. 4, F and G), as expected, did not increase oxygen consumption upon stimulation with NE (Fig. 5A). In contrast, NE addition led to a rapid and marked increase in oxygen consumption in rosiglitazone-treated brown adipocytes (Fig. 5A).
|
agonist rosiglitazone are competent to perform UCP1-dependent respiration (thermogenesis). Thus brown-fat cells differentiated in culture are capable, upon stimulation with NE, of demonstrating UCP1-dependent thermogenesis, and PPAR
activation constitutes a fully competent recruitment pathway.
Conclusion.
Sympathetically mediated recruitment of BAT cannot explain all of the physiological conditions that demonstrate enhanced BAT recruitment. There are at least two physiological contexts where this pathway is contraindicated: prenatal and prehibernation recruitment. In these physiological conditions, brown fat needs to be recruited and, what is of great importance, not simultaneously thermogenically activated (which would be expected as a consequence of adrenergic stimulation). Figuratively, BAT recruited in this way represents a nonburning stove that waits for the spark, an adrenergic stimulus, to initiate the heat production. In the present study, using a brown adipocyte culture system as a model, we demonstrate that PPAR
activation represents such a mechanism for BAT recruitment: nonadrenergic, potent, and fully competent.
Thus continuous treatment with the PPAR
agonist rosiglitazone markedly enhanced brown-fat specific characteristics of brown adipocytes in such a way that they became qualitatively different from untreated brown adipocytes: brown-fat specific genes (UCP1 and PPAR
) were highly expressed, the amount of mitochondria was significantly increased, and the competence to demonstrate NE-induced UCP1-dependent thermogenesis was fully established. Thus essential recruitment processes in brown adipocytes were remarkably promoted when they were grown and differentiated in the presence of a PPAR
activator.
Provided that PPAR
activation is a relevant physiological pathway for brown adipocyte recruitment under certain important physiological conditions, questions may be raised as to under which conditions this pathway is activated, what is the nature of the endogenous PPAR
activator (which is in general a still unresolved issue; Ref. 45), and which signaling pathway leads to the production of this activator.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development. Mol Cell 4: 585–595, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
agonism on adipose tissue remodeling, insulin sensitivity and lipemia in absence of glucocorticoids. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287: R1116–R1123, 2004.
, -β, and -
during rat embryonic development. Endocrinology 139: 2748–2754, 1998.
-deficient mice rescued from embryonic lethality. J Clin Invest 117: 812–822, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-mediated positive energy balance in the rat is associated with reduced sympathetic drive to adipose tissues and thyroid status. Endocrinology 149: 2121–2130, 2008.
activator, exhibits potent antidiabetic effects and induces uncoupling protein 1 in white adipose tissue of KKAy obese mice. Diabetes 49: 759–767, 2000.[Abstract]
) function. Endocrinology 147: 5708–5714, 2006.
knockout causes insulin resistance in fat and liver but not in muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15712–15717, 2003.
gene transcription: an autoregulatory loop controls PGC-1
expression in adipocytes via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
coactivation. Endocrinology 147: 2829–2838, 2006.
is required in mature white and brown adipocytes for their survival in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 4543–4547, 2004.
and
mediate in vivo regulation of uncoupling protein (UCP-1, UCP-2, UCP-3) gene expression. Endocrinology 139: 4920–4927, 1998.
isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol Cell Biol 15: 3012–3022, 1995.[Abstract]
2 gene expression in brown adipocytes: Intracellular signalling and effects on PPAR
2 and PPAR
1 protein levels. Biochem J 382: 597–606, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- and β-Adrenergic induction of the expression of the uncoupling protein thermogenin in brown adipocytes differentiated in culture. J Biol Chem 265: 16464–16471, 1990.
agonism increases the capacity for sympathetically mediated thermogenesis in lean and ob/ob mice. Endocrinology 145: 3925–3934, 2004.
and human metabolic disease. J Clin Invest 116: 581–589, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
promotes brown adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem 271: 29909–29914, 1996.
2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 79: 1147–1156, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
and -
gene expression by both their ligands and retinoic acid in brown adipocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 154: 101–109, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. T. Festuccia, P.-G. Blanchard, V. Turcotte, M. Laplante, M. Sariahmetoglu, D. N. Brindley, D. Richard, and Y. Deshaies The PPAR{gamma} agonist rosiglitazone enhances rat brown adipose tissue lipogenesis from glucose without altering glucose uptake Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): R1327 - R1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |