|
|
||||||||
Department of Medical Physiology, Institute of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway
Submitted 19 September 2006 ; accepted in final form 6 January 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
glucose; insulin; myocardial oxygen consumption; pressure-volume area
-cell secretory defect. Increased cardiovascular disease is the most common complication of diabetes (10). Both clinical (4) and experimental (2, 35) studies have shown that type 2 diabetes and/or insulin resistance is associated with reduced myocardial tolerance to ischemia, which may explain the increased morbidity of ischemic heart disease in diabetes (10). Type 2 diabetes and/or insulin resistance are associated with increased cardiac fatty acid oxidation (FAox) and a concomitant decrease in glucose utilization (2, 5, 9, 33). This change in substrate utilization has been considered a metabolic maladaptation that may contribute to the development of cardiac dysfunction and/or reduced ischemic tolerance in type 2 diabetes. In line with this notion, transgenic mice with increased cardiac fatty acid (FA) uptake/utilization show a diabetic phenotype with reduced ventricular function and/or reduced postischemic recovery (3, 6). There has been a long-standing interest in metabolic modulation as a means to improve functional recovery following myocardial ischemia, and administration of glucose and insulin, as part of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) treatment, has gained new interest in the last decade (19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32). Although cardioprotective effects of high glucose and/or insulin have been demonstrated in experimental studies using nondiabetic models (7, 37), few studies have examined if this treatment exerts a cardioprotective effect in type 2 diabetic models.
We have previously reported that ex vivo perfused hearts from type 2 diabetic db/db mice show enhanced FAox and reduced glucose utilization (1, 5, 6), as well as reduced tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion (2). More recently, we have also shown that db/db hearts exhibit reduced cardiac efficiency [elevated unloaded myocardial oxygen consumption (M
O2); see Ref. 13]. It is reasonable to suggest that reduced ischemic tolerance of diabetic hearts is causally related to lower cardiac efficiency, since lower efficiency will increase oxygen utilization and thus exacerbate the energy shortage in the ischemic myocardium. Moreover, several lines of evidence have linked cardiac efficiency to the choice of metabolic fuel. Elevated rates of FA uptake and oxidation increased M
O2 in nondiabetic hearts (12, 29), and decreased cardiac efficiency has been associated with elevated rates of FA utilization in diabetic- and/or insulin-resistant hearts in both experimental (13, 34) and clinical studies (33). Accordingly, interventions aimed to improve cardiac metabolism in diabetic hearts should potentially also increase cardiac efficiency and improve ischemic tolerance.
Interestingly, we have recently found that ex vivo perfused hearts from the db/db mouse show a marked shift toward higher glucose oxidation (Gox) at the expense of FAox in response to acutely administered insulin (11), despite the fact that db/db mice show severe insulin resistance in vivo (18). McNulty (27) has pointed out that this observation agrees with reports of cardiac insulin responsiveness in human diabetes (14, 36). Because the cardioprotective role of insulin in a type 2 diabetic model has not previously been investigated, the aim of the present study was to examine whether an acute metabolic intervention (high glucose and insulin) will improve cardiac efficiency and postischemic recovery following low-flow ischemia in perfused db/db hearts.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurements of cardiac metabolism and postischemic functional recovery.
Heparin (100 units ip) was administered 5 min before the mice were anesthetized (10 mg ip injection of plastic pentobarbital sodium). Hearts were quickly excised, and the aorta was cannulated with an 18-gauge cannula. The left atrium was cannulated with a steel cannula (1.5 mm outer diameter, 1.0 mm inner diameter) connected to a preload reservoir (12.5 mmHg), and hearts were perfused in the working mode with the left ventricle ejecting against an afterload of 55 mmHg using a modified Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer supplemented with 0.4 mM palmitate bound to 3% BSA. All hearts were allowed to beat spontaneously. The concentration of endogenous free fatty acids in the 3% BSA solution was 0.3 mM, so that the total FA concentration in the perfusion buffer was 0.7 mM. In addition to FAs, the perfusion buffer was also supplemented with either 5 mM glucose (G), 5 mM glucose and 300 µU/ml insulin (low glucose and insulin, GI), or 33 mM glucose and 900 µU/ml of insulin (high glucose and high insulin, HGHI). Measurement of intraventricular pressure was obtained by inserting a 2-Fr micromanometer-tipped catheter (SPR 407; Millar), via the atrial steel cannula, into the left ventricle. In some cases, introduction of the catheter resulted in a marked drop in aortic flow, presumably because of interference with the function of the mitral valves. We therefore decided to run the protocol without the intraventricular pressure recording if the introduction of the catheter caused a decrease in the aortic flow of >0.5 ml/min. Coronary flow was measured by timed collections of the effluent dripping from the heart, whereas aortic flow was determined using a drop counter (with infrared detection) at the outlet of the afterload line. Cardiac output was calculated as the sum of the coronary and aortic flow. Following 30 min preischemic perfusion, hearts were subjected to 40 min low-flow ischemia (3.1 ml·g dry wt1·min1, which is
3% of their baseline coronary flow), followed by 5 min reperfusion in Langendorff mode and 30 min in working mode. Hearts that did not produce pressure exceeding that of the afterload column were perfused in an "assisted" mode to hold the perfusion pressure (i.e., the height of the afterload column was maintained by supplying it with freshly oxygenated buffer). Postischemic recovery of ventricular function was measured after 35 min reperfusion relative to baseline (preischemic) values. Glucose and palmitate oxidation were determined simultaneously by measuring 14CO2 and 3H2O released by the oxidation of [U-14C]glucose and [9,10-3H]palmitate, respectively (2, 5). Measurements were performed for all three perfusion groups (G, GI, and HGHI) both in the pre- and postischemic periods.
Measurements of cardiac efficiency and ventricular function.
Cardiac efficiency was determined in a separate series of experiments by measuring the relationship between cardiac work (pressure-volume area, PVA) and M
O2 (12, 13). A 1.4-Fr micromanometer-conductance catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) was inserted in the left ventricle through the apex. Fiber-optic oxygen probes (FOXY-AL300; Ocean Optics, Duiven, Netherlands) were placed in the left atrial cannula (adjacent to the heart) and in the pulmonary trunk for on-line recordings of the partial oxygen pressure (PO2). M
O2 was calculated by the following equation: M
O2 = [PO2 (oxygenated perfusate) PO2 (coronary effluent)] x Bunsen solubility coefficient of O2 x coronary flow. Finally, electrodes were connected to the right atrium for electrical pacing of the heart (10% above the intrinsic heart rate). Hearts were exposed to different workloads by changing preload (from 3 to 8 mmHg) and afterload (from 35 to 50 mmHg), and steady-state values of PVA and M
O2 were calculated at each workload. The PVA-M
O2 relationship was first determined in hearts perfused with low glucose (G buffer). Thereafter, the concentrations of glucose and insulin were elevated to 33 mM and 900 µU/ml, respectively (HGHI buffer), and another set of PVA-M
O2 relationships was determined following stabilization. The PVA-M
O2 regression allows the myocardial oxygen cost to be separated in the following two parts: unloaded M
O2 (y-intercept of the PVA-M
O2 relationship) and contractile efficiency (the inverse slope of the PVA-M
O2 relationship). Unloaded M
O2 is a measure of the energy cost of excitation-contraction coupling and basal metabolism, whereas contractile efficiency reflects the amount of metabolic energy that is converted to mechanical work. Finally, steady-state ventricular function was also determined at baseline loading conditions (8 mmHg preload and 50 mmHg afterload before and after addition of HGHI) using the pressure-volume (P-V) catheter.
Statistical analysis. Data are expressed as means ± SE. Differences in cardiac function, myocardial substrate oxidation, and recovery of functional parameters were determined by a two-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak's method to adjust for multiple comparisons. For analysis of regression (correlation between cardiac recovery and preischemic oxidation rates), a Person Product Moment Correlation was used. Between- and within-group differences in cardiac efficiency and cardiac function were analyzed by an unpaired and paired Student's t-test, respectively. The overall significance level was 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
O2 was determined in hearts that were first perfused with G buffer and thereafter by HGHI buffer. Table 2 gives the y-intercept (unloaded M
O2) and slope of the regression lines obtained in individual experiments, as well as the group means. In accordance with How et al. (13) hearts from db/db mice perfused under baseline conditions showed decreased cardiac efficiency revealed as a 36% increase in unloaded M
O2 compared with db/+ hearts. Contractile efficiency (the inverse of the slope of the regression line) was, however, not significantly altered. HGHI improved cardiac efficiency significantly in db/db hearts by decreasing unloaded M
O2. In contrast, HGHI did not influence efficiency in db/+ hearts, so that unloaded M
O2 in db/+ and db/db hearts perfused with HGHI was not statistically different. Contractile efficiency (slope) was not altered by the addition of HGHI, neither in db/db nor in db/+ hearts.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well established that elevation of myocardial FA supply and oxidation impairs functional recovery following ischemia in normal hearts (21). On the other hand, pharmacological inhibition of FAox (23) or stimulation of Gox (37) improves postischemic recovery. Although growing evidence supports the notion that dysregulation of metabolism contributes to the development of cardiac dysfunction and/or reduced ischemic tolerance in diabetic hearts (3, 6), no studies have examined the effect of acute administration of glucose and/or insulin in type 2 diabetes. However, we recently demonstrated that acute administration of insulin caused a marked metabolic shift toward Gox in perfused type 2 diabetic (db/db) mouse hearts (11). In accordance with this finding, the present study showed that insulin significantly increased Gox and decreased FAox in db/db hearts. After high glucose and insulin administration, cardiac metabolism was completely normalized. We also found that administration of insulin and HGHI improved postischemic recovery. Interestingly, the postischemic functional recovery (aortic flow) was positively correlated to preischemic Gox and negatively correlated to FAox rates in the diabetic hearts. These findings support the notion that the metabolic status of the heart, when entering the ischemic condition, is a determinant of the functional outcome of the ischemic insult (23, 35, 37). The lack of correlation between cardiac substrate oxidation and recovery in control hearts was most likely because of a much lower effect of insulin and glucose on fuel selection, plus the fact that these hearts were only modestly damaged by the ischemic insult, so that the window for protection was limited. Although our data show that insulin and glucose were protective only in diabetic hearts, it should be noted that the ischemic stress used in the present protocol was adjusted to give a reasonable dysfunction in the diabetic hearts and, not surprisingly, this degree of stress caused only a minor functional loss in the control hearts. Thus one should not categorically exclude that insulin and glucose would have had beneficial effects also in control hearts, given that these hearts were subjected to a more severe stress.
Clearly, there are controversies in the literature with respect to the cardioprotective effect of GIK in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion or recovery from cardiac surgery in humans (19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32). Our data are, however, consistent with a recent clinical study by Pache et al. (32) in which GIK therapy on patients with acute myocardial infarction was not associated with enhanced myocardial salvage, except in patients with diabetes. Also, in a study of diabetic patients with myocardial infarction (25) and in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery (19, 20), GIK was found to have beneficial effects.
Recently, Folmes et al. (8) reported that insulin increased recovery of contractile function after ischemia-reperfusion in normal mouse hearts perfused with 5 mM glucose. However, this cardioprotective effect of insulin was lost when the perfusate also contained 1.2 mM palmitate (8). The authors explained this surprising effect of insulin by increased proton production, resulting from a greater stimulation of glycolysis than Gox. In contrast, we observed that addition of insulin, in the presence of 0.7 mM palmitate, had no influence on the postischemic recovery of ventricular function (Fig. 2) in control hearts, which may be because of the fact that we used a lower palmitate concentration (GI group) and/or a highly elevated glucose concentration (33 mM, HGHI group) in the perfusate.
We have previously reported that treatment of db/db mice with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-
ligand K111 (previously called BM 17.0744), although partly normalizing cardiac metabolism, failed to improve postischemic functional recovery (2). One plausible explanation for this discrepancy could be that the hearts in the previous study were exposed to no-flow ischemia in which aerobic and anaerobic metabolism ultimately cease because of reduced delivery of glucose and enzyme (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) inhibition because of accumulation of lactate, protons, and NADH (17). In contrast, under low-flow ischemia, as used in the present study, glycolysis is stimulated (via allosteric activation of the enzyme phosphofructokinase), providing ATP and pyruvate, the latter serving as substrate for any residual oxidative metabolism.
Although our experimental design does not allow us to decide whether the protection by high insulin and glucose is because of the decrease in FAox or the increase in Gox, there is growing evidence that excess FA utilization may have pathological consequences in the heart muscle, such as extra drainage of oxygen (because of the lower phosphorylation-oxygen ratio and futile cycling; see Refs. 12, 29, 31), accumulation of lipotoxic intermediates, and reactive oxygen species production (22). On the other hand, one cannot exclude that increased glucose utilization plays a role, for instance via increased supply of glycolytic ATP (15) and/or improved coupling between glycolysis and Gox (24), that otherwise may lead to functional deterioration because of sodium and calcium overload. Finally, it is well documented that insulin directly stimulates prosurvival pathways (16) in nondiabetic hearts. It remains to be determined whether insulin can stimulate prosurvival pathways also in diabetic hearts, a question that should be addressed in a protocol designed to distinguish between metabolic and nonmetabolic effects of insulin.
In accordance with a recent study by How et al. (13), we found that hearts from db/db mice showed reduced cardiac efficiency because of a significant increase in unloaded M
O2 (representing oxygen cost for noncontractile purposes, including basal metabolism and excitation-contraction coupling). Cardiac efficiency was, however, markedly improved in the presence of HGHI, supporting earlier findings of improved cardiac efficiency following stimulation of glucose metabolism with GIK in chronic ovine diabetes (34). The increased cardiac efficiency can only partly be explained by the switch in fuel consumption, since a maximum of 12% decrease in M
O2 can occur when changing from 100% FAox to 100% Gox. Therefore, additional mechanisms must contribute to the reduced unloaded M
O2 in the db/db hearts, for instance reduced cost of excitation-contraction coupling (resulting from improved calcium handling and increased calcium sensitivity), less mitochondrial uncoupling (30), and less turnover of intracellular futile triglyceride-FA cycles (31). Because reduced cardiac efficiency may have deleterious consequences, particularly under conditions of decreased oxygen supply, the improved ischemic tolerance in glucose- and/or insulin-perfused db/db hearts is most likely related to the resulting improvement in cardiac efficiency. In support of this view, recent results from our own laboratory (unpublished observations) show that normalization of cardiac metabolism and lowering of unloaded M
O2 following PPAR
treatment are associated with an improved ischemic tolerance of db/db hearts.
In summary, the present study shows that HGHI normalize myocardial metabolism, restore efficiency, and improve postischemic functional recovery in hearts from a type 2 diabetic animal model, a finding that may explain the particular beneficial effects of GIK therapy in diabetic patients with cardiac complications.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Gandhi, B. A. Finegan, and A. S. Clanachan Role of glucose metabolism in the recovery of postischemic LV mechanical function: effects of insulin and other metabolic modulators Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2576 - H2586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. du Toit, W. Smith, C. Muller, H. Strijdom, B. Stouthammer, A. J. Woodiwiss, G. R. Norton, and A. Lochner Myocardial susceptibility to ischemic-reperfusion injury in a prediabetic model of dietary-induced obesity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2336 - H2343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Abel, S. E. Litwin, and G. Sweeney Cardiac Remodeling in Obesity Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 389 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Boudina and E. D. Abel Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Revisited Circulation, June 26, 2007; 115(25): 3213 - 3223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |