|
|
||||||||
1The Center for Research in Reproduction, 2Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine and 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Submitted 11 September 2003 ; accepted in final form 19 January 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ovarian steroidogenesis; hyperandrogenism; androstenedione; testosterone; 17-hydroxyprogesterone; luteinizing hormone
In vivo studies of PCOS demonstrate characteristically abnormal ovarian steroid responses to acute administration of either a potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (2, 7, 15, 31, 38) or a high dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; see Ref. 12, 15, 19). Specifically, these stimuli elicit exaggerated secretion of 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) and, to a lesser degree, androstenedione (
4A), suggesting abnormal ovarian steroidogenesis. However, these paradigms involve pharmacological ovarian stimulation and do not reproduce physiological LH pulsatility. For instance, with acute GnRH agonist administration, plasma LH approaches or exceeds 100 IU/l within 4 h (2, 31) and remains elevated for several days. Similarly, hCG challenge protocols involve administration of 5,00010,000 IU hCG (12, 15, 19), which effects potent and prolonged ovarian stimulation. In contrast, mean LH concentrations in women with PCOS approximate 535 IU/l (5, 26, 37). Thus these paradigms of supraphysiological gonadotropin stimulation evaluate maximal ovarian responses only. Moreover, supraphysiological gonadotropin stimuli may induce selective downregulation of ovarian steroidogenic enzymes. For instance, when gonadotropin stimulation of rodent or human Leydig cells is excessive, partial downregulation of 17-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase ensues (7). Therefore, it is possible that abnormal 17-OHP and
4A responses in PCOS reflect abnormalities of steroidogenic enzyme downregulation in response to supraphysiological stimuli.
We hypothesized that near-physiological LH stimuli would effect greater ovarian secretion of androgens and their precursors in women with PCOS compared with controls. To test this supposition, we employed a paradigm of sequential GnRH-receptor antagonist administration to suppress endogenous LH concentrations, and intermittent (pulse-like) infusions of physiological amounts of recombinant human LH (rhLH) to stimulate ovarian steroidogenesis.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-hCG. Subjects had not taken any hormonal medications for at least 90 days before the study screening, and none of the women was taking medications known to affect the reproductive axis. Study protocol. The study was approved by both the Human Investigation Committee and the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) Advisory Committee of the University of Virginia Health System. Informed consent was obtained from all study volunteers. Ganirelix (Antagon; Organon, West Orange, NJ) and rhLH (Luveris; Serono, Aubonne, Switzerland) were used in the protocol under an investigator-initiated Food and Drug Administration Investigational New Drug application.
All study participants were admitted to the GCRC for study over 2 nights and the intervening day. Women with PCOS were studied at least 60 days after last menses. Recent ovulation was excluded in these women by a plasma P concentration <1 ng/ml at the time of study, the absence of vaginal bleeding within 1 mo of study completion, or both. Normal controls were studied between days 5 and 12 of the follicular phase to approximate the hormonal milieu of PCOS (e.g., E2, P, LH pulse frequency). Pregnancy was excluded in all participants with a
-hCG measured on arrival to the GCRC.
The GCRC protocol is shown in Fig. 1. At 8 PM, an intravenous catheter was placed in an antecubital vein and used exclusively for sampling purposes. At 10 PM, 2 mg ganirelix, a GnRH-receptor antagonist, was given subcutaneously. Ganirelix lowers plasma LH over 26 h, with maximal suppression occurring in 812 h and continuing for at least 24 h (21, 29). In the last five subjects studied (3 controls, 2 PCOS), blood samples for later LH assay were obtained every 10 min for 1 h before ganirelix administration. At 12 AM, subjects took 0.75 mg dexamethasone orally to suppress adrenal androgen secretion. At 7 AM, a second intravenous catheter was placed in a contralateral antecubital vein and used for later hormone infusion.
|
4A, and T every 30 min. At 10 AM (12 h after ganirelix), we began pseudorandomized (i.e., highest dose last) intravenous doses of rhLH. In the initial 10 controls and 5 PCOS subjects, administered doses included 0 (saline), 10, 30, and 100 IU rhLH. Evaluation of these patients revealed the 10 IU dose to be ineffectual; therefore, the last five subjects studied (3 controls, 2 PCOS) received 0, 30, 100, and 300 IU rhLH. The highest rhLH dose was always administered last to obviate sequence artifact. All rhLH doses were given as 8-min square wave infusions at 4-h intervals via a Harvard infusion pump; this method of rhLH administration produces plasma LH profiles that are essentially indistinguishable from endogenous LH pulses. In the initial five women with PCOS and nine controls, 500 µg GnRH were administered intravenously at 2 AM on the second night.
Hormonal measurements.
All samples from each individual were analyzed in duplicate in the same assay for each hormone. Plasma LH and FSH were measured by chemiluminescence (assay sensitivities 0.01 and 0.2 IU/l, intra-assay CVs
5.4 and 9.5%, and interassay CVs
15.1 and 14.4%, respectively; Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA). Steroids were measured by RIA (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX). For 17-OHP,
4A, and T, sensitivities were 0.01 ng/ml (0.03 nmol/l), 0.03 ng/ml (0.1 nmol/l), and 0.08 ng/ml (0.28 nmol/l), respectively; intra-assay CVs
7.9, 7.5, and 11.5%, respectively; and interassay CVs
18.6, 18, and 18.9%, respectively. For E2 and P, sensitivities were 4.7 pg/ml (17.3 pmol/l) and 0.12 ng/ml (0.38 nmol/l), respectively; intra-assay CVs
10.6 and 11%, respectively; and interassay CVs
15.9 and 17.4%, respectively. SHBG was measured by immunoradiometric assay (assay sensitivity 3 nmol/l, intra-assay CV
9.4%, interassay CV
15%; Diagnostic Systems Laboratories). Samples with measured values below assay sensitivity were assigned the value of the assay's sensitivity.
Data and statistical analysis. Data from one normal control was excluded because of failure to administer the highest (100 IU) rhLH dose; the final analysis for this report is thus based on 12 controls and 7 women with PCOS. All data are reported as means ± SE.
Screening data were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Average plasma LH, 17-OHP,
4A, and T concentrations were calculated from 0800 to 1000 (i.e., beginning 10 h after ganirelix administration and ending immediately before the first rhLH infusion) and designated as baseline hormone concentrations; these were compared (PCOS vs. controls) using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
Average LH and ovarian steroid concentrations over the 4-h intervals after each dose of rhLH were also calculated. Missing values, which represented <0.1% of the total, were ignored. For each steroid and each individual, linear regression models were estimated to characterize the relationship between the mean steroid concentration over each 4-h period (the dependent variable) and the corresponding 4-h mean LH concentration (the independent variable). In this way, we estimated an LH dose-steroid response relationship for each woman with PCOS and each control. Mean LH was chosen as the measure of ovarian stimulus because this incorporated possible disparity between the relative contributions of endogenous LH (because suppression with ganirelix could have differed) between PCOS and controls. We chose the mean 4-h steroid concentration, instead of steroid pulse mass, as the dependent variable largely because clear steroid pulses were rarely observed (see below). To determine whether mean steroid concentration changed significantly with increasing mean LH concentration (i.e., if estimated regression line slopes were different from 0) within the PCOS group and within the control group, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used. To determine whether the association between steroid and LH levels (i.e., the apparent LH dose-steroid response relationship) differed between PCOS and controls, estimated regression line slopes were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. For all Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank-sum tests, statistical testing was based on exact permutation tests (32). All hypothesis tests were two-sided and conducted at the 0.05 level of significance.
Because 300 IU rhLH produced supraphysiological LH pulses, linear regression models were also estimated while disregarding this highest dose only. Differences in results were negligible, and we therefore report results including all rhLH doses, unless otherwise specified.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
50 and 68% of pretreatment values, respectively. Four-hour mean plasma LH and LH increments after rhLH infusions were similar in controls and PCOS (Table 2). Mean LH concentrations and LH increments after 10 IU rhLH were not elevated over saline controls. The 30 and 100 IU rhLH doses produced plasma LH values (i.e., mean concentration and increment) similar to those present in normals and PCOS, respectively (5, 26); whereas 300 IU rhLH resulted in plasma LH values that were supraphysiological for the midfollicular phase.
|
4A, and T (ng/ml) to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 3.03, 3.49, and 3.47, respectively. After ganirelix (1012 h), plasma 17-OHP levels were similar in controls and PCOS (0.24 ± 0.05 and 0.34 ± 0.06 ng/ml, respectively), as were
4A levels (0.86 ± 0.10 and 0.99 ± 0.07 ng/ml, respectively). Plasma T concentrations were higher in PCOS during this time period (0.72 ± 0.10 vs. 0.39 ± 0.05 ng/ml; P = 0.01).
|
|
4A and T regressed on LH did not differ between controls and PCOS (0.016 ± 0.012 and 0.005 ± 0.018, respectively, for
4A; 0.008 ± 0.006 and 0.006 ± 0.015, respectively, for T). The mean slope for LH vs. 17-OHP in PCOS was different from zero in PCOS (P < 0.05), but not in controls (P > 0.05). Mean slopes for LH vs.
4A and LH vs. T were not different from zero in either PCOS or controls.
|
4A at zero LH was also similar (0.83 ± 0.09 and 1.23 ± 0.16 ng/ml for controls and PCOS, respectively). Although extrapolated T at zero LH appeared to be higher in PCOS (0.69 ± 0.13 vs. 0.39 ± 0.05 ng/ml), this difference did not achieve statistical significance.
Acute steroid responses after rhLH infusion were infrequently observed (see Fig. 2), being most consistent for 17-OHP in PCOS, and generally absent for
4A and T.
Hormonal responses after GnRH.
The supraphysiological dose (500 µg) of intravenous GnRH overcame the competitive GnRH-receptor antagonist, resulting in 4-h mean LH concentrations that were similar in controls and PCOS (24.6 ± 6.6 and 19.9 ± 4.0 IU/l, respectively; P > 0.05); these values were similar to those observed after 300 IU rhLH (Table 1). In the 4 h after 500 µg intravenous GnRH, mean 17-OHP concentrations were higher in PCOS than in controls (0.78 ± 0.10 vs. 0.33 ± 0.06 ng/ml; P = 0.01), as were 4-h mean T concentrations (0.86 ± 0.06 vs. 0.32 ± 0.06 ng/ml; P < 0.01).
4A concentrations after 500 µg iv GnRH did not differ between PCOS and controls (Table 2).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4A, responses in PCOS compared with controls. We similarly observed heightened 17-OHP secretion in response to near-physiological ovarian stimulation with rhLH in patients with PCOS, suggesting abnormalities of the early steps of ovarian steroidogenesis (i.e., conversion of early precursor steroids, such as pregnenolone and P, to the weak androgen
4A). Notably, the results were similar regardless of whether responses to the 300 IU dose were included in analysis, confirming that these findings were not driven by supraphysiological LH stimulation. The increased 17-OHP responses in PCOS observed in our study may reflect exaggerated acute steroidogenic responses that parallel escalating doses of rhLH. However, an alternative explanation is that the 17-OHP increase in PCOS reflects abrupt (compared with normal) rhLH-induced resumption of early steroidogenic steps after temporary removal of physiological LH stimulation. In our research paradigm, LH dose-ovarian steroid responses were not observed in normal women, as the slopes for all steroids regressed on LH were indistinguishable from zero. Furthermore, acute ovarian steroid responses to rhLH infusions were not commonly apparent when reviewing individual steroid time series. It remains possible that ovarian steroid responses could have occurred after our surveillance had ended. Nonetheless, these observations suggest that ovarian steroidogenesis during the normal follicular phase is influenced by integrated LH stimulation and does not vary acutely with changes in LH pulse mass. This contrasts with acute P responses to endogenous LH pulses during the luteal phase (9).
The flat slopes of
4A and T regressed on LH observed in our study might be expected in light of steroid responses to GnRH agonist administration. For instance, with acute GnRH agonism,
4A does not increase above baseline in PCOS for
1224 h (2); likewise, T does not increase above baseline rapidly, even in response to maximal ovarian stimulation. Also, baseline T concentrations (i.e., 1012 h after ganirelix) in our study were higher in PCOS than in controls despite similar LH levels, suggesting that increased T production in PCOS is maintained during short-term reduction of plasma LH. Taken together, these findings suggest that acute changes in gonadotropin stimulation result in more rapid alterations in the early steps of steroidogenesis, reflected by changes of 17-OHP concentrations, compared with later steps, reflected by changes in
4A and T. It is also possible that there is a time delay between rhLH administration and
4A and T responses, or that more rhLH doses, or a different pattern (frequency) of intermittent rhLH stimulation, are required to elicit a
4A and T response.
In a number of ways, ovarian stimulation in the present study differed from that achieved with either acute GnRH agonist or high-dose hCG administration. First, the magnitude of the LH stimulus is more physiological, as is the intermittent nature of the stimulus. Second, rhLH infusions do not elevate FSH in contrast to GnRH agonist administration; the absence of accompanying FSH stimulation, as in hCG stimulation protocols, may (19) or may not (15) mitigate abnormal ovarian responses to acute gonadotropin challenge. Third, rhLH differs from native LH in its posttranslational glycosylation and may have different biological potency from endogenous LH (3). Finally, it is possible that GnRH agonists and antagonists have differential effects on ovarian steroidogenesis, since GnRH receptors have been demonstrated in the human ovary (25).
In PCOS, steroidogenic response patterns after acute challenge with GnRH agonists, high-dose hCG, or intermittent rhLH infusions are consistent with excessive 17-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase activity (7). Ehrmann and colleagues (7) hypothesized that these patterns reflect a failure of appropriate steroidogenic downregulation in response to excessive gonadotropin drive. The patterns are also compatible with a global increase in ovarian steroidogenic activity, with pronounced accumulation of 17-OHP being secondary to the relative inefficiency with which 17,20-lyase uses 17-OHP as a substrate (10). Indeed, some investigators find no evidence of 17,20-lyase activity in the
4 pathway (i.e., converting 17-OHP to
4A) in humans (28).
The etiology of putative ovarian steroidogenic abnormalities in PCOS is unknown. They may reflect a primary ovarian abnormality, such as genetic mutations leading to increased steroidogenic enzyme activity. In vitro studies have demonstrated that PCOS theca cells cultured through three to four passages in LH-free media retain excessive steroidogenic activity (22), suggesting that abnormalities of steroidogenesis are inherent. Alternatively, steroidogenic abnormalities may reflect the prevailing hormonal milieu in PCOS. For instance, altered enzymatic activity may result from insulin excess. Insulin has potent trophic actions on ovarian theca cells in vitro, and high insulin doses stimulate androgen production, whereas lower doses augment LH-induced androgen secretion (4, 27, 35, 40). Additionally, insulin reduction in vivo is associated with reduced steroidogenic responses to GnRH agonist or hCG testing in most (6, 1618, 23, 24, 36) but not all (33) PCOS studies.
Chronic exposure to excessive LH could also induce qualitative steroidogenic abnormalities in PCOS, but definitive evidence is lacking. 17-OHP responses to acute hCG challenge remain elevated 4 wk after GnRH agonist (leuprolide) administration (12), arguing against a role for LH. However, GnRH agonists initially stimulate gonadotropins, and pituitary desensitization and a fall in LH may not occur for 23 wk. Thus compelling evidence to exclude a role for LH awaits effective removal of LH drive for longer periods of time before acute stimulation of steroidogenesis using a physiological LH challenge.
Other factors may also contribute to abnormal steroidogenic response patterns in PCOS, including FSH deficiency, growth factors (e.g., insulin-like growth factors), and other autocrine and paracrine influences (7). An intriguing possibility is that abnormal steroidogenic activity may reflect early androgen exposure, since exaggerated 17-OHP and T responses to hCG occur in prenatally androgenized monkeys (8).
In summary, we conclude that near-physiological ovarian stimulation via intermittent (pulse-like) rhLH administration produces exaggerated 17-OHP secretion in patients with PCOS, supporting earlier studies of pharmacological ovarian stimulation. Delineating the mechanisms underlying heightened precursor responsiveness to LH in PCOS will require further clinical investigation.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Present address for J. D. Veldhuis: Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Medical and Graduate Schools, General Clinical Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1Free T (pmol/l) was calculated as the total T (nmol/l) divided by [K x SHBG (nmol/l) + 1], then multiplied by 1,000. In this equation, K is the equilibrium constant for T binding to SHBG (1.6 x 109 l/mol; see Ref. 1). ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 975984, 1999.
activity, and serum free testosterone after reduction of insulin secretion in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 335: 617623, 1996.
-hydroxylase/17, 20-lyase (CYP17) genes in porcine theca cells. Endocrinology 141: 27352742, 2000.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-N. Hugues, L. Theron-Gerard, C. Coussieu, M. Pasquier, D. Dewailly, and I. Cedrin-Durnerin Assessment of theca cell function prior to controlled ovarian stimulation: the predictive value of serum basal/stimulated steroid levels Hum. Reprod., November 6, 2009; (2009) dep378v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |