AJP - Endo Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 293: E1140-E1152, 2007. First published August 7, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00236.2007
0193-1849/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/5/E1140    most recent
00236.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frutos, M. G.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Franco, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frutos, M. G.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Franco, F.

Insights into a role of GH secretagogues in reversing the age-related decline in the GH/IGF-I axis

Miriam García-San Frutos,1 Lucinda Cacicedo,2 Carolina Fernández,1 David Vicent,1 Beatriz Velasco,1 Helena Zapatero,1 and Franco Sánchez-Franco1

1Endocrine Service, Hospital Carlos III and 2Endocrine Service, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

Submitted 17 April 2007 ; accepted in final form 2 August 2007


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Growth hormone (GH) secretion and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) decline with aging. This study addresses the role played by the hypothalamic regulators in the aging GH decline and investigates the mechanisms through which growth hormone secretagogues (GHS) activate GH secretion in the aging rats. Two groups of male Wistar rats were studied: young-adult (3 mo) and old (24 mo). Hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) mRNA and immunoreactive (IR) GHRH dramatically decreased (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001) in the old rats, as did median eminence IR-GHRH. Decreases of hypothalamic IR-somatostatin (SS; P < 0.001) and SS mRNA (P < 0.01), and median eminence IR-SS were found in old rats as were GHS receptor and IGF-I mRNA (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05). Hypothalamic IGF-I receptor mRNA and protein were unmodified. Both young and old pituitary cells, cultured alone or cocultured with fetal hypothalamic cells, responded to ghrelin. Only in the presence of fetal hypothalamic cells did ghrelin elevate the age-related decrease of GH secretion to within normal adult range. In old rats, growth hormone-releasing peptide-6 returned the levels of GH and IGF-I secretion and liver IGF-I mRNA, and partially restored the lower pituitary IR-GH and GH mRNA levels to those of young untreated rats. These results suggest that the aging GH decline may result from decreased GHRH function rather than from increased SS action. The reduction of hypothalamic GHS-R gene expression might impair the action of ghrelin on GH release. The role of IGF-I is not altered. The aging GH/IGF-I axis decline could be rejuvenated by GHS treatment.

growth hormone; ghrelin; growth hormone-releasing peptide-6; growth hormone secretagogue; aging; growth hormone decline


GROWTH HORMONE (GH) secretion in humans and rats declines progressively with aging (17, 41) and results in lower serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels.

Early studies in elderly humans showed an age-associated attenuation of GH pulse amplitude and GH secretion in response to several stimuli, including insulin-induced hypoglycemia and arginine administration (32, 43). Subsequent studies revealed a decrease in plasma IGF-I parallel to the decline in GH pulses (51). The studies in humans have been confirmed in experimental animals, and it is now evident that the decline in high-amplitude pulsatile GH release and plasma IGF-I concentrations is one of the best characterized events that occur with aging in humans and rats (61). Thus the aging rat is a model of relative or partial GH deficiency and consequently is suitable for studying the mechanisms of this alteration.

GH has a broad range of actions and therefore its diminished secretion rate has clinical significance and may be responsible for the generalized catabolic state, functional alterations, cognitive impairment, and decreased neuroprotection associated with normal aging. In elderly adults, with or without GH defect, GH increases IGF-I, the lean-to-fat ratio, muscle strength, and skin thickness and reduces total body fat content (7, 42).

In previous studies, we observed that the decrease of GH gene expression and secretion, as well as the expression of GH target genes such as IGF-I and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3, are the result of aging and not the increase in body weight that occurs with aging (59). Subsequently, we showed that aging is not a physiological situation of GH resistance because the peripheral alterations of the GH-IGF-I axis are reversible by repetitive exogenous GH administration (60).

The secretion of GH is regulated by the opposite actions of at least two specific neuropeptides, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS); GHRH stimulates GH secretion, whereas SS inhibits it (33, 56). GHRH neurons are predominantly located in the arcuate nucleus and the SS neurons in the periventricular nucleus (18, 35).

Reverse pharmacology allowed the development of GH secretagogues (GHS). The GHS receptor (GHS-R) and the endogenous agonist ghrelin were subsequently identified (23, 26, 46). Ghrelin, synthesized in the stomach, anterior pituitary gland, and the hypothalamus, drives GH secretion via a novel mechanism that includes increasing GHRH release, amplifying GHRH signaling in somatotropes, reducing SS release, and antagonizing SS receptor signaling (46).

The fact that ghrelin-producing neurons are present in the arcuate nucleus and that GHS-R is expressed in the pituitary (23, 27) could be determinant for hypothalamic ghrelin playing an important role in the physiological regulation of GH via a novel cascade of the hypothalamic-hypophysial mechanism. There is in vivo evidence that GHS requires GHRH to fully stimulate GH release (33). A direct action of ghrelin on cultured somatotropes has also been shown. However, particularly in humans, the ability of ghrelin to directly influence GH secretion remains controversial.

It is very likely that changes occurring in the specific hypothalamic regulatory hormones are the primary mechanism in the age-related decline of pituitary GH secretion and gene expression (9, 31) that have been reported in the rat. Although a reduced hypothalamic SS gene expression has been found in old rats (47), most studies have shown increased secretion and therefore a higher somatostatinergic tone or action as the main mechanism of GH decline with age (49, 54). Several studies regarding hypothalamic GHRH have suggested a deficiency of the peptide in aging rats and humans (10). It has recently been reported that, in transgenic GHRH-green fluorescent protein mice, aging does not decrease GHRH but causes an enlargement of GHRH-positive axons suggestive of neuropeptide accumulation (2). It has been suggested, and confirmed in our laboratory, that GHRH-receptor (GHRH-R) mRNA levels in the pituitary decline with age (24), which is in agreement with the age-related decline of pituitary GHRH sensitivity, although there is no general consensus on this point (10, 50, 61). Because GHRH-R is upregulated by the hypothalamic GHRH (21), our previous findings suggest that a major event in the decline of GH might be the decrease of hypothalamic GHRH secretion.

Studies to determine whether ghrelin levels change during aging have been inconclusive. Both an age-related decline of plasma ghrelin concentrations in humans (40) and an increase of stomach ghrelin production and secretion in aging rats have been described (13). Plasma ghrelin slightly increased with age, and ghrelin mRNA levels were similar in brains from C57BL/6J male mice aged 2 and 28 mo (55). There are no data on the expression and function of hypothalamic ghrelin in aging.

Circulating IGF-I, a modulator of the GH response, also participates in the negative feedback regulation of GH, acting at the hypothalamus and the pituitary levels through an endocrine long loop feedback (3). The presence of IGF-I mRNA in the hypothalamus (36) suggests that hypothalamic IGF-I may be involved in GH feedback regulation and thus may function as a hypothalamic modulator of GH as previously shown (63). Some studies have shown alterations in hypothalamic IGF-I in GH deficiency situations such as aging (30) and hypophysectomy (63); however, the implication of hypothalamic IGF-I and its receptor in the mechanism of GH decline in aging is not clearly established.

Our recent observations seem to indicate that the GH decline is not because of a pituitary defect itself since the capacity to respond to some secretagogues is maintained in somatotropes from old rats, although the low magnitude of the response is proportional to the intracellular GH content (44). To further confirm this hypothesis, we have studied the alterations of hypothalamic GH regulators and the possible reversibility of pituitary age-related GH decline with secretogogues in vitro.

It is known that peripheral alterations of the GH-IGF-I axis are reversible by repetitive exogenous GH administration (60), and the capacity to respond to some secretagogues is maintained in somatotropes from old rats (44). The purpose of this study was to determine the underlying mechanisms responsible for the age-related decline in the GH/IGF-I system, specifically addressing the role played by hypothalamic GHRH and/or SS as well as ghrelin and IGF-I. To better understand the role played by the hypothalamic regulators, we performed in vitro studies where the response of somatotropes to GHS was analyzed in the presence and absence of hypothalamic cells, as well as in vivo experiments.

This study shows that pituitary aging-related GH decline may be reversed in vitro and in vivo by exposing the somatotropes to an appropriate secretagogues stimulus and suggests that alterations in GHRH may be a primary event in this decline.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and experimental design. Young adult (3-mo-old) and old (24-mo-old) male Wistar rats were obtained from the Animal Experimental Center (Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain). Upon arrival at our institution, the animals were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility and maintained on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. Water and food were available ad libitum to all animals. All the animal procedures were conducted according to the guidelines set by the Spanish Real Decreto 223/1988 March 14th and Orden October 13th 1989 in accordance with the European Union normative for care and use of experimental animals.

For the in vivo studies, 24-mo-old rats were treated with 20 µg/kg growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6 every 12 h subcutaneously for 15 consecutive days. Control groups received the vehicle. The animals were killed by decapitation, and blood was collected and stored at –20°C until assayed for immunoreactive (IR) GH and IR-IGF-I. The hypothalami, pituitaries, and livers were removed under sterile conditions, rapidly frozen on dry ice, and stored at –80°C until extraction for radioimmunoassay and mRNA measurements. Five to six animals per group were used.

For the in vitro studies, the pituitary glands from 3-mo-old and 24-mo-old rats were removed under sterile conditions; the neurohypophyses were discarded, and the anterior pituitaries were collected and mechanicoenzymatically dispersed for preparation of primary pituitary cell cultures. Five experiments were conducted with two to three dishes per condition.

For tissue extract studies, tissue were collected and processed as indicated above. Experiments were done four times with three rats in each group. Experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Committee of Research Ethics.

Reagents. Rat ghrelin and GHRP-6 were from Bachem (Torrance, CA). 125I-[32P]deoxy-CTP and [32P]ribo-UTP were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Bucks, UK). Poly-L-ornithine and DNase I were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Papain was from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Neutral protease was from Roche Diagnostics (Barcelona, Spain).

Buffers and media. DMEM, FCS, horse serum, Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS), and PBS were from GIBCO (Invitrogen Life Technology, Paisley, UK). Penicillin-streptomycin and L-glutamine were from Bio Whittaker (Walkersville, MD). Pituitary defined medium consisted of DMEM (1 g/l glucose) supplemented with 1% BSA, 15 mM HEPES, 0.1 µM hydrocortisone, 0.5 nM triiodothyronine, 10 µM transferrin, 10 nM glucagon, and 0.2 nM parathyroid hormone from Sigma, 4 mM L-glutamine, and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin. Hypothalamic defined medium consisted of DMEM supplemented with 15% FCS, 4 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin. Neurobasal medium consisted of 1x neurobasal medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 2% B27 (GIBCO), 0.5 mM L-glutamine, and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin.

Cell culture and experimental design. Coculture of pituitary cells from the two groups of rats and fetal hypothalamic cells was made through a dual-chamber cell coculture system using the Transwell cell culture insert with pore size of 0.4 µm (Costar, Cambridge, MA), which allows free diffusion of macromolecules.

Pituitary cells from the two groups of rats were cultured as previously described (4). Anterior pituitaries were collected and mechanicoenzymatically dispersed with 0.1% papain, 0.1% neutral protease, and 0.1% DNase for 1 h at 37°C (Sigma). The dispersed pituitary cells were resuspended in defined medium containing 5% FCS, plated on poly-L-ornithine-coated culture plates (24-well), and seeded at a density of 4 x 105 cells/dish. Cultures were kept in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air at 37°C.

Fetal hypothalamic cells were cultured as previously described (16) using timed-pregnant Wistar rats raised in our laboratory. On day 17 of fetal life, the embryos were removed from the mother by aseptic surgical procedures, and the hypothalamic regions were dissected in PBS. All dissections of fetal tissue were performed using a binocular dissecting microscope. The diencephalon was first isolated by two transverse cuts: one was made anterior to the optic chiasm and the other through the midbrain. Then vertical cuts were used to remove lateral cortex and a horizontal cut to remove the dorsal thalamus. After being rinsed three times with Hanks' solution, the tissues were placed in DMEM-FCS-HBSS and dissociated mechanically by gently passing them through a Pasteur pipette and then through 20-, 21-, and 22-gauge needles. Dispersed cells were resuspended in defined medium and plated on the poly-L-ornithine-coated culture membrane of the Transwell inserts at a density of 4 x 104 cells/dish. Cultures were kept in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air at 37°C. After 5 h of incubation, defined medium was replaced by Neurobasal medium. Experiments were performed after 15 days in vitro, which is when we have observed that high levels of SS secretion and the peak of GHRH secretion occur (11, 14). Medium was changed every 3–4 days.

After 72 h of incubation in serum-supplemented defined medium (5% FCS), pituitary cells were preincubated in defined medium (serum free) for 2 h. Subsequently, the Transwell inserts with the fetal hypothalamic cells were placed in the 24-well plate containing the pituitary cells. The cocultures were stimulated with ghrelin in the absence or presence of SS antiserum for 4 h. Anti-SS14 IgG equivalent to 3 µl of antiserum/dish (binding capacity 0.2 µg/ml) was used. Controls received the same amount of IgG from normal rabbit serum (NRS) (15). Neither IgG from NRS nor SS antiserum affected pituitary cell cultures. Transwell inserts, containing only the medium, were placed in the control wells. No change was observed in GH secretion between pituitary cells cultured alone and pituitary cells cultured in the presence of a Transwell containing only the neurobasal medium. At the end of the experiment, media were removed, boiled for 5 min, and centrifuged for 30 min at 14,000 rpm. The supernatants were immediately frozen and stored at –20°C until being analyzed for GH concentration by RIA. In the studies of pituitary cell response to secretagogues, cells were preincubated in defined medium for 2 h, stimulated, and processed in the same conditions as the cocultures.

RIAs. IR-GHRH and IR-SS were measured in hypothalamic tissue extracts by previously described RIAs with specific GHRH and SS antisera raised in our laboratory as previously described (14, 15). The tissue peptide content was expressed as a function of the total protein determined by the Bradford method.

IR-GH in the pituitary culture media, blood, and pituitary tissues was measured by RIA using the National Pituitary Hormone Distribution Program rat hormone kit (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD) with a sensitivity limit of 0.8 µg/l. GH values were expressed as percentage of the untreated 3-mo-old group. Serum IGF-I was measured by a commercial RIA (Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA).

Tissue peptides were acid ethanol extracted as previously described (29). All parameters were measured in serum and tissues of individual rats, and all samples from the same experiment were measured in the same RIA to avoid interassay variations.

Western analysis. Pituitaries were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 0.01 M Tris·HCl, pH 7.6, 0.001 M EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 100 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Total protein extracts (10 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. After the membranes were blocked, immunodetection was performed using rabbit anti-IGF-I-Rbeta (1:2,000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), followed by incubation with a goat peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1,000 dilution; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detecting system (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, Bucks, UK). Quantification of the intensities of the autoradiography bands was done by densitometric scanning using Adobe-Photoshop 2.0 and NIH-Image 1.47 programs (Macintosh). The membranes were systematically treated with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 solution (0.125%) for 1 h at room temperature to confirm equal loading.

Northern analysis. Total hypothalamic and pituitary RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. Fractions of 2–15 µg were electrophoresed in a 1% agarose-0.66 mol/l formaldehyde gel, followed by electrotransfer to a nylon membrane (Nytran, Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH) and ultraviolet cross-linking (Hoefer Scientific Instrument, San Francisco, CA). The cDNA probe for SS and GH was labeled with deoxy-[32P]CTP (3,000 Ci/mmol). Prehybridization was carried out for 16 h at 42°C, and membranes were hybridized for 24 h at 42°C using UltraHyb (Ambion, Austin, TX) with an ~1 x 106 cpm/ml labeled antisense SS probe and 5 x 105 cpm/ml labeled antisense GH probe. Autoradiograms and quantification of intensities were done as described above. Equal loading was confirmed, and data were expressed as arbitrary units after making the correction for 18S.

Ribonuclease protection assay. Total hypothalamic and liver RNA was extracted as previously described. In the ribonuclease protection assay, total RNA was hybridized overnight with ~600,000 cpm of labeled antisense rat IGF-I and IGF-IR at 45°C. The hybridization solution contained 75% (vol/vol) formamide, 80 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.6, 4 mM EDTA, 1.6 M NaCl, and 0.4% SDS. After hybridization, samples were digested using RNase A (40 µg/ml) and RNase T1 (2 µg/ml) for 1 h at 30°C. Protected hybrids were isolated by ethanol precipitation after phenol-chloroform extraction and separated according to size on an 8% polyacrylamide/8 M urea denaturing gel. Gels were exposed to X-ray film (Kodak, Cambridge, UK) at –80°C for 24–36 h. Quantification of the intensities of the autoradiogram bands corresponding to protected hybrids was done by densitometric scanning as described above. All samples were hybridized at the same time with 18S or cyclophilin to correct for the differences in gel loading.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA isolated from hypothalamic extracts was used as a template for GHRH, GHS-R1a, IGF-I, glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and 18S. Briefly, total RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed using random primer and Superscript II RT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

LightCycler. Sets of specific primers for rat GHRH, IGF-I, and GAPDH were designed using LightCycler Probe Design Software 1.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) based on the sequence data of the gene available in GeneBank (Table 1). The sets of primers were used for LightCycler real-time PCR using SYBR Green I (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). The reaction was performed in a total volume of 20 µl in microcapillary tubes, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each reaction mixture contained 5 µl of cDNAs, 2 µl FasterStart DNA Master SYBR Green I mix, 2 µl of sense and antisense primers each (0.5 µM), 2.4 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, and 6.6 µl of PCR-grade H2O. The LightCycler programs for each gene were as follows: denaturation (95°C/10 min); PCR amplification and quantification (95°C/15 s, 58–60°C/5 s, 72°C/12 s) with single fluorescence measurement at the end of the elongation step, repeated for 40 cycles. The transition temperature at all steps was 20°C/s. To verify that only the specific product was amplified, a melting point analysis was conducted after the final cycle. Specific amplification was also confirmed by electrophoresis of PCR products on 2% agarose gel.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Primers used in PCR

 
Data acquisition and analysis were performed using LightCycler software 3.5 (Roche). Threshold cycle (CT) was determined by second-derivative maximum analysis. Specific standard curves for each gene were generated by serial dilution (1 to 1/100) of total hypothalamic cDNAs to determine the lineal amplification range and reaction efficiency. All samples were tested in triplicate. Each run included a nontemplate control to test for contamination of assay reagents. For each sample, the value of the housekeeping gene GAPDH was analyzed as a standard for the quality of the RNA samples investigated. No regulation of hypothalamic GAPDH gene expression by age was confirmed by Northern blot.

Taqman gene expression assays. To detect amplification of GHS-R1a and 18S, primers and probes from the predeveloped primer and probe lists of Applied Biosystems (GHS-R: Rn00821417_m1 and 18S: Hs99999901-s1) were used. PCR was performed in duplicate for each sample using 1 µl 10-fold diluted cDNA as template for GHS-Ra and 18S, 1x Real Master Mix (Eppendorf, Netheler, Germany), and 1x of Taqman Gene Expression Assays in a 20-µl reaction. The amplification was carried out in an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System under the following conditions: 2 min 95°C, 40 cycles (15 s 95°C, 1 min 60°C).

The results are given as percentage of 3-mo rats after normalizing GHRH and IGF-I mRNA to GAPDH expression and GHS-R1a mRNA to 18S ribosomal RNA content. Relative target mRNA expression from old to young rats was calculated by using the 2 Formula method described by Livak and Schmittgen (28).

Immunocytochemistry. The animals were anesthetized with halothane inhalation and perfused transcardially with 250 ml heparin 0.0125% in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) followed by 500–750 ml of a fresh fixative solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Brains were removed and cut into small blocks that were postfixed in the same fixative at room temperature for 4 h. The blocks were then transferred to a 30% sucrose solution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer and stored at 4°C overnight. After fixation and cryoprotection, 40 µm frontal-frozen serial sections from the level of –1.8 to –4.8 mm, relative to the bregma, according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (38) were obtained with a microtome (Crycut 1800; Leyca, Bensheim, Germany). Free-floating sections were collected in cryoprotectant (30% glycerol, 30% ethyleneglycol in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) and stored at –80°C until being processed. Specific polyclonal antisera raised in rabbits against rat GHRH and SS were used in this study (14, 15). All antisera were diluted in PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma). The sections were washed several times in PBS and soaked in PBS containing 0.3% H2O2 to block endogenous peroxidase. The sections were then washed in PBS and preincubated in 5% normal goat serum for 1 h at room temperature before incubation with the primary antisera [anti-GHRH (1:1,000) or anti-SS (1:3,000)] overnight at 4°C. The remaining procedures were performed at room temperature. After several more washes in PBS, the sections were incubated 1:250 with a biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG (Dako) for 1 h, washed again in PBS, and incubated with an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (Vectastain ABC Elite kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 90 min. The immunoperoxidase activity was revealed by incubating the tissue sections in a histochemical medium that contained 0.03% 3,3'-diaminoenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma) dissolved in PBS containing 0.01% H2O2 and 0.088% nickel(II) nitrate (Sigma) for the SS-stained slices. The sections were mounted on SuperFrost Plus slides (Menzel-Glaser), dehydrated through graded ethanols, cleared in xylene, and covered with DPX (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, UK). Control sections were routinely processed by either omitting the primary antibody or by replacing it with an equivalent concentration of preimmune rabbit IgG. These sections showed no staining. Sections incubated with the primary antiserum preabsorbed with recombinant rat GHRH or SS for 24 h at 4°C showed no staining.

Statistical analysis. All data are expressed as means ± SE. Tests for significance between sample groups were performed with a two-tailed t-test. For multiple comparisons, ANOVA was used with the Fisher's test for post hoc comparisons. Differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Hypothalamic GHRH mRNA and immunoreactive peptide and median eminence IR- GHRH in aging rats. GHRH is considered to be the most potent secretagogue of pituitary GH, including GH gene expression and secretion. Therefore, hypothalamic GHRH mRNA and IR-GHRH levels were measured to determine their role in the mechanism of the decreased GH secretion that occurs with aging. As shown in Fig. 1A, hypothalamic GHRH mRNA levels, analyzed by real time RT-PCR, were significantly decreased in the old rats, [40.6 ± 3.7% (P < 0.01)] compared with young rats. IR-GHRH content in the hypothalamic extracts showed a striking reduction in the old rats and was in fact almost undetectable (P < 0.001 vs. 3 mo; Fig. 1B).


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) mRNA, immunoreactive (IR)-GHRH peptide levels, and IR-GHRH in median eminence in young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats. A: GHRH mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR. Total hypothalamic RNA (2 µg) from young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats was reverse transcribed, amplified, and quantified by real-time PCR as described in METHODS. After correction for glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) levels, the data were adjusted so that the values obtained from hypothalami of 3 mo rats equaled 100. B: IR-GHRH levels were measured by RIA and expressed as pg/mg of protein. Values represent means ± SE (n = 12). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. 3-mo group. au, Arbitrary units. C: IR-GHRH staining of the median eminence in relation to age. Immunohistochemistry preparations of coronal sections of median eminence of young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats. V, third ventricle.

 
To approach the neuroendocrine function of GHRH in young and old rats, IR-GHRH content in coronal sections of the median eminence of young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. As shown in Fig. 1C, GHRH content was markedly decreased in the median eminence of old rats when compared with the young animals, thus confirming the reduced hypothalamic IR-GHRH levels found in hypothalamic extracts.

These findings suggest that the dramatic reduction of GHRH gene expression and IR-GHRH content in the hypothalamus and in the median eminence may account for the decreased GH gene expression and secretion in old rats.

Hypothalamic SS mRNA and immunoreactive peptide, and median eminence IR-SS in aging rats. SS, the GH secretion inhibitor, was quantified in the hypothalamus of young and old rats for the better understanding of the mechanism of the reduction of GH secretion in aging. As shown in Fig. 2A, SS mRNA was decreased significantly in the hypothalamic extracts of old rats; it was 60% lower in the old rat group when compared with the young rat group (P < 0.001). IR-SS in hypothalamic extracts was also significantly decreased by sixfold in the old rats when compared with the young rats (Fig. 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) mRNA, IR-SS peptide levels, and IR-SS in median eminence in young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats. A: hypothalamic SS mRNA levels measured by Northern blot. Top: representative Northern blot. Bottom: quantification of SS mRNA band by scanning densitometry. Total hypothalamic RNA (8 µg) from young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats was subjected to Northern blot using SS probe. After correction for 18S levels, optical density units were adjusted so that the ratio obtained from hypothalami of 3 mo rats equaled 100. B: IR-SS levels were quantified by RIA and expressed as ng/mg of protein. Values represent means ± SE (n = 12). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. 3 mo group. adu, Arbitrary densitometric units. C: IR-SS staining in the median eminence in relation to age. Immunohistochemistry preparations of coronal sections of median eminence of young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats.

 
To clarify the neuroendocrine function of SS in the regulation of GH secretion in aging rats, IR-SS was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in coronal sections of the median eminence of young and old rats. As shown in Fig. 2C, SS content was decreased markedly in the median eminence of the old rats when compared with the young rats, confirming the hypothalamic decrease of the immunoreactive peptide.

These results clearly indicate that a significant decrease of SS mRNA and IR-SS in the hypothalamus as well as a marked diminution of IR-SS in the median eminence occurred in the old rats. Consequently, it is most unlikely that the secretion inhibitor SS may account for the GH secretion decline in aging.

GHS-R expression in the hypothalamus of aging rats. Because the secretagogue ghrelin is mainly expressed and secreted in the stomach, we quantified the expression of the hypothalamic ghrelin receptor instead of the secretagogue itself as a way to determine the activity of ghrelin.

GHS-R mRNA was quantified by real-time RT-PCR in hypothalamic extracts of rats of different ages. In the old rats, a significant decrease in the levels of GHS-R mRNA was observed [78.4 ± 4.1% (P < 0.01)] compared with the young rats, as shown in Fig. 3.


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue (GHS)- receptor mRNA levels in relation to age. Total hypothalamic RNA (2 µg) from young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats was reverse transcribed, amplified, and quantified by real-time PCR as described in METHODS. After correction for GAPDH levels, data were adjusted so that the ratio obtained from the hypothalami of 3 mo rats equaled 100. Values represent means ± SE (n = 12). **P < 0.01 vs. 3 mo group.

 
These data indicate that alterations of the GHS signaling might be involved in the mechanism of GH decline with age. It is not clear whether this is a primary event since, at least at the pituitary level, the GHS-R is regulated by GHRH in addition to ghrelin.

IGF-I and IGF-I-R gene expression in the hypothalamus of aging rats. Although IGF-I is not considered a major regulatory signal of GH secretion, hypothalamic IGF-I and IGF-I-R gene expression was studied for the better understanding of the mechanism of the GH decline in aging. As shown in Fig. 4A, hypothalamic IGF-I mRNA levels, measured by real time RT-PCR, were significantly decreased in the old rats [58.8 ± 5.3% (P < 0.05)] compared with young rats. Significantly lower levels of circulating IR-IGF-I were also observed in the group of old rats. The decrease of circulating IR-IGF-I (see Fig. 8B) and hypothalamic IGF-I mRNA (Fig. 4A) suggests that IGF-I does not play a role in the mechanisms underlying the decline of GH in aging.


Figure 4
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Hypothalamic insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I mRNA, IGF-I-R mRNA, and IGF-I-Rbeta protein levels of young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats. A: IGF-I mRNA levels. Total hypothalamic RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed, amplified, and quantified by real-time PCR as described in METHODS. After correction for GAPDH levels, data were adjusted so that the values obtained from the hypothalami of 3 mo rats equaled 100. B: IGF-I-R mRNA levels were measured by RNase protection assay. Total hypothalamic RNA (10 µg) was subjected to solution hybridization/RNase protection assay using the antisense IGF-I-R and 18S probes. The identifications of each protected fragment are indicated on the left of a representative gel. Lane 1, IGF-I-R and 18S probes after RNase A and T1 digestion. Lane 2, undigested 18S probe. Lane 3, undigested IGF-I-R probe. Lane 4, tRNA control. Lane 5, molecular-weight marker. Data were adjusted so that the ratio obtained from hypothalami of 3 mo rats equaled 100. C: IGF-I-Rbeta protein was measured by Western immunoblot. Top: representative Western blot. Bottom: quantification of IGF-I- Rbeta by scanning densitometry. Protein from hypothalamic extracts (10 µg) was subjected to Western blot. Optical density units were adjusted so that the values obtained from hypothalami of 3 m rats equaled 100. Values represent means ± SE (n = 12). *P < 0.05, not significant (ns) vs. 3 mo group.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Effect of GHRP-6 on serum IR-IGF-I and liver IGF-I mRNA levels in young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats. Reversibility of age-related alterations. A: effect of GHRP-6 on serum IR-IGF-I in young and old rats measured by RIA. Data were adjusted as percentage of their respective age control group. **P < 0.01 vs. their respective age control group. B: serum IR-IGF-I reversibility in old rats with GHRP-6. Results were adjusted so that the values obtained in untreated 3 mo rats equaled 100. ***P < 0.001, not significant vs. 3 mo group. C: effect of GHRP-6 on liver IGF-I mRNA levels in young and old rats measured by RNase protection assay. Top: representative gel. Bottom: quantification of IGF-I a and IGF-I b protected bands by scanning densitometry after correction for cyclophilin levels. Total liver RNA (10 µg) was subjected to solution hybridization/RNase protection assay using the antisense IGF-I and cyclophilin probes. Data were adjusted as percentage of their respective age control group. *P < 0.05 vs. their respective age control group. D: reversibility of liver IGF-I mRNA levels in old rats with GHRP-6. Results were adjusted so that the untreated 3 mo values equaled 100. **P < 0.01, not significant vs. 3 mo group. Values represent means ± SE (n = 6).

 
Hypothalamic IGF-I-R gene expression and protein content were analyzed by RNase protection assay and Western blot. As shown in Fig. 4, B and C, both IGF-I-Rbeta mRNA levels and content were similar both in young and old rats.

Validation of coculture system as a model for the study of ghrelin action on pituitary cells. To analyze the somatotrope responsiveness to secretagogues in a more physiological environment, we established a model of coculture of pituitary and fetal hypothalamic cells, where interactions between the two cellular populations and certain treatments could be studied. To this end, hypothalamic cells from 17-day-old embryos were cultured for 15 days, the time at which we had observed the peak of GHRH and high levels of SS secretion (11, 14).

To characterize the behavior of the somatotropes in this in vitro model, the cumulative GH secretion of pituitary cells from 3 and 24-mo-old rats, in the absence or presence of fetal hypothalamic cells, was analyzed. As shown in Fig. 5, the presence of fetal hypothalamic cells decreased GH secretion with the same intensity in cells of both groups when compared with their own controls [3 mo: 37.1 ± 7.2, (P < 0.01); 24 mo: 45.1 ± 2.5, (P < 0.001)]. These data indicated that the neuropeptides secreted in the coculture exerted an inhibitory effect on basal GH secretion.


Figure 5
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Effect of fetal hypothalamic cells on pituitary cell IR-growth hormone (GH) secretion in relation with aging. Primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells from young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats were maintained alone (PC) or cocultured with fetal hypothalamic cells (CC), as described in METHODS, in the absence or presence of SS antiserum (SS-As) for 4 h. Data represent IR-GH in culture medium. Data are expressed as percentage of their respective age PC group. Values represent means ± SE or 5 experiments (n = 5). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. their respective PC group.

 
To confirm this, SS was blocked with specific antisomatostatin antiserum during the period of coculture. As shown in Fig. 5 the blockade of endogenous SS completely reversed the inhibitory action of fetal hypothalamic cells on GH secretion in pituitary cells of young rats. This action was less effective in pituitary cells of aged rats. These results, which allowed analysis of the somatotrope sensitivity to SS with age, showed that aged pituitary cells do not have a greater sensitivity to the inhibitory action of SS, at least in this in vitro model.

Responsiveness of aged pituitary cells to ghrelin in the coculture system. In previous studies, we observed that cultured aged pituitary cells, which have lower intracellular content and secretion of GH, retained their capacity to respond to secretagogues, albeit the magnitude of the response was proportional to the intracellular GH content (44).

To further assess the implication of the hypothalamic regulators in the age-related decline of GH, we studied the capacity of ghrelin to reverse the aged-related decline in GH secretion in the following two in vitro systems: the pituitary cell culture and the coculture model. Cultured pituitary cells from 3-mo- and 24-mo-old rats were treated with ghrelin for 4 h. As shown in Fig. 6A, ghrelin produced a significant increase of cumulative GH secretion in the cells from both groups; there was not any significant difference in the magnitude of the response of the two groups when it was compared with their respective basal values (3 mo: 178.2 ± 15.3; 24 mo: 174.1 ± 15.3).


Figure 6
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Reversibility of age-related GH release decrease. A: response of pituitary cells to ghrelin. Pituitary cells of young and old rats were incubated in the absence or presence of ghrelin (10–6 M) for 4 h. Data represent IR-GH in culture medium. Data were adjusted so that the values obtained in their respective age untreated group equaled 100. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. their respective age control group. B: IR-GH secretion reversibility in cultured pituitary cells of aging rats with ghrelin. Results were adjusted so that values obtained in pituitary cells from untreated 3 mo rats equaled 100. **P < 0.01 vs. 3 mo group. C: effect of ghrelin on GH secretion in pituitary cells from young and old rats cocultured with fetal hypothalamic cells. Primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells from young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats were cocultured with fetal hypothalamic cells and treated with ghrelin (10–6 M) in the presence of SS antiserum for 4 h. Data represent IR-GH in culture medium. Data are expressed as percentage of their respective age control group. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. their respective control group. D: IR-GH secretion reversibility in cocultured pituitary cells of aging rats with ghrelin. Results were adjusted so that values obtained in untreated pituitary cells from 3 mo rats equaled 100. ***P < 0.001, not significant vs. 3 mo group. Values represent means ± SE of 5 experiments (n = 5).

 
Because cultured aged pituitary cells responded to ghrelin, we next assessed the degree of reversibility of the diminished GH secretion in pituitary cells from aging rats. To this end, the GH secretory response of cells from old rats was analyzed as a percentage of the IR-GH released by untreated cells from 3-mo-old rats. As shown in Fig. 6B, as expected, a reduced basal GH secretion was maintained in cells from 24-mo rats compared with cells from 3-mo rats (P < 0.001). The stimulation with ghrelin of old pituitary cell rats increased GH levels, but they were lower than those observed in untreated cells from young rats (60.8 ± 3.2 vs. 3 mo). These results indicate that, in this in vitro system, ghrelin only partially reversed the diminished age-related GH secretion. However, when the response to ghrelin was analyzed in the coculture system, we observed that ghrelin, in the presence of SS antiserum, increased GH secretion in the cells from both groups, without any significant difference in the response between the two groups when compared with their respective basal values (3 mo: 190.4 ± 25.2; 24 mo: 195.6 ± 34.7; Fig. 6C). The reversibility analysis (Fig. 6D) showed that, in the presence of fetal hypothalamic cells, a reduced basal GH secretion was maintained in cells from 24-mo rats compared with cells from 3-mo rats (P < 0.001). The stimulation with ghrelin of cells from old rats, in the presence of SS antiserum, increased GH secretion to levels that were not significantly different from the basal secretion levels observed in untreated cells from young rats (80.9 ± 17.9 vs. 3 mo). These data indicate that the diminished age-related basal GH secretion of cells from old rats was reversible by ghrelin in the coculture model.

Responsiveness of aged rats to GHRP-6 in vivo. The in vitro data from the coculture studies suggested that ghrelin completely reversed the aging decline in basal GH secretion in the presence of hypothalamic cells. To further investigate the role played by the hypothalamic regulators in the age-related GH decline, we carried out an in vivo study where the response to secretagogues in an aged hypothalamic environment was analyzed. Also the effect of secretagogues on the reversibility on the peripheral and pituitary age-related alterations of the GH/IGF-I axis was assessed. This study was preceded by a previous one where we evaluated the length of GHRP-6 treatment. The highest GH secretion was obtained 15 days after GHRP-6 treatment, which produced a significant increase of serum IR-GH (Fig. 7A) and pituitary GH mRNA (Fig. 7E) levels in young and old rats. There was not any significant difference in the magnitude of the response between the two groups when it was compared with their respective basal values [IR-GH: 3 mo 321.7 ± 112 (P < 0.05), 24 mo 304.1 ± 77.6 (P < 0.001); GH mRNA: 3 mo 149.8 ± 5.4 (P < 0.05), 24 mo 156.2 ± 11.7 (P < 0.05)]. As shown in Fig. 7C, GHRP-6 treatment had a different effect on pituitary IR-GH content in young and old rats. Although in young rats GHRP-6 caused a depletion, in the old rats GHRP-6 increased pituitary IR-GH content [3 mo: 58.6 ± 6.1, (P < 0.05); 24 mo: 205.7 ± 23.6, (P < 0.05)] when compared with their respective basal values. These results indicated a clear effect of GHRP-6 on GH synthesis and release in pituitaries from old rats.


Figure 7
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. In vivo effect of growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6 on serum and pituitary IR-GH and pituitary GH mRNA levels in young (3 mo) and old (24 mo) rats. Reversibility of age-related alterations. A: effect of GHRP-6 on serum IR-GH in young and old rats quantified by RIA. Data were adjusted as percentage of their respective age control group. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 vs. their respective age control group. B: serum IR-GH reversibility in old rats with GHRP-6. Results were adjusted so that the values obtained in untreated 3 mo rats equaled 100. **P < 0.01, not significant vs. 3 mo group. C: effect of GHRP-6 on pituitary IR-GH content in young and old rats quantified by RIA. Data were adjusted as percentage of their respective age control group. *P < 0.05 vs. their respective age control group. D: reversibility of pituitary IR-GH content in old rats with GHRP-6. Results were adjusted so that the values obtained in untreated 3 mo rats equaled 100. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 vs. 3 mo group. E: effect of GHRP-6 on pituitary GH mRNA levels in young and old rats measured by Northern blot. Top: representative Northern blot. Bottom: quantification of GH mRNA bands by scanning densitometry after correction for 18S levels. Total pituitary RNA (2 µg) was subjected to Northern blot using GH probe. Values were adjusted as percentage of their respective age control group. *P < 0.05 vs. their respective age control group. F: pituitary GH mRNA level reversibility in old rats with GHRP-6. Values were adjusted so that the values obtained from untreated 3 mo rats equaled 100. ***P < 0.001, not significant vs. 3 mo group. Values represent means ± SE (n = 6).

 
To determine the potential reversibility of the age-related GH alterations, serum IR-GH, pituitary IR-GH content, and GH mRNA levels from old rats were analyzed as a percentage of the normal untreated young rat levels. As previously described, serum IR-GH (Fig. 7B), pituitary IR-GH content (Fig. 7D), and GH mRNA levels (Fig. 7F) were decreased significantly in the old rats compared with young rats [65.2 ± 17.2, (P < 0.01); 25.7 ± 2.4, (P < 0.001); and 47.1 ± 2.9, (P < 0.001) respectively]. Chronic treatment of old rats with GHRP-6 increased serum IR-GH up to levels significantly higher than those in the untreated 3 mo rats (Fig. 7B). We observed, for the first time, that GHRP-6 significantly increased pituitary IR-GH content and GH mRNA levels in the old rats. GH mRNA levels were not significantly different from those of young rats (76.6 ± 5.7 vs. 3 mo), indicating that this treatment almost completely rejuvenated the age-related decrease of basal GH mRNA levels, whereas IR-GH content was only partially reversed.

To complete the study on the reversibility of the peripheral age-related alterations of the GH/IGF-I axis, we analyzed the effect of chronic treatment with GHRP-6 on serum IR-IGF-I and hepatic IGF-I mRNA levels in old rats. Treatment with GHRP-6 for 15 days did not change serum IR-IGF-I in young animals, whereas it produced a significant increase in old rats when compared with their respective basal values [IR-IGF-I: 3 mo 101.4 ± 2.7; 24 mo 171.9 ± 9.4, (P < 0.01)]; Fig. 8A). As shown in Fig. 8C, GHRP-6 treatment caused a significant increase of both a and b liver IGF-I mRNA transcripts in young and old rats. There was not any significant difference in the magnitude of the response of the two groups when it was compared with their respective basal values [IGF-I a: 3 mo 144.3 ± 20.5 (P < 0.05), 24 mo 139.5 ± 26.3 (P < 0.05); IGF-I b: 3 mo 155.2 ± 23.5 (P < 0.05), 24 mo 167.5 ± 31.2 (P < 0.05)].

When the effects of GHRP-6 treatment in aging rats were analyzed as a percentage of normal untreated young rats, a significant decrease of serum IR-IGF-I (Fig. 8B) and of both a and b liver IGF-I mRNA transcripts was observed in the old rats (Fig. 8D); [50.7 ± 2.1, (P < 0.001); 65.1 ± 7.2, (P < 0.01); 47.9 ± 3.9, (P < 0.01), respectively]. GHRP-6 treatment significantly increased serum IR-IGF-I; even more, for the first time we found that it significantly increased liver IGF-I mRNA in old rats up to levels no different from those observed in the untreated young rats (IR-IGF-I: 85.9 ± 2.1; IGF-I a: 93.8 ± 16.6; IGF-I b: 79.3 ± 13.4 vs. 3 mo). These results indicate that GHRP-6 rejuvenated the age-related alterations of the peripheral IGF-I system.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The data reported here indicate that a chronic treatment with GHRP-6 can normalize, at least in part, some biological indexes related to somatrotropic function in old rats. The GH releasing activity of ghrelin and its mimetic is dependent on the presence of hypothalamic cells or an intact hypothalamic pituitary axis. Our results suggest a permissive role for GHRH in the aging rat in the mechanism of action of GHS.

This study confirms that hypothalamic IR-GHRH levels dramatically decrease in aging rats as do GHRH mRNA levels, which result in lower GHRH accumulation in the median eminence. In agreement with other studies (47, 52), we found a drastic decrease of hypothalamic IR-SS and SS mRNA levels in old rats as well as a decreased SS immunostaining in the median eminence. Early passive immunization studies with SS antiserum (48) and reports showing increased hypothalamic SS levels in the aging rats (19) advocated that an increase in the somatostatinergic tone might be a key mechanism of the GH alterations in the aging rat. As a whole, our results support the hypothesis that a major mechanism of GH alterations in aging is a diminution of GHRH secretion rather than an increase of SS tone, as was suggested in earlier studies (65). Previously, some of these alterations in aging male rats (9, 31) had been partially shown. However, the present systematic study, which includes the analysis of most of the hypothalamic signals involved in the regulation of the GH, strongly suggests that the major event of the somatotropic axis decline in aging might be a decrease of the hypothalamic secretagogue GHRH. However, there is unequivocal evidence that, in aging, major alterations may be located at hypothalamic and suprahypothalamic levels. Changes that occur with aging in brain neurotransmitters, catecholamines, and acetylcholine and deficits in receptor sites, turnover, and interaction and transduction mechanisms are possibly instrumental in incurring changes in the functional activity of GHRH synthesizing neurons.

We also found a decrease in hypothalamic GHS-R mRNA levels in aging rats. It has been described that ghrelin acts on GH regulation at hypothalamic and pituitary levels, thus increasing GHRH release, amplifying GHRH signaling in the somatotropes, reducing SS release, and antagonizing SS receptor signaling (46). Because of the important role of ghrelin in GH regulation, interacting with both GHRH and SS, deficits in endogenous ghrelin signaling may contribute to the alterations of GH secretion in aging. Recent studies conducted in C57BL/6J male mice show that the levels of GHS-R mRNA in the pituitary and the whole brain do not decline with age. It is possible that GHS-R expression is differentially altered in specific brain centers and is masked by assaying whole brain. Some species differences appear to be involved in the effect of aging on the GH/IGF-I axis. In rats, the effect of aging on the GH/IGF-I axis has been shown to be dependent upon genetic background (55).

We observed a decreased IGF-I gene expression and no alteration of IGF-I-R mRNA levels and IGF-I-R protein content in the hypothalamus of aging rats. These findings in aging rats are in agreement with data from other animal models of GH and IGF-I deficiency, such as the hypophysectomized rat in which a diminished hypothalamic IGF-I gene expression was described (63), and a food-deprived rat in which hypothalamic IGF-I mRNA levels were decreased while IGF-I-R mRNA levels were unaffected (36). Because IGF-I inhibits GH secretion at the hypothalamic level, these results, together with the low circulating IGF-I, clearly exclude that changes in IGF-I may account for the decline of the GH in aging. Given that IGF-I is reduced at all levels, its neuroendocrine inhibitory action and the negative long loop feedback cannot account for the mechanism of the declined GH secretion.

Our results indicate that there is an alteration of the GH regulators in the aging rat. In spite of this, reports in humans have shown that chronic treatment with ghrelin mimetics restores GH secretion and pulsatile GH secretion in the elderly. Also, our previous in vitro studies (44) show the capacity of the old pituitary cells to respond to some GHS. For the better understanding of the role played by the hypothalamic GH regulators in the age-related GH decline, we performed in vitro studies where the response of somatotropes to GHS was analyzed in the presence and absence of hypothalamic cells, as well as in vivo studies where the hypothalamus-pituitary axis was intact. To this end, we set up a coculture system of pituitary cells and fetal hypothalamic cells that allowed us to study the somatotrope responsiveness to secretagogues in a more physiological environment where interactions between the two cellular populations under certain treatments can be studied. In this in vitro model, we observed that the presence of hypothalamic cells containing GH regulatory neuropeptides modified basal GH secretion with the prevalence of an inhibitory action. This inhibition was completely abolished with the blockade of SS with antiserum, thus indicating that the inhibitory effect was exerted by SS. This inhibition could be due to the fact that SS secretion by fetal hypothalamic cells in this in vitro model is 10 times greater than that of GHRH (11, 14). Although the profile on neuropeptides secreted by the fetal hypothalamic cells is probably different from that of young and old animals, the outcome of the in vitro experiments coincides with our in vivo studies.

This study also indicates that the presence of fetal hypothalamic cells decreased GH secretion with the same intensity in cells of both age groups. Early studies showed an increased sensitivity of old pituitary cells to SS (48, 54), and this was postulated as the mechanism responsible for the diminished GH secretion in aging. Neither our previous studies in pituitary cell cultures (44), those of others (12, 37), nor the data shown here support this hypothesis. One problem common to many studies on aging is that different animal strains are used and submitted to different nutritional conditions. It has been reported that moderate caloric restriction altered the subcellular distribution of SS mRNA and increased GH pulse amplitude in aged animals (53).

Regarding the response of GH to ghrelin in aging rats, there is no consensus on in vivo studies (45, 62), and there are no in vitro studies in aging. Our data indicate that the magnitude of the GH response to ghrelin is not significantly different between young and old pituitary cells when compared with their own basal secretion, either in pituitary cultures or in cocultures with fetal hypothalamic cells. When the response of GH to ghrelin was compared with the basal GH secretion of cells from young rats in the pituitary cell cultures, the levels of GH in the old pituitary cultures did not reach the basal levels observed in the young pituitary cultures. However, in the coculture model, the response of GH to ghrelin in old pituitary cells was similar to that found with cells from untreated young rats. These data indicate that the presence of hypothalamic cells is required for full biological activity of GHS as has been suggested (57). Ghrelin has been shown to stimulate GHRH release from hypothalamic explants (64). In addition, these results show an in vitro model where the lower GH secretion of pituitary cells from old rats is stimulated with ghrelin.

Data regarding the increase in circulating GH with chronic GHS treatment in the old rat are conflicting. Our in vivo study demonstrates that GH release in response to exogenous GHRP-6 was not significantly different in rats aged 3 or 24 mo, indicating that old rats maintain the sensitivity to GHS. Although these are single serum sample data, they are supported by the results on pituitary IR-GH and GH mRNA content, and serum IR-IGF-I and liver IGF-I mRNA. These findings agree with previous studies in aged freely moving rats (45) and in aged mice (55). A decline in GH secretion following administration of GHRP-6 during aging in female rats has also been reported (62). The discrepancy with our study could be related to differences in the experimental design since the rat strain, age, dose of GHRP-6, and length of the treatment were different. In rats, the effect of aging on the GH/IGF-I axis has been shown to be dependent upon genetic background (25). A diminished ghrelin-induced GH response in the old rat could be related to the decrease in hypothalamic GHRH, since an inefficient treatment with GHS has been observed when GHRH is absent (34, 39).

We present the first evidence demonstrating that the reduced concentration of pituitary IR-GH and GH mRNA exhibited by the old rats is increased by GHRP-6, indicating that GHRP-6 may induce GH synthesis in the aged somatotrope and consequently reverse the lower GH levels in aging. The response of GH mRNA to secretagogues is controversial. Chronic treatment of 18-mo Sprague-Dawley rats with hexarelin did not restore GH mRNA content in the pituitaries of old animals (5). GHRP-6 and ghrelin have been shown to induce activation of Pit-1 in cultured anterior pituitary cells from infant rats (22). In adult rats, pituitary GH mRNA does not change in response to ghrelin administration (8).

Pituitary IR-GH levels are differently affected by GHRP-6 treatment. Pituitary IR-GH content is decreased by GHRP-6 in young rats, whereas it is increased in old rats. This may be because of the aging alterations observed in the hypothalamic regulators. In fact, the diminution in SS could increase the pituitary GH response to secretagogues, and the diminished GHRH could impair GH secretion, resulting in increased pituitary GH content.

We also demonstrate that GHRP-6 stimulates IGF-I secretion in the old rats up to levels found in the untreated young adult rats, but does not modify it in the young rats.

These results agree with our previous studies which showed that, after GH administration IR-IGF-I, brain IGF-I mRNA and IR-IGF-I increased in aging rats but were not modified in young rats (29, 60). GH also increased the low brain SS levels in the aging rats but was noneffective in adult rats (29). The striking difference in the response of peripheral IR-IGF-I to GHRP-6 between young and old rats is compatible with the aging-related decline in IGFBP-3 (60). In addition, GHRP-6-induced GH could negatively regulate the activity of liver GH receptors.

For the first time we observe that it markedly increases hepatic IGF-I mRNA. Our data are consistent with previous studies in elderly humans where the treatment with secretagogues restored IGF-I levels (6). Others found that, in aging rats, the IGF-I response to GHRP-6 vanished with aging in spite of the presence of a GH response in aging rats induced by the peptide (45). Although no evidence exists on the action of GHS on hepatic IGF-I mRNA levels when adult male rats were treated with GHRP-6, IGF-I mRNA levels increased in the cerebellum, hypothalamus, and hippocampus (20).

In summary, this study confirms that, in the old male rat, the decline in GH secretion rate is because of a reduction of GH gene expression and GH reserve that may result from the reduction of GHRH gene expression and secretion and is not the result of an increased somatostatinergic tone or action. There is reduction of hypothalamic GHS-R gene expression in old rats that might partly be because of a decreased GHRH and that could determine a low stimulatory action of GHS released at this level. The feedback exerted by IGF-I is not altered in aging rats and is ruled out as the primary mechanism responsible for the GH decline of aging. Additionally, we demonstrate that the diminished GH secretion of pituitary cells from old rats could be rejuvenated, at least in our in vitro model of coculture with fetal hypothalamic cells, by pharmacological ghrelin administration. The in vivo study reported in this article indicates that long-term treatment with GHRP-6 rejuvenates the GH-IGF-I axis in the aging rats. The GH-releasing activity of GHRP-6 appears to be dependent on the integrity on the hypothalamic pituitary axis involving GHRH-secreting neurons. The age-related decrements in GH secretion result from inadequate stimulation, rather than from maladaptive changes in the mechanism of GH release/or intrinsic pituitary defect. In this context, GHS could be more appropriate to restoring GH secretion in aged individuals than GHRH with its major limitation of a short half-life. Recent studies with CJC-1295, a long-lasting human GHRH analog, have shown that once-daily administration of the GHRH analog normalizes growth in the GHRH knockout mouse (1). In humans, prolonged stimulation of GH and IGF-I has been shown with a single subcutaneous administration of CJC-1295 in normal subjects (58). This analog may represent a more valid and physiological approach than GHS, particularly when growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is due to hypothalamic dysfunction. The development of stable orally active GHRH analogs and drug delivery systems could offer new therapeutic perspectives for these drugs. However, GHS which are known to activate the endogenous GHRH system, may represent a more physiological therapy in situations where the integrity of the hypothalamus is partially preserved such as some short-stature pathologies, adult GH deficiency, and aging. At present, the oral bioavailability of the GHS makes them particularly convenient for clinical use in a number of potential therapeutic opportunities. Our results give experimental support to the concept of reversibility of the pituitary alteration of the GH/IGF-I system that occurs in aging.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by FONDO DE INVESTIGACIONES SANITARIAS Grants FIS 98/0343, 02/0720, 04/1580, and 05/0881 from Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. M. García- San Frutos was the recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. E. Hernández, D. LeRoith, and S. Ojeda for providing the cDNAs necessary to generate the riboprobes. The rat GH kit was provided by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Current address of M. García-San Frutos: Health Science Faculty, University Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón 28922, Madrid, Spain.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. Sánchez-Franco, Endocrine Service, Hospital Carlos III, C/ Sinesio Delgado, 10. Madrid 28029 (e-mail: sanchezfr{at}terra.es)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Alba M, Fintini D, Sagazio A, Lawrence B, Castaigne JP, Frohman LA, Salvatori R. Once-daily administration of CJC-1295, a long-acting growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) analog, normalizes growth in the GHRH knockout mouse. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291: E1290–E1294, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Alonso G, Sánchez-Hormigo A, Loudes C, El Yandouzi T, Carmignac D, Faivre-Bauman A, Recolin B, Epelbaum J, Robinson IC, Mollard P, Mery PF. Selective alteration at the growth-hormone- releasing-hormone nerve terminals during aging in GHRH-green fluorescent protein mice. Aging Cell 6: 197–207, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Berelowitz M, Szabo M, Frohman LA, Firestone S, Chu L, Hintz RL. Somatomedin-C mediates growth hormone negative feedback by effects on both the hypothalamus and the pituitary. Science 212: 1279–1281, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cacicedo L, Sánchez FF. Role of naloxone and opioid peptides on thyrotrophin, alpha subunit and beta thyrotrophin by dispersed rat pituitary cells. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 110: 101–106, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cattaneo L, Luoni M, Settembrini B, Müller EE, Cocchi D. Effect of long-term administration of Hexarelin on the somatotrophic axis in aged rats. Pharmacol Res 36: 49–54, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Chapman IM, Bach MA, Van CE, Farmer M, Krupa D, Taylor AM, Schilling LM, Cole KY, Skiles EH, Pezzoli SS, Hartman ML, Veldhuis JD, Gormley GJ, Thorner MO. Stimulation of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I axis by daily oral administration of a GH secretogogue (MK-677) in healthy elderly subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 4249–4257, 1996.[Abstract]
  7. Conceicao FL, Bojensen A, Jorgensen JO, Christiansen JS. Growth hormone therapy in adults. Front Neuroendocrinol 22: 213–246, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Date Y, Nakazato M, Murakami N, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Matsukura S. Ghrelin acts in the central nervous system to stimulate gastric acid secretion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280: 904–907, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. De Gennaro C, V, Zoli M, Cocchi D, Maggi A, Marrama P, Agnati LF, Müller EE. Reduced growth hormone releasing factor (GHRF)-like immunoreactivity and GHRF gene expression in the hypothalamus of aged rats. Peptides 10: 705–708, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Degli Uberti EC, Ambrosio MR, Cella SG, Margutti AR, Trasforini G, Rigamonti AE, Petrone E, Müller EE. Defective hypothalamic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone activity may contribute to declining GH secretion with age in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 2885–2888, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. de los Frailes MT, Cacicedo L, Lorenzo MJ, Sánchez-Franco F. Divergent effects of acute depolarization on somatostatin release and protein synthesis in cultured fetal and neonatal rat brain cells. J Neurochem 52: 1333–1339, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Deslauriers N, Gaudreau P, Abribat T, Renier G, Petitclerc D, Brazeau P. Dynamics of growth hormone responsiveness to growth hormone releasing factor in aging rats: peripheral and central influences. Neuroendocrinology 53: 439–446, 1991.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Englander EW, Gómez GA, Greeley GH Jr. Alterations in stomach ghrelin production and in ghrelin-induced growth hormone secretion in the aged rat. Mech Ageing Dev 125: 871–875, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Fernández G, Cacicedo L, Lorenzo MJ, de los Frailes MT, Sánchez FF. Growth hormone-releasing factor production by fetal rat cerebrocortical and hypothalamic cells in primary culture. Endocrinology 125: 1991–1998, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fernandez VG, Cacicedo L, de los Frailes MT, Lorenzo MJ, Tolón R, Sánchez FF. Growth hormone-releasing factor regulation by somatostatin, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I in fetal rat hypothalamic-brain stem cell cocultures. Neuroendocrinology 58: 655–665, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Fernández VG, Cacicedo L, Lorenzo MJ, de los Frailes MT, Lara JI, Sánchez FF. Biosynthesis of growth hormone-releasing factor by fetal rat cerebrocortical and hypothalamic cells. Peptides 15: 825–828, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Florini JR, Harned JA, Richman RA, Weiss JP. Effect of rat age on serum levels of growth-hormone and somatomedins. Mech Ageing Dev 15: 165–176, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Fodor M, Csaba Z, Kordon C, Epelbaum J. Growth hormone-releasing hormone, somatostatin, galanin and beta-endorphin afferents to the hypothalamic periventricular nucleus. J Chem Neuroanat 8: 61–73, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Forman LJ, Sonntag WE, Hylka VW, Meites J. Pituitary growth hormone and hypothalamic somatostatin in young female rats versus old constant estrous female rats. Experientia 41: 653–654, 1985.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Frago LM, Paneda C, Dickson SL, Hewson AK, Argente J, Chowen JA. Growth hormone (GH) and GH-releasing peptide-6 increase brain insulin-like growth factor-I expression and activate intracellular signaling pathways involved in neuroprotection. Endocrinology 143: 4113–4122, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Frohman LA, Kineman RD, Kamegai J, Park S, Teixeira LT, Coschigano KT, Kopchic JJ. Secretagogues and the somatotrope: signaling and proliferation. Recent Prog Horm Res 55: 269–290, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. García A, Álvarez CV, Smith RG, Diéguez C. Regulation of Pit-1 expression by ghrelin and GHRP-6 through the GH secretagogue receptor. Mol Endocrinol 15: 1484–1495, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Howard AD, Feighner SD, Cully DF, Arena JP, Liberator PA, Rosenblum CI, Hamelin M, Hreniuk DL, Palyha OC, Anderson J, Paress PS, Diaz C, Chou M, Liu KK, McKee KK, Pong SS, Chaung LY, Elbrecht A, Dashkevicz M, Heavens R, Rigby M, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Dean DC, Melillo DG, Patchett AA, Nargund R, Griffin PR, DeMartino JA, Gupta SK, Schaeffer JM, Smith RG, Van der Ploeg LH. A receptor in pituitary and hypothalamus that functions in growth hormone release. Science 273: 974–977, 1996.[Abstract]
  24. Kamegai J, Wakabayashi I, Kineman RD, Frohman LA. Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRH-R) and growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) mRNA levels during postnatal development in male and female rats. J Neuroendocrinol 11: 299–306, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Kappeler L, Zizzari P, Alliot J, Epelbaum J, Bluet-Pajot MT. Delayed age-associated decrease in growth hormone pulsatile secretion and increased orexigenic peptide expression in the Lou C/JaLL rat. Neuroendocrinology 80: 273–283, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 402: 656–660, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Korbonits M, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Grossman AB. Presence of ghrelin in normal and adenomatous human pituitary. Endocrine 14: 101–104, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 25: 402–408, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. López-Fernández J, Sánchez-Franco F, Velasco B, Tolón RM, Pazos F, Cacicedo L. Growth hormone induces somatostatin and insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in the cerebral hemispheres of aging rats. Endocrinology 137: 4384–4391, 1996.[Abstract]
  30. Miller BH, Gore AC. Alterations in hypothalamic insulin-like growth factor-I and its associations with gonadotropin releasing hormone neurones during reproductive development and ageing. J Neuroendocrinol 13: 728–736, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Morimoto N, Kawakami F, Makino S, Chihara K, Hasegawa M, Ibata Y. Age-related changes in growth hormone releasing factor and somatostatin in the rat hypothalamus. Neuroendocrinology 47: 459–464, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Muggeo M, Fedele D, Tiengo A, Molinari M, Crepaldi G. Human growth hormone and cortisol response to insulin stimulation in aging. J Gerontol 30: 546–551, 1975.
  33. Müller EE. Neural control of somatotropic function. Physiol Rev 67: 962–1053, 1987.[Free Full Text]
  34. Müller EE, Locatelli V, Cocchi D. Neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion. Physiol Rev 79: 511–607, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Nurhidayat Tsukamoto Y, Sigit K, Sasaki F. Sex differentiation of growth hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin neurons in the mouse hypothalamus: an immunohistochemical and morphological study. Brain Res 821: 309–321, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Olchovsky D, Song J, Gelato MC, Sherwood J, Spatola E, Bruno JF, Berelowitz M. Pituitary and hypothalamic insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-I receptor expression in food-deprived rats. Mol Cell Endocrinol 93: 193–198, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Parenti M, Cocchi D, Ceresoli G, Marcozzi C, Müller EE. Age-related-changes of growth-hormone secretory mechanisms in the rat pituitary-gland. J Endocrinol 131: 251–257, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. San Diego, CA: Academic, 1997.
  39. Popovic V, Damjanovic S, Micic D, Djurovic M, Diéguez C, Casanueva FF. Blocked growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP-6)-induced GH secretion and absence of the synergic action of GHRP-6 plus GH-releasing hormone in patients with hypothalamopituitary disconnection: evidence that GHRP-6 main action is exerted at the hypothalamic level. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 942–947, 1995.[Abstract]
  40. Rigamonti AE, Pincelli AI, Corra B, Viarengo R, Bonomo SM, Galimberti D, Scacchi M, Scarpini E, Cavagnini F, Müller EE. Plasma ghrelin concentrations in elderly subjects: comparison with anorexic and obese patients. J Endocrinol 175: R1–R5, 2002.[Abstract]
  41. Rudman D. Growth hormone, body composition, aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 33: 800–807, 1985.[Web of Science][Medline]
  42. Rudman D, Feller AG, Nagraj HS, Gergans GA, Lalitha PY, Goldberg AF, Schlenker RA, Cohn L, Rudman IW, Mattson DE. Effects of human growth hormone in men over 60 years old. N Engl J Med 323: 1–6, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Russell-Aulet M, Dimaraki EV, Jaffe CA, mott-Friberg R, Barkan AL. Aging-related growth hormone (GH) decrease is a selective hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone pulse amplitude mediated phenomenon. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56: M124–M129, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. San Frutos MG, Cacicedo L, Méndez CF, Vicent D, González M, Sánchez-Franco F. Pituitary alterations involved in the decline of GH gene expression in the pituitary of aging rat. J Gerontology A Biol Sci Med Sci 62: 585–597, 2007.
  45. Settembrini B, Figueroa J, Gallardo M, Chiocchio S. Growth hormone (GH) but not IGF-I-secretion is stimulated in aged rats by chronic hexarelin and GHRP-6 administration. Endocr Regul 32: 17–26, 1998.[Medline]
  46. Smith RG. Development of growth hormone secretagogues. Endocr Rev 26: 346–360, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Sonntag WE, Boyd RL, Booze RM. Somatostatin gene expression in hypothalamus and cortex of aging male rats. Neurobiol Aging 11: 409–416, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Sonntag WE, Forman LJ, Miki N, Steger RW, Ramos T, Arimura A, Meites J. Effects of CNS active drugs and somatostatin antiserum on growth hormone release in young and old male rats. Neuroendocrinology 33: 73–78, 1981.[Web of Science][Medline]
  49. Sonntag WE, Gottschall PE, Meites J. Increased secretion of somatostatin-28 from hypothalamic neurons of aged rats in vitro. Brain Res 380: 229–234, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  50. Sonntag WE, Hylka VW, Meites J. Impaired ability of old male rats to secrete growth hormone in vivo but not in vitro in response to hpGRF(1-44). Endocrinology 113: 2305–2307, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Sonntag WE, Lenham JE, Ingram RL. Effects of aging and dietary restriction on tissue protein-synthesis: relationship to plasma insulin-like growth factor-I. J Gerontol 47: B159–B163, 1992.
  52. Sonntag WE, Steger RW, Forman LJ, Meites J. Decreased pulsatile release of growth hormone in old male rats. Endocrinology 107: 1875–1879, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Sonntag WE, Xu X, Ingram RL, D'Costa A. Moderate caloric restriction alters the subcellular distribution of somatostatin mRNA and increases growth hormone pulse amplitude in aged animals. Neuroendocrinology 61: 601–608, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  54. Spik K, Sonntag WE. Increased pituitary response to somatostatin in aging male rats: relationship to somatostatin receptor number and affinity. Neuroendocrinology 50: 489–494, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
  55. Sun Y, García JM, Smith RG. Ghrelin and growth hormone secretagogue receptor expression in mice during aging. Endocrinology 148: 1323–1329, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Tannenbaum GS. Physiological role of somatostatin in regulation of pulsatile growth hormone secretion. Adv Exp Med Biol 188: 229–259, 1985.[Web of Science][Medline]
  57. Tannenbaum GS, Bowers CY. Interactions of growth hormone secretagogues and growth hormone-releasing hormone/somatostatin. Endocrine 14: 21–27, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  58. Teichman SL, Neale A, Lawrence B, Gagnon C, Castaigne JP, Frohman LA. Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting analog of GH-releasing hormone, in healthy adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 799–805, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Velasco B, Cacicedo L, Escalada J, López-Fernández J, Sánchez-Franco F. Growth hormone gene expression and secretion in aging rats is age dependent and not age-associated weight increase related. Endocrinology 139: 1314–1320, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Velasco B, Cacicedo L, Melián E, Fernández-Vázquez G, Sánchez-Franco F. Sensitivity to exogenous GH and reversibility of the reduced IGF-I gene expression in aging rats. Eur J Endocrinol 145: 73–85, 2001.[Abstract]
  61. Veldhuis JD, Iranmanesh A, Weltman A. Elements in the pathophysiology of diminished growth hormone (GH) secretion in aging humans. Endocrine 7: 41–48, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
  62. Walker RF, Yang SW, Bercu BB. Robust growth hormone (GH) secretion in aged female rats co-administered GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). Life Sci 49: 1499–1504, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  63. Wood TL, Berelowitz M, Gelato MC, Roberts CT Jr, LeRoith D, Millard WJ, McKelvy JF. Hormonal regulation of rat hypothalamic neuropeptide mRNAs: effect of hypophysectomy and hormone replacement on growth-hormone-releasing factor, somatostatin and the insulin-like growth factors. Neuroendocrinology 53: 298–305, 1991.[Web of Science][Medline]
  64. Wren AM, Small CJ, Fribbens CV, Neary NM, Ward HL, Seal LJ, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. The hypothalamic mechanisms of the hypophysiotropic action of ghrelin. Neuroendocrinology 76: 316–324, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  65. Xu X, Sonntag WE. Growth hormone and aging: regulation, signal transduction and replacement therapy. Trends Endocrinol Metab 7: 145–150, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/5/E1140    most recent
00236.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frutos, M. G.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Franco, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frutos, M. G.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Franco, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.