|
|
||||||||
1Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California 90059; and 2Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvamia 15261
Submitted 22 August 2002 ; accepted in final form 26 March 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
anabolic steroids; anabolic effects of androgens; mechanisms of androgen action; testosterone effects on muscle stem cells
Accordingly, we measured the number of satellite cells in muscle biopsies obtained from healthy men in whom endogenous testosterone production was suppressed by administration of a GnRH agonist, and different levels of serum testosterone concentrations were created by weekly intramuscular injections of graded doses of testosterone enanthate. The design and the main findings of this study have been published (9, 40). Because significant increases in type I and type II muscle fiber cross-sectional areas were observed only in men receiving the 600-mg weekly doses of testosterone enanthate (40), and to a lesser extent in those receiving the 300-mg dose, we focused our analysis of satellite cells on these two groups. In addition, we included the 125-mg dose group as a control, because men in this group did not experience demonstrable muscle fiber hypertrophy or an increase in myonuclear number.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nutritional intake and exercise stimulus were controlled at the outset of the study, as previously described (9, 40). Two weeks before the initiation of the study, subjects were prescribed a diet standardized for energy intake at 150 kJ·kg-1·day-1 and protein intake at 1.3 g·kg-1·day-1. These instructions were reinforced every 4 wk during a meeting with the dietitian in which each subject's actual nutrient intake was verified by analysis of 3-day food records.
Hormone assays. Serum total testosterone was measured by a previously reported radioimmunoassay (57, 9, 10). Free testosterone was separated by an equilibrium dialysis procedure and measured in the dialysate by radioimmunoassay (41). The sensitivity of total testosterone assay was 0.6 ng/dl; intra-assay coefficient of variation was 8.2%, and interassay coefficient of variation was 13.2%. For the free testosterone assay, the sensitivity was 0.22 pg/ml, and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 4.2 and 12.3%, respectively.
Muscle biopsy and tissue fixation. Percutaneous needle muscle biopsies were obtained from the midbelly of the vastus lateralis muscle in the quadriceps muscle group before and within 5 days after the final testosterone enanthate injection. Biopsy specimens were immediately fixed in 5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) overnight and processed for epoxy embedding (38). After fixation, the tissues were washed in cacodylate buffer, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in graded series of ethanol, and embedded in Epon. During embedding, the tissue blocks were oriented longitudinally. Embedded tissue blocks were sectioned with an LKB ultramicrotome. Thin sections showing pale gold interference color were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined with a Hitachi 600 electron microscope.
Spatial distribution of myonuclei and satellite cells. All samples were processed and micrographed by an observer who was unaware of the treatment assignment. Parts of longitudinally oriented, healthy muscle fibers were selected randomly and photographed using an electron microscope at x3,500 magnification. The electron micrographs were further magnified three times to obtain a total magnification of x10,500. Montages of the fibers were constructed, and total numbers of myonuclei and satellite cells were counted and expressed per unit length (mm) of muscle fiber. Six montages were constructed for each subject before and after treatment (averaging 0.91.2 mm of muscle fiber in each sample).
Identification of satellite cells. The satellite cells were identified on the basis of their characteristic ultrastructural morphology (34, 42) by using the following criteria (Fig. 1). 1) The satellite cells are mononucleated cells with an independent cytoplasm that are inside the basal lamina of the muscle fibers. 2) The satellite cells are located outside the sarcolemma of the muscle fiber.
|
Determination of satellite cell proportion by direct counting and by spatial distribution. We used two separate counting procedures to determine the number of satellite cells and myonuclear number in muscle fibers. In the direct-counting procedure, the numbers of myonuclei and satellite cells were counted in randomly selected photomicrographs from each subject. A total of 6201,189 myonuclei were photographed in each of the three groups (97210 myonuclei per biopsy) at each time point, and the number of satellite cells was expressed as a percentage of myonuclear number.
In addition, all myonuclei and satellite cells were counted in the reconstructed fiber montages (6 per biopsy) to obtain the satellite cell percentage by spatial distribution. Percent satellite cells equaled the number of satellite cells divided by the sum of myonuclear number and the number of satellite cells and was expressed as a percentage (19, 34).
Morphometry of the satellite cells. The electron micrographs of the satellite cells were evaluated to identify possible differences in morphology before and after treatment in each group. The point counting method was used to obtain the volume densities [volume of a given component per unit volume of the cell (Vv)] of the satellite cell components (3, 18, 50).
The total cellular, nuclear, and mitochondrial areas were calculated by the equation: A = P·U2 (15, 16, 38), where A denotes area, P denotes the number of points falling on the satellite cell or its nucleus, and U represents the distance between two neighboring points in the grid, taking into account the magnification used. Because no significant changes were observed in either muscle volume or satellite cell number in men in the 125-mg dose group, we performed the ultrastructural analysis only in the 300- and 600-mg dose groups. Also, because the number of satellite cells in baseline biopsies was very small, we pooled the baseline data on ultrastructural analysis.
Statistical analyses. All data are presented as means ± SE for each of the three treatment groups. The main outcome measures were absolute and percent satellite cell number and myonuclear number. We used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare posttreatment values, adjusting for baseline values for each outcome measure. If the overall ANCOVA revealed a significant effect, the statistical significance of the between-group differences was tested by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison procedure. We also compared the change from baseline in each outcome measure by one-way ANOVA. The significance of the change from baseline to posttreatment within a dose group was evaluated using the paired t-test. For all statistical analyses, P values <0.05 were considered significant. The NCSS2001 (version 5/02, Kaysville, UT) and Sigma-Stat programs (SPSS, Chicago, IL) were used for all statistical analyses. The correlations between serum testosterone concentrations and various outcomes were evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient and were tested for significance from zero with an appropriate t-test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A detailed description of the hormonal changes in all 61 treated men has been published (7). Among the 19 men who were evaluated by electron microscopy, the three groups did not significantly differ in their baseline characteristics, including age, body weight, and height, or in serum total and free testosterone concentrations (Table 1). Combined administration of GnRH agonist and graded doses of testosterone enanthate resulted in dose-dependent changes in serum total and free testosterone concentrations and muscle volumes (change in thigh muscle volumes by MRI, +21, +43, and +68 cm3, overall P = 0.001), as previously reported (9). Consistent with our previous report (40), testosterone administration was associated with dose- and concentration-dependent increases in cross-sectional area of type I and type II muscle fibers (data not shown).
|
Myonuclear number. When we used the spatial distribution method, the myonuclear number per millimeter of muscle fiber length did not differ significantly among the three groups at baseline (Table 2). However, posttreatment myonuclear number after combined administration of a GnRH agonist and graded doses of testosterone was significantly different among the three groups, after control for baseline values (AN-COVA P = 0.003). The change from baseline in myonuclear number in the three groups was significantly different (ANOVA, P < 0.001; Fig. 2). The change in myonuclear number was greater in men receiving the 600-mg dose than in those receiving the 125- or the 300-mg dose of testosterone enanthate (P < 0.05 for each of the two comparisons based on the global significance level of the Tukey-Kramer procedure). The number of myonuclei was significantly greater after treatment compared with baseline in men receiving the 300-mg (P < 0.05 vs. baseline) and 600-mg (P < 0.05 vs. baseline) doses of testosterone enanthate. The change in myonuclear number was significantly correlated with serum total (r = 0.53, P = 0.02) testosterone concentrations.
|
|
Satellite cell number. By use of the spatial distribution method, the number of satellite cells at baseline in all three groups varied from 0 to 2 satellite cells/mm of muscle fiber and did not differ significantly among the three groups (Table 3). By ANCOVA, the mean posttreatment values for satellite cell number per millimeter of muscle fiber measured by spatial orientation were significantly different among the three groups, after control for the baseline values (P = 0.0002). The posttreatment satellite cell number was greater in men receiving the 600-mg dose than in those receiving the 125- or the 300-mg doses (P < 0.05 for each comparison by use of the global significance level of the Tukey-Kramer procedure). The increase in the number of satellite cells per millimeter of muscle fiber from baseline was statistically significant in men receiving the 300- and 600-mg testosterone doses (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for each comparison; Fig. 2). The change in satellite cell number was significantly correlated with the change in total (r = 0.548, P = 0.015) and free testosterone concentrations (r = 0.468, P = 0.043; Fig. 3A).
|
|
The mean posttreatment values for satellite cell number, measured by direct counting and expressed as a percentage of myonuclear number (Table 3), were also significantly different by ANCOVA, after control for the baseline values (P < 0.000001). The change from baseline in satellite cell number was greater in the 600-mg dose compared with the 125- and 300-mg dose groups (P < 0.05 for each comparison). The satellite cell number after treatment was significantly greater compared with baseline in men treated with the 300- and 600-mg doses of testosterone (P < 0.05 for each comparison).
Satellite cell morphology and ultrastructure. The mean satellite cell area was significantly greater after treatment with 300- and 600-mg doses compared with baseline area (ANOVA P < 0.05; Table 4 and Fig. 4). The mean absolute nuclear area was not significantly different after treatment with the 300- or 600-mg dose compared with baseline (P = 0.40); however, the ratio of the nuclear to total cellular area decreased significantly in men receiving the 300- and 600-mg doses (P < 0.005 by ANOVA). The increase in cytoplasmic area compared with the nuclear area during treatment was statistically significant (P < 0.005 by ANOVA). The ratio of Vv% nucleus to Vv% cytoplasm was significantly different after treatment with the 300- and 600-mg doses (P < 0.01). The mean satellite cell mitochondrial area increased significantly from baseline in men receiving the 300 and 600 mg of testosterone enanthate weekly (P < 0.05). The heterochromatin volume, expressed as a percentage of satellite cell nuclear volume (P = 0.45), did not differ significantly among the groups.
|
|
We noted additional qualitative changes in satellite cell morphology after testosterone treatment, including the presence of lamellopodia in one-half of the posttreatment biopsies in the 300- and 600-mg groups, a greater amount of endoplasmic reticulum, and a greater number of pinocytic vesicles compared with the baseline biopsies (Fig. 4).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, significant increases in satellite cell number were observed only in men who were treated with supraphysiological doses of testosterone enanthate. We do not know whether physiological replacement doses of testosterone when administered to older men with low testosterone concentrations or to men with chronic illness would produce similar anabolic effects.
Because of the difficulties inherent in obtaining multiple muscle biopsies from volunteers and the labor-intensive nature of electron microsopic analysis, the sample size was relatively small. The number of satellite cells in the adult muscle is relatively small and constitutes a very small fraction of the myonuclear number. Not surprisingly, in baseline samples, we were able to locate only one or two, and in some subjects no satellite cells. Although this increases the imprecision in quantitation of satellite cell number in baseline biopsies, the remarkable increases in satellite cell numbers following testosterone treatment observed in the present study are particularly striking. Similarly, the ultrastructural details were evaluated in a small number of satellite cells that were identified and should be viewed cautiously. The satellite cells were identified by electron microscopy using previously established histological criteria (19, 34); the satellite cells recognized by these criteria might not represent a monomorphic cell population. There is growing evidence that these cells represent myogenic cells at more than one stage of differentiation (17).
Although testosterone's effects on muscle have generated enormous controversy for over five decades (10, 51), a number of recent studies are in agreement that testosterone supplementation increases muscle mass in healthy hypogonadal men (7, 11, 25, 43, 48, 49), older men with low or low normal testosterone concentrations (13, 26, 44, 45), and men with chronic illnesses (5, 8, 14). Our dose-response study demonstrated that testosterone's anabolic effects on fat-free mass and muscle size are dose and concentration dependent (9). The mechanisms by which testosterone induces muscle mass accretion are not well understood. The prevalent hypothesis that testosterone stimulates muscle protein synthesis (11, 13, 47) emerged from observations made 50 years ago that testosterone promotes nitrogen retention in castrated males of many mammalian species (26), in prepubertal boys, and in women (27). Lowering of testosterone concentrations by administration of a GnRH agonist is associated with decreased muscle protein synthesis (29). Testosterone supplementation in healthy hypogonadal men (11, 29) and older men with low normal or low testosterone levels (47) increases fractional muscle protein synthesis. Indeed, muscle fiber hypertrophy could not possibly occur without an increase in muscle protein synthesis or a decrease in muscle protein degradation. However, this hypothesis cannot explain our observations that testosterone administration is associated with increases in satellite cell and myonuclear number. Our data lead us to conclude that an increase in satellite cell number and the subsequent fusion of satellite cells with muscle fibers resulting in an increase in myonuclear number and muscle fiber hypertrophy are likely involved in mediating androgen-induced muscle hypertrophy. However, our data cannot exclude the important role that changes in muscle protein synthesis and degradation might play in the process of muscle hypertrophy associated with testosterone supplementation. We do not know whether the increase in satellite cell number is the primary event that is subsequently associated with increased muscle protein synthesis or whether the increases in myonuclear and satellite cell numbers occur secondarily to maintain the myonuclear domain (2).
Substantial evidence supports a role for the modulation of myonuclear number during muscle remodeling in response to injury or disease (1, 2, 1923, 33, 35, 36). Muscle hypertrophy involves the addition of newly formed myonuclei via the fusion of myogenic cells to the adult myofibers (2). Therefore, we speculate that muscle fiber hypertrophy and the increase in myonuclear number observed here were preceded by testosterone-induced increases in satellite cell number and fusion of satellite cells with muscle fibers. The hypertrophy of levator ani muscle in the female rat induced by exogenous testosterone administration is associated with satellite cell proliferation (2022, 31, 32, 46). Muscle remodeling and repair following injury or hormone and growth factor stimulation often involve satellite cell replication and recruitment of new stem cells into the myogenic cell lineage (2, 20, 2224, 3033, 35, 36, 42, 46).
The mechanisms by which testosterone increases satellite cell number are not known. An increase in satellite cell number could occur by an increase in satellite cell replication, inhibition of satellite cell apoptosis, and/or increased differentiation of stem cells into the myogenic lineage. We do not know which of these processes is the site of regulation by testosterone. On the basis of the observations that testosterone administration induces a rapid proliferative response in muscle satellite cells of prepubertal rats, Jubert and Tobin (22) inferred that androgen receptors might be present on the satellite cells. Doumit et al. (12) demonstrated the presence of androgen receptors in cultured porcine satellite cell nuclei and myotubes and reported that testosterone exposure increased androgen receptor immunostaining in satellite cells. The authors further demonstrated that the cultured satellite cells exhibited lower differentiation in response to testosterone exposure without an effect on proliferation. Taken together, these data point to a direct role for testosterone in satellite cell regulation.
Our observations that testosterone promotes muscle fiber hypertrophy by increasing the number of satellite cells might have clinical and commercial applications. Testosterone effects on satellite cells could serve as the platform for the development of in vitro assays for anabolic agents and have implications for the discovery of selective androgen receptor modulators. Because of the constraints inherent in obtaining multiple biopsy specimens in humans, the effects of testosterone on satellite cell replication and stem cell recruitment into the myogenic lineage would be more easily studied in an animal model that demonstrates androgen responsiveness and sexual dimorphism in skeletal muscle mass similar to what is observed in humans. It is possible that testosterone might promote entry of satellite cells into the cell cycle (22); however, it is equally plausible that androgens might promote myogenesis by stimulating stem cell differentiation into the myogenic lineage. The molecular mechanisms by which testosterone increases muscle satellite cell number should be examined.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. R. Dayton and M. E. White Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle growth and development in meat animals J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E217 - E225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cao, W. Liu, Z. Wang, D. Xie, L. Jia, and Y. Chen Green and Blue Monochromatic Lights Promote Growth and Development of Broilers Via Stimulating Testosterone Secretion and Myofiber Growth J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(2): 211 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Aizawa, M. Iemitsu, T. Otsuki, S. Maeda, T. Miyauchi, and N. Mesaki Sex differences in steroidogenesis in skeletal muscle following a single bout of exercise in rats J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2008; 104(1): 67 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Lewis, M. Fournier, T. W. Storer, S. Bhasin, J. Porszasz, S.-G. Ren, X. Da, and R. Casaburi Skeletal muscle adaptations to testosterone and resistance training in men with COPD J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1299 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. O'Connor and G. K. Pavlath Point:Counterpoint: Satellite cell addition is/is not obligatory for skeletal muscle hypertrophy J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 1099 - 1100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Aizawa, M. Iemitsu, S. Maeda, S. Jesmin, T. Otsuki, C. N. Mowa, T. Miyauchi, and N. Mesaki Expression of steroidogenic enzymes and synthesis of sex steroid hormones from DHEA in skeletal muscle of rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2007; 292(2): E577 - E584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Verdijk, R. Koopman, G. Schaart, K. Meijer, H. H. C. M. Savelberg, and L. J. C. van Loon Satellite cell content is specifically reduced in type II skeletal muscle fibers in the elderly Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E151 - E157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Solomon and P M G Bouloux Modifying muscle mass - the endocrine perspective. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 191(2): 349 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Brack, H. Bildsoe, and S. M. Hughes Evidence that satellite cell decrement contributes to preferential decline in nuclear number from large fibres during murine age-related muscle atrophy J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2005; 118(20): 4813 - 4821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. McClung, K. A. Mehl, R. W. Thompson, L. L. Lowe, and J. A. Carson Nandrolone decanoate modulates cell cycle regulation in functionally overloaded rat soleus muscle Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1543 - R1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Asthana, S. Bhasin, R. N. Butler, H. Fillit, J. Finkelstein, S. M. Harman, L. Holstein, S. G. Korenman, A. M. Matsumoto, J. E. Morley, et al. Masculine Vitality: Pros and Cons of Testosterone in Treating the Andropause J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2004; 59(5): M461 - M465. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP |