|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Institute of Epidemiology, Gesellschaft für Strahlen-Forschung (GSF)-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg; 2Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; 3Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilians University; 4Neurochemistry and Neurogenetics Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and 5Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University, Munich, Germany; 6Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Medical Genetics, Molecular, and Clinical Pharmacology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; 7German Diabetes Clinic, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf; and 8Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, GSF-National Research Center of Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Submitted 25 November 2005 ; accepted in final form 10 November 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
single nucleotide polymorphism; genetic association study; metabolic syndrome; type 2 diabetes mellitus
510% of women of reproductive age (13, 47). Previous studies (4, 9, 12) indicate that PCOS is a complex disease with both multiple genetic components and environmental factors contributing to its etiology. Since PCOS is associated with a two- to sevenfold increased risk to develop impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), genes related to T2DM may also play a role in PCOS pathogenesis (41, 44). Several T2DM candidate genes, including those for insulin, insulin receptor, and insulin receptor substrates, have been investigated in this context and partly indicated significant evidence for a genetic contribution to PCOS susceptibility (12, 44, 53, 55, 56, 58). Calpain-10 (CAPN10) was the first positionally cloned susceptibility gene for T2DM (24, 31). It encodes the ubiquitously expressed cysteine protease Calpain-10, which is essential for calcium-regulated intracellular signaling (35, 52). CAPN10 plays a crucial role in proinsulin processing, insulin secretion, action, and sensitivity (3, 48). The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the CAPN10 gene UCSNP-43 and the haplotype combination 112/121, defined by the three UCSNPs UCSNP-43, ins/del-19, and -63, were found to be associated with an up to threefold increased risk to develop T2DM in selected populations (31). The rare UCSNP-43 A allele was also found to be associated with idiopathic hirsutism (15) and with an approximately twofold increased risk for PCOS in both African-Americans and Europids in the case of the haplotype combination (14). Moreover, UCSNP-44 located in a transcription enhancer element next to UCSNP-43 was found to be associated with T2DM (17, 59) and with PCOS in a Spanish population (20, 21). It is in perfect linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the missense mutation Thr504Ala (UCSNP-110) and two additional polymorphisms in the 5'UTR (UCSNP-134 and UCSNP-135). These results suggest that either the UCSNP-44 or an SNP in high LD may contribute to T2DM and PCOS susceptibility. Nevertheless, the relationship between CAPN10 and both T2DM and PCOS is highly controversial across studies and populations, because discordant or lacking associations of polymorphisms in the CAPN10 region with T2DM (17, 39, 36) and PCOS (23) have been reported.
Taken together, these studies suggest CAPN10 to be a strong candidate for both T2DM and PCOS. However, it remains unclear whether and which DNA variation at CAPN10 really affects the disease risk or is in LD with a causative variation nearby. Moreover, contradictory results of previous linkage and association studies (33, 50) can be attributed to study populations that have been far too small to yield any definite results. To further analyze the role of CAPN10 in PCOS susceptibility, we selected an extended sample of eight variants (UCSNP-44, -43, -56, ins/del-19, -110, -58, -63, and -22) in the
31-kb spanning region of the CAPN10 gene on human chromosome band 2q37.3. Subsequently, we genotyped 146 PCOS subjects and 606 matched female controls to determine whether these variations in the CAPN10 gene predispose to PCOS. Finally, to clarify putative associations between CAPN10 and PCOS, we performed a meta-analysis on the basis of published data of all genetic association studies to date on CAPN10 and PCOS.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6 or obvious acne or alopecia and/or an elevated total testosterone (normal range <2.0 nmol/l)] were found and when other pituitary, adrenal, or ovarian diseases could be excluded. All patients also fulfilled the 2003 Rotterdam Criteria of PCOS (44a). None of the PCOS subjects was taking any medication known to affect carbohydrate metabolism or endocrine parameters for
3 mo before entering the study. All PCOS patients were of Caucasian origin and German descent. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Essen. Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Female controls (n = 606, matching rate 1:4) were taken from the population-based German study "Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg, Survey 4" (KORA S4) (19, 30, 60) that studied a representative sample of the adult general population of German nationality comprising 4,261 subjects aged 2574 yr recruited from 1999 to 2001. All study methods were approved by the ethics committee of the "Bayerische Landesärztekammer," Munich, Germany. All participants signed a consent form to participate in genetic studies. Following frequency matching for age (best possible matching: tolerance maximum + 5 yr at
20 yr of age) and sex (perfect matching), 606 female individuals that in particular were not suffering from diabetes (according to self-report, medical diagnosis, and medication) were randomly selected. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as measured weight (kg) divided by measured height squared (m2).
DNA preparation. Genomic DNA of PCOS patients was isolated from whole blood with the QIAmp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genomic DNA of KORA participants was extracted from blood leukocytes by using the Puregene DNA Isolation Kit (MN 55441; Gentra Systems) according to the manufacturer's recommendation.
SNP selection criteria.
Human CAPN10 consists of 15 exons and extends over a region of
31 kb on chromosome 2q37.3. For genotyping, we selected a gene-spanning panel of eight SNPs that had partly shown evidence for association with T2DM, PCOS, or related traits (14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 31, 51). Two of these, namely UCSNP-110 and UCSNP-58, result in amino acid substitutions and are located at the exonic splicing enhancers SC35 and SRp55, respectively, which are important cis elements required for exon inclusion. The other selected variants are located in the 3'UTR or at intronic sites and are thus suspected to influence stability of mRNA, CAPN10 transcription, and expression (3, 31). There is a distinct overlap between HapMap II tagging SNP panel (r2 > 0.8) and the SNP panel, which has been investigated in our study.
SNP genotyping. Genotyping of SNPs was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight-based mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) of allele-specific primer extension products (Mass Array; Sequenom, San Diego, CA), as described previously (57). Genomic DNA of each subject was tested individually. Primer information is given in Tables 1 and 2. A modified Bruker Biflex MALDI-TOF MS and a Bruker Autoflex HT MALDI-TOF MS were used for data acquisition from the SpectroCHIP. Genotype calling was performed in real time with Mass Array RT software version 3.0.0.4 [EC] (Sequenom). For quality control, 2% of negative controls were included in all assays. To control for reproducibility of genotyping data, 10% of randomly selected samples were genotyped in duplicate with an error rate <1%.
|
|
Statistical analysis. Each SNP was tested for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by means of a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test depending on allele frequency. To evaluate the relationship between SNPs, pairwise LD statistics D' and correlation coefficients r2 were calculated using Haploview version 3.2 (http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/index.php; Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research).
To estimate the genetic association of each SNP with PCOS, differences in genotype distributions between case and control groups were tested using a chi-square test. Subsequently, logistic regression analyses were performed and adjusted for age and BMI. To assess independent genotypic effects, heterozygotes and homozygotes for the rare allele were each tested against homozygotes for the common allele as reference group. Only in the meta-analysis for polymorphism ins/del-19 were the homozygotes for the rare allele used as reference group, according to the nomenclature of UCSNP-19 by Horikawa et al. (31). In a second step, we tested whether a dose effect per copy of the rare allele was available.
The impact of the different age and BMI structures in the case and control groups was explored by sensitivity analyses. Logistic regression analyses were constrained to participants aged 2535 yr or to individuals above or below BMI of 25 kg/m2, respectively, each adjusted for the other covariate, to ensure a balanced proportion of cases and controls.
The expected numbers of copies of each haplotype were estimated for all subjects using the expectation-maximization algorithm (18). A global test on all haplotypes (frequency >1%) was performed via logistic regression with stepwise selection procedure using the expected number of copies. Haplotype estimation and logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age and BMI and calculated using SAS software version 8.0 (Cary, NC).
A meta-analysis including our own and all available published data has been performed for all UCSNPs, on which at least three studies were available (UCSNP-44, -43, -19, -63). Between-study heterogeneity was tested by the
2-based Q-statistic, and its impact was quantified by I2, the proportion of total variation in the estimates of genotype associations that is due to heterogeneity between studies (27). To derive a combined odds ratio (OR) estimate, study-specific ORs were pooled by using the inverse-variance fixed effect and the DerSimonian and Laird (10) random effects models. The random effects model incorporates an estimate of the between-study variance and tends to provide wider confidence intervals in the case of heterogeneity. In the absence of heterogeneity, the two models provide identical results.
Forest plots displaying study-specific ORs with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were prepared using Review Manager software version 4.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 yr of age). Thus the KORA controls were 2538 yr old (mean = 32). The range of BMI was 1758 (PCOS, mean = 30.2 kg/m2) and 1646 (controls, mean = 24.7 kg/m2) kg/m2. Eight CAPN10 variants were genotyped. Genetic locations of the polymorphisms, genotyping success rates, and allelic frequencies are given in Table 3. The observed genotype frequencies agreed with the expected frequencies according to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Pairwise comparison showed extensive LD between two pairs of variations: UCSNP-44 and UCSNP-110 (D' = 0.994, r2 = 0.975); UCSNP-56 and UCSNP-19 (D' = 1.000, r2 = 0.976) (Fig. 1).
|
|
|
Haplotype association results. Eleven CAPN10 haplotypes with frequencies >1% were identified in the entire group of 752 individuals. Two of these haplotypes emerged from the stepwise selection procedure of the global test on all haplotypes. The most common haplotype TGG3AGCA (frequency 22%) comprised common alleles of all SNPs, except for the 3' UCSNP-22, and it only differed in UCSNP-56 and -19 from haplotype TGA2AGCA (4.9%). TGG3AGCA showed a protective association with PCOS (OR = 0.487, P = 0.0057), whereas TGA2AGCA increased the risk (OR = 3.557, P = 0.0011), being consistent with the results of the single SNP analyses. Frequencies of these two haplotypes clearly differed as follows: 14.64 vs. 23.56% for TGG3AGCA (pchi2 = 0.0198) and 10.18 vs. 3.55% for TGA2AGCA (pchi2 = 2.5 x 108) in cases and controls, respectively.
Meta-analysis results. To clarify the putative associations between CAPN10 and PCOS, we performed a meta-analysis that was based on our own data and the published data of all genetic association studies to date that have investigated CAPN10 and PCOS (Table 5). Unfortunately, in the publication by Ehrmann et al. (14), essential data from 177 Europid PCOS cases were missing and were therefore not included in the meta-analysis. Since the data published in Gonzalez et al. 2002 (20) are part of the data published in Gonzalez et al. 2003 (21), only the latter were analyzed in the meta-analysis.
|
Results of the meta-analysis presenting fixed and random effects ORs on the basis of allele frequencies are given in Table 6. In the presence of heterogeneity between studies (I2 > 0), the results of the fixed and random effects models differ. In this case we assessed the results of the random effects model, which usually are more conservative than the results of the fixed effects model, to be more qualified and valid. Analyzing the pooled data of five case-control studies, we revealed a significant association between UCSNP-19 and PCOS, with the insertion being protective (OR = 0.83, P = 0.02) and the deletion being a risk factor for PCOS (OR = 1.21, P = 0.02), respectively. Study-specific as well as the pooled ORs with 95% CI are illustrated in the forest plot in Fig. 2. There was no association between PCOS and UCSNP-44, -43, and -63; that is, the association findings of our single study were well supported by the meta-analysis.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Possible modification of the transcription process.
The genetic association between UCSNP-19 and UCSNP-56 observed in our study may originate from a possible modification of the transcription process. Whereas UCSNP-56 does not modify any interacting or binding site domains, the UCSNP-19 32-bp repeat sequence includes a possible binding site of the Pdx1 (IDX1/IPF-1) pancreatic and intestinal homeodomain transcription factor (MatInspector, Genomatix). In the case of UCSNP-19 deletion there are two possible binding sites of this transcription factor, and in the case of insertion there are three. Pdx1 was originally described as insulin promoter factor-1 (IPF-1), a homeodomain protein that is expressed in
-cells of mouse pancreas and binds to and transactivates the insulin promoter. The pattern of IPF-1 expression and its ability to stimulate insulin gene transcription suggest that IPF-1 functions in the maturation of the pancreatic
-cell (38). Given the known association between PCOS and diabetes and considering the positive impact of insulin sensitizers like metformin on PCOS (7, 11, 25, 32, 37, 54), a consequence of the UCSNP-19 ins/del polymorphism on PCOS risk driven by the transcription factor Pdx1 may be assumed.
Significant association of UCSNP-56 and ins/del-19 but not of other UCSNPs, including UCSNP-44. Our data provide support for the involvement of the CAPN10 UCSNP-19 ins/del polymorphism that is, as shown previously (31), in strong LD with UCSNP-56 as a determinant of PCOS susceptibility. In addition, we found clear evidence for a risk increase by one allelic change in single SNP analyses, which was consistent with a copy number effect of haplotypes.
Our positive association findings are in accordance with previous single study results. Gonzalez et al. (20) described a statistically significant (P = 0.045) positive correlation between the UCSNP-19 deletion variant with PCOS in 55 Caucasian PCOS cases and 93 controls that was based on comparable minor allele frequencies of 47.2 and 34.4%, respectively. Additionally, they described an association between PCOS and the C allele of UCSNP-44 (P = 0.023), which is in LD with the ins/del polymorphism and has been also associated with T2DM in European populations (17). Additional studies revealed PCOS or associated phenotypes like IGT and hirsutism score to be associated with the heterozygous T2DM risk haplotype combination 112/121 of the polymorphisms UCSNP-43 (allele 1 = G), UCSNP-19 (allele 1 = deletion), and UCSNP-63 (allele 1 = C) in 124 white and 45 black PCOS cases (14) and with UCSNP-43 and -44 in 97 idiopathic hirsutism or PCOS cases and 37 controls (15). Although given a higher power, in our study, we did not confirm these findings. Moreover, other large studies did not reveal any association between PCOS and either the haplotype combination in family-based and case-control studies (23) or the single CAPN10 UCSNP-43, -44, and -45 in 57 nondiabetic PCOS and 567 nondiabetic controls (22). Taken together, these data suggest that the UCSNP-44 may not be involved in the PCOS pathogenesis, although, in contrast, there is strong evidence for a contribution to T2DM predisposition for two reasons. First, a trio study conducted in the UK found the UCSNP-44 C allele to be more often transmitted to affected T2DM offspring (17); and second, two recent meta-analyses, including 3,303 and 7,667 subjects, confirmed that the rare C allele is associated with increased risk for T2DM (8, 59).
Finally, stating a significant association between UCSNP-19 and PCOS as well as a lack of association between other variants of the CAPN10, including UCSNP-43, -44, and -63, the association findings described in our manuscript were well supported by the meta-analysis including our data. In addition, we also performed meta-analysis for UCSNP-19 in only the two other published case-control studies to avoid overlap with our own data. With an OR of 0.89, the result of this association analysis points in the same direction as our study, but lacking power due to sample size, the small effect size does not reach significance (95% CI = 0.731.10, P = 0.28), which is not surprising. In contrast, the meta-analysis of parent-offspring trios, together with case-control studies, revealed no significant association of any of the CAPN10 polymorphisms tested but borderline association between UCSNP-19 and PCOS. It is noteworthy that, for UCSNP-19 and -63, heterogeneity between studies was remarkably reduced when eliminating the trio study from the meta-analysis. Haddad et al. (23) already described a difference between their case-control and trio studies, with only the latter showing nominal evidence of excess transmission of the more common allele of UCSNP-63. Due to a typically lower age of onset in cases of trio studies, since both parents must still be alive, a different genetic background may prevail in study participants of trio studies compared with case-control studies, which might explain the heterogeneity between study results.
Relationship between CAPN10 and BMI. The only distinctive feature with respect to UCSNP-44 we observed in our study was one single PCOS homozygote carrier of the very rare UCSNP-44CC/-110GG genotype that showed an extreme BMI >40 kg/m2, whereas the BMI of heterozygote and wild-type carriers was inconspicuous and the BMI of KORA controls was independent of genotype. Although it lacks significance, this is an interesting observation given that we found a significant interaction between CAPN10 and BMI in a large T2DM case-control study (Huth and Kolz, personal communication).
Although Shima et al. (45) found an association of CAPN10 UCSNP-19 genotype 33 with higher BMI and increased hemoglobin A1c levels, which was consistent with results of haplotype analysis, suggesting the contribution of UCSNP-19 to mild obesity and glucose intolerance in Japanese, we did not confirm these findings in our Caucasian sample. Our study did not reveal any significant association between CAPN10 variants and BMI in PCOS patients and controls. By sensitivity analyses for BMI subgroups we could also exclude any significant interaction of the BMI on associations between genotypes of the investigated CAPN10 polymorphisms and PCOS.
Associations between CAPN10 and T2DM might be influenced by associations between CAPN10 and PCOS.
Our data suggest that CAPN10 UCSNP-19 could be related to both pathologies, PCOS and T2DM. Depending on the population studied,
90% of PCOS women suffer from impaired insulin secretion, IGT, insulin resistance, and T2DM (5, 13, 34). In addition, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome is nearly twofold higher in PCOS patients than in age-matched women in the general population (2). Only a few studies have assessed the prevalence of PCOS among women with T2DM (6). Given the high prevalence of 510% of PCOS in the population and especially in T2DM patients (
27%), these PCOS patients may be severely underdiagnosed in samples of T2DM association studies (42). In this case, results of CAPN10 and T2DM association studies are likely to depend on the male-female ratio and on the degree of hyperandrogenism of the study participants.
Limitations and strengths of the study. Regarding limitations of our study, it needs to be noted that the control individuals were on average 5 yr older than the PCOS patients. Because genetic structure as our main outcome is independent of age (at least in the investigated age groups), we accepted this best possible matching for age for the advantages of investigating population-based controls. In addition, because the control individuals were older and not suffering from diabetes yet, they should be suitable controls and are probably not PCOS patients. Due to the high prevalence of 5% of PCOS in the normal population, it is nevertheless possible that PCOS patients are included in the control group. In this case, however, the true association would have been rather underestimated. The BMI was the only age-dependent phenotype we tested. Although the controls were of older age, they showed on average 5 kg/m2 lower BMI than the PCOS cases. Thus there seemed to be no bias by study design-driven age structure. This was also confirmed by sensitivity analyses.
In an independent genomic control approach, we tested for population stratification by genotyping 212 genome-wide selected markers in 2,159 individuals from KORA and two Northern German populations (49). No major population substructuring either between or within these populations was found, indicating that the Northwestern, Northeastern, and Southern German populations are genetically homogeneous and that population stratification plays only a minor role in association studies for complex diseases in the German population. In a second independent genomic control study, restless leg patients that had been recruited all over the country were compared with KORA controls with a subset of 70 of the same 212 genome-wide markers (Juliane Winkelmann, personal communication). Again, there was no major population stratification. In this second genomic control study, one recruiting center was quite close to our PCOS recruiting center in the central western part of Germany. However, because we did not genotype the PCOS cases for the same genome-wide markers and did not test whether there are genetic differences between them and the KORA population, we cannot entirely exclude a possible, although not very likely, population stratification.
Compared with the literature, the present study has the great advantage of comprising one of the largest PCOS case-control studies. All patients were recruited in a single-center study using the same standardized diagnosis criteria. The controls are population-based and were matched at the high ratio of 1:4. One-hundred forty-six PCOS patients may still be a rather small number of cases regarding the expected small effects and low allele frequencies that are typical for complex diseases. However, given the small P values and rather high minor allele frequencies between 36.7 and 48.6%, the stated associations seemed to overcome the risk of being false positive. Even if corrected for multiple testing, the results remained statistically significant. In addition, the study results based on single SNP and haplotype association analyses were highly consistent. Finally, the association findings that we described here have been well supported by meta-analysis of all available data of association studies that have investigated the relationship of PCOS and CAPN10 to date.
Our data provide support for the contribution of the CAPN10 UCSNP-19 ins/del and the UCSNP-56 polymorphism to PCOS susceptibility. We found clear evidence for an allele-dose relationship in single SNP analyses, which was consistent with haplotype analyses. Thus, despite the fact that a broad panel of CAPN10 variants did not show significant associations, our study suggests that CAPN10 is an interesting candidate gene for PCOS. Although there is possible evidence for the UCSNP-19 ins/del polymorphism to influence the transcription factor Pdx1, it is not yet clear whether this variation at CAPN10 causally affects the risk for PCOS or is in LD with a nearby variation that does. Therefore, although our study is population based and is one of the larger case-control association studies in PCOS up to now, and is supported by meta-analysis of published data, we insistently recommend extended case-control studies and meta-analysis on the basis of individual participants' data that additionally permit to compose homogenous subgroups by higher consensus criteria in PCOS sample definitions to confirm our observations.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The KORA group consists of H.-E. Wichmann (speaker), H. Löwel, C. Meisinger, T. Illig, R. Holle, J. John, and their coworkers, who are responsible for the design and conduct of the KORA studies.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: O. E. Janssen, Division of Endocrinology, Dept. of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany (e-mail: onno.jannssen{at}uni-essen.de)
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.O. Goodarzi, J.F. Maher, J. Cui, X. Guo, K.D. Taylor, and R. Azziz FEM1A and FEM1B: novel candidate genes for polycystic ovary syndrome Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2842 - 2849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |