AJP - Endo Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292: E400-E407, 2007. First published September 19, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00322.2006
0193-1849/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/2/E400    most recent
00322.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellingson, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winder, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellingson, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winder, W. W.

Effects of 3-phosphoglycerate and other metabolites on the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by LKB1-STRAD-MO25

W. J. Ellingson, D. G. Chesser, and W. W. Winder

Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

Submitted 3 July 2006 ; accepted in final form 13 September 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Skeletal muscle contraction results in the phosphorylation and activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) by an upstream kinase (AMPKK). The LKB1-STE-related adaptor (STRAD)-mouse protein 25 (MO25) complex is the major AMPKK in skeletal muscle; however, LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity is not increased by muscle contraction. This relationship suggests that phosphorylation of AMPK by LKB1-STRAD-MO25 during skeletal muscle contraction may be regulated by allosteric mechanisms. In this study, we tested an array of metabolites including, glucose 6-phosphate, fructose 6-phosphate, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PG), glucose 1-phosphate, glucose 1,6-bisphosphate, ADP, carnitine, acetylcarnitine, IMP, inosine, and ammonia for allosteric regulation. ADP inhibited both AMPK and LKB1-STRAD-MO25 actions, but probably is not important physiologically because of the low free ADP inside the muscle fiber. We found that 3-PG stimulated LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity and allowed for increased AMPK phosphorylation. 3-PG did not stimulate LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity toward the peptide substrate LKB1tide. These results have identified 3-PG as an AMPK-specific regulator of AMPK phosphorylation and activation by LKB1-STRAD-MO25.

adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase; adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase kinase; metabolism; glycolysis; STK11


THE AMP-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE (AMPK) is a master metabolic regulator found to regulate fatty acid oxidation (20, 43, 44) and glucose uptake (2, 11, 17, 20) in skeletal muscle. AMPK senses changes in AMP-to-ATP ratios. An increase in AMP concentration causes a conformational change in AMPK. This occurs when two AMP molecules bind to four cystathione beta-synthase domains on the {gamma}-subunit of AMPK (1, 31). This conformational change allows AMPK to be phosphorylated, and consequently activated, by an upstream kinase, AMPKK, composed of three complexed proteins [LKB1, STE-related adaptor (STRAD), and mouse protein 25 (MO25); see Refs. 9, 32, and 45]. AMPK must be phosphorylated by AMPKK on its activation loop at Thr172 for full activation.

AMPK is activated by the constitutively active kinase complex LKB1-STRAD-MO25 during skeletal muscle contraction (28, 29). AMPK activation increases during a bout of skeletal muscle contraction caused by endurance exercise (41), in situ stimulation (14, 15, 28, 39), or in vitro stimulation (11), whereas the apparent AMPKK activity does not change (14, 28). Furthermore, studies showing skeletal muscle contraction of both trained humans (23) and rats (14) yielded increases in AMPK phosphorylation in the face of no change or decreased measurable AMPKK activity. This relationship seems contradictory, given that one would expect an increased AMPKK activity to accompany the increased AMPK phosphorylation. These findings imply that muscle AMPKK becomes more active during contraction by mechanisms other than covalent modifications that could be detected in extracts of the muscle homogenate. Because LKB1-STRAD-MO25 can phosphorylate at least 14 downstream kinases, substrate level regulation for each of these is conceivable. Allosteric activation of AMPK phosphorylation by undefined modulators must also be considered as a mechanism of specific regulation of downstream targets.

To explore this issue, we considered changes that occur in the skeletal muscle metabolite concentrations during contraction. Previous studies have demonstrated exercise-induced changes in the concentrations of glucose 6-phosphate (G-6-P; see Refs. 12, 13, 16, 26, 30), fructose 6-phosphate (F-6-P; see Refs. 12, 26, 41, 42), fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (F-1,6-P2; see Refs. 13, 30, and 42), 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PG; see Ref. 6), glucose 1-phosphate (G-1-P; see Ref. 12), glucose 1,6-bisphosphate (G-1,6-P2; see Refs. 30 and 41), ADP (12, 26, 33), carnitine (Carn; see Refs. 3, 27, and 38), acetylcarnitine (Acarn; see Refs. 3, 27, and 38), IMP (12, 46, 47), inosine (5, 8, 47), and ammonia (12, 33). Initially, no consideration was given to intracellular compartmentalization or protein binding of the metabolites. In the case of ADP, only a small proportion of the total would be in the free ADP fraction of the sarcoplasm; therefore, additional concentrations were examined. We hypothesized that one or more of these metabolites would demonstrate allosteric control on AMPK activation by interacting either directly on the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex, or on AMPK itself, making it a better substrate for phosphorylation by LKB1-STRAD-MO25.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Buffers. When applicable, dithiothreitol (DTT) and [{gamma}-32P]ATP are added just before use. The following buffers were used: AMPK storage buffer: 50 mM Tris·HCl, 250 mM mannitol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.02% (wt/vol) Brij-35, and 10% vol/vol glycerol, pH 7.4 at 4°C; AMPK phosphorylation buffer: 100 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 20% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM AMP, 0.5 mM ATP, and 2.0 mM DTT, pH 7.0; AMARA phosphorylation buffer: 40 mM HEPES, 80 mM NaCl, 8% glycerol, 0.8 mM EDTA, 0.8 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM AMP, 0.2 mM ATP, 0.33 mM AMARA peptide, and 0.05 µCi/µl [{gamma}-32P]ATP, pH 7.0; Laemmli's buffer (18); PBS: 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 2.1 mM KH2PO4, and 9.9 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.3; PBST: PBS with 1% Tween 20.

Materials. General reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated. G-6-P, F-6-P, F-1,6-P2, 3-PG, G-1-P, G-1,6-P2, ADP, Carn, Acarn, IMP, and inosine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical. Ammonium acetate was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Recombinant LKB1-STRAD-MO25 lot no. 28640AU (0.1 µg/µl, 34 U/mg) and LKB1tide were obtained from Upstate (Charleston, VA). His-bind nickel-binding resin was obtained from Novagen (Madison, WI). Western blotting primary antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA). Resins for chromatographic purification, secondary antibody for Western blotting, and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection solution were obtained from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ).

Generation and purification of recombinant AMPK. Bacteria expressing recombinant {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2- and {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1-AMPK were prepared as previously described (21, 22, 34, 35). Recombinant {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2- and {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1-AMPK was extracted and purified by nickel affinity chromatography (36). After buffer exchange into AMPK storage buffer, recombinant AMPK was concentrated to 1 µg/µl before use for experimentation. Recombinant {alpha}-312 AMPK protein for Western blot analysis was likewise obtained as previously described (7, 14, 35, 36).

AMPKK and phosphorylated-AMPK activity assays. In all cases, unless otherwise stated, the AMPK used for experimentation was {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2-AMPK. AMPKK activity was measured in a two-step assay. In the first step, AMPK was phosphorylated and activated by LKB1-STRAD-MO25 (p-AMPK). In the second step, p-AMPK phosphorylated AMARA peptide (10). Recombinant {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2-AMPK was diluted 1:19 in water and {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1 was diluted 1:9 in water. Recombinant LKB1-STRAD-MO25 (0.1 µg/µl) was diluted 1:39 in AMPK storage buffer. The metabolites G-6-P, F-6-P, F-1,6-P2, 3-PG, G-1-P, G-1,6-P2, ADP, Carn, Acarn, inosine, IMP, and ammonia were individually dissolved in water at 5x the desired final concentration before the first step of the reaction. G-6-P, F-6-P, ADP, and IMP were all controlled for their sodium content as previously described (34), and G-1-P was controlled for potassium in the same manner. For the assay, 4 µl of AMPK phosphorylation buffer were mixed with 2 µl of diluted recombinant AMPK, 2 µl of the testing compound, and 2 µl of AMPKK and allowed to incubate for 20 min at 30°C. After the incubation, 15 µl of AMARA phosphorylation buffer were added to the mixture to start the second step of the assay and allowed to incubate for an additional 10 min at 30°C. At the conclusion of the 10 min, the reaction was stopped by spotting 15 µl of the final reaction mixture on a 1-cm2 piece of Whatman P81 filter paper. Filter papers were allowed to absorb the reaction mix for 15 s and then were placed in 100 ml of 1% phosphoric acid. The papers were washed in the acid six times and then briefly in acetone. After drying, the papers were then placed in 3 ml of Ecolite scintillation fluid, and radioactivity was determined in a liquid scintillation counter for 1 min.

Assays to measure the effects of ADP and 3-PG on p-AMPK were performed the same as the AMPKK activity assay with the following changes. Water (2 µl) was added before the start of the first reaction instead of 5x ADP or 3-PG. The first reaction was allowed to proceed for 30 min to allow for full phosphorylation of AMPK. The ADP or 3-PG was added at the start of the second reaction.

For assays to determine the activity of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 in phosphorylating LKB1tide, 450 µl AMPK phosphorylation buffer, 225 µl of 0.775 mM LKB1tide in water, 135 µl of water, and 4 µl of [{gamma}-32P]ATP were combined, and 18 µl of this mixture were loaded together with 5x 3-PG as above. The reaction was started with the addition of 2 µl recombinant LKB1-STRAD-MO25 diluted 1:4 in AMPK storage buffer and stopped by spotting the reaction mixture on filter papers and continuing as above.

Western blot. The first step of the AMPKK assay was performed, but with a 30-min incubation. After the incubation period, the reaction was stopped by addition of diluted 4x Laemmli's buffer and water (1:1:2). Proteins in the reaction mixture were then separated by SDS-PAGE at 200 V for 50 min in 7.5% Tris·HCl, 30 µl/well (Criterion Precast Gels; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins were electrophoretically transferred from the gels to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes at 100 volts for 60 min. Membranes were blocked in PBST and 5% Blotting Grade Blocker Non-Fat Dry Milk for 1 h. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C in PBST, 5% blocking milk, and primary antibody. After incubation with a rabbit anti-P-AMPK antibody, membranes were washed two times with PBST for 10 min and two times with PBS for 5 min. Membranes were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature in PBST, 3% blocking milk, and a secondary antibody. After incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit antibody, membranes were washed two times with PBST for 10 min and two times with PBS for 5 min. Membranes were covered with ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagent, enclosed in transparent plastic sheets, and visualized on Classic Blue Autoradiography film. Relative amounts of protein were quantified by measuring spot size and intensity with AlphaEaseFC software (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).

Statistics. The effects of each metabolite on AMPKK activity, assays testing effects of ADP and 3-PG on AMPKK and p-AMPK activity, assays of AMPKK activity against {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1-AMPK in the presence of 3-PG, Western blot analysis of 3-PG-mediated AMPK and {alpha}-312 AMPK activation, and AMPKK activity assays against LKB1tide were all compared by one-way ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were performed using Fisher's least-significant difference multiple-comparison test. For Western blotting of the inhibitory effect of ADP on AMPK phosphorylation, and comparisons of maximal velocity (Vmax) and substrate concentration at 50% Vmax (K0.5) of the substrate-activation curves, Student's t-tests were used to test for statistical significance. For all statistical tests, significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical procedures were performed using the NCSS statistical program (Kaysville, UT). All data are reported as means ± SE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To test the hypothesis that an intracellular metabolite demonstrates allosteric control of the phosphorylation of AMPK, we assayed the AMPKK activity of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 in the presence of each of the following compounds: G-6-P, F-6-P, F-1,6-P2, 3-PG, G-1-P, G-1,6-P2, ADP, Carn, Acarn, inosine, IMP, and ammonia. Each metabolite was assayed at concentrations typical of resting conditions and exercising conditions (Fig. 1, A–D, n = 5-6). Resting concentrations for all metabolites except Carn were determined by taking the lowest values cited in the primary literature. Likewise, exercising concentrations were determined by taking the highest values cited. Given that Carn concentrations decrease during exercise, the resting concentration was found by taking the highest value, and the exercising concentration was found by taking the lowest value found in the primary literature. Addition of ADP at both resting and exercising concentrations resulted in a marked inhibition of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity, whereas addition of Carn at the resting concentration resulted in slight inhibition of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity (Fig. 1B). Addition of 3-PG at the exercising concentration resulted in an increase in LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity (Fig. 1D). Addition of all other metabolites had no effect on LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity.


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. AMP-activated protein kinase kinase (AMPKK) activities of LKB1-STE-related adaptor (STRAD)-mouse protein 25 (MO25) against AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the presence of various metabolites at concentrations typical of resting and exercising values. A: (in mM) 0.005 and 0.25 inosine; 0.5 and 5.0 IMP; 0.05 and 0.5 ammonia. B: (in mM) 3.5 and 1.0 carnitine (Carn); 0.5 and 5.0 acetylcarnitine (Acarn); 0.4 and 0.8 ADP. C: (in mM) 0.05 and 2.0 glucose 6-phosphate (G-6-P); 0.1 and 0.4 glucose 1-phosphate (G-1-P); 0.075 and 0.5 glucose 1,6-phosphate (G-1,6-P2). D: (in mM) 0.02 and 0.15 fructose 6-phosphate (F-6-P); 0.04 and 0.2 fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (F-1,6-P2); 0.5 and 1.5 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PG). Concentrations of each metabolite are listed in the order of resting concentration, then exercising concentration. *Activity at these concentrations was significantly different from the respective 0 mM concentration (n = 5–6, P < 0.05). With the exceptions of 3-PG, Carn, and ADP, no statistically significant differences were observed between resting and exercising values.

 
Given that the AMPKK assay is a two-step assay, with the metabolite being added at the beginning of the first step, it is possible that ADP and 3-PG exhibit their effects on p-AMPK rather than LKB1-STRAD-MO25. To test this, two assays were performed. The first was done the same as the previous assays, but with ADP at concentrations of 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mM. In the second assay, we fully phosphorylated AMPK and then added ADP at the same concentrations at the start of the second reaction. ADP had an inhibitory effect under both conditions, but the effect was greater in the first assay (Fig. 2A, n = 6). From these curves, it is apparent that, if only the free ADP (i.e., not bound to protein) is available for inhibition of phosphorylation of AMPK by the LKB1 complex, minimal inhibition would be seen between the concentrations of 0.02 and 0.11 mM (free ADP concentration calculated from reference 12).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Inhibition of AMPKK activity of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 and phosphorylated (p)-AMPK activity by ADP. A: assays of both AMPKK activity and p-AMPK activity in the presence of 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, or 1.0 mM ADP. B: measurement of ADP inhibition of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 by Western blot analysis of p-AMPK. LKB1-STRAD-MO25 and AMPK were incubated in the presence of 0.0 or 0.8 mM ADP. All control values were normalized to 1. P < 0.05, significantly different from AMPKK assay ({dagger}) and significant difference from control (*; n = 5–8 experiments).

 
Because the p-AMPK assay showed ADP to inhibit P-AMPK activity, but demonstrated an inhibition of ~22% less than what was seen in the AMPKK assay, it was possible that ADP was inhibiting both p-AMPK and LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activities. To test this, a Western blot was performed. We incubated LKB1-STRAD-MO25 with AMPK at ADP concentrations of 0 or 0.8 mM, stopped the reaction with Laemmli's buffer, and Western blotted for p-AMPK (Fig. 2B, n = 8). Addition of 0.8 mM ADP reduced p-AMPK quantities by ~22%.

AMPKK and p-AMPK assays were also performed in the presence of 0, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mM 3-PG concentrations to test if it stimulates either LKB1-STRAD-MO25 or p-AMPK activities. 3-PG had a stimulatory effect on LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity but no effect on p-AMPK activity (Fig. 3A, n = 5–6). To validate the AMPKK assay by directly measuring the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity toward AMPK, Western blotting was performed. We incubated LKB1-STRAD-MO25 with AMPK at 3-PG concentrations of 0, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mM, stopped the reaction with Laemmli's buffer, and Western blotted for p-AMPK. 3-PG stimulated LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity in the same pattern as was seen in the AMPKK activity assays (Fig. 3B, n = 7–8). To test whether the stimulatory effect that 3-PG has on LKB1-STRAD-MO25 is specific to the AMPK isoform used as a substrate, AMPKK assays were performed using {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1-AMPK at 3-PG concentrations 0, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mM. 3-PG was found to have a similar effect on {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1-AMPK activation as it did on {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2-AMPK activation. Analysis was also performed on these blots to obtain a Hill coefficient, Vmax, and activation constant (Ka; Fig. 4). The Vmax was determined to be 157.0 ± 12.4 units, the Ka was found to be 1.50 ± 0.28 mM 3-PG, and the Hill coefficient was found to be 1.49 ± 0.26. The best-fit line was calculated using the average value at each data point.


Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Stimulatory effect of 3-PG on AMPKK activity of LKB1-STRAD-MO25-mediated AMPK activation. Concentrations of 3-PG used in all experiments were 0.0, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 mM. A: assays of both AMPKK activity and p-AMPK activity in the presence of 3-PG. B: Western blot validation of the stimulatory effect of 3-PG on AMPKK activity. C: stimulation of AMPKK activity by 3-PG is not confined to muscle-specific AMPK. AMPKK assay was performed using {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1-AMPK as a substrate. Control values were normalized to 1. P < 0.05, significantly different from p-AMPK assay and significant difference from control observed at these concentrations (*; n = 5–8).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Hill equation analysis of the effects of 3-PG on AMPK phosphorylation. Maximal velocity (Vmax) = 157.0 ± 12.4, activation constant (Ka) = 1.5 ± 0.28, Hill coefficient = 1.49 ± 0.26. Data points were calculated using data from Western blots of Fig. 3B. The line of best fit was determined using the Grafit Program from the increases in activity above the 0 mM 3-PG group.

 
To test whether 3-PG is able to cause an LKB1-STRAD-MO25-mediated activation of a non-AMPK substrate, or whether 3-PG has a substrate-specific stimulatory effect, we tested LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity against the peptide substrate LKB1tide at 3-PG concentrations of 0 and 7.5 mM. Preliminary tests showed that 3-PG had an inhibitory effect on LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity toward LKB1tide. To ensure that the inhibitory effect was not caused by the sodium found in the 3-PG, additional assays were performed with sodium acetate at 15.0 mM. We found again that 3-PG has an inhibitory effect and that the inhibition is not because of the presence of sodium (Fig. 5, n = 6).


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. AMPKK activity of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 in phosphorylating LKB1tide in the presence of 7.5 mM 3-PG and 15.0 mM sodium acetate (SA). SA was used to verify that the observed inhibition was not because of the sodium content of 3-PG. Control values were normalized to 1. *Significantly different from control (n = 6, P < 0.05).

 
We investigated the necessity of the beta- and {gamma}-AMPK subunits in LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activation of AMPK. Western blotting was done with LKB1-STRAD-MO25 incubated with truncated {alpha}-312 AMPK in the presence of 0.0, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mM 3-PG. Analysis with anti-p-AMPK antibody detected a progressive increase in p-AMPK as a function of 3-PG concentration, with a maximal increase of approximately threefold seen at 5 mM 3-PG (Fig. 6, n = 8).


Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Activation of truncated AMPK ({alpha}-312) by LKB1-STRAD-MO25 in the presence of 0.0, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mM 3-PG. Control was normalized to 1. *Significantly different from control (n = 8, P < 0.05).

 
Western blots were also done to investigate a possible allosteric interaction of 3-PG. p-AMPK blots were performed at ATP concentrations of 0.0, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 1.0 mM, and with or without 7.5 mM 3-PG. Both 0.0 and 7.5 mM 3-PG curves demonstrated a sigmoidal curve. The Vmax for LKB1-STRAD-MO25 in the absence of 3-PG was 356 ± 14 relative units, and the K0.5 was 86 ± 14 µM ATP. The Vmax for LKB1-STRAD-MO25 in the presence of 7.5 mM 3-PG was 468 ± 23 relative units, and the K0.5 was 56 ± 5 µM ATP (Fig. 7, n = 8).


Figure 7
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Substrate-activity curves for LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity against AMPK. ATP was the substrate used at concentrations of 0.0, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 1.0 mM. 3-PG (0.0 or 7.5 mM) was used to demonstrate 3-PG as a positive allosteric modulator. For the 0.0 mM 3-PG curve, the Vmax was 356 ± 14, and half-maximal inhibition constant (K0.5) was 86 ± 14 µM ATP. For the 7.5 mM 3-PG curve, the Vmax was 468 ± 14, and K0.5 was 56 ± 5 µM ATP. Vmax for the curves were significantly different, whereas the K0.5 for the curves was not. Significance was established as P < 0.05, n = 8.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Previous studies dealing with AMPKK activity and AMPK activation during exercise have produced data that appear to be contradictory. Previous studies have demonstrated a contraction-induced increase in phosphorylation of AMPK (24, 15, 39, 43) without concurrent detectable increases in AMPKK activity (14, 28). This discrepancy could be explained by the presence of intramuscular allosteric activators that increase in response to contraction. These activators would not be retained in the polyethylene glycol precipitates utilized for determination of AMPKK activity. Very little is currently known about allosteric regulation of the LKB1-STRAD-MO25/AMPK system. A previous study showed that creatine phosphate acted as an allosteric inhibitor of AMPK (25, 40); however, a recent study from our laboratory produced evidence against that concept (34). Another report from our laboratory demonstrated that long-chain acyl-CoA esters, such as palmitoyl-CoA, inhibit AMPKK activity and that palmitoylcarnitine may act as an allosteric activator (35). In our current study we tested, in vitro, an array of metabolites at concentrations typical of both resting and exercising conditions in an attempt to discover an allosteric regulator.

From our first set of experiments, our data suggest that Carn, ADP, and 3-PG all have some type of effect on LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity (Fig. 1, B and D). We first investigated the drastic inhibition seen when LKB1-STRAD-MO25 and AMPK were incubated with ADP. Controlling for the presence of sodium in the ADP, both our AMPKK assay and our p-AMPK assay showed an ADP dose-dependent inhibition (Fig. 2A). Because in the AMPKK assay the ADP was added at the beginning of the first step of the two-step assay and was still present during the second step, ADP could possibly be inhibiting p-AMPK, and not AMPKK. The p-AMPK assay showed a similar decrease in activity, which indicates that ADP is inhibiting the activity of p-AMPK against its substrate, the AMARA peptide. However, there is a discrepancy in the extent that ADP caused inhibition between the AMPKK assay and the p-AMPK assay. At an ADP concentration of 0.8 mM, an ~22% difference is seen between the two assay curves. This difference could be explained by an inhibition of the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex as well. Western blot analysis confirmed that ADP indeed does inhibit the phosphorylation of AMPK by LKB1-STRAD-MO25 (Fig. 2B). We conclude that ADP is able to inhibit both p-AMPK and, to a lesser extent, LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity toward AMPK. We emphasize that free ADP concentrations in the muscle at rest and during exercise are in the range of 0.02–0.11 mM (calculated from values given in Ref. 12). By far, the greatest proportion of ADP would be expected to be bound to proteins. As can be seen from Fig. 2, a relatively small inhibitory effect would be seen in the range of 0.02 to 0.11 mM ADP. Although it is unclear what proportion of the total ADP in the muscle fiber would be available for inhibition of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 or AMPK, we consider it unlikely that ADP is an important inhibitor under physiological conditions. Of course any rise in free ADP would be expected to markedly increase the free AMP concentration via the adenylate kinase reaction. AMP, being a very potent activator, would certainly overwhelm any small inhibitory effect of the rise in free ADP.

Both our AMPKK assays and our Western blots clearly showed that 3-PG acts as an activator of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity. Our p-AMPK assay also showed that 3-PG has no significant effect on the activity of activated AMPK. These results suggest that, when an individual undergoes a bout of exercise, the change in the concentration of 3-PG allows for the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex to more readily phosphorylate skeletal muscle AMPK. This effect, however, may not be isolated to working skeletal muscle. Our AMPKK assay using {alpha}1beta1{gamma}1-AMPK as a substrate demonstrated a similar stimulatory response to increased 3-PG levels (Fig. 3C). Given that very little information is available on the concentrations of 3-PG during resting and exercising conditions in nonskeletal muscle sources, we cannot declare with certainty that this newfound effect will occur outside skeletal muscle, such as the liver; however, it does remain a possibility.

With the use of Western blot data from Fig. 3B, a Hill coefficient was calculated. While recognizing Western blotting to represent a nonprecise method of quantitation, a crude estimation of the Ka and Hill coefficient can be obtained. Although the method was crude, we were able to gain a general understanding from our analysis. Our calculated Hill coefficient of 1.49 ± 0.26 leads us to believe that 3-PG exhibits mild cooperativity. Our calculated Ka for 3-PG of 1.50 ± 0.28 lies well within the range of fluctuations in concentration expected to be observed between resting and contracting muscle.

We performed a number of experiments in an attempt to discern where 3-PG was inducing its stimulatory effect. 3-PG has the possibility of acting on either the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex, allowing it to phosphorylate AMPK better, or it could act on AMPK itself, causing AMPK to undergo a change, making it a better substrate for phosphorylation by the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex. Our evidence suggests that 3-PG enhancement of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity is specific to AMPK as a substrate. AMPK is one of 14 kinases that have been found to be directly phosphorylated by LKB1 (19). The peptide LKB1tide corresponds to an amino acid sequence of another of the 14 kinases, NUAK2. LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity against LKB1tide was inhibited by 7.5 mM 3-PG, suggesting that the effect is specific to AMPK (GoFig. 5). Likewise, AMPK phosphorylation was further enhanced when we used the truncated AMPK {alpha}-312 subunit as shown by Western blot analysis. When we used the full {alpha}2beta2{gamma}2-AMPK as a substrate, maximal AMPK phosphorylation yielded an increase of ~160% (Fig. 3B), whereas the maximal increase in phosphorylation of the {alpha}-312 AMPK reached nearly 300% (Fig. 6). These data suggest that 1) the beta- and {gamma}-AMPK subunits are not necessary for 3-PG-mediated enhancement of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity and that 2) 3-PG will either bind to the {alpha}-AMPK subunit or to the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex. In summary, although our data suggest that 3-PG causes a substrate-specific enhancement of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity, we cannot definitively conclude that the effect was specific to AMPK. Further investigation of the effect of 3-PG on multiple LKB1 substrates, as well as binding affinity experiments, would need to be performed to make such a conclusion. Furthermore, we were unable to conclude from our data where 3-PG binding was occurring.

Regardless of the location of the 3-PG binding, we present clear evidence as to the type of interaction that 3-PG has with whichever enzyme it binds to (Fig. 7). First, we show activity of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 as a function of ATP concentration. The curve shown in Fig. 7 clearly has a sigmoidal shape, which is consistent with allosteric enzymes. As well, we show that the Vmax of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 is reached at no more than 1.0 mM ATP. Preliminary tests showed that incubation with concentrations of 2.0 and 4.0 mM ATP yielded velocities that were not significantly different from at 1.0 mM ATP (data not shown). LKB1-STRAD-MO25 without any additional modulators was able to reach a Vmax of 356 ± 14 relative units, with a K0.5 of 86 ± 14 µM ATP. At a 3-PG concentration of 7.5 mM, and with the same increasing concentrations of ATP, a sigmoidal curve was also observed. The Vmax of this curve was 468 ± 23 relative units, with a K0.5 of 56 ± 5 µM ATP. Comparing the two curves, the Vmax of each curve is significantly different from the other, whereas the K0.5 of each curve is not significantly different from the other. These results are consistent with allosteric activators; we believe that the data presented are sufficient to conclude that 3-PG is an allosteric modulator of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity. Another point that should be emphasized is that the prevailing ATP concentrations inside the muscle fiber are always far above the K0.5 and would never be limiting for LKB1-STRAD-MO25 phosphorylation of AMPK.

We now propose a physiological rationale for having 3-PG as an activator of the AMPK pathway. 3-PG could be acting as an energy utilization switch. At the onset of exercise, the predominant energy substrate used in skeletal muscle is glycogen. This glycogen is broken down to G-6-P, which then enters glycolysis. Further down the glycolytic pathway, 3-PG will be formed. As more glycogen is broken down in the first moments of exercise, 3-PG levels will continue to increase and will stimulate LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity. This increase in LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity will then activate AMPK and allow for blood glucose to be transported into the muscle. As exercise continues, the 3-PG-induced elevation in AMPK activity will cause phosphorylation and inactivation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase, causing malonyl-CoA to decrease and allowing an increase in fatty acid oxidation as fatty acids become available. In short, this model suggests that 3-PG contributes to AMPK activation, acting as a switch to turn on blood glucose utilization near the beginning of exercise and allowing for more fatty acids to be oxidized as exercise continues over time.

In summary, we found that a majority of the metabolites that we investigated had no effect on LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity. ADP had a partial inhibitory effect on LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity but a more pronounced effect on p-AMPK activity. This effect of ADP was determined to be minimal at estimated free ADP concentrations. Carn had an effect on LKB1-STRAD-MO25, whereas 3-PG had a larger effect. Although it seems clear that 3-PG is an allosteric modulator of LKB1-STRAD-MO25 activity, we are unsure whether its effect is on the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex or whether the effect occurs within the first 312 residues of the {alpha}-AMPK subunit. Physiologically, 3-PG may act as an energy substrate utilization sensor, or in some other capacity. Regardless, the discovery of an LKB1-STRAD-MO25 allosteric modulator appears to clarify why previous studies have shown contradictory evidence of exercise-induced decreases in AMPKK activity along with increased AMPK phosphorylation and is generally important as we continue to learn and understand the AMPK signaling cascade. (4, 6, 37)


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. W. Winder, 545 WIDB, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah 84602 (e-mail: william_winder{at}byu.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Adams J, Chen ZP, Van Denderen BJ, Morton CJ, Parker MW, Witters LA, Stapleton D, Kemp BE. Intrasteric control of AMPK via the gamma1 subunit AMP allosteric regulatory site. Protein Sci 13: 155–165, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Bergeron R, Russell RR 3rd, Young LH, Ren JM, Marcucci M, Lee A, Shulman GI. Effect of AMPK activation on muscle glucose metabolism in conscious rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 276: E938–E944, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Constantin-Teodosiu D, Simpson EJ, Greenhaff PL. The importance of pyruvate availability to PDC activation and anaplerosis in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 276: E472–E478, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Durante PE, Mustard KJ, Park SH, Winder WW, Hardie DG. Effects of endurance training on activity and expression of AMP-activated protein kinase isoforms in rat muscles. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283: E178–E186, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Esbjornsson-Liljedahl M, Bodin K, Jansson E. Smaller muscle ATP reduction in women than in men by repeated bouts of sprint exercise. J Appl Physiol 93: 1075–1083, 2001.
  6. Feraudi M, Kolb J, Hassel M, Weicker H. ATP-ADP-dependent phosphorylations of glycolysis metabolites, creatine and glycerol: their compartition and thermodynamic relationship in gastrocnemius muscle cell of exercised guinea pigs. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 91: 351–360, 1983.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Hamilton SR, O'Donnell JB Jr, Hammet A, Stapleton D, Habinowski SA, Means AR, Kemp BE, Witters LA. AMP-activated protein kinase kinase: detection with recombinant AMPK alpha1 subunit. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293: 892–898, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Hargreaves M, McKenna MJ, Jenkins DG, Warmington SA, Li JL, Snow RJ, Febbraio MA. Muscle metabolites and performance during high-intensity, intermittent exercise. J Appl Physiol 84: 1687–1691, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hawley SA, Boudeau J, Reid JL, Mustard KJ, Udd L, Makela TP, Alessi DR, Hardie DG. Complexes between the LKB1 tumor suppressor, STRAD alpha/beta and MO25 alpha/beta are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade (Abstract). J Biol 2: 28, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Hawley SA, Davison M, Woods A, Davies SP, Beri RK, Carling D, Hardie DG. Characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase kinase from rat liver and identification of threonine 172 as the major site at which it phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 271: 27879–27887, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hayashi T, Hirshman MF, Kurth EJ, Winder WW, Goodyear LJ. Evidence for 5' AMP-activated protein kinase mediation of the effect of muscle contraction on glucose transport. Diabetes 47: 1369–1373, 1998.[Abstract]
  12. Hellsten Y, Richter EA, Kiens B, Bangsbo J. AMP deamination and purine exchange in human skeletal muscle during and after intense exercise. J Physiol 520: 909–920, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hintz CS, Chi MM, Fell RD, Ivy JL, Kaiser KK, Lowry CV, Lowry OH. Metabolite changes in individual rat muscle fibers during stimulation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 242: C218–C228, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hurst D, Taylor EB, Cline TD, Greenwood LJ, Compton CL, Lamb JD, Winder WW. AMP-activated protein kinase kinase activity and phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase in contracting muscle of sedentary and endurance-trained rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 289: E710–E715, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hutber CA, Hardie DG, Winder WW. Electrical stimulation inactivates muscle acetyl-CoA carboxylase and increases AMP-activated protein kinase. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 272: E262–E266, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Katz A, Sahlin K, Broberg S. Regulation of glucose utilization in human skeletal muscle during moderate dynamic exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 260: E411–E415, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kurth-Kraczek EJ, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ, Winder WW. 5' AMP-activated protein kinase activation causes GLUT4 translocation in skeletal muscle. Diabetes 48: 1667–1671, 1999.[Abstract]
  18. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophatge T4. Nature 227: 680–685, 1970.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Lizcano JM, Goransson O, Toth R, Deak M, Morrice NA, Boudeau J, Hawley SA, Udd L, Makela TP, Hardie DG, Alessi DR. LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1. EMBO J 23: 833–843, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Merrill GF, Kurth EJ, Hardie DG, Winder WW. AICA riboside increases AMP-activated protein kinase, fatty acid oxidation, and glucose uptake in rat muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 273: E1107–E1112, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wallimann T. A molecular approach to the concerted action of kinases involved in energy homoeostasis. Biochem Soc Trans 31: 169–174, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Neumann D, Woods A, Carling D, Wallimann T, Schlattner U. Mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase: functional, heterotrimeric complexes by co-expression of subunits in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 30: 230–237, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Nielsen JN, Mustard KJ, Graham DA, Yu H, MacDonald CS, Pilegaard H, Goodyear LJ, Hardie DG, Richter EA, Wojtaszewski JF. 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase activity and subunit expression in exercise-trained human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 94: 631–641, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Park SH, Gammon SR, Knippers JD, Paulsen SR, Rubink DS, Winder WW. Phosphorylation-activity relationships of AMPK and acetyl-CoA carboxylase in muscle. J Appl Physiol 92: 2475–2482, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ponticos M, Lu QL, Morgan JE, Hardie DG, Partridge TA, Carling D. Dual regulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase provides a novel mechanism for the control of creatine kinase in skeletal muscle. EMBO J 17: 1688–1699, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Putman CT, Jones NL, Hultman E, Hollidge-Horvat MG, Bonen A, McConachie DR, Heigenhauser GJ. Effects of short-term submaximal training in humans on muscle metabolism in exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 275: E132–E139, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sahlin K, Katz A, Broberg S. Tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates in human muscle during prolonged exercise. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 259: C834–C841, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sakamoto K, Goransson O, Hardie DG, Alessi DR. Activity of LKB1 and AMPK-related kinases in skeletal muscle: effects of contraction, phenformin, and AICAR. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287: E310–E317, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sakamoto K, McCarthy A, Smith D, Green KA, Grahame Hardie D, Ashworth A, Alessi DR. Deficiency of LKB1 in skeletal muscle prevents AMPK activation and glucose uptake during contraction. EMBO J 24: 1810–1820, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Salmons S, Jarvis JC, Mayne CN, Chi MM, Manchester JK, McDougal DB Jr, Lowry OH. Changes in ATP, phosphocreatine, and 16 metabolites in muscle stimulated for up to 96 h. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 271: C1167–C1171, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Scott JW, Hawley SA, Green KA, Anis M, Stewart G, Scullion GA, Norman DG, Hardie DG. CBS domains form energy-sensing modules whose binding of adenosine ligands is disrupted by disease mutations. J Clin Invest 113: 274–284, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Shaw RJ, Kosmatka M, Bardeesy N, Hurley RL, Witters LA, DePinho RA, Cantley LC. The tumor suppressor LKB1 kinase directly activates AMP-activated kinase and regulates apoptosis in response to energy stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 3329–3335, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Snow RJ, Carey MF, Stathis CG, Febbraio MA, Hargreaves M. Effect of carbohydrate ingestion on ammonia metabolism during exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 88: 1576–1580, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Taylor EB, Ellingson WJ, Lamb JD, Chesser DG, Compton CL, Winder WW. Evidence against regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase and LKB1/STRAD/MO25 activity by creatine phosphate. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 290: E661–E669, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Taylor EB, Ellingson WJ, Lamb JD, Chesser DG, Winder WW. Long-chain acyl-CoA esters inhibit phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase at threonine-172 by LKB1/STRAD/MO25. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E1055–E1061, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Taylor EB, Hurst D, Greenwood LJ, Lamb JD, Cline TD, Sudweeks SN, Winder WW. Endurance training increases LKB1 and MO25 protein but not AMP-activated protein kinase kinase activity in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287: E1082–E1089, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Taylor EB, Lamb JD, Hurst RW, Chesser DG, Ellingson WJ, Greenwood LJ, Porter BB, Herway ST, Winder WW. Endurance training increases skeletal muscle LKB1 and PGC-1{alpha} protein abundance: effects of time and intensity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 289: E960–E968, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. van Loon LJ, Greenhaff PL, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Saris WH, Wagenmakers AJ. The effects of increasing exercise intensity on muscle fuel utilization in humans. J Physiol 536: 295–304, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Vavvas D, Apazidis A, Saha AK, Gamble J, Patel A, Kemp BE, Witters LA, Ruderman NB. Contraction-induced changes in acetyl-CoA carboxylase and 5'-AMP-activated kinase in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem 272: 13255–13261, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Winder WW. AMP-activated protein kinase: possible target for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2: 441–448, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Winder WW, Duan C. Control of fructose 2,6-diphosphate in muscle of exercising fasted rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 262: E919–E924, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Winder WW, Fisher SR, Gygi SP, Mitchell JA, Ojuka E, Weidman DA. Divergence of muscle and liver fructose 2,6-diphosphate in fasted exercising rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 260: E756–E761, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Winder WW, Hardie DG. Inactivation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in muscle during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270: E299–E304, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Winder WW, Wilson HA, Hardie DG, Rasmussen BB, Hutber CA, Call GB, Clayton RD, Conley LM, Yoon S, Zhou B. Phosphorylation of rat muscle acetyl-CoA carboxylase by AMP-activated protein kinase and protein kinase A. J Appl Physiol 82: 219–225, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Woods A, Johnstone SR, Dickerson K, Leiper FC, Fryer LG, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carlson M, Carling D. LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Curr Biol 13: 2004–2008, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Zarzeczny R, Brault JJ, Abraham KA, Hancock CR, Terjung RL. Influence of ribose on adenine salvage after intense muscle contractions. J Appl Physiol 91: 1775–1781, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Zhao S, Snow RJ, Stathis CG, Febbraio MA, Carey MF. Muscle adenine nucleotide metabolism during and in recovery from maximal exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 88: 1513–1519, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Ljubicic and D. A. Hood
Specific attenuation of protein kinase phosphorylation in muscle with a high mitochondrial content
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2009; 297(3): E749 - E758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Ljubicic and D. A. Hood
Kinase-specific responsiveness to incremental contractile activity in skeletal muscle with low and high mitochondrial content
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2008; 295(1): E195 - E204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Cho, J. S. King, X. Qian, A. J. Harwood, and S. B. Shears
Dephosphorylation of 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate by MIPP expands the regulatory capacity of the Rapoport-Luebering glycolytic shunt
PNAS, April 22, 2008; 105(16): 5998 - 6003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. E. Jensen, A. J. Rose, S. B. Jorgensen, N. Brandt, P. Schjerling, J. F. P. Wojtaszewski, and E. A. Richter
Possible CaMKK-dependent regulation of AMPK phosphorylation and glucose uptake at the onset of mild tetanic skeletal muscle contraction
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2007; 292(5): E1308 - E1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/2/E400    most recent
00322.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellingson, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winder, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellingson, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winder, W. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.