AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 290: E670-E677, 2006. First published November 8, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00251.2005
0193-1849/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/E670    most recent
00251.2005v2
00251.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gotfredsen, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gotfredsen, C. F.

Measurements of insulin responses as predictive markers of pancreatic beta-cell mass in normal and beta-cell-reduced lean and obese Göttingen minipigs in vivo

Marianne O. Larsen,1 Bidda Rolin,2 Jeppe Sturis,2 Michael Wilken,3 Richard D. Carr,4 Niels Pørksen,5 and Carsten F. Gotfredsen6

1Department of Pharmacology Research I and 2Department of Pharmacology Research III, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev; 3Department of Assay and Cell Technology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd; 4Discovery Management, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd; 5Medical Department C, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and 6Department of Pharmacology Research IV, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark

Submitted 6 June 2005 ; accepted in final form 1 November 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
At present, the best available estimators of beta-cell mass in humans are those based on measurement of insulin levels or appearance rates in the circulation. In several animal models, these estimators have been validated against beta-cell mass in lean animals. However, as many diabetic humans are obese, a correlation between in vivo tests and beta-cell mass must be evaluated over a range of body weights to include different levels of insulin sensitivity. For this purpose, obese (n = 10) and lean (n = 25) Göttingen minipigs were studied. beta-Cell mass had been reduced (n = 16 lean, n = 5 obese) with a combination of nicotinamide (67 mg/kg) and streptozotocin (125 mg/kg), acute insulin response (AIR) to intravenous glucose and/or arginine was tested, pulsatile insulin secretion was evaluated by deconvolution (n = 30), and beta-cell mass was determined histologically. AIR to 0.3 (r2 = 0.4502, P < 0.0001) or 0.6 g/kg glucose (r2 = 0.6806, P < 0.0001), 67 mg/kg arginine (r2 = 0.5730, P < 0.001), and maximum insulin concentration (r2 = 0.7726, P < 0.0001) were all correlated to beta-cell mass when evaluated across study groups, and regression lines were not different between lean and obese groups except for AIR to 0.3 g/kg glucose. Baseline pulse mass was not significantly correlated to beta-cell mass across the study groups (r2 = 0.1036, NS), whereas entrained pulse mass did show a correlation across groups (r2 = 0.4049, P < 0.001). This study supports the use of in vivo tests of insulin responses to evaluate beta-cell mass over a range of body weights in the minipig. Extensive stimulation of insulin secretion by a combination of glucose and arginine seems to give the best correlation to beta-cell mass.

animal model; streptozotocin; arginine; pulsatile insulin secretion


REDUCED beta-CELL MASS is an intrinsic aspect of diabetes in humans (9, 11, 23, 34, 43, 52, 53). Measurement of glucose levels is used both in the diagnosis of the disease and to evaluate effects of treatment of diabetes (1, 5), but because glucose is tightly controlled by several mechanisms, increased levels of glucose are not seen before a considerable proportion of beta-cell function and mass is lost (4, 9). Similarly, reductions of beta-cell mass by 30–50% result in only mild changes in glycemia and insulin levels in humans (21), rats (35, 52), and pigs (33), and severe changes are seen only after more dramatic reductions in beta-cell mass in humans (13, 23, 42), rats (8), pigs (22, 29, 33), and baboons (36). In both humans (45) and pigs (38), there is a strong relation between islet mass used in transplantation studies and metabolic control obtained as evaluated by glucose levels and insulin secretion, a finding that underlines the importance of beta-cell mass in maintenance of normal glucose tolerance and insulin secretion.

The possibility of studying the dynamics of beta-cell mass in humans could supply important information about the development of diabetes as well as effects of pharmacological treatment of the disease as a supplement to measurement of the highly regulated glucose levels.

Nuclear imaging has been validated for this purpose in mice (39), whereas at present it is not possible to use this technology in humans. Therefore, the best available estimates are measurements of insulin levels or appearance rates in the circulation as an indication of beta-cell mass and/or function in vivo. Several methods are available for such evaluations in humans, all relying on measurements of insulin levels or appearance rates in the circulation, including stimulation with glucose (6, 12) and arginine (50). The use of measurements to estimate beta-cell mass based on extensive stimulation of insulin secretion using glucose and/or arginine has been validated in primates (36) and pigs (29) and based on detailed evaluation of pulsatile insulin secretion in pigs (22, 26). Whether either of the two methods shows a superior correlation to beta-cell mass remains to be determined. Furthermore, these validations have been performed only in lean animals, and since many diabetic humans are obese, it is of importance to evaluate whether this correlation is also found across a wider range of body weights in the same strain of animals. We have previously evaluated measurements of insulin responses to stimulations of various types in obese animals in detail (27) but have not related these to beta-cell mass compared with what is seen in lean animals.

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate correlations between beta-cell mass and different methods for evaluation of insulin levels or appearance rates in the circulation, including detailed analysis of pulsatile insulin secretion, over a range of body weights. The Göttingen minipig is a relevant model in the field of diabetes due to its well-described biology with respect to glucose metabolism in normal and diabetic animals (22, 30, 31) and the rapid dynamics of endogenous insulin facilitating evaluation of pulsatile insulin secretion (25). Because there is a close relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin levels and responses in humans (2, 19, 20, 32, 47), it is important to include different levels of insulin sensitivity when measurements of insulin responses in vivo and beta-cell mass are compared. We (28) have previously shown a negative correlation between body weight and insulin sensitivity in Göttingen minipigs, so both lean and obese animals were included in the study to cover a wide range of body weights and insulin sensitivity. Similarly, to include a wide range of beta-cell masses, both lean and obese animals that had had their beta-cell mass reduced by a combination of nicotinamide (NIA) and streptozotocin (STZ) (31) were included in the study.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study Design

The present study was a retrospective analysis summarizing data from two different experiments performed in our laboratory. The major objective was to combine information obtained from these two studies of different aspects of insulin appearance in the circulation and beta-cell mass. Because data were analyzed retrospectively, group sizes have been dependent on the available data and, therefore, differ across the included study groups. Inclusion criteria for the study was that each animal should have completed at least two in vivo tests, one of these focusing on pulsatile insulin secretion and one focusing on insulin response to glucose and/or arginine. The only deviation from this was five normal animals, which were included for histological assessment of beta-cell mass only (see below).

Animals

Source and housing. All animals included in the study were adult male Göttingen minipigs 11–14 mo of age. Animals had been obtained from the barrier unit at Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs ApS (Dalmose, Denmark). All animals had been housed in single pens under controlled conditions (temperature was kept between 18 and 22°C, relative air humidity was 30–70% with 4 air changes/h) with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and allowed free access to water.

All pigs had been studied ≥2 wk after surgical implantation of central venous catheters (see below) and after careful training in all experimental procedures before start of experiments.

Principles of laboratory animal care were followed and the type of study was approved by the Animal Experiments Inspectorate, Ministry of Justice, Denmark.

In total, 35 animals were included in the study.

Diet. Three different feeding regimens had been used for the animals included in the study. To obtain a wide range of body weights, 25 animals that had been kept on the standard feeding regimen to maintain lean phenotype [140 g of SDS minipig diet (SDS, Essex, England) and 240 g of a commercial swine fodder ("Svinefoder 22" or "Antonio", Østsjællands Andel, Karise, Denmark) fed twice daily] were included. Furthermore, 10 obese animals were included, five of which had been fed SDS ad libitum from weaning until 12 mo of age. From 12 mo of age, these animals had been fed ~300 g of a high-fat diet (~20% fat) (Danish pastry, Ganløse, Denmark) plus 240 g of commercial swine fodder twice daily for 7 mo, as previously described (27), to induce obesity. To combine reduced beta-cell mass and obesity, another five of the obese animals included in the study had had their beta-cell mass reduced at age 12 mo (see below) followed by high-fat feeding (240 g commercial swine fodder and 300 g high-fat diet twice daily) for 8 mo.

Data obtained. Data on beta-cell mass and body weight were collected from all 35 included animals.

For five of the included lean animals, these were the only data obtained. The reason for including these animals was to ensure a robust measurement of beta-cell mass in lean animals.

Data from three types of in vivo tests were included in the study: insulin secretion in response to glucose and/or arginine, basal pulsatile insulin secretion, and entrained pulsatile insulin secretion (see below for methodology applied). Because of the inclusion criteria, it was not possible to include data from all in vivo tests from all animals, so n is different for each test (see exact number of animals for each test in the descriptions below).

For some of the animals included in this study, data from in vivo tests have been published previously. Detailed information on this is found below.

Surgical Implantation of Central Venous Catheters

All animals from which data from in vivo tests were included had had two central venous catheters (Certo 455; B. Braun Melsungen, Melsungen, Germany) inserted surgically under general anesthesia as described previously (31). Postsurgical analgesia had been maintained by injection of 0.03 mg/kg buprenorfine (Anorfin; GEA, Frederiksberg, Denmark) and carprofen 4 mg/kg (Rimadyl vet. 50 mg/ml; Pfizer, Ballerup, Denmark) intramuscularly before the end of anesthesia and for 3 days postsurgery by injection of 4 mg/kg carporfen once daily intramuscularly. At the start of the study period, all animals had recovered fully from the surgical procedure as evaluated by normal behavior and eating patterns.

Reduction of beta-Cell Mass

To obtain a wide range of beta-cell mass, we included 21 animals which had had their beta-cell mass reduced by intravenous administration of NIA (67 mg/kg, Sigma N-3376; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) followed by STZ (125 mg/kg, Sigma S-0130) after an 18-h overnight fast, as previously described (31). With respect to reduction of beta-cell mass, all animals had been offered SDS fodder 2 h after treatment and had been observed frequently during the first 48 h after administration of NIA and STZ, including regular monitoring of blood glucose to detect and treat episodes of hypoglycaemia due to sudden hyperinsulinemia caused by necrosis of beta-cells.

Five of the 21 beta-cell-reduced animals had also been fed a high-fat diet for 7–8 mo to induce obesity (obese-STZ animals).

Dynamics of Baseline Insulin Secretion

Baseline pulsatile insulin secretion had been studied in fasted (18 h) conscious animals (n = 4 lean, 12 lean-STZ, 5 obese, and 5 obese-STZ) as previously described (25). In short, blood samples (0.8 ml) had been obtained from a central venous catheter every minute for 40 min. Before each blood sample was collected, 1.5 ml of blood, corresponding to the catheter dead space, were withdrawn and returned aseptically after each sample. Catheters were flushed with 0.8 ml of sterile saline (0.9% SAD, Copenhagen, Denmark) after each blood sample.

Detailed analysis of baseline pulsatile insulin secretion in these animals (except from 2 lean-STZ) has been published elsewhere (26, 27).

Dynamics of Entrained Insulin Secretion

Entrainment of pulsatile insulin secretion had been studied in fasted (18 h) conscious animals (n = 4 lean, 10 lean-STZ, 5 obese, and 5 obese-STZ) as previously described (25). In short, blood samples (0.8 ml) had been obtained from a central venous catheter every minute for 40 min as described above. Every 10th min, starting at 0 min, a bolus of glucose (4 mg·kg–1·min–1 glucose, 200 mg/ml, SAD) had been infused over 1 min via the other central venous catheter.

Detailed analysis of entrained pulsatile insulin secretion in these animals has been published elsewhere (26, 27).

Glucose- and Arginine-Stimulated Insulin Responses

All evaluation of glucose- and arginine-stimulated insulin responses had been performed in fasted (18 h) conscious animals as previously described (29). All compounds had been given intravenously through a central venous catheter, and blood samples had been obtained from the other central venous catheter.

Glucose-stimulated insulin response had been evaluated by administration of glucose (0.3 g/kg, 500 g/l, SAD, given as a bolus over 30 s; n = 4 lean, 15 lean-STZ, 5 obese, and 5 obese-STZ). Furthermore, in some animals (n = 2 lean, 9 lean-STZ, 5 obese, and 4 obese-STZ), the test had been extended with evaluation of insulin secretion in response to 0.6 g/kg glucose (given as a bolus over 30 s 60 min after the 0.3 glucose bolus) followed by an infusion of glucose (2 g·kg–1·h–1, 200 g/l, SAD) for 40 min to maintain hyperglycemia at ~20–30 mM. In these animals, a bolus of arginine (67 mg/kg given over 30 s) had been given 30 min after the 0.6 g/kg glucose bolus.

Blood samples had been obtained at –15, –10, –5, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 min relative to each of the bolus injections; 24 blood samples were obtained in total.

Details of insulin responses in relation to beta-cell mass have been published for some of these animals [n = 4 lean, 7 lean-STZ, 5 obese, and 5 obese-STZ (27, 29)].

Handling and Analysis of Blood Samples

Blood samples had immediately been transferred to vials containing EDTA (1.6 mg/ml final concentration) and aprotinin 500 KIU/ml full blood (Trasylol, 10,000 KIU/ml; Bayer, Lyngby, Denmark) and kept on ice until centrifugation. Samples had been centrifuged (4°C, 10 min, 3,500 rpm) and plasma separated and stored at –20°C until analysis. Plasma glucose had been analyzed using the immobilized glucose oxidase method, 10 µl of plasma in 0.5 ml of buffer (EBIO plus autoanalyzer and solution; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Plasma insulin had been analyzed in a two-site immunometric assay with monoclonal antibodies as catching and detecting antibodies [catching antibody HUI-018 raised against the A-chain of human insulin; detecting antibody OXI-005 raised against the B-chain of bovine insulin (3)] and using purified porcine insulin for calibration of the assay as previously described (31). The minimal detectable concentration was 3.2 pmol/l, the upper limit was 1,200 pmol/l (no sample dilution), and the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation at three concentration levels were 15.3 and 3.2% (at 342 pM), 9.9 and 7.6% (at 235 pM), and 14.6 and 4.4% (at 87 pM). Recovery at high, medium, and low concentration levels was 97.1, 97.9, and 101%, respectively.

Histological Examination of Pancreas

Histological examination had been performed in all animals. After euthanasia with pentobarbitone (20 ml per animal, 200 mg/ml; Pharmacy of the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark), the pancreas had been isolated in toto and fixed in paraformaldehyde (Bie & Berntsen) for 24 h. In all animals, the pancreas had been obtained at least 4 days after the last in vivo test to ensure recovery of insulin stores. To compensate for a possible heterogeneous distribution of the islets in the pancreas, as described for dog pancreas (24), an unbiased fractionator sampling scheme had been used. In short, pancreata were embedded in 3% agar solution (Meco-Benzon cat. no. 303289, Copenhagen, Denmark) and physically sectioned. The pancreas was cut into 3-mm slices, and every fifth tissue slice, starting at slice 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, determined from a table of random numbers, was retained for sectioning, so that, in total, one-fifth of the whole pancreas was included in 9–10 slices. All of the tissue included in these 9–10 slices was then cut into 80–90 cubes of roughly equal size, still representing 20% of the total pancreas. These cubes were arranged on a line according to size, as practiced in the smooth fractionator method, with the largest cubes in the middle and the smallest cubes on the ends (7, 15), a recent modification of the classical fractionator scheme (16). Every eighth cube, starting at cube 1, 2, 3 ... 8, determined from a table of random numbers, was retained and placed randomly oriented in cassettes for dehydration and paraffin infiltration in a tissue processor (Leica TP 1050, Copenhagen, Denmark). On the basis of the described sampling schedule, the resulting paraffin block from each pancreas contained 10–12 cubes of tissue representing different anatomic areas selected randomly. This tissue sample equals 2.5% of the total pancreas mass from each animal. From each paraffin block, 2–3 sections (representing all 10–12 cubes of tissue) 3 µm thick, 250 µm apart in depth, were cut on a Leica RM 2165 microtome.

The deparaffinized sections were stained for insulin to visualize beta-cells. Furthermore, sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. beta-Cell mass was evaluated stereologically in an Olympus BX-50 microscope (Olympus, Copenhagen, Denmark) with video camera and monitor at a total on-screen magnification of x1,025, resulting in a rectangular screen of 310 x 230 µm. The sections were analyzed by point-counting of frames after systematic, uniformly random sampling (SURS) using a PC-controlled motorized stage and the CAST-GRID software (Olympus).

The sections were examined with the observer blinded to the origin of the sections. Initially, the tissue sections were circumscribed using a x1.25 objective, and the counting of endocrine and exocrine structures took place within this area. The volume fraction of tissues was estimated by point-counting stereological techniques on the 310 x 230 µm screens of tissue (14). beta-Cell volume was estimated using a grid of 4 x 64 points per screen, nonpancreatic tissue (fat and connective tissue) volume was estimated using a grid of four points per screen, and pancreas volume was estimated using a grid of one point per screen. Step length between screens was maximally 900 x 600 µm and controlled by the CAST-GRID software. Thus ~800 (SD200) screens were analyzed per pancreas, resulting in 534 (SD132, n = 35) screens scored for pancreas volume and 437 (SD341) hits for beta-cell volume. Mean values of estimated volume fractions were calculated from area weighted mean values, so that the volume fraction of beta-cells was calculated as the total number of hits for beta-cell volume over the two to three sections analyzed divided by the total number of hits for pancreas volume over the two to three sections and the grid ratio (256). Total beta-cell mass was calculated from the volume fraction of beta-cells and the weight of the pancreas, corrected for the presence of nonpancreatic tissue, and assuming that beta-cells and the rest of the pancreas have the same density. beta-Cell mass is expressed as absolute mass (mg) for each individual animal.

In groups of identically treated animals (non-STZ or STZ animals from previous studies in our laboratory), the total coefficient of error (CE) for determination of beta-cell mass (variation between animals and from method) is 25–40%. In the material included in the present study, the between-sections 250 µm apart CE was 16%. The involved SURS method alone contributes with an estimated CE of ~3% and the point-counting "noise" with a CE of 3% with the number of fractions (10–12 fractions) and "hits" used for the present studies (7, 15). An increase in the number of sections or points counted would only marginally have reduced the overall CE by 2–3%. Therefore, the methodology used in the present study fairly represents the true difference in beta-cell mass between animals.

The technique of using point counting has been described in detail by other laboratories (7, 15), and we have previously compared the use of point counting with image analysis of whole sections of the pancreas to estimate beta-cell mass in our laboratory (Gotfredsen CF, unpublished results). The correlation between the two methods in our laboratory was r2 = 0.8545, P < 0.0001, n = 18.

The average number of days between evaluation of pulsatile insulin secretion and histology was 40 (SD 28), and this period was significantly longer in obese vs. lean-STZ animals [90 (SD 15) vs. 20 (SD 8), P < 0.01], whereas no significant differences were found between any other pairs of groups [lean 34 (SD 9), obese-STZ 50 (SD 15)]. Similarly, the average number of days between glucose and arginine stimulation and histology was 30 (SD 25), and this period was significantly longer in obese vs. lean-STZ animals [77 (SD 14) vs. 14 (SD 9), P < 0.001], whereas no significant differences were found between any other pairs of groups [lean 30 (SD 7), obese-STZ 25 (SD 10)].

Evaluation of Results

Acute insulin response. Acute insulin response (AIR) to glucose and arginine was calculated as the average increase in insulin levels during the first 10 min after dosing: AIR = (mean insulin 0–10 min) – (baseline before dosing).

Maximum insulin. Maximum insulin concentration during stimulation with glucose and arginine was used as an additional measure of beta-cell response. Maximum insulin concentration was generally seen in one of the blood samples taken after the arginine bolus.

Detection and quantification of pulsatile insulin secretion by deconvolution. The plasma insulin concentration time series were analyzed by deconvolution for the purpose of detection and quantification of insulin secretory bursts, as previously described (25). In short, deconvolution of venous insulin concentration data was performed with a multiparameter technique (49), which requires the following assumptions. The venous plasma insulin concentrations measured in samples collected at 1-min intervals were assumed to have resulted from five determinable and correlated parameters: 1) a finite number of discrete insulin secretory bursts occurring at specific times and having 2) individual amplitudes (maximal rate of secretion attained within a burst); 3) a common half-duration (duration of an algebraically Gaussian secretory pulse at half-maximal amplitude), which is superimposed on a 4) basal time-invariant insulin secretory rate; and 5) a biexponential insulin disappearance model in the systemic circulation. The mass of hormone secreted per burst (time integral of the calculated secretory burst) was computed as picomoles of insulin released per liter of systemic distribution volume, and pulse mass during both baseline and entrained conditions was evaluated in relation to beta-cell mass. All data analysis by deconvolution was performed in a blinded manner by a single person.

Statistics

All calculations and statistical evaluation of results were performed using Excel (2000) and GraphPad Prism v. 3.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistical evaluation using Prism included one-way ANOVA (with Tukey’s multiple comparison test as a post hoc test) or the Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s test as post hoc test), Student’s t-test, or Mann-Whitney test. Linear regression was done using Prism. P values of 0.05 or less were considered significant. Data are presented as means (SD) in the text.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
beta-Cell Mass

The range of beta-cell mass was from 28 to 931 mg (Fig. 1), and there was considerable overlap between groups. The STZ-dosed animals had significantly reduced beta-cell mass compared with animals not dosed with STZ [168 (SD 89) vs. 557 (SD 157) mg, P < 0.001]. Obese non-STZ animals tended to have increased beta-cell mass compared with lean non-STZ animals [643 (SD 162) vs. 508 (SD 108) mg, P = 0.06; Fig. 1]. On the basis of the overlap between the groups, correlations between in vivo tests and beta-cell mass were analyzed across the entire data set included in the study.


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Relation between beta-cell mass and body weight (A and C) or fasting plasma glucose (FPG; B and D) in the experimental groups. A and B present raw data, whereas C and D present group means ± SE. {blacktriangleup}, lean (A and C, n = 9; B and D, n = 4); {triangleup}, lean-STZ (n = 16); {blacksquare}, obese (n = 5); {square}, obese-STZ animals (A and B, n = 5).

 
Body Weight and Fasting Plasma Glucose

The range of body weights was from 24 to 65 kg, with lean animals weighing significantly less than obese animals [33 (SD 5) (range 24–41) vs. 54 (SD 6) (range 47–65) kg, P < 0.0001; Fig. 1].

Similarly, the range of fasting plasma glucose values was 2.6 to 9.2 mM, with STZ-dosed animals having significantly higher fasting plasma glucose than animals not dosed with STZ [4.5 (SD 1.5) (range 3.4–9.2) vs. 3.4 (SD 0.5) (range 2.6–4.1) mM, P < 0.01; Fig. 1].

Obese animals tended to have slightly lower fasting plasma glucose than lean animals [3.2 (SD 0.5) vs. 3.7 (SD 0.3)], but this was not significant.

Relation Between Parameters from In Vivo Tests and beta-Cell Mass

AIR 0.3, AIR 0.6, and AIR arginine, as well as maximum insulin and entrained pulse mass, were all significantly correlated to beta-cell mass across the study groups (Fig. 2), whereas basal pulse mass was not. Extensive stimulation of beta-cells gave the best correlations to mass across the groups (AIR 0.6, AIR arginine, and maximum insulin), with maximum insulin concentrations during the test giving the best correlation to beta-cell mass. To explore possible reasons for poor correlations for AIR 0.3 and pulse mass, regression lines for lean and obese animals were compared. For AIR 0.3, slopes (pM/mg) were significantly different in lean (0.7503 ± 0.1032) vs. obese animals (0.2818 ± 0.1188, P = 0.005). It was, therefore, not possible to evaluate whether the difference seen for intercept on the y-axis for beta-cell mass = 0 was significantly different between obese and lean animals (2.141 ± 25.88 pM for lean; 57.42 ± 59.77 pM for obese animals). Similarly, slopes for basal pulse mass were different between lean (0.2394 ± 0.0746) and obese (0.0126 ± 0.0247, P = 0.01) animals (y-axis intercept for lean: –6.168 ± 18.99; for obese: 29.80 ± 12.40). Slopes for entrained pulse mass were not significantly different between lean (0.3306 ± 0.0994) and obese (0.1892 ± 0.0400, P = 0.2) animals. Furthermore, the y-axis intercept did not differ significantly between lean (15.35 ± 27.16) and obese (10.66 ± 20.10, P = 0.056), although there was a tendency for obese animals to have lower intercept. For AIR 0.6, AIR arginine, and maximum insulin, no differences were found between slopes or intercepts between lean and obese animals (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relation between in vivo tests and beta-cell mass. A: acute insulin response (AIR) 0.3 g/kg glucose. B: AIR 0.6 g/kg glucose. C: AIR arginine. D: maximum insulin. E: baseline pulse mass. F: entrained pulse mass. {blacktriangleup}, lean animals; {triangleup}, lean-STZ animals; {blacksquare}, obese animals; {square}, obese-STZ animals.

 
When data were analyzed across the study groups, evaluation of pulse mass did not provide a stronger correlation with beta-cell mass than any of the other tests. Similarly, when lean animals were considered separately, baseline or entrained pulse mass did not show stronger correlation with beta-cell mass than any of the other tests, whereas, when considering obese animals, entrained pulse mass showed correlations in the same range, or slightly stronger than the other tests (data not shown).

Relation Between In Vivo Tests

To be able to evaluate the strength of the correlations between in vivo tests and beta-cell mass, we looked at the correlation between parameters such as AIR 0.6 and maximum insulin (r2 = 0.9530, P < 0.0001) and AIR arginine and AIR 0.6 (r2 = 0.6595, P < 0.0001) across the study groups. These parameters are very closely related, since they all reflect insulin responses during extensive beta-cell stimulation. The observation that the correlations between closely related parameters from in vivo tests and beta-cell mass are in the same range is an indication of a very strong biological relationship between these parameters, further supporting the use of parameters based on in vivo insulin responses as a surrogate measure of beta-cell mass in this model.

In lean animals, both basal and entrained pulse mass were strongly correlated with insulin responses to 0.3 and 0.6 g/kg glucose, arginine, and maximum insulin (r2 ranging from 0.5515 to 0.9471), whereas no strong correlation was seen between these parameters in the obese animals (r2 ranging from 0 to 0.4466).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we have demonstrated a significant correlation between a range of different parameters derived from in vivo tests and beta-cell mass across a group of lean and obese animals. Furthermore, the relationships were similar for those parameters that involve extensive stimulation of insulin secretion (AIR 0.6, AIR arginine, and maximum insulin concentration) when lean and obese animals were evaluated separately. However, with parameters based on either no (baseline pulse mass) or considerably reduced stimulation of insulin secretion (entrained pulse mass and AIR 0.3), a tendency for a steeper decline with reduction of beta-cell mass in lean compared with obese animals was observed.

The dose-response curve for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in humans is very steep at glucose concentrations between 7.5 and 10 mM, whereas at glucose concentrations between 10 and 15 mM the increase is less marked (41). Thus the use of extensive stimulation of insulin secretion with plasma glucose concentrations of ≥10 mM during in vivo tests should provide the most useful estimate for beta-cell mass in the minipig over a range of body weights, and this is in accord with what we have previously reported in lean minipigs (29).

An argument against extensive stimulation of beta-cells could be the risk of reducing insulin clearance, because this phenomenon has been reported in humans (46) and would result in an overestimate of beta-cell mass. However, the present results show a strong correlation between beta-cell mass and maximum insulin concentration, so any overestimate of beta-cell mass seems to be similar at low and high mass, enabling the relationship between maximum insulin concentration and mass to be described with a linear function in the range studied.

Because insulin levels and responses and insulin resistance are closely related in humans (2, 19, 20, 32, 47), it is of special interest that the strong correlation between parameters from in vivo tests and mass is present across a group of lean and obese animals. These findings in an animal model could indicate that the use of methods involving extensive stimulation of insulin secretion may possibly provide an estimate of beta-cell mass in population studies in humans including a broad range of body weights, such as, for instance, patients with the metabolic syndrome and/or type 2 diabetes. However, before the use of such an estimate in a human population, it would be necessary to validate the method in more detail in animals. In particular, it would be of relevance to include obese animals with more marked hyperglycemia. We (29) have previously reported that there is a good correlation between beta-cell mass and insulin responses in severely hyperglycemic lean animals, but this correlation still remains to be demonstrated in obese animals with marked hyperglycemia. Furthermore, it remains to be determined whether the same methodology can be used to evaluate changes in beta-cell mass after pharmacological intervention in this model.

The weaker correlation with beta-cell mass seen after 0.3 g/kg glucose could indicate that not all beta-cells respond to the more moderate stimuli. A weaker correlation might be due to different secretory stimulation in the population of beta-cells, as has previously been shown in vitro (40, 48). Alternatively, it could be speculated that less extensive stimulation of insulin secretion would allow animals with reduced beta-cell mass to compensate to a larger extent than when more extensive stimulation is applied, as has been observed in both dogs (51) and baboons with reduced beta-cell mass (37).

Evaluation of pulsatile insulin secretion has been shown to be a very sensitive method for detection of changes in beta-cell responses (17, 18, 27, 44) and to correlate with beta-cell mass in lean minipigs (22, 26). The present results confirm that deconvolution analysis of pulsatile insulin secretion can provide a useful estimate of beta-cell mass. However, this method does not seem to provide better estimates of beta-cell mass compared with some of the more simple tests (stimulation with glucose and/or arginine).

Even though the present study was focused on determining surrogate markers of beta-cell mass, the glycemic levels in obese animals deserve attention in their own right. First, the slightly lower fasting plasma glucose in the obese animals could indicate a powerful compensation for the obesity in the fasted state, and a similar tendency for slightly lower glucose levels has recently been reported in obese humans (10). We have previously shown in these animals that around two years of obesity is mostly linked to subtle changes in the coordination of pulsatile insulin secretion (27), whereas it remains to be determined whether longer-term obesity will have an effect on insulin responses in vivo and their relation to beta-cell mass in this model.

Second, it is surprising that obese-STZ animals did not show increased fasting hyperglycemia compared with lean-STZ animals, since the combination of obesity and reduced beta-cell mass could be expected to further deteriorate metabolic control. Whether such abnormalities would develop over a longer period still remains to be determined. On the basis of our results, further studies of the relation between obesity and compensatory mechanisms to maintain glucose tolerance in this animal model would be very interesting.

In conclusion, evaluation of insulin concentrations and appearance rates in vivo can provide a highly predictive estimate of beta-cell mass across a wide range of body weights in the Göttingen minipig. Evaluation of pulsatile insulin secretion did not show a stronger relationship to beta-cell mass compared with some of the simpler tests used. The strongest correlation with beta-cell mass across the groups was seen after extensive stimulation of insulin secretion with both glucose and arginine when maximum insulin concentration was measured during the in vivo test. This finding in an animal model could support the evaluation of similar methods in the future to estimate beta-cell mass in studies in humans over a range of body weights. Furthermore, the ability to estimate beta-cell mass on the basis of in vivo experiments would allow longitudinal studies on changes in beta-cell mass in minipigs to evaluate the dynamics of this process in vivo.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Lene Sejersen Winther, Helle Nygaard, Lotte Gotlieb Sørensen, Anne Grethe Juul, Nanna Kasmira Nowa Hansen, Annemette Petersen, Susanne Primdal, Karsten Larsen, Ejnar Eriksen, and Hans Rasmussen for excellent technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. O. Larsen, Dept. of Pharmacology Research I, Research and Development, Novo Nordisk Park, F6.1.30, DK-2760 Maaloev, Denmark (e-mail: mmla{at}novonordisk.com)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. ADA. Diagnosis and classification. In:Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (4th ed.), edited by Kelley DB. Alexandria, VA: American Diabetes Association, Clinical Education Series, 1998, p. 1–18.
  2. Ahren B and Thorsson O. Increased insulin sensitivity is associated with reduced insulin and glucagon secretion and increased insulin clearance in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 1264–1270, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Andersen L, Dinesen B, Jørgensen PN, Poulsen F, and Røder ME. Enzyme immunoassay for intact human insulin in serum or plasma. Clin Chem 39: 578–582, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Anonymous. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 16. Overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group.Diabetes 44: 1249–1258, 1995.[Abstract]
  5. Anonymous. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes Care 26: S5–S20, 2003.
  6. Bergman RN, Ider YZ, Bowden CR, and Cobelli C. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Gastrointest Physiol 236: E667–E677, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bock T, Svenstrup K, Pakkenberg B, and Buschard K. Unbiased estimation of total beta-cell number and mean beta-cell volume in rodent pancreas. APMIS 107: 791–799, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Bonner-Weir S, Trent DF, and Weir GC. Partial pancreatectomy in the rat and subsequent defect in glucose-induced insulin release. J Clin Invest 71: 1544–1553, 1983.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Butler AE, Janson J, Bonner-Weir S, Ritzel R, Rizza RA, and Butler PC. Beta-cell deficit and increased beta-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 52: 102–110, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Camastra S, Manco M, Mari A, Baldi S, Gastaldelli A, Greco AV, Mingrone G, and Ferrannini E. Beta-cell function in morbidly obese subjects during free living—long-term effects of weight loss. Diabetes 54: 2382–2389, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Clark A, Wells CA, Buley ID, Cruickshank JK, Vanhegan RI, Matthews DR, Cooper GJ, Holman RR, and Turner RC. Islet amyloid, increased A-cells, reduced B-cells and exocrine fibrosis: quantitative changes in the pancreas in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res 9: 151–159, 1988.[ISI][Medline]
  12. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, and Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Gastrointest Physiol 237: E214–E223, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gepts W and Lecompte PM. The pancreatic islets in diabetes. Am J Med 70: 105–115, 1981.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Gundersen HJG, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Møller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sørensen FB, and Vesterby A. Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 96: 379–394, 1988.[ISI][Medline]
  15. Gundersen HJG. The smooth fractionator. J Microsc (Oxf) 207: 191–210, 2002.[CrossRef]
  16. Gundersen HJG, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, Evans SM, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Møller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sørensen FB, Vesterby FB, and West MJ. The new stereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 96: 857–881, 1988.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Hollingdal M, Juhl CB, Pincus SM, Sturis J, Veldhuis JD, Polonsky KS, Porksen N, and Schmitz O. Failure of physiological plasma glucose excursions to entrain high-frequency pulsatile insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 49: 1334–1340, 2000.[Abstract]
  18. Juhl CB, Hollingdal M, Porksen N, Prange A, Lönnquist F, and Schmitz O. Influence of rosiglitazone treatment on beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes: evidence of an increased ability of glucose to entrain high-frequency insulin pulsatility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 3794–3800, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kahn SE. The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 46: 3–19, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Kahn SE, Prigeon RL, McCulloch DK, Boyko EJ, Bergman RN, Schwartz MW, Neifing JL, Ward WK, Beard JC, and Palmer JP. Quantification of the relationship between insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in human subjects. Evidence for a hyperbolic function. Diabetes 42: 1663–1672, 1993.[Abstract]
  21. Kendall DM, Sutherland DE, Najarian JS, Goetz FC, and Robertson RP. Effects of hemipancreatectomy on insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in healthy humans. N Engl J Med 322: 898–903, 1990.[Abstract]
  22. Kjems LL, Kirby BM, Welsh EM, Veldhuis JD, Straume M, McIntyre SS, Yang DC, Lefebvre P, and Butler PC. Decrease in beta-cell mass leads to impaired pulsatile insulin secretion, reduced postprandial hepatic insulin clearance, and relative hyperglucagonemia in the minipig. Diabetes 50: 2001–2012, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Klöppel G, Öhr M, Habich K, Oberholzer M, and Heitz PU. Islet pathology and the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus revisited. Surv Synth Pathol Res 4: 110–125, 1985.[ISI][Medline]
  24. Kroustrup JP and Gundersen HJG. Sampling problems in an heterogeneous organ: quantitation of relative and total volume of pancreatic islets by light microscopy. J Microsc (Oxf) 132: 43–55, 1983.
  25. Larsen MO, Elander M, Sturis J, Wilken M, Carr RD, Rolin B, and Porksen N. The conscious Gottingen minipig as a model for studying rapid pulsatile insulin secretion in vivo. Diabetologia 45: 1389–1396, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Larsen MO, Gotfredsen CF, Wilken M, Carr RD, Porksen N, and Rolin B. Loss of beta-cell mass leads to a reduction of pulse mass with normal periodicity, regularity and entrainment of pulsatile insulin secretion in Göttingen minipigs. Diabetologia 46: 195–202, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Larsen MO, Juhl CB, Pørksen N, Gotfredsen CF, Carr RD, Ribel U, Wilken M, and Rolin B. beta-Cell function and islet morphology in normal, obese, and obese beta-cell mass-reduced Göttingen minipigs. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E412–E421, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Larsen MO, Raun K, Ribel U, Gotfredsen CF, Brand CL, Wilken M, Carr RD, and Rolin B. Insulin sensitivity is negatively correlated to total body mass in Göttingen minipigs. Diabetes Metab 29: S98, 2003. Abstract.
  29. Larsen MO, Rolin B, Wilken M, Carr RD, and Gotfredsen CF. Measurements of insulin secretory capacity and glucose tolerance to predict pancreatic beta-cell mass in vivo in the nicotinamide/streptozotocin Göttingen minipig, a model of moderate insulin deficiency and diabetes. Diabetes 52: 118–123, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Larsen MO, Rolin B, Wilken M, Carr RD, Svendsen O, and Bollen P. Parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism in the male Gottingen minipig: influence of age, body weight, and breeding family. Compar Med 51: 436–442, 2001.
  31. Larsen MO, Wilken M, Gotfredsen CF, Carr RD, Svendsen O, and Rolin B. Mild streptozotocin diabetes in the Göttingen minipig: a novel model of moderate insulin deficiency and diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E1342–E1351, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Levy JC, Rudenski A, Burnett M, Knight R, Matthews DR, and Turner RC. Simple empirical assessment of beta-cell function by a constant infusion of glucose test in normal and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects. Diabetologia 34: 488–499, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  33. Lohr M, Lubbersmeyer J, Otremba B, Klapdor R, Grossner D, and Kloppel G. Increase in B-cells in the pancreatic remnant after partial pancreatectomy in pigs. An immunocytochemical and functional study. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 56: 277–286, 1989.[ISI][Medline]
  34. Maclean N and Ogilvie RF. Quantitative estimation of the pancreatic islet tissue in diabetic subjects. Diabetes 4: 367–376, 1955.[Medline]
  35. Masiello P, Broca C, Gross R, Roye M, Manteghetti M, Hillaire-Buys D, Novelli M, and Ribes G. Experimental NIDDM: development of a new model in adult rats administered streptozotocin and nicotinamide. Diabetes 47: 224–229, 1998.[Abstract]
  36. McCulloch DK, Koerker DJ, Kahn SE, Bonner-Weir S, and Palmer JP. Correlations of in vivo beta-cell function tests with beta-cell mass and pancreatic insulin content in streptozocin-administered baboons. Diabetes 40: 673–679, 1991.[Abstract]
  37. McCulloch DK, Raghu PK, Johnston C, Klaff LJ, Kahn SE, Beard JC, Ward WK, Benson EA, Koerker DJ, and Bergman RN. Defects in beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in normoglycemic streptozocin-treated baboons: a model of preclinical insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67: 785–792, 1988.[Abstract]
  38. Mellert J, Hering BJ, Liu X, Brandhorst D, Brandhorst H, Pfeffer F, Federlin K, Bretzel RG, and Hopt UT. Critical islet mass for successful porcine islet autotrasplantation. J Mol Med 77: 126–129, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Moore A, Bonner-Weir S, and Weissleder R. Noninvasive in vivo measurement of beta-cell mass in mouse model of diabetes. Diabetes 50: 2231–2236, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Pipeleers DG. Heterogeneity in pancreatic beta-cell population. Diabetes 41: 777–781, 1992.[Abstract]
  41. Rudenski AS, Hosker JP, Burnett MA, Matthews DR, and Turner RC. The beta cell glucose stimulus-response curve in normal humans assessed by insulin and C-peptide secretion rates. Metabolism 37: 526–534, 1988.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  42. Saito K, Yaginuma N, and Takahashi T. Differential volumetry of A, B and D cells in the pancreatic islets of diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Tohoku J Exp Med 129: 273–283, 1979.[ISI][Medline]
  43. Sakuraba H, Mizukami H, Yagihashi N, Wada R, Hanyu C, and Yagihashi S. Reduced beta-cell mass and expression of oxidative stress- related DNA damage in the islet of Japanese Type II diabetic patients. Diabetologia 45: 85–96, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  44. Schmitz O, Pørksen N, Nyholm B, Skjaerbaek C, Butler PC, Veldhuis JD, and Pincus SM. Disorderly and nonstationary insulin secretion in relatives of patients with NIDDM. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 272: E218–E226, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Teuscher AU, Kendall DM, Smets YFC, Leone JP, Sutherland DER, and Robertson RP. Successful islet autotransplantation in humans: functional insulin secretory reserve as an estimate of surviving islet cell mass. Diabetes 47: 324–330, 1998.[Abstract]
  46. Tillil H, Shapiro ET, Miller MA, Karrison T, Frank BH, Galloway JA, Rubenstein AH, and Polonsky KS. Dose-dependent effects of oral and intravenous glucose on insulin secretion and clearance in normal humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 254: E349–E357, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Turner RC, Holman RR and Matthews D. Insulin deficiency and insulin resistance interaction in diabetes: estimation of their relative contribution by feedback analysis from basal plasma insulin and glucose concentrations. Metab Clin Exp 28: 1086–1096, 1979.
  48. Van Schravendijk CF, Kiekens R, and Pipeleers DG. Pancreatic beta cell heterogeneity in glucose-induced insulin secretion. J Biol Chem 267: 21344–21348, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Veldhuis JD, Carlson ML, and Johnson ML. The pituitary gland secretes in bursts: appraising the nature of glandular secretory impulses by simultaneous multiple-parameter deconvolution of plasma hormone concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 7686–7690, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Ward WK, Bolgiano DC, McKnight B, Halter JB, and Porte D. Diminished B cell secretory capacity in patients with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 74: 1318–1328, 1984.[ISI][Medline]
  51. Ward WK, Wallum BJ, Beard JC, Taborsky GJ, and Porte D. Reduction of glycemic potentiation. Sensitive indicator of beta-cell loss in partially pancreatectomized dogs. Diabetes 37: 723–729, 1988.[Abstract]
  52. Weir GC, Leahy JL, and Bonner-Weir S. Experimental reduction of B-cell mass: implications for the pathogenesis of diabetes. Diabetes Metab Rev 2: 125–161, 1986.[Medline]
  53. Yoon KH, Ko SH, Cho JH, Lee JM, Ahn YB, Song KH, Yoo SJ, Kang MI, Cha BY, Lee KW, Son HY, Kang SK, Kim HS, Lee IK, and Bonner-Weir S. Selective beta-cell loss and beta-cell expansion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 2300–2308, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
R. P. Robertson
Estimation of {beta}-Cell Mass by Metabolic Tests: Necessary, but How Sufficient?
Diabetes, October 1, 2007; 56(10): 2420 - 2424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/E670    most recent
00251.2005v2
00251.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gotfredsen, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gotfredsen, C. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.