|
|
||||||||
1Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 2Chair of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Milan, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
Submitted 28 July 2006 ; accepted in final form 2 April 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
unacylated ghrelin
10 times the concentration of ghrelin (25). GHS-R1a signals via G
11 to stimulate inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate generation and Ca2+ release and has constitutive activity (18, 19). GHS-R1a gene expression is limited to the hypothalamus and pituitary and a few other peripheral tissues (15, 33, 37). In contrast, ghrelin gene expression is widespread among tissues in humans, including the adrenal cortex (15, 35). Acylated ghrelin stimulates the release of growth hormone (GH), as well as prolactin and ACTH, from the anterior pituitary gland. However, much recent evidence suggests numerous other functions for ghrelin at the periphery, including effects on cell proliferation (1, 3, 20, 22, 23, 32). Interestingly, there is also evidence suggesting that unacylated ghrelin can modulate cellular function and body growth. For example, transgenic mice that overexpress unacylated ghrelin are smaller than their wild-type counterparts (2), direct treatment with unacylated ghrelin alters adipogenesis in the bone marrow of rats (34), and in vitro unacylated ghrelin inhibits apoptosis of human cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells (3). We also have demonstrated effects of unacylated ghrelin in primary hepatocytes (14) and fetal osteoblasts (13) in vitro. Because unacylated ghrelin cannot activate the GHS-R1a at physiological concentrations, it has been suggested that these effects are mediated by an alternative receptor. This possibility has recently been substantiated in vivo, whereby centrally administered unacylated ghrelin was shown to stimulate feeding in GHS-R1a gene-deleted mice (36). Recent work has demonstrated the expression of preproghrelin mRNA in the human adrenal cortex (9, 35). In addition, transcripts for ghrelin's cognate receptor, GHS-R1a, have been identified in human adrenocortical tissues (8, 30). A functional result of this coexpression was found to be the proliferative effect of acylated ghrelin on adrenocortical cell growth, as shown in primary cell cultures (30). The effects of exogenous acylated ghrelin were blocked by the GHS-R1a antagonist [D-Lys3]growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 (GHRP6), suggesting the involvement of GHS-R1a in the proliferative effect.
Adrenocortical carcinoma is a relatively rare disease in the human population (24). However, since the majority of tumors do not cause clinical manifestations (so-called nonfunctional tumors), with only a small proportion causing endocrine disorders, adrenocortical carcinomas are usually diagnosed late, by which time they have already metastasized (11, 27). Thus the prognosis for patients with this type of adrenocortical tumor is very poor, with a mean survival rate of 20% at 5 yr (29). Surgical and chemotherapeutic approaches have proved relatively ineffective treatments, and the identification of new means of treatment seems necessary (24). The development of adrenocortical carcinomas probably involves autocrine overexpression of particular growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) (11). However, the biology of these tumors is not completely characterized, since they are heterogeneous and may not all express high levels of these factors. The findings that the adrenal cortex expresses ghrelin and its cognate receptor and that ghrelin appears to be a growth factor for other cell types suggested to us that acylated and unacylated ghrelin may be relevant growth factors for adrenocortical tumor cells.
The aims of this study were to determine whether acylated and unacylated ghrelin could be proliferative auto/paracrine factors for adrenocortical tumor cell growth and, if so, to determine whether receptors relevant to this growth stimulatory effect are expressed in these cells. The model we have chosen is the SW-13 cell line, since it is so-called nonfunctional (derived from the most poorly diagnosed form of adrenocortical tumor). Moreover, under basal conditions, SW-13 cells, unlike the other commonly utilized adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295R (28), express relatively low levels of the potent growth factor IGF-II, meaning that the potential growth effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin can be distinguished.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell growth experiments. Cells were seeded in a volume of 100 µl at a density of 2,000 cells/well in 96-well plates and allowed to attach overnight, and then their medium was replaced with media containing the various treatments described in RESULTS. The peptides used were as follows: acylated ghrelin and [D-Lys3]GHRP-6 were obtained from NeoMPS (Strasbourg, France), unacylated-ghrelin was synthesized by Thera Technologies (Montreal, QC, Canada), and astressin2B was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
For tritiated thymidine uptake experiments, [3H]thymidine (Amersham, Little Chalfont, UK) was added on day 3 following the start of treatment to a concentration of 1 µCi/ml, and the cells were incubated for a further 7 h at 37°C, 5% CO2, in a humidified incubator. The cells were then harvested onto fiberglass mats using a Tomtec Harvester96 (Hamden, CT), and radioactivity was measured with a Wallac MicroBeta scintillation counter.
To assess changes in DNA content, we seeded cells in 24-well plates at a density of 10,000 cells·ml1·well1. After 24 h, the cell culture medium was replaced with 1 ml of medium containing acylated or unacylated ghrelin (quadruplicate wells). Three days later, the cellular DNA content was measured using the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33258 (Boehringer Diagnostics, La Jolla, CA).
For WST1 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) assays, cells were maintained in treatment medium for 6 days with a complete change of medium at day 3. The timing of the assay was closely evaluated following a growth curve analysis using WST1 (data not shown). On the basis of this analysis, we used an assay time of 6 days, although some experiments were terminated at day 3 to examine more acute growth effects. On the day of assay, 5 µl of WST1 diluted with 5 µl of medium were added to each well, and the cells were incubated for a further 3 h at 37°C, 5% CO2, in a humidified incubator. Absorbance readings of each well at 450 nm were taken using a Wallac Victor2 multiplate reader. Data are expressed as percentages of absorbance readings from control wells.
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and PCR.
Total RNA was isolated from cells grown in six-well plates (50,000 cells/well) grown for 5 days and then processed using an RNA isolation kit (Roche). RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop UV spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). Total RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed using oligo(dT)18 primers and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. Complementary DNAs were then assayed for preproghrelin mRNA. One-step TaqMan real-time PCR was performed with an ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (PE Biosystems, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Samples were assayed in duplicate and normalized for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) mRNA. Reactions without reverse transcriptase were included to check for genomic DNA contamination. Primer and probe sequences were as follows: preproghrelin, forward 5'-gggcagaggatgaactggaa, reverse 5'-cctggctgtgctgctggta, probe 5'-FAM-tccggttcaacgcc-TAMRA; and HPRT, forward 5'-tgctttccttggtcaggcagtat, reverse 5'-tcaaatccaacaaagtctggcttatatc, probe 5'-FAM-caagcttgcgaccttgaccatctttgga-TAMRA (17). Data presented are relative mRNA levels calculated as 2
Ct, where 
Ct = Ctpreproghrelin CtHPRT (7).
Qualitative RT-PCR of GHS-R1a, using primers described by Kim et al. (23), and corticotrophin-releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF-R2) also were performed using the following primers, generating 247- and 358-bp products, respectively: GHS-R1a, forward 5'-cctcgctcagggaccagaacca -3', reverse 5'-gccacccggtacttcttggacat-3'; and CRF-R2, forward 5'-gcctatcgagaatgcttgga-3', reverse 5'-tggtcaccacgaagtagttga-3'. The reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 µl using a GeneAmp 9600 system. The cycling protocol was 94°C for 2 min; 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 2 min repeated for 40 cycles; and a final extension phase at 72°C for 5 min.
Ghrelin protein expression. To examine whether the SW-13 cells secrete ghrelin, we measured its release into serum-free medium in vitro. Briefly, 3.5 x 105 SW-13 cells were seeded into the wells of six-well plates. After 48 h, the cells were washed twice with 0.9% saline and once with serum-free medium. The cells were then incubated for 24 h in 1 ml of medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA fraction V; Roche). The medium was then collected, and 50 µl were assayed for acylated ghrelin by radioimmunoassay (active ghrelin kit; Linco Research, St. Charles, MO) following the manufacturer's protocol. Nonconditioned medium (50 µl) containing 0.1% BSA was assayed as a control.
Cell cycle analysis. Cells (4 x 105) were plated in six-well plates (Corning Costar, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). After 10 h of incubation, medium was changed with medium lacking (control group) or containing 10 nM acylated or unacylated ghrelin. Treatments were performed in duplicate in two independent experiments. After 24 h, cells were harvested by gentle trypsinization and prepared for cell cycle determination, as previously described (39), using propidium iodide for DNA staining. The stained cells were analyzed by FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium) and CellQuest Pro Software (Becton Dickinson; Macintosh version). Cell cycle progression was measured with corresponding absorbances for G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases, whereas apoptosis was assessed by quantifying the sub-G0 peak.
Measurement of apoptosis. We first substantiated the effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on apoptosis by measuring DNA fragmentation. Cells were seeded at 1 x 105 cells/well in 24-well plates. Three days later, the cell culture medium was replaced with 1 ml/well of medium containing acylated or unacylated ghrelin at 10 nM. After 24 h, apoptosis was assessed using a commercially available ELISA kit (Cell Death Detection ELISAPlus; Roche Diagnostic, Penzberg, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol. Data are from three independent experiments (n = 4), expressed as percentages of untreated control.
To assess caspase activity, we measured the ability of lysates from treated SW-13 cells to cleave a luminogenic substrate (containing the tetrapeptide DEVD) that is specific for the effector caspases-3 and -7 by using the Caspase Glo 3/7 kit (Bio-Rad, Madison, WI). To do this, we seeded white-walled 96-well plates with 1 x 104 cells/well. After 24 h, their growth medium was replaced with 100 µl of medium containing either 10 or 100 nM acylated or unacylated ghrelin. After 24 h of treatment, 100 µl of reconstituted Caspase Glo 3/7 reagent was added to each well, and the plate was mixed for 30 s on a plate shaker. Thirty minutes later, luminescence was measured using a Wallac Victor2 multiplate reader. Data are reported from two independent experiments (n = 4), expressed as percentages of untreated control.
Data analysis. All data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Fisher's protected least significant difference post hoc test (Statview, v.5, Macintosh).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
150% of control levels at 10 nM of each peptide (Fig. 2, A and B).
|
90% of the added ghrelin was lost from the medium within 24 h, as measured by radioimmunoassay. Since ghrelin can be rapidly deacylated and proteolyzed in cell culture conditions, we tested a stabilized form, [Dap-octanoyl3]ghrelin (5), and hexarelin to determine whether the cells responded in a manner similar to other GH secretagogues. [Dap-octanoyl3]ghrelin and hexarelin had potent effects on SW-13 cell growth, again peaking at
200% of controls at 10 nM of each peptide (Fig. 2, C and D). The growth effect of these peptides was also dose dependent. SW-13 cells in regular culture consist of two subtypes (16), vimentin positive (vim+) and vimentin negative (vim). Since a previous report suggested a different growth response to ghrelin in SW-13 cells (4), we examined whether these cell subtypes responded differentially to acylated and unacylated ghrelin, perhaps explaining the conflicting results. However, we found that these sublines both showed increased proliferation in response to acylated and unacylated ghrelin and that there was no significant differential response by either subclone to acylated and unacylated ghrelin (Fig. 3, A and B). Furthermore, their response was relatively blunted compared with our standard SW-13 cell-line. Again, in concordance with our findings in SW-13 cells, another human adrenocortical cell line, NCI-H295R, also showed a proliferative response to acylated and unacylated ghrelin (Fig. 3C), but this was again blunted and apparently biphasic, with a decreased response to 100 nM peptide and a maximal response at about 1 nM. NCI-H295R cells express IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) and IGF-II mRNAs; therefore, we examined whether ghrelin or unacylated ghrelin might modulate IGF-IR and IGF-II gene expression in a way that could explain the increase in proliferation. However, after 24 h of treatment with 10 nM peptide, we were unable to detect any effect of ghrelin or unacylated ghrelin on the level of expression of these genes (data not shown).
|
|
Antagonism of GHS-R1a and CRF-R2. We next examined the effects of well-characterized antagonists of GHS-R1a and CRF-R2, [D-Lys3]GHRP-6 and astressin2B, respectively. Using [D-Lys3]GHRP6, we attempted to block the growth response of the cells to acylated and unacylated ghrelin. In this separate set of experiments, 10 nM acylated and unacylated ghrelin again stimulated SW-13 growth measured using WST1 (Fig. 4B). We found that at 100 µM, [D-Lys3]GHRP6 completely abrogated the growth response to both of these peptides and suppressed the growth of untreated cells. However, we found that the selective CRF-R2 antagonist astressin2B, at 2 µM (IC50 = 1.3 nM), had no significant effect on unacylated ghrelin-stimulated proliferation of SW-13 cells (Fig. 4C).
Ghrelin expression.
Preproghrelin mRNA was readily detectable using our TaqMan-based real-time RT-PCR assay. Preproghrelin gene expression was found to be significantly downregulated by ghrelin treatment to
50% of control levels at 10 and 100 nM (P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively; Fig. 5A). In contrast, unacylated ghrelin had an inductive effect, almost doubling expression relative to controls at 100 nM (P < 0.01) and having a significant effect down to a concentration of 1 nM (Fig. 5B). These results could not be explained by regulation of HPRT, the housekeeping gene we used to normalize the ghrelin data.
|
6.8 pM at 24 h. Medium that had not been conditioned by cells contained no detectable ghrelin. Effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on cell cycle and apoptosis. The effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on cell proliferation would be expected to be linked to modulation of some aspect of the cell cycle. Cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry (4 experiments with 20,000 cells per run) demonstrated that although neither ghrelin nor unacylated ghrelin (10 nM) significantly altered the proportion of cells in the G0/G1, S, or G2/M phases, they caused a consistent decrease in the number of cells in sub-G0, indicative of cells undergoing apoptosis (Fig. 6A).
|
To further substantiate, and provide a more mechanistic explanation for, our cell cycle analysis and cell death ELISA results, we examined the effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on effector caspase activity in SW-13 cells. We found that the rate of cleavage of a luminogenic substrate specific for the effector caspases-3 and -7 containing the tetrapeptide DEVD was suppressed following treatment of the SW-13 cells with 10 and 100 nM acylated and unacylated ghrelin (Fig. 6C). At 10 nM, unacylated ghrelin suppressed caspase-3/7 activity by 20%, whereas 10 nM acylated ghrelin suppressed caspase activity by 10%. This confirms the cell cycle analysis and cell death ELISA data, which indicate that unacylated ghrelin is more potent at blocking apoptosis of SW-13 cells than acylated ghrelin.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20% suppression of SW-13 cell proliferation by ghrelin in the 10100 nM range using the methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) assay (4) and 4060% induction of apoptotic rate (6). The tetrazolium salts MTT and WST1 used in these proliferation assays are very similar, except that WST1 is cleaved in cells to form a soluble formazan that can be measured directly in the medium of the cells. Together with supporting evidence using other end points that we have used, we do not think that it is the method of determining proliferative rate that accounts for the contrasting findings. We thought that a possible explanation for these different findings might be linked to heterogeneity in the SW-13 cell line (16), which consists of at least two subtypes characterized by the presence or absence of vimentin expression. For this reason, we examined whether these sublines would respond differently to acylated and unacylated ghrelin but found that there was no overall differential proliferative effect of these peptides. Furthermore, the growth of another human adrenocortical tumor cell line, NCI-H295R, was increased by acylated and unacylated ghrelin, but to a lesser extent than SW-13 cells. NCI-H295R cells express high levels of IGF-II (mRNA and secreted protein), which means that they are probably already close to their maximal growth rate, perhaps explaining why acylated and unacylated ghrelin have a relatively lower potency. The SW-13 cells express extremely low levels, if any, of GHS-R1a mRNA, which fits the phenotype of adrenocortical carcinomas, which appear to express low levels of this gene (4). However, SW-13 cells were still capable of responding to ghrelin. To address this issue, we attempted to block the growth response to ghrelin using the GHS-R1a antagonist [D-Lys3]GHRP6. We found that this antagonist blocked ghrelin-induced proliferation of SW-13 cells, which is consistent with a GHS-R1a-mediated response. However, [D-Lys3]GHRP-6 also blocked the growth response to unacylated ghrelin. This could be explained by acylation, or activation, of unacylated ghrelin before its activity in stimulating growth. Currently, there is no evidence either way that unacylated ghrelin can be modified in this way outside the cell. Another possible explanation is that there is an alternative receptor that mediates the response to ghrelin and unacylated ghrelin in SW-13 cells and whose activity is antagonized by binding [D-Lys3]GHRP-6.
Acylated ghrelin is inactivated in culture medium over time, and this process is probably dependent on cell-derived proteases (21) or the removal of the octanoyl side chain by esterases (12). A study described by Muccioli et al. (31) using adipocytes suggests a very rapid removal of ghrelin from cell culture medium, with levels declining to 10% of starting values within 3 h of incubation. However, our finding that the stabilized ghrelin analog [Dap-octanoyl3]ghrelin had similar, if not more potent, effects on cell growth than native ghrelin suggests that the induction of proliferation that we have observed can be attributed to acylated ghrelin.
Intriguingly, acylated and unacylated ghrelin regulate preproghrelin gene expression, but with opposing effects. Acylated ghrelin downregulates its own transcription, perhaps via a classic negative feedback loop. Potentially, this would suppress both acylated and unacylated ghrelin expression. On the other hand, we found that unacylated ghrelin stimulated ghrelin gene expression. This suggests that failure of the cells to acylate ghrelin could lead to overexpression of the ghrelin gene, which in turn might contribute to tumorigenesis and/or tumor-like growth rates in these cells. Thus inactivation of the mechanism for acylation of ghrelin and/or an increase in the rate of deacylation could be an important tumorigenic signal(s). Our finding that SW-13 cells express the preproghrelin gene complements similar findings in the adrenal cortex (1). Importantly, we also found that these cells secrete ghrelin, and together with the suppressive effects of a GHSR antagonist on basal proliferative rate, this strongly suggests an auto/paracrine role for this peptide.
Both acylated and unacylated ghrelin increase SW-13 cell growth through reduction of apoptotic rate, at least partly by suppressing effector caspase-3/7 activity. The growth of adrenocortical cells is modulated by a potent antiapoptotic hormone, IGF-II, and it was possible that acylated and unacylated ghrelin could modulate the expression and/or function of this growth factor. Therefore, we examined whether the gene expression of the IGF-1R and/or IGF-II were regulated by these peptides in SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells. SW-13 cells express low, whereas H295 cells express high, levels of the IGF-II gene, and both express IGF-1R mRNA. Nevertheless, we were unable to demonstrate any regulation of these genes by ghrelin or unacylated ghrelin (data not shown), suggesting that their effects are not mediated by the auto/paracrine IGF system in these cells.
The mechanism for unacylated ghrelin signal transduction is not currently understood. Unacylated ghrelin is known not to activate the GHS-R1a at physiological concentrations (5). Recent evidence from an in vivo model of unacylated ghrelin action suggests the involvement of the CRF-R2. In a recent report, Chen et al. (10) showed that specific antagonism of central CRF-R2 can block at least some of the effects of unacylated ghrelin, such as decreased food intake and the regulation of motor activity in the gastric antrum. Since this receptor may also mediate the proliferative response to unacylated ghrelin, we examined its gene expression in SW-13 cells and found that it was present. However, the effects of unacylated ghrelin on cell growth could not be blocked with the potent selective antagonist astressin2B, suggesting that CRF-R2 does not mediate unacylated ghrelin induced proliferation in these cells. Recently, additional compelling evidence for an alternative receptor has been demonstrated in GHS-R1a knockout mice (36). The feeding response of these mice is augmented by central administration of unacylated ghrelin, indicating the presence of an alternative receptor for this peptide hormone, at least centrally. However, currently there is no direct proof of a specific receptor for unacylated ghrelin.
In conclusion, we have shown a growth stimulatory effect of both acylated and unacylated ghrelin on the adrenocortical carcinoma cell line SW-13. Our findings fit well with observations on the proliferative effects of ghrelin on primary adrenocortical cells (30, 35) and the local expression of ghrelin in the majority of adrenocortical tumors (4), although contrasting with two other reports (4, 6). The expression of preproghrelin mRNA and ghrelin protein by SW-13 cells suggests that ghrelin, and perhaps also unacylated ghrelin, may act as auto/paracrine factors in adrenocortical tumor growth, perhaps even tumorigenesis, and this is substantiated by our finding that [D-Lys3]GHRP6 antagonizes not only ghrelin-stimulated but also basal cell growth. The proliferative response to unacylated ghrelin suggests at least one new receptor-mediated signaling pathway in these cells. The absence of consistently expressed GHS-R1a and the ability of [D-Lys3]GHRP6 to block both acylated and unacylated ghrelin effects suggest that this receptor could bind all three peptide ligands. Finally, the finding that astressin2B does not block the unacylated ghrelin effect suggests that its mechanism of action in these cells does not involve the CRF-R2. Further work is required to determine the significance of acylated and unacylated ghrelin as growth factors and potential tumorigenic agents in adrenocortical cancer.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a highly potent inhibitor of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cell growth in vitro. Cancer Res 66: 554562, 2006.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |