|
|
||||||||
-glutamylcysteine synthetase in cultured rat
hepatocytes
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rat
hepatocytes cultured for 3 days in basal medium expressed low levels of
cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) and high levels of
-glutamylcysteine
synthetase (GCS). When the medium was supplemented with 2 mmol/l
methionine or cysteine, CDO activity and CDO protein increased by
>10-fold and CDO mRNA increased by 1.5- or 3.2-fold. In contrast, GCS
activity decreased to 51 or 29% of basal, GCS heavy subunit (GCS-HS)
protein decreased to 89 or 58% of basal, and GCS mRNA decreased to 79 or 37% of basal for methionine or cysteine supplementation,
respectively. Supplementation with cysteine consistently yielded
responses of greater magnitude than did supplementation with an
equimolar amount of methionine. Addition of propargylglycine to inhibit
cystathionine
-lyase activity and, hence, cysteine formation from
methionine prevented the effects of methionine, but not those of
cysteine, on CDO and GCS expression. Addition of buthionine sulfoximine
to inhibit GCS, and thus block glutathione synthesis from cysteine, did
not alter the ability of methionine or cysteine to increase CDO. GSH
concentration was not correlated with changes in either CDO or GCS-HS
expression. The effectiveness of cysteine was equivalent to or greater
than that of its precursors (S-adenosylmethionine,
cystathionine, homocysteine) or metabolites (taurine, sulfate). Taken
together, these results suggest that cysteine itself is an important
cellular signal for upregulation of CDO and downregulation of GCS.
glutathione; hepatocytes
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
OTHER THAN
INCORPORATION INTO PROTEIN, the major fates of cysteine in the
body are incorporation into the tripeptide glutathione (GSH) or
catabolism via cysteinesulfinate-dependent pathways (Fig. 1). Because methionine sulfur is almost
entirely converted to cysteine sulfur via the transsulfuration pathway
before its sulfur is oxidized and excreted, intake of a certain molar
amount of methionine results in synthesis of a nearly equimolar amount
of cysteine (21, 22). Although substantial amounts of
cysteine are incorporated into both protein and GSH, cysteine is
ultimately catabolized to taurine or sulfate. We have previously
reported results of several rat studies in which both hepatic cysteine dioxygenase (CDO, EC 1.13.11.20) and hepatic
-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GCS, EC 6.3.2.2) activities responded to changes in the
protein or dietary sulfur amino acid levels. These two enzymes
responded in opposite directions, with CDO activity increasing and GCS
activity decreasing in response to an increase in the protein or sulfur
amino acid level (2-5). Increases in CDO activity were associated with increases in the urinary
taurine-to-taurine+sulfate ratio (5). Higher
levels of CDO activity were also accompanied by greater rates of both
taurine and sulfate production as well as by an increase in the
proportion of cysteine metabolized to taurine vs. sulfate by isolated
hepatocytes incubated with 0.2 mmol/l L-cysteine (2,
3, 5). Likewise, the lower levels of GCS activity in isolated
hepatocytes were accompanied by lower rates of GSH synthesis (2,
5).
|
Increases in CDO activity in response to an increase in the supply of sulfur amino acids could be critical for prevention of potential damage to the cell by rapid removal of excess cysteine. Elevated levels of cysteine have been shown to be both cytotoxic and neurotoxic, and increased levels of homocysteine, a precursor of cysteine in the methionine transsulfuration pathway, have been associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease and with the occurrence of neural tube defects (22). The lower GCS activity present in animals fed high levels of sulfur amino acids acts to somewhat limit the rate of GSH synthesis and favors the catabolism of cysteine to taurine or sulfate. On the other hand, the higher GCS activities and lower CDO activities that are present in animals fed diets low in sulfur amino acids appear to ensure that cysteine is efficiently used for GSH synthesis, rather than being catabolized to taurine and sulfate, when sulfur amino acid supply is limited.
Studies of the molecular regulation of CDO and GCS activities in rat liver by dietary sulfur amino acid intake indicated that increases in CDO activity were accomplished predominantly by increases in CDO protein concentration, with no effect on CDO mRNA levels and a much smaller degree of change in activity state (3, 4). Changes in GCS activity in response to dietary supplementation with methionine were largely accounted for by changes in the concentration of mRNA coding for GCS-heavy (or catalytic) subunit (GCS-HS) (3, 4). The precise mechanisms and signals involved in the sulfur amino acid-induced regulation of CDO and GCS are not known, although the regulation of CDO clearly appears to be posttranscriptional (3, 4).
Recently, we reported the development of a primary hepatocyte model for studies of regulation of CDO and GCS by sulfur amino acids (16). Supplementation of the culture medium with either methionine or cysteine resulted in higher CDO activity and lower GCS activity in cultured rat hepatocytes. These studies demonstrated that hepatocytes in culture could be used as a model for further studies of the regulation of hepatic CDO and GCS at the cellular level.
Thus rat hepatocytes in primary culture were used for studies designed
to further elucidate the particular sulfur amino acid or metabolite
that was effective at the cellular level in inducing regulatory changes
in hepatic CDO and GCS activities and to determine whether the pattern
of changes in enzyme activity, enzyme protein concentration, and enzyme
mRNA concentrations in cultured hepatocytes were similar to those
observed in liver of intact animals. To determine the particular sulfur
amino or metabolite that acts as a signal for regulatory changes in CDO
and GCS at the cellular level, we cultured hepatocytes with methionine,
cysteine, or one of their metabolites. We also used
DL-propargylglycine (PPG), an inhibitor of cystathionine
-lyase (EC 4.4.1.1), to block transsulfuration of methionine to
cysteine (17) and
DL-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (BSO), an inhibitor of
GCS, to block GSH synthesis (15) to further assess the
roles of cysteine and GSH, respectively, as mediators of the effect of
sulfur amino acid availability on CDO and GCS activities.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Williams' medium E (WE medium), murine natural epidermal growth factor (EGF), bovine insulin, and antibiotic-antimycotic mixture that contained the sodium salt of penicillin G, streptomycin sulfate, and amphotericin B were purchased from GIBCO-BRL (Grand Island, NY). Calf skin collagen type I, collagenase, dexamethasone, Na2SeO3, bathocuproine disulfonate (BCS), BSO, PPG, L-cysteine, L-methionine, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, L-cystathionine, L-homocysteine, and taurine were all purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Tissue culture dishes (60 × 15 mm) were purchased from Becton-Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ). [32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Du Pont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). All other reagents were of analytical grade and were obtained from commercial sources.
Antibodies. The purified IgG fraction from rabbit anti-CDO serum was a gift from Dr. Yu Hosokawa (National Institute of Health and Nutrition, Tokyo, Japan). Rabbit antibody was raised to CDO purified from rat liver (13). Rabbit anti-GCS-HS serum was a gift from Dr. Henry Jay Forman (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL). The preparations of these antibodies against rat liver CDO (13) and a peptide sequence of rat kidney GCS-HS (18) have been reported. Specificity of these antibodies has been described previously (4).
Primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were housed in stainless steel mesh cages in a room maintained at 20°C and 60-70% humidity with light from 2000 to 0800. Rats were given ad libitum access to water and a nonpurified diet (Prolab RMH 1000, Agway, Syracuse, NY). The care and use of animals was approved by the Cornell University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Rats weighed ~250-300 g when they were used to obtain hepatocytes.
Hepatocytes were isolated aseptically by collagenase perfusion as described by Berry et al. (6). The initial viability of isolated hepatocytes was more than 85% as determined by 0.2% (wt/vol) Trypan blue exclusion. The freshly isolated hepatocytes were resuspended in WE medium to give a cell number of 1.5 × 107 cells per ml; the suspended cells then were diluted with basal WE medium to yield a final cell concentration of 7.5 × 105 cells per ml. The basal WE medium provided 0.49 mmol/l total L-cysteine, 0.08 mmol/l L-methionine, and a negligible amount of GSH (0.16 µmol/l) and was prepared to contain 1 µg/ml insulin, 50 ng/ml EGF, 50 nmol/l dexamethasone, 3 nmol/l Na2SeO3, 100 units/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B. Culture dishes were coated with collagen as described previously (16). Five milliliters of the diluted cell suspension (0.18 ml/cm2) were plated on each 60-mm-diameter collagen-coated dish. Cells were allowed to attach in basal medium over a 4-h period. At 4 h, the basal medium was replaced with fresh basal medium or with medium that was supplemented with 2 mmol/l methionine, 2 mmol/l cysteine, or 2 mmol/l of a sulfur amino acid metabolite as indicated in RESULTS. Incubations with thiols (i.e., cysteine or homocysteine) also contained 0.05 mmol/l of BCS, which was added to prevent formation of disulfides (9). The experimental medium was replaced every 24 h (i.e., at 28 and 52 h). To examine the effect of inhibitors, either 1 mmol/l PPG or 100 µmol/l BSO were added to the designated culture medium when medium was changed at 28 and 52 h. Cells were harvested after 72 h of treatment (i.e., total of 76 h in culture). At the end of the culture period, monolayer cultures were washed three times with 2.5 ml of ice-cold PBS. For measurement of enzyme activities and Western blot analysis, washed cells were collected by scraping. Harvested cells were suspended in 50 mmol/l MES, pH 6.0, to give a final cell concentration of ~6.5 × 106 cells per ml, and the suspension was sonicated for three 15-s periods using a High Intensity Ultrasonic Processor (Sonics and Materials, Danbury, CT) to disrupt the cells. A portion of each cell homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000 g for 30 min at 4°C to obtain the supernatant fraction. Protein concentrations in the cell homogenates and supernatant fractions were measured by the bicinchoninic acid method of Smith et al. (19). Total GSH concentration in the homogenate was measured by the method of Fariss and Reed (10) as modified by Stipanuk et al. (23). For mRNA analysis (Northern and dot blots), 0.75 ml of denaturation solution (ToTALLY RNA kit, Ambion, Austin, TX) was added to the washed cells in the culture dish, and the cells were then collected by scraping.Measurement of enzyme activities. By use of the cell homogenate, which contained ~8-10 mg protein/ml, CDO activity was measured according to the method of Bagley and Stipanuk (1), except that the volume of the reaction mixture was reduced to 0.2 ml and the amount of [35S]cysteine was increased to 10-15 µCi/0.2 ml of reaction mixture. For assay of GCS activity, the cell homogenate was further diluted with 0.5 or 1 volume of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N'-3-propanesulfonic acid (EPPS) buffer, pH 8.5, to give a final concentration of 50 mmol/l EPPS buffer. GCS activity was assayed as described previously (4), except that the volume of the reaction mixture was reduced to 0.5 ml and EPPS buffer was used (instead of HEPES) to maintain the incubation mixture at pH 8.1. Under these assay conditions, the GSH present in the cell homogenate had no effect on measured GCS activity (Y. H. Kwon and M. H. Stipanuk, unpublished results).
Western blot analysis. Separation of proteins was carried out by one-dimensional SDS-PAGE (14). Aliquots of supernatants that contained ~20-150 µg of protein were mixed with equal volumes of SDS-reducing buffer and then were loaded onto polyacrylamide gels (10 and 15% wt/vol polyacrylamide for GCS-HS and CDO, respectively, with 4% stacking gels). Medium-range molecular weight markers (Promega, Madison, WI) and Rainbow molecular weight markers (Sigma) were used for estimation of protein molecular weights.
Protein blotting was performed using the procedure for tank transfer described by Hoefer Scientific (San Francisco, CA) to an Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride transfer membrane (Millipore, Medford, MA). Membranes were incubated with the IgG fraction of rabbit polyclonal anti-rat CDO for 3 h or with rabbit polyclonal anti-rat GCS-HS for 2 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive protein was detected by chemiluminescence with the use of goat anti-rabbit IgG (Pierce, Rockford, IL) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and the Supersignal CL-HRP substrate system (Pierce) with exposure to Kodak X-OMAT SRP film. Bands were scanned with a Hewlett Packard Scanjet 3C (Hewlett Packard, Camas, WA), and two-dimensional quantitative densitometric analysis of the scanned bands was done using the Molecular Analyst program (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Relative protein amounts were quantitated using standard curves (pixel density/mm2 vs. µg total protein loaded) run on each gel; standard curves were generated by loading incremental amounts (20-50 µg for CDO, 15-45 µg for GCS-HS) of total supernatant protein from hepatocytes cultured in methionine-supplemented medium on each gel. The relative amount of protein was then divided by the actual amount of total protein loaded for each sample.Extraction of cellular RNA and mRNA analysis. Total RNA was isolated from cultured hepatocytes using a ToTALLY RNA kit (Ambion) based on the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (8). Northern blot analysis was done as described by Brown (7) with electrophoresis on a 1% (wt/vol) agarose-formaldehyde gel and blotting onto a Magna Graph nylon membrane (Micron Separations, Westboro, MA). Membranes were prehybridized using herring sperm DNA and then hybridized with one of the 32P-labeled cDNA probes (2 × 106 cpm/ml) for rat CDO, rat GCS-HS, or mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA. Probes for CDO and GCS-HS mRNAs were prepared and labeled as described previously (4). GAPDH mRNA was synthesized using GAPDH mouse DECAprobe template (Ambion). After hybridization, membranes were washed twice in 2× saline-sodium phosphate-EDTA buffer (SSPE) with 0.2% (wt/vol) SDS for 30 min at room temperature and twice in 0.1× SSPE at 60°C for 15 min and then autoradiographed using Kodak X-OMAT film. Probes were stripped from the membrane by boiling the membrane in 0.1× SSPE with 1% (wt/vol) SDS between hybridization with the three probes.
For quantification of relative levels of mRNA, aliquots of total RNA (5-15 µg/dot) were applied to a Magna Graph nylon membrane using a microsample filtration manifold (Minifold, Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH). The membranes were hybridized with the [32P]cDNA for CDO, GCS-HS, or GAPDH mRNA. Results were quantified using a Bio-Rad GS-363 Phosphorescence Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Melville, NY) and Molecular Analyst program (Bio-Rad). A standard curve was generated on each membrane by loading incremental amounts (1.25-15 µg) of pooled total RNA from hepatocytes cultured in methionine-supplemented medium. Relative amounts of mRNA for each enzyme mRNA and for GAPDH were calculated using a standard curve of pixel density per square millimeter vs. the amount of total RNA loaded. Relative enzyme mRNA amount was calculated from the standard curve and was corrected for loading by dividing the relative enzyme mRNA amount by the relative GAPDH mRNA amount.Statistics.
Data were analyzed either by the paired t-test or by
analysis of variance (Minitab 10.5., Minitab, State College, PA) and Tukey's
-procedure (20). Differences were accepted at
P
0.05. Data for CDO activity and relative amounts
of CDO protein were transformed to log10 before statistical
analysis. Correlation coefficients were calculated using Microsoft
Excel 5.0 (Microsoft, Cambridge, MA).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of methionine, cysteine and their metabolites on the
activities of CDO and GCS.
As shown in Table 1, addition of 2 mmol/l
methionine, homocysteine, or cysteine to the basal medium was effective
in both increasing CDO activity and decreasing GCS activity. Neither
S-adenosylmethionine nor cystathionine was effective in
significantly increasing CDO activity, although both compounds can be
converted to homocysteine and then cysteine.
S-Adenosylmethionine and cystathionine did significantly
decrease GCS activity, but the decrease was less than that obtained
with cysteine, homocysteine, or methionine. Taurine and sulfate, which
are catabolites of cysteine, were not effective as regulators of either
CDO or GCS activity. The changes in CDO and GCS activities across all
treatments were reciprocal, with the correlation coefficient for CDO
activity vs. GCS activity being r =
0.87.
|
Effects of PPG on the ability of methionine and cysteine to affect
expression of CDO and GCS.
As shown in Fig. 2, the addition of PPG
significantly decreased the GSH concentration in cells cultured in
either basal or methionine-supplemented medium but not in cells
cultured in cysteine-supplemented medium. Despite a higher initial GSH
concentration in methionine-supplemented cells, the GSH content of
cells cultured in either basal or methionine-supplemented medium
reached a similar low level of ~10-15 nmol/mg protein
(~1.5-2.5 µmol/g wet weight of hepatocytes) after 2 days of
treatment with PPG. The marked decrease in the GSH content of cells
cultured in basal medium, which provided much more cysteine than
methionine [0.49 mmol/l cyst(e)ine and 0.1 mmol/l methionine], or
in medium supplemented with excess methionine (+ 2.0 mmol/l)
demonstrates the quantitatively important contribution of methionine as
a precursor of cysteine for GSH synthesis. The level of GSH in cells
cultured in cysteine-supplemented medium was not significantly
decreased by PPG, as would be expected when excess preformed cysteine
is available.
|
|
0.61 for GCS).
The relative amounts of CDO and GCS-HS protein, which were quantified
by Western blot analysis of samples from individual experiments, are
shown in Table 2. The band detected by
antibody for CDO corresponded to a molecular mass of ~23.5 kDa. This
band corresponds to the lower of the two apparent forms of CDO (23.5 and 25.5 kDa) observed by Bella et al. (4, 5) for rat
liver CDO. No other CDO antibody-reactive bands were observed. The
level of CDO protein in cells cultured in basal medium was too low to be quantified in some experiments. Nevertheless, this basal level clearly was significantly increased in hepatocytes cultured in medium
supplemented with methionine or cysteine to levels that were at least
10 or 15 times basal, respectively. Addition of PPG to the
methionine-supplemented medium prevented the increase in CDO protein
level, but addition of PPG did not affect the level of CDO protein in
cells cultured in cysteine-supplemented medium. These effects on CDO
protein are consistent with observed changes in the activity of CDO in
response to sulfur amino acids and PPG.
|
|
Effects of buthionine sulfoximine on the ability of methionine and
cysteine to affect expression of CDO and GCS.
Although cellular GSH concentrations were not closely correlated with
CDO or GCS activity in the studies with PPG, the possible role of GSH
concentration in regulation of CDO activity was studied further using
buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) to block GSH synthesis. As shown in Fig.
5, the GSH concentration tended to be
higher in hepatocytes cultured in medium supplemented with sulfur amino acids and without BSO. Addition of BSO decreased the concentration of
GSH by >90% in cells cultured in either basal or sulfur amino acid-supplemented medium. GSH concentration was low and similar in all
cells cultured with BSO (~2-4 nmol/mg protein, or
~0.3-0.7 µmol/g wet wt of hepatocytes), regardless of whether
or not the medium was supplemented with sulfur amino acid.
|
|
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reciprocal regulation of CDO and GCS. In all three of the studies reported in this paper, CDO activity was greater and GCS activity was less in hepatocytes cultured in medium to which either methionine or cysteine had been added. CDO activity increased up to 24 times the basal level with cysteine supplementation of the medium and up to 15 times the basal level with methionine supplementation of the medium. In contrast, GCS activity in hepatocytes cultured with methionine decreased to as little as 33% of the level found in cells cultured in basal medium, and GCS activity in cells cultured with cysteine decreased to as little as 24% of the basal level. Thus the capacity for GSH synthesis decreased and the capacity for cysteine catabolism increased in response to an increased availability of sulfur amino acid.
Although we used 2 mmol/l of supplemental amino acid or metabolite in this study, we would expect to see significant effects of lower concentrations of cysteine or methionine on CDO and GCS activities. In our initial studies with hepatocytes in culture, we noted a dose-response relationship for both CDO and GCS activities between 0.1 and 0.5 mmol/l cysteine or methionine and a plateau in responses over the range of 0.5-5 mmol/l (16). Changes in sulfur amino acid concentration in the medium were not monitored over the 24-h period after each replacement of medium with fresh medium, but a copper chelator was included in thiol-supplemented medium to minimize thiol oxidation. This pattern of response of CDO and GCS activities in hepatocytes to sulfur amino acids in the culture medium is consistent with the pattern reported previously for these hepatic enzymes in rats fed diets that contained methionine, cysteine, or protein in excess of the requirement level (3, 4). For example, supplementation of a basal diet that contained 100 g of casein/kg with 10 g of L-methionine/kg resulted in an increase of CDO activity to 35 times the basal level and in a decrease of GCS activity to 47% of the basal level (4). However, although the pattern of response was very similar, it should be noted that the CDO activity observed in cultured hepatocytes was markedly lower than the values reported for liver from intact rats or for freshly isolated hepatocytes (3, 4, 5). CDO activity appears to be lost with dedifferentiation of hepatocytes in culture and is also low in liver cell lines (16). A second notable difference between studies with intact rats and these experiments with cultured rat hepatocytes is that addition of cysteine to the culture medium consistently yielded a greater increase in CDO activity and a smaller decrease in GCS activity than did an equimolar amount of methionine, whereas methionine was more effective than cysteine when the sulfur amino acids were added to a low protein diet (2, 3). Differences in the rates of intestinal absorption or the rates of hepatic uptake of methionine and cyst(e)ine in intact rats, differences in the rate or efficiency of conversion of methionine to cysteine in intact rats vs. cultured hepatocytes, or differences in the rates of removal of methionine and cysteine by various pathways could explain this apparent difference in response of liver cells to methionine vs. cysteine.Changes in enzyme mRNA and protein concentrations in response to
sulfur amino acid supplementation.
The relative changes in CDO and GCS activities, protein concentrations,
and mRNA concentrations are summarized in Table
4. Increases in CDO activity in response
to sulfur amino acids were associated with similar degrees of changes
in CDO protein concentration and with much smaller changes in CDO mRNA
abundance (r = 0.97 for CDO activity vs. CDO protein
and r = 0.89 for CDO protein vs. CDO mRNA). In previous
studies with rats fed diets supplemented with methionine or cysteine or
with high levels of protein, increases in both CDO activity and CDO
protein, but no changes in CDO mRNA abundance, were observed. In
cultured hepatocytes the increases in CDO activity could be explained
by an increase in the mRNA level (2.5-5.0 times basal) and
increases in CDO protein or activity that were 4-6 times as much
as those predicted from the increases in CDO mRNA. The meaning of the
differences in CDO mRNA levels is uncertain, as the amount of CDO mRNA
found in freshly isolated hepatocytes decreases markedly with
maintenance of these cells in primary culture over 24 h and
remains low through 76 h in culture (Y. H. Kwon, L. L. Hirschberger, and M. H. Stipanuk, unpublished observations).
Although cultured hepatocytes do not exactly model hepatocytes in situ,
the major regulatory change, which was an increase in CDO activity
associated with a similar increase in CDO protein, was consistent
between the animal and cell culture studies. Thus these studies in cell
culture also indicate that regulation of CDO activity in response to
sulfur amino acids is accomplished predominantly via changes in CDO
concentration. The possible role of changes in CDO mRNA abundance and
the significance of the two isoforms of CDO need further study, as does
the mechanism by which the concentration of CDO is increased.
|
Cellular mediator of response to sulfur amino acids. When methionine and cysteine and their metabolites were tested for effectiveness in upregulating CDO and downregulating GCS, methionine, homocysteine (an intermediate in the transsulfuration pathway), and cysteine were found to be effective in regulating the activities of both enzymes. S-Adenosylmethionine and cystathionine, intermediates in the transsulfuration pathway, were effective in downregulating GCS activity but not in upregulating CDO. The lesser effect of S-adenosylmethionine and cystathionine may be related to lower rates of cellular uptake of these compounds compared with methionine, cysteine, and homocysteine (21). Taurine and sulfate, which are metabolites of cysteine, had no effect on either GCS or CDO activity. Because cysteine was as effective as any of its precursors, it seems very likely that either cysteine or a closely related compound must play an essential role in the hepatic response to sulfur amino acids.
A key role of cysteine is also supported by the observation that, in these studies with cultured hepatocytes, the magnitudes of the effects of sulfur amino acid supplementation in increasing CDO activity, CDO concentration, and CDO mRNA concentration or in decreasing GCS activity, GCS-HS concentration, and GCS-HS mRNA concentration were consistently greater when cysteine was added than when methionine was added. To clarify the role of cysteine, we used PPG to block the transsulfuration of methionine to cysteine at the level of cystathionine. Inhibition of cystathionine
-lyase (cystathionase)
blocks the last step of the methionine transsulfuration pathway in
which cystathionine is cleaved to release cysteine,
-ketobutyrate, and ammonia. By blocking transsulfuration at the level of
cystathionine, addition of PPG should limit cysteine formation from
methionine sulfur and serine and also result in higher concentrations
of cystathionine and perhaps other transsulfuration intermediates. The
marked decrease in GSH concentration that resulted from treatment of
cells cultured in either basal or methionine-supplemented medium with
PPG indicated the effectiveness of PPG in inhibiting transsulfuration; GSH synthesis depends upon cysteine availability as well as on GCS
activity. Addition of PPG to culture medium supplemented with methionine blocked the increase in CDO activity and the decrease in GCS
activity, but PPG had no effect on CDO or GCS activity in hepatocytes
cultured in medium supplemented with cysteine. Thus methionine was
ineffective in regulating these two enzymes when its conversion to
cysteine was blocked, clearly indicating that cysteine, rather than
methionine or an intermediate in the transsulfuration pathway, is
essential for bringing about sulfur amino acid-induced changes in CDO
and GCS activities in hepatocytes.
Because GSH concentration is closely associated with cysteine
availability (supplied as cysteine or formed from methionine via
transsulfuration), additional studies were done to test the possibility
that GSH, rather than cysteine, may be the mediator of the effect of
sulfur amino acids on CDO and GCS activities. The effectiveness of BSO
in inhibiting GCS, the enzyme that catalyzes the first step in GSH
synthesis, is clear from the low GCS activities (but not GCS-HS protein
concentrations) and low GSH concentrations in hepatocytes cultured with
BSO. The effects of BSO on GCS activity and GSH concentration were
observed regardless of the sulfur amino acid level in the medium.
The consistent lack of response of CDO activity, CDO protein, and CDO
mRNA to BSO despite the marked decreases in the level of GSH that were
induced by BSO indicate that CDO is not regulated by the cellular
content of GSH. GSH concentrations were not correlated with CDO
activity in either the study with PPG or the study with BSO, also
indicating that GSH is not the mediator of the effect of cysteine on
CDO activity.
Although GCS activity was low in cells cultured with BSO due to its
inhibition of GCS, cells cultured with BSO had higher concentrations of
GCS-HS mRNA and GCS-HS protein. This suggests that the low GSH
concentration, or oxidative stress related to it, caused upregulation
of GCS-HS expression. On the other hand, variations in GSH
concentration in cells cultured with or without PPG and with or without
sulfur amino acid were not correlated with GCS activity, suggesting
that a signal other than cellular GSH concentration and/or oxidative
stress is also involved in regulation of GCS activity. It is possible
that cysteine itself, in addition to GSH, is involved in the
downregulation of GCS in response to sulfur amino acid supplementation.
These studies provide strong evidence that cysteine itself, rather than
a precursor or metabolite of cysteine, acts as an initial signal for
regulation of CDO and GCS activities in hepatocytes. Clearly, further
studies of the mechanisms by which cysteine downregulates GCS activity
and upregulates CDO activity need to be conducted, and cultured rat
hepatocytes appear to be a suitable model system for use in some of
those studies.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Larry L. Hirschberger. We also thank Dr. Jay Forman for the anti-GCS-HS serum, Dr. Yu Hosokawa for the anti-CDO IgG, and Drs. Yu Hosokawa and Nobuyo Tsuboyama for the EcoR I-cut cDNA for CDO.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This research was supported in part by United States Department of Agriculture/Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service Grants 94-34324-0987 and 99-34324-8120.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. H. Stipanuk, 225 Savage Hall, Div. of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6301 (E-mail: mhs6{at}cornell.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 5 October 2000; accepted in final form 26 January 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bagley, PJ,
and
Stipanuk MH.
Evaluation and modification of an assay procedure for cysteine dioxygenase activity.
Anal Biochem
227:
40-48,
1995[ISI][Medline].
2.
Bagley, PJ,
and
Stipanuk MH.
Rats fed a low protein diet supplemented with sulfur amino acids have increased cysteine dioxygenase activity and increased taurine production in hepatocytes.
J Nutr
125:
933-940,
1995.
3.
Bella, DL,
Hahn C,
and
Stipanuk MH.
Effects of non-sulfur and sulfur amino acids on the regulation of hepatic enzymes of cysteine metabolism.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
277:
E144-E153,
1999
4.
Bella, DL,
Hirschberger LL,
Hosokawa Y,
and
Stipanuk MH.
The mechanisms involved in the regulation of key enzymes of cysteine metabolism in rat liver in vivo.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
276:
E326-E335,
1999
5.
Bella, DL,
and
Stipanuk MH.
Effects of protein, methionine, or chloride on acid-base balance and on cysteine catabolism.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
269:
E910-E917,
1995
6.
Berry, MN,
Edwards AM,
and
Barritt GJ.
Isolated Hepatocytes: Preparation, Properties and Applications. New York: Elsevier, 1991.
7.
Brown, C.
Analysis of RNA by Northern and slot blot hybridization.
In: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, edited by Ausubel M,
Brent R,
Kingston RE,
Moore DD,
Seidman JG,
Smith JA,
and Strunl K. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1993, p. 4.9.1-4.9.14.
8.
Chomczynski, P,
and
Sacchi N.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:
156-159,
1987[ISI][Medline].
9.
Coloso, RM,
Drake MR,
and
Stipanuk MH.
Effect of bathocuproine disulfonate, a copper chelator, on cyst(e)ine metabolism by freshly isolated rat hepatocytes.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
259:
E443-E450,
1990
10.
Fariss, MW,
and
Reed D.
High-performance liquid chromatography of thiols and disulfides: dinitrophenyl derivatives.
Methods Enzymol
143:
101-109,
1987[ISI][Medline].
11.
Hosokawa, Y,
Yamaguchi K,
Kohashi N,
Kori Y,
Fujii O,
and
Ueda I.
Immaturity of the enzyme activity and the response to inducers of rat liver cysteine dioxygenase during development.
J Biochem (Tokyo)
88:
339-394,
1980.
12.
Hosokawa, Y,
Yamaguchi K,
Kohashi N,
Kori Y,
and
Ueda I.
Decrease of rat liver cysteine dioxygenase (cysteine oxidase) activity mediated by glucagon.
J Biochem (Tokyo)
84:
419-424,
1978
13.
Hosokawa, Y,
Matsumoto A,
Oka J,
Itakura H,
and
Yamaguchi K.
Isolation and characterization of a cDNA for rat liver cysteine dioxygenase.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
168:
473-478,
1990[ISI][Medline].
14.
Laemmli, UK.
Cleavage of structural proteins during its assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:
680-685,
1970[Medline].
15.
Meister, A.
Metabolism and function of glutathione.
In: GSH: Chemical, Biochemical, and Medical Aspects, edited by Dolphin D,
Poulson R,
and Avramovie O. New York: Wiley, 1989, p. 367-474.
16.
Ohta, J,
Kwon YH,
and
Stipanuk MH.
Cysteine metabolism by primary cultures of hepatocytes responds to methionine supplementation of the culture medium.
Amino Acids
19:
705-728,
2000[ISI][Medline].
17.
Rao, AM,
Drake MR,
and
Stipanuk MH.
Role of the transsulfuration pathway and of
-cystathionase activity in the formation of cysteine and sulfate from methionine in rat hepatocytes.
J Nutr
120:
837-845,
1990.
18.
Shi, MM,
Kugelman A,
Iwamoto T,
Tian L,
and
Forman HJ.
Quinone-induced oxidative stress elevates glutathione and induces
-glutamylcysteine synthetase activity in rat lung epithelial L2 cells.
J Biol Chem
269:
26512-26517,
1994
19.
Smith, PK,
Krohn RI,
Hermanson GT,
Mallia AK,
Gartner FH,
Provenzano MD,
Fujimoto EK,
Goeke NM,
Olson BJ,
and
Klenk DC.
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid.
Anal Biochem
150:
76-85,
1985[ISI][Medline].
20.
Steel, RGD,
and
Torrie JH.
Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960, p. 99-160.
21.
Stipanuk, MH.
Metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acids.
Annu Rev Nutr
6:
179-209,
1986[ISI][Medline].
22.
Stipanuk, MH.
Homocysteine, cysteine, and taurine.
In: Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease (9th ed.), edited by Shils ME,
Olson JA,
Shike M,
and Ross AC. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1999, p. 543-558.
23.
Stipanuk, MH,
Coloso RM,
Garcia RAG,
and
Banks MF.
Cysteine concentration regulates cysteine metabolism to glutathione, sulfate and taurine in rat hepatocytes.
J Nutr
122:
420-427,
1992.
24.
Sun, W-M,
Huang Z-Z,
and
Lu SC.
Regulation of
-glutamylcysteine synthetase by protein phosphorylation.
Biochem J
320:
321-328,
1996.
25.
Wild, AC,
and
Mulcahy RT.
Regulation of
-glutamylcysteine synthetase subunit gene expression: insights into transcriptional control of antioxidant defenses.
Free Radic Res
32:
281-301,
2000[ISI][Medline].
26.
Yamaguchi, K,
Sakakibara S,
Koga K,
and
Ueda I.
Induction and activation of cysteine oxidase of rat liver. I. The effects of cysteine, hydrocortisone and nicotinamide injection on hepatic cysteine oxidase and tyrosine transaminase activities of intact and adremalectomized rats.
Biochim Biophys Acta
237:
502-512,
1971.
27.
Yan, N,
and
Meister A.
Amino acid sequence of rat kidney
-glutamylcysteine synthetase.
J Biol Chem
265:
1588-1593,
1990
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Dominy Jr., J. Hwang, and M. H. Stipanuk Overexpression of cysteine dioxygenase reduces intracellular cysteine and glutathione pools in HepG2/C3A cells Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2007; 293(1): E62 - E69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sakakura, H. Sato, A. Shiiya, M. Tamba, J.-i. Sagara, M. Matsuda, N. Okamura, N. Makino, and S. Bannai Expression and function of cystine/glutamate transporter in neutrophils J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2007; 81(4): 974 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Niture, C. S. Velu, Q. R. Smith, G.J. Bhat, and K. S. Srivenugopal Increased expression of the MGMT repair protein mediated by cysteine prodrugs and chemopreventative natural products in human lymphocytes and tumor cell lines Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 378 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Stipanuk, J. E. Dominy Jr., J.-I. Lee, and R. M. Coloso Mammalian Cysteine Metabolism: New Insights into Regulation of Cysteine Metabolism J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1652S - 1659S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-S. S. Alhamdani Impairment of glutathione biosynthetic pathway in uraemia and dialysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 124 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. G. Bolt, W. Liu, G. Qiao, J. Kong, W. Zheng, T. Krausz, G. Cs-Szabo, M. D. Sitrin, and Y. C. Li Critical role of vitamin D in sulfate homeostasis: regulation of the sodium-sulfate cotransporter by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2004; 287(4): E744 - E749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Borkovich, L. A. Alex, O. Yarden, M. Freitag, G. E. Turner, N. D. Read, S. Seiler, D. Bell-Pedersen, J. Paietta, N. Plesofsky, et al. Lessons from the Genome Sequence of Neurospora crassa: Tracing the Path from Genomic Blueprint to Multicellular Organism Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 68(1): 1 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Stipanuk, L. L. Hirschberger, M. P. Londono, C. L. Cresenzi, and A. F. Yu The ubiquitin-proteasome system is responsible for cysteine-responsive regulation of cysteine dioxygenase concentration in liver Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2004; 286(3): E439 - E448. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K.'i. Ogawa, A. Hatano-Iwasaki, M. Yanagida, and M. Iwabuchi Level of Glutathione is Regulated by ATP-Dependent Ligation of Glutamate and Cysteine through Photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: Mechanism of Strong Interaction of Light Intensity with Flowering Plant Cell Physiol., January 15, 2004; 45(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||