|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Clinical Nutrition, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal; 2Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Charité-University-Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; 3First Medical Department, Hanusch Hospital, Karl-Landsteiner Institute for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vienna, Austria; 4Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and 5Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Submitted 29 May 2007 ; accepted in final form 1 August 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
endogenous glucose production; gluconeogenesis; insulin resistance; free fatty acids; nutrigenomics; randomized controlled study
Liver-type FABP (L-FABP) accounts for up to 5% of the cytoplasmatic protein in hepatocytes (3) and is a key regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism by influencing the uptake, transport, mitochondrial oxidation, and esterification of fatty acids (1). L-FABP knockout mice that are exposed to high FFA concentrations by prolonged 48-h fasting show about 10-fold reduced liver fat (21), which might affect hepatic insulin sensitivity (31). Lower insulin concentrations in fed animals have been further reported (21), indicating improved glucose metabolism. Obviously, in humans, knockout models are not available. However, amino acid variations in L-FABP could be functionally relevant and thus exert a phenotype, particularly in lipid-exposed subjects. This is supported by observational studies showing associations of the common threonine (Thr)94-to-alanine (Ala) amino acid replacement in L-FABP with reduced body weight (7) and protection against high apolipoprotein B levels in Ala/Ala94 carriers that consume a high-fat, Western diet (24).
To date, potential contributions of amino acid variants in L-FABP to hepatic and peripheral glucose metabolism have not been reported. Thus, we first investigated all known polymorphisms leading to amino acid replacements in L-FABP. Only one of these coding polymorphisms was found in the subjects investigated, resulting in a Thr94-to-Ala amino acid replacement with a minor allele frequency of 36%. We then performed a randomized, single-blind, controlled intervention with nine healthy subjects carrying the Ala/Ala94 mutation vs. nine sex-, age-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched wild-type (Thr/Thr94) controls to assess endogenous glucose production (EGP), gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis at baseline and during 320-min lipid/heparin-insulin-glucagon-somatostatin clamps. Potential differences in lipid-induced peripheral insulin resistance between L-FABP genotypes were investigated in a substudy.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Investigation of polymorphisms in L-FABP. All known polymorphisms leading to an amino acid replacement in L-FABP (Thr94Ala, Thr54Ala, and Leu42Ala) were first genotyped in 93 subjects. In these subjects, only the Thr94Ala variant was present and subsequently investigated in 1,453 participants of our cohort of metabolically characterized volunteers.
DNA of all participants was extracted from whole blood using Magnasep magnetic beads (Agowa, Berlin, Germany). The region around the polymorphisms was amplified by PCR (Thr94Ala: upper primer 5'-ACACGCTCAGAGCACCACCA, lower primer 5'-GACAGTGGTT-CAGTTGGAAG; Thr54Ala and Leu42Val: upper primer 5'-GTCTGCCGGAAGAGC-TCATC, lower primer 5'-CTGTCATTGTCTCCAGCTCA). Amplificates were controlled by restriction enzyme digestion. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) diagnostic was performed by primer elongation using SnuPE (Thr94Ala: 5'-GGTGACAATAAACTGGTGACA; Thr54Ala: 5'-CTTCAAGTTCA-CCATCACC; Leu42Val: 5'-TCAAGGGGGTGTCGGAAATC; Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). Detection was performed on a MegaBACE 1000 (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) using SNP profiler 1.0 software.
Participants of the intervention trial. The experimental protocol was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written, informed consent. Healthy carriers of the homozygous Ala/Ala94 mutation with normal fasting glucose and normal glucose tolerance were recruited from 1,453 characterized volunteers. Exclusion criteria were impaired glucose metabolism as indicated by an oral glucose tolerance test, menstrual irregularities, a history of smoking, or a medication with cortisone. For nine of the subjects willing to participate, age-, sex-, and BMI-matched wild-type (Thr/Thr94) controls were selected (Table 1). Subjects were invited in random order according to their availability for participation in the study. The participants of the study and the researchers that performed the laboratory analyses were not aware of the L-FABP genotype. Fertile female subjects were studied in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Subjects were instructed to maintain normal physical activity for 3 days before all study days.
|
|
4.4 mmol/l. Plasma FFA concentrations were raised from 0 min to +320 min by a constant lipid infusion (20% Deltalipid LCT; Deltaselect, Pfullingen, Germany) combined with heparin (Heparin-Natrium-25000-ratiopharm; Merckle, Blaubeuren, Germany) (Fig. 1A). Plasma glucose concentrations were allowed to rise freely after the start of the lipid/heparin infusion.
|
30 min) and throughout the lipid infusion period, arterialized plasma glucose was adjusted at 4.4 mmol/l. Assays. Blood samples were drawn at timed intervals from –150 min to +320 min and immediately chilled and centrifuged, and the supernatants were stored at –80°C until analysis. Arterialized plasma glucose concentrations were measured immediately, using the glucose oxidase method on a Dr. Müller Super-GL glucose analyzer (Freital, Germany). Results for plasma glucose concentrations were confirmed after the experiments, using reagents from ABX Diagnostics (Montpellier, France) on a Pentra 400 (Horiba ABX Diagnostics). Measurements of C-peptide and insulin in serum and FFA, cholesterol, and triacylglycerols in plasma were performed as previously described (30). Plasma apolipoprotein B was measured on a Cobas-Mira (Roche, Lörrach, Germany), using reagents from ABX Diagnostics [intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) 1.9%]. Plasma glucagon was measured by RIA (intra-assay CV 4.4%; DPC Biermann, Bad Nauheim, Germany). Serum growth hormone concentrations were measured using a two-phase chemoluminescence immunometric assay [Immulite 2000 growth hormone (human growth hormone), intra-assay CV 3.7%; DPC, Los Angeles, CA].
Assessment of EGP. For calculation of EGP (in mg·kg–1·min–1), a primed [0.06 (mg) x body wt (kg) x fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl), from –120 to –115 min], continuous [0.27 (mg) x body wt (kg), from –115 to +320 min] infusion of [6,6-2H2]glucose 99% (Euriso-Top, Saarbrücken, Germany) was administered. A basal period of 100 min was allowed for tracer equilibration. The priming dose was adjusted to fasting glucose concentrations to avoid overestimation of glucose production rates (17).
Assessment of the contribution of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis to EGP. At –150 min, subjects started to drink a total of 5 g 2H2O (99.9%; Euriso-Top) per kilogram body water, divided into four equal doses spaced at intervals of 45 min (17), for the assessment of gluconeogenesis. This was followed by free access to 0.5% 2H2O in tap water throughout the study to maintain isotopic steady state (Fig. 1A) (18). Body water was assumed to be 50% of body weight in women and 60% in men (18). Enrichments of 2H in the hydrogens bound to carbon 2 (C2) and carbon 5 (C5) of blood glucose were measured as previously detailed (9, 18, 27). 2H enrichment in plasma water was measured by an exchange with acetone as described by Yang et al. (33).
Calculations. Rates of EGP were determined from the tracer infusion rate of D-[6,6-2H2]glucose and its enrichment to the hydrogens bound to carbon 6 divided by the mean percent enrichment of plasma D-[6,6-2H2]glucose. Because tracer-to-tracee ratios were constant after 300 min, steady-state equations were appropriate for calculation of EGP. The percent contribution of gluconeogenesis to EGP was set to the ratio of 2H enrichment at C5 to that at C2. The percent contribution of glycogenolysis was calculated as [1 – (C5/C2)] x 100, and absolute contributions of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis were calculated by multiplying their percent contributions by the rate of EGP (29). Metabolic clearance rate of glucose (expressed in ml·kg–1·min–1) was calculated from the rate of disappearance of glucose divided by the mean glucose concentration over the respective time period (23). Whole body glucose disposal (M value) in the substudy was calculated from the glucose infusion rate (14). Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as [fasting insulin (mU/l) x fasting glucose (mmol/l)/22.5].
Statistical analyses. Results are presented as means ± SE. The genotypes of the entire cohort were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test (when comparing 3 categories) or Mann-Whitney test (when comparing two categories). The age-adjusted comparison was performed using analysis of covariances. For this purpose, BMI was 1/square root transformed to achieve normal distribution regarding the Kolmogoroff-Smirnoff test.
The age-, sex-, and BMI-matched subjects (Ala/Ala94 carriers vs. wild types) were compared using two-tailed Student's t-test for paired analysis or two-way-ANOVA with the Huynh-Feldt epsilon procedure as correction factor. Results from the substudy were compared using two-tailed Student's t-test for unpaired samples. Total area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the trapezoid method. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Calculations were performed using SPSS version 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There was, however, a significant difference in BMI (Thr/Thr wild types 29.5 ± 0.3, Thr/Ala 28.6 ± 0.2, Ala/Ala94 carriers 28.4 ± 0.4 kg/m2, P for comparing 3 categories = 0.04). This was explained by the difference in BMI between wild types (Thr/Thr) and Ala carriers (Thr/Ala or Ala/Ala). BMI of Ala carriers (28.6 ± 0.2 kg/m2) was significantly lower than the BMI of wild types (P = 0.012). Because of the significant difference in age (51.5 ± 0.6, 52.3 ± 0.5, 54.9 ± 1.0 yr, P for comparing 3 categories = 0.01), we additionally performed an age-adjusted comparison of BMI (P for comparing the 3 genotypes = 0.01, P for comparing wild types vs. Ala carriers = 0.003), which confirmed the lower BMI in Ala carriers compared with the wild types.
Characteristics of the subjects enrolled into the intervention studies. The matched subjects of the intervention trial (n = 18) did not differ in baseline parameters (Table 1).
EGP, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis without lipid challenge (baseline study). Before the pancreatic clamp was started in 10-h overnight-fasted subjects (Fig. 1A), there were no significant differences in rates of EGP (wild types 1.92 ± 0.08 vs. Ala/Ala94 carriers 1.99 ± 0.12 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.62), gluconeogenesis (0.96 ± 0.04 vs. 0.98 ± 0.04 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.69), and glycogenolysis (0.96 ± 0.09 vs. 1.00 ± 0.10 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.75) between L-FABP genotypes.
Pancreatic clamp study: peripheral concentrations (somatostatin-insulin-glucagon clamp). After start of the lipid/heparin infusions, FFA increased from +30 min (P < 0.001) and rose further within the range seen in uncontrolled diabetes from 240 min (>1.5 mmol/l), with no difference between groups (P = 0.86; Fig. 2A). After the start of somatostatin infusion, C-peptide concentrations decreased, indicating inhibition of insulin secretion with no difference between L-FABP genotypes (P = 0.64; Fig. 2B). Insulin and glucagon were replaced within the low fasting range, with no difference between groups (molar insulin/glucagon ratio between L-FABP genotypes, P = 0.42; Fig. 2, C and D). In the overnight-fasted state, growth hormone levels tended to be higher in Ala/Ala94 carriers but were not significantly different between L-FABP genotypes (P = 0.185; Fig. 2E), with high variance very likely to be explained by the known pulsatile secretion pattern of this hormone. Upon somatostatin infusion, growth hormone levels were completely suppressed in all subjects. There was no difference in growth hormone concentrations between L-FABP genotypes (P = 0.187, –150 to +320 min; Fig. 2E). Upon lipid challenge, plasma glucose levels were increased significantly less in Ala/Ala94 carriers compared with the wild types (P < 0.0001; Fig. 2G). Glucose concentrations expressed as AUC470min were reduced in Ala/Ala94 carriers vs. wild types (AUC470min 2,305 ± 72 vs. 2,503 ± 92 mmol·l–1·min–1, P = 0.002). Differences in plasma glucose concentrations between L-FABP genotypes were statistically significant from 180 min of lipid/heparin infusion.
Tracer-to-tracee ratios determined at 310 vs. 300 min and at 320 vs. 300 min were constant both in wild types (2.00 ± 0.12 vs. 2.01 ± 0.11, P = 0.54, and 1.99 ± 0.11 vs. 2.01 ± 0.11, P = 0.41) and in Ala/Ala94 carriers (2.21 ± 0.16 vs. 2.22 ± 0.16, P = 0.52, and 2.21 ± 0.16 vs. 2.22 ± 0.16, P = 0.45).
EGP, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis in lipid-exposed subjects (somatostatin-insulin-glucagon clamp). When genotype (Ala/Ala94 carriers vs. wild types) and treatment (basal state vs. lipid infusion) were included in one model, two-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of the lipid treatment (P = 0.005) and a genotype-vs.-treatment interaction (P = 0.009) but no effect of the genotype per se (P = 0.78), indicating that lipid exposure was necessary to detect differences in EGP between L-FABP genotypes. During lipid infusion, EGP significantly decreased in Ala/Ala94 carriers (from 1.99 ± 0.12 to 1.69 ± 0.14 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.002), and this decrease was attenuated and not statistically significant in wild types (from 1.92 ± 0.08 to 1.82 ± 0.09 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.087). Relative to baseline, changes in EGP after 320-min lipid/heparin infusion were significantly different between genotypes (P = 0.007; Fig. 2F). Glucose infusion rates required to prevent a somatostatin-induced decrease of plasma glucose during the first hours of the somatostatin clamps (maximal rates 1.38 ± 0.24 vs. 1.01 ± 0.19 mg·kg–1·min–1 over 5 min, P = 0.18; time of maximal rates 80 ± 32 vs. 75 ± 2 min, P = 0.64) and metabolic clearance rates of glucose (1.54 ± 0.20 vs. 1.40 ± 0.21 ml·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.59) were not significantly different between Ala/Ala94 carriers and wild types.
Both glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis contribute to EGP. The contribution of glycogenolysis to EGP after 320-min lipid/heparin infusion was significantly lower in Ala/Ala94 carriers vs. wild types (0.46 ± 0.05 vs. 0.59 ± 0.05 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.013). Compared with the baseline, glycogenolysis was reduced by 54% in Ala/Ala94 carriers (P < 0.001) and by 38% in wild types (P < 0.001), and these reductions were significantly different between genotypes (P = 0.015) (Fig. 2F).
For the contribution of gluconeogenesis to EGP, there was an effect of lipid treatment (P = 0.003) but neither an effect of genotype per se (P = 0.83) nor a genotype-vs.-treatment interaction (P = 0.78). Gluconeogenesis increased by 29% in wild types (P = 0.003) and by 25% in Ala/Ala94 carriers (P = 0.015) during lipid treatment, with no difference between the genotypes (absolute rates P = 0.97, baseline changes P = 0.65; Fig. 2F). These results indicate that lipid/heparin infusions affected EGP and contribution of glycogenolysis dependent on the L-FABP genotype, whereas gluconeogenesis increased independently of the genotype.
Whole body glucose disposal in overnight-fasted and lipid-exposed subjects (substudy). Steady-state conditions were reached after 150 ± 7 min. Thereafter, lipid/heparin infusions were added for an additional 320 min (Fig. 1B). M values decreased in lipid-exposed subjects (6.93 ± 0.59 vs. 5.67 ± 0.75 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.020; n = 13), reflecting lipid-induced peripheral insulin resistance. When comparing age-, sex-, and BMI-matched L-FABP genotypes (4 of the matched pairs from the main study), M values were not significantly different between L-FABP genotypes in the overnight-fasted state and even tended to be higher in wild types (7.04 ± 0.65 vs. 4.98 ± 0.64 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.19), which was also in agreement with the estimated insulin resistance in nine matched pairs, as calculated with HOMA-IR (Table 1). After lipid exposure, there was not any difference in M values between L-FABP wild types and Ala/Ala94 carriers (3.89 ± 1.14 vs. 4.74 ± 0.62 mg·kg–1·min–1, P = 0.85). There was no difference in apolipoprotein B concentrations between lipid-exposed L-FABP genotypes (0.76 ± 0.07 vs. 0.75 ± 0.09 g/l, P = 0.92).
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the non-lipid-exposed, overnight-fasted state, commonly used markers of glucose metabolism such as fasting glucose, fasting insulin, or HOMA-IR were not different between L-FABP genotypes. In contrast, plasma glucose concentrations markedly increased in wild types vs. Ala/Ala94 carriers when FFA concentrations were raised about threefold above fasting levels, which is within the range seen in obese subjects postprandially after a high-fat meal (13). This was explained mainly by higher rates of glycogenolysis in wild types, whereas lipid-induced increases in gluconeogenesis were comparable between L-FABP genotypes. Although more pronounced hyperglycemia per se should be expected to inhibit hepatic glucose production (11), lipid challenge appeared to interfere with this inhibitory effect, suggesting more severe FFA-induced impairment of hepatic autoregulation in L-FABP wild types.
It has recently been reported that plasma glucose can rise in lipid-exposed subjects, despite unaltered or even decreased rates of EGP (26, 29), due to lipid-induced reduction of whole body glucose disposal (16, 25). Because L-FABP is expressed mainly in hepatocytes and enterocytes (3), differences in whole body glucose disposal between matched L-FABP genotypes after intravenous administration of lipids were unlikely. However, to exclude this possibility, a substudy was performed with the same participants on separate study days, which showed lipid-induced reduction of whole body glucose disposal in all subjects, as expected (16), but no differences between L-FABP genotypes. This is again in agreement with the phenotype described in lipid-exposed L-FABP knockout mice (22).
We can further confirm the previously reported association of the Ala94 allele with reduced body weight (7) in a larger cohort. Because lipid-induced increases in plasma glucose under nonclamp conditions are accompanied by increased insulin secretion, and hyperglycemic-hyperinsulinemic conditions have been shown to inhibit fatty acid oxidation (28), this could be a contributing factor to the observed differences in body weight between L-FABP genotypes.
The rationale for choosing the specific experimental setup in the present study needs to be discussed. In vitro, FFA increase gluconeogenesis through the activation of key gluconeogenic factors (32). However, in vivo, lipid-induced changes in gluconeogenesis were not generally associated with changes in EGP (5, 26, 29), which can be partly explained by hepatic autoregulation with a matched decrease of glycogenolysis (12). Therefore, in addition to determining EGP, in the present study we also measured the contribution of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis to EGP. Generally, clamp studies cannot completely reflect the complex metabolic situation observed in the postprandial state, e.g., after the intake of a high-fat meal. When using hyperinsulinemic clamps, elevation of FFA concentrations is known to impair insulin-mediated suppression of EGP (4). However, hyperinsulinemic conditions might obscure effects of FFA particularly on glycogenolysis, which is known to be sensitive even to very small increases in insulin concentrations (10, 15). In studies not using clamp conditions, another problem arises in that FFA potently increase insulin secretion (4). To circumvent these potential problems we used an infusion of somatostatin and the replacement of insulin and glucagon at low fasting doses, which allowed plasma glucose concentrations to increase freely in response to lipid infusion (6, 26) and was furthermore likely to reduce potential interference of higher insulin doses, particularly with glycogenolysis.
The experimental conditions for matched Ala/Ala94 carriers and wild types were identical in the present study. Potential differences in somatostatin responsiveness between L-FABP genotypes were unlikely, as indicated by near-complete somatostatin-induced suppression of C-peptide and growth hormone concentrations in all subjects, with no difference between L-FABP genotypes. However, the chosen experimental design might have been advantageous for a proof of principle, and we cannot exclude that the metabolic effects of systemic vs. portal lipid administration might be distinct. In addition, we investigated healthy persons with normal glucose metabolism, and potential effects of the Ala/Ala94 variant in patients with high blood lipids, diabetes, and obesity are as yet unknown. Another important limitation was the small number of participants in the intervention studies. However, phenotypical differences between lipid-exposed L-FABP genotypes in the present study were pronounced, statistically significant, and are in agreement with the phenotype observed in L-FABP knockout mice (22).
In conclusion, the common Ala/Ala94 amino acid variant in L-FABP contributed significantly to decreased hepatic glycogenolysis and less severe hyperglycemia in lipid-challenged humans. Investigation of L-FABP phenotypes in the basal, overnight-fasted state yielded only incomplete information. It can be hypothesized that L-FABP may not play a significant role in a normal diet but may contribute to disturbed glucose metabolism in a high-fat diet.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |