|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm; and 2 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The C-peptide of proinsulin is important
for the biosynthesis of insulin but has for a long time been considered
to be biologically inert. Data now indicate that C-peptide in the
nanomolar concentration range binds specifically to cell surfaces,
probably to a G protein-coupled surface receptor, with subsequent
activation of Ca2+-dependent intracellular signaling
pathways. The association rate constant, Kass, for
C-peptide binding to endothelial cells, renal tubular cells, and
fibroblasts is ~3 · 109
M
1. The binding is stereospecific, and
no cross-reaction is seen with insulin, proinsulin, insulin growth
factors I and II, or neuropeptide Y. C-peptide stimulates
Na+-K+-ATPase and endothelial nitric oxide
synthase activities. Data also indicate that C-peptide administration
is accompanied by augmented blood flow in skeletal muscle and skin,
diminished glomerular hyperfiltration, reduced urinary albumin
excretion, and improved nerve function, all in patients with type 1 diabetes who lack C-peptide, but not in healthy subjects. The
possibility exists that C-peptide replacement, together with insulin
administration, may prevent the development or retard the progression
of long-term complications in type 1 diabetes.
sodium-potassium-adenosine 5'-triphosphatase; endothelial nitric oxide synthase; renal function; autonomic nerve function; G protein
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DURING THE COURSE OF INSULIN SYNTHESIS, C-peptide is
cleaved from proinsulin, stored in secretory granules, and eventually released into the bloodstream in amounts equimolar with those of
insulin (45, 52, 53). C-peptide has an essential function in the
synthesis of insulin in that it links the A and B chains in a manner
that allows correct folding and interchain disulfide bond formation.
When C-peptide is removed from proinsulin by proteolytic processing,
the COOH-terminal part of insulin's B-chain becomes exposed and free
to assume an appropriate conformation for effective interaction with
the insulin receptor (51). A schematic representation of the proinsulin
molecule and its components is given in Fig. 1.
|
After the discovery of the mode of insulin biosynthesis, several early studies addressed the question of possible physiological effects of C-peptide. Insulin-like effects on blood glucose levels and on glucose disposal after glucose loading were looked for but not found (14, 17). Rat C-peptide was, however, found to diminish glucose-stimulated insulin release in rats both in vivo and in vitro (6, 57, 58, 63, 64), whereas the corresponding findings in other animals were less conclusive (8, 32). C-peptide was also reported to inhibit arginine-stimulated glucagon release from the isolated perfused rat pancreas (63) and to inhibit fat-stimulated gastric inhibitory polypeptide secretion by intestinal cells (6). Despite these reported effects, it became generally accepted that C-peptide possesses little or no biological activity and has no other role than its participation in insulin synthesis (33), a role that is emphasized by its name, "connecting peptide." Recently, new data have been presented demonstrating specific binding of C-peptide to cell surfaces in a manner that suggests the presence of G protein-coupled membrane receptors. C-peptide may thereby stimulate specific intracellular processes, influencing renal and nerve function in C-peptide-deficient type 1 diabetes patients. This contribution aims to review these new findings and to examine the possible physiological role of C-peptide.
| |
C-PEPTIDE BINDING |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The classic manner in which bioactive peptides exert their effects is via specific binding as ligands to receptors. In such binding, a limited region of the ligand serves as "active site," effecting the binding to the receptor. This segment of the peptide is frequently well conserved across species borders. The binding process can usually be studied via binding of a labeled peptide in a radioligand assay. In the case of proinsulin C-peptide, the lack of the two basic concepts, a conserved active site and an established ligand assay, has long hampered the recognition of C-peptide as a bioactive hormone per se. Instead, nonreceptor membrane interactions have been suggested to explain some C-peptide effects (19). Recently, however, binding studies using new technology have established a typical receptor interaction for C-peptide (44). Consequently, it now appears that C-peptide can be recognized as a receptor ligand; it is just that some properties were difficult to define initially and that additional or multiple effects may exist. The molecular interactions that currently form the basis of a receptor concept are outlined below.
Radioligand binding. The first study describing interactions between C-peptide and cell membranes appeared in 1986. Binding of tyrosylated 125I-labeled rat C-peptide 1 was examined by use of cultured rat islet tumor cells (10). Evidence for specific binding of C-peptide was reported, and a Scatchard plot of the data suggested a nonlinear course. The demonstration of C-peptide binding provided support for the earlier observations that C-peptide influences the function of the islet cells (6, 57, 63, 64). Interpretation of the results was complicated, however, by the ongoing secretion of C-peptide from the cells during the binding studies and by the existence of two different rat C-peptides (55). There is a lack of other studies describing C-peptide binding to cell membranes by use of the radioligand binding technique; only one report for skeletal muscle cell membranes, with negative result, is available (68). Relatively few binding sites per unit cell surface area (10) may have contributed to the difficulties in demonstrating cellular binding of C-peptide.
Binding evaluated via
Na+-K+-ATPase
stimulation.
Intracellular effects of C-peptide have been examined by using fresh
preparations of proximal segments from the rat nephron, a well defined
experimental model (1, 5). Addition of homologous C-peptide
to the tubular segments was found to increase the intrinsic Na+-K+-ATPase activity in a
concentration-dependent manner (42) (Fig. 2). Moreover, pretreatment of the tubular
segments with pertussis toxin completely blocked this effect. These and
other observations indicate that a G protein interacting with a
ligand-activated receptor may be involved in a C-peptide signal
transduction pathway. Pertussis toxin treatment, known to affect the
-subunit of Gi proteins, may thus interfere with the
interaction between the G protein and a loop region of a
membrane-spanning receptor (15), which in turn could abolish the
C-peptide effects. Although the definition of a receptor is lacking,
the Na+-K+-ATPase studies (42, 43) have
established that C-peptide is capable of eliciting molecular
interactions in cellular systems and that these interactions can be
measured, albeit indirectly. The above results support the notion that
C-peptide effects are mediated via a receptor and that G proteins may
be involved in the signal transduction pathway.
|
Fragment activities. Further studies of the Na+-K+-ATPase activity of rat renal tubular segments involved a set of C-peptide fragments, essentially covering the entire length of C-peptide in different subsets and analogs (43). Two sets of rat C-peptide fragments were found to elicit stimulatory effects on Na+-K+-ATPase activity, suggesting the presence of two different types of interactive sites. One was localized to the COOH-terminal part of the molecule, with maximal activity from the COOH-terminal pentapeptide segment, and the other to the midsegment of C-peptide, with maximal activity from the segment corresponding to positions 11-19 (43).
The results for the COOH-terminal pentapeptide were characteristic of a receptor-ligand interaction. This pentapeptide gave full replacement of the entire C-peptide activity; the remaining part of the molecule, des-(27
31)-C-peptide, was without effect in this assay, and the
effects were residue specific (43). Consequently, the pentapeptide data
supported the notion of a specific C-peptide receptor that recognizes
the COOH-terminal pentapeptide segment. Notably, the residues at
positions 1 (Glu) and 5 (Gln) of the pentapeptide are conserved in most
mammalian species (Table 1). The above
results for C-peptide fragment stimulation of
Na+-K+-ATPase were all obtained in studies
involving rat tubular segments (43), but similar findings have also
been made for rat pancreatic islets (60).
|
Nonreceptor interactions. In a report by Ido et al. (19), it was suggested that C-peptide effects may be elicited via a mechanism that defies the general rule that peptide hormones act by binding to stereospecific receptors. Human C-peptide was found to exert beneficial effects on vascular and neural dysfunction induced by experimental diabetes in rats. These effects were seen not only with the native C-peptide but also with its D-enantiomer and with reverse-sequence C-peptide (19). The authors suggested that the effects of C-peptide may be independent of chirality and peptide bond direction and exerted via mechanisms similar to those of amphipathic antimicrobial peptides. The latter peptides elicit their effects by nonchiral interactions with membranes, resulting in the formation of ion channels and interference with phospholipase A activity (2). Ido et al. suggested that the glycine-rich segment in the central region of C-peptide (positions 13-17) was important for such biological activity (47). As discussed above, this conclusion agrees with the second site deduced from the fragment studies involving determinations of Na+-K+-ATPase activity (43). The central region of C-peptide is largely achiral and reasonably well conserved in mammalian species (Table 1). It should be noted, however, that the C-peptide molecule differs considerably from that of antimicrobial peptides, and that the negatively charged C-peptide may not easily interact with cell membranes to form cation-selective channels. Thus direct measurements under in vitro conditions have recently demonstrated that C-peptide fails to bind to lipid vesicles (16) and that its secondary structure is not altered in the presence of lipid membranes (16). Consequently, the nonreceptor effects, although observed in two different assays, testing vascular function (19) and Na+-K+-ATPase stimulation (43), are not only not ascribable to receptor interactions but also not explainable in terms of membrane interactions in general. Furthermore, in the study by Ido et al., heterologous C-peptide was used in a supraphysiological concentration (100 nM), and the effects required 2-3 days to become evident, which complicates the evaluation of those findings. It can be concluded that C-peptide midsegment effects may exist but do not appear to involve receptor or membrane interactions and do not interfere with conclusions regarding the receptor-like interactions of the pentapeptide COOH-terminal segment.
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
New evidence that C-peptide binds to specific cell surface receptors
has recently been reported (44). Thus fluorescence correlation
spectroscopy (FCS) has been applied to the evaluation of
C-peptide-membrane interactions. In FCS, the Brownian movements of a
fluorophore-marked ligand are observed after excitation by a sharply
focused laser beam (9, 38). The small volume element (<1 · 10
15 l) in
which the measurements are performed can be shifted from the incubation
medium containing the labeled ligand to the membrane surface of cells
growing in culture. From the autocorrelation function of the
fluctuations in fluorescence intensity, it is possible to characterize
the diffusion time of the labeled ligand when it is free in the
incubation medium or bound to a cell membrane (9, 38). Compared with
the radioligand binding method, the FCS technique has the advantage of
higher detection sensitivity and an improved signal-to-noise ratio
combined with submicron resolution (9, 38).
1, and the specificity of the binding
was evidenced by the consistent displacement of bound C-peptide by
excess unlabeled C-peptide. Addition of a peptide with the same amino
acid composition as human C-peptide but with the residues arranged in
random sequence (scrambled C-peptide), or of D-enantio
C-peptide, failed to displace bound C-peptide, demonstrating the
stereospecific nature of the binding. In contrast, addition of excess
COOH-terminal pentapeptide competitively displaced bound C-peptide,
indicating that the COOH-terminal segment is involved in the binding
process as measured by FCS, in agreement with the ability of the
pentapeptide to stimulate Na+-K+-ATPase
activity (43). Proinsulin, which includes the pentapeptide segment,
failed to elicit displacement of bound C-peptide, suggesting that the
free COOH-terminal end of the segment is required for binding.
Likewise, addition of insulin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I,
IGF-II, or neuropeptide Y (NPY) was not accompanied by displacement of
bound C-peptide, indicating absence of cross-reactions with these
hormones and their membrane receptors. Labeled insulin bound to cell
membranes was not displaced by excess concentrations of C-peptide (44,
68). In the case of proinsulin, the finding is in contrast to reports
that C-peptide may bind with low affinity to a proinsulin receptor (22,
23). Finally, preliminary FCS evidence indicates the presence of
species specificity; at physiological concentrations, rat C-peptide
fails to bind to human cells (unpublished observation).
Preincubation of cells with pertussis toxin was found to abolish
FCS-measurable binding of C-peptide at physiological concentrations (44), in agreement with the findings from the
Na+-K+-ATPase data (42, 43). The FCS binding
results before and after treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin
are consistent with a typical allosteric mechanism of signal
transduction: before pertussis toxin treatment there was a
high-affinity interaction between C-peptide and its membrane receptor,
reflecting one configuration of the receptor. After pertussis toxin,
the FCS data indicated only a small component of low-affinity
interaction between C-peptide and the receptor, which then most
likely has assumed a new configuration secondary to the effect of
pertussis toxin on the
-subunit of the G protein (15).
It has been a consistent finding that effects of C-peptide
cannot be demonstrated in normal animals or healthy subjects (14, 17,
19, 21, 28, 64, 65); it is only in animals with experimental diabetes
or patients with type 1 diabetes and, consequently, no or very low
C-peptide plasma concentrations, that specific effects have been
observed (11, 25-31, 35, 37, 50, 65). This may have to
do with the binding characteristics for C-peptide (Fig.
3). Half-saturation of C-peptide binding to
renal tubular cells determined by FCS was found to occur already at a
concentration of 0.3 nM, and full saturation was seen at ~0.9 nM
(44). Thus it is likely that, in healthy humans, receptor saturation is
reached already at the ambient physiological C-peptide concentration
(0.5-1.5 nM), so that no additional biological activity can be
expected from a further increase in C-peptide concentration. This may
explain why no C-peptide effects were seen in the early studies
involving healthy humans and animals (14, 17, 64). For a further
understanding of the detailed nature of the C-peptide binding and its
physiological effects, the receptor structure will have to be
determined. Moreover, the FCS results quantitate the binding affinity
to that applicable to physiological C-peptide levels and provide a
C-peptide binding assay.
|
| |
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND CELLULAR EFFECTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As mentioned above, rat C-peptide was found to elicit a concentration-dependent stimulation of Na+-K+-ATPase activity at nonsaturating Na+ concentrations (42) (Fig. 2). Rat C-peptides 1 and 2, which differ by two amino acid residues (55), were largely equipotent in stimulating Na+-K+-ATPase activity (43), and scrambled C-peptide had no detectable effect. Subsequent reports have demonstrated that C-peptide stimulates Na+-K+-ATPase activity also in rat sciatic nerve (19, 54) and granulation tissue (19), pancreatic islets (61), and red blood cells (4). C-peptide also ameliorates the impaired deformability of red blood cells from type 1 diabetes patients (35). This effect was abolished after pretreatment of the erythrocytes with ouabain, compatible with C-peptide effects being mediated via stimulation of Na+-K+-ATPase activity (35), known to be reduced in red blood cells from patients with type 1 diabetes (7).
The C-peptide effect on Na+-K+-ATPase activity
of renal cells was inhibited by pretreatment of the cells with
pertussis toxin (42), as outlined above. The results of
Ohtomo et al. (42) also indicate that C-peptide activates
Ca2+-dependent intracellular signaling pathways. Exposure
of cultured proximal convoluted tubular cells to homologous C-peptide
in the concentration range 10
11-10
9 M
resulted in rapid and consistent increments of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration. It is noteworthy that the C-peptide
concentration required for increasing the intracellular
Ca2+ concentration (42) was less than that needed for
stimulation of Na+-K+-ATPase activity in renal
tubule segments (Fig. 2) (42). This is most likely related to the fact
that the tubule segment, but not the cultured cells, underwent a
preparation procedure involving freezing, thawing, and collagenase
treatment, possibly resulting in interference with cell membrane
structures (42). When the cultured renal tubule cells were maintained
in a calcium-free medium, exposure to C-peptide failed to increase
intracellular Ca2+ levels. Moreover, addition of FK506, a
specific inhibitor of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase
2B (PP2B), resulted in complete inhibition of the stimulatory effect of
C-peptide. PP2B is of major importance in the regulation of
Na+-K+-ATPase activity in tubular cells because
of its ability to convert the phosphorylated, inactive form of
Na+-K+-ATPase to its dephosphorylated, active
form (1, 18). The simplified, overall signal transduction pattern that
emerges is thus that C-peptide activates a membrane receptor coupled to
a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein, with subsequent activation of
Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways and stimulation of PP2B,
resulting in increased Na+-K+-ATPase activity
(Fig. 4).
|
The possibility exists that C-peptide may act in synergism with other hormones. This is suggested by the finding that the dose-response curve for C-peptide and Na+-K+-ATPase activity in renal tubular segments was shifted more than two orders of magnitude to the left, indicating increased C-peptide effectiveness, in the presence of subthreshold concentrations of NPY (42). NPY is released after activation of the sympathetic adrenergic system and is known to act synergistically with norepinephrine (59). Tissue levels of NPY are upregulated in animals with experimental diabetes and C-peptide deficiency (62). The results may suggest that C-peptide effects are dependent on sympathetic adrenergic activity. It is noted that, with regard to stimulation of Na+-K+-ATPase activity, no synergistic interaction was observed between C-peptide and insulin (42). In contrast, the smooth muscle-relaxing effect exerted by C-peptide (human) on rat muscle arterioles was potentiated by the presence of a low insulin concentration (24). Further experimental work will be required for a better understanding of these phenomena.
Administration of C-peptide to type 1 diabetes patients is accompanied by circulatory responses: it results in increased blood flow in skeletal muscle at rest (29) and during exercise (28), augmented capillary blood cell velocity and redistribution of skin microvascular blood flow (11), and increased renal blood flow (31). Again, no effects are observed in healthy subjects (28) or animals (21). C-peptide has also been found to increase blood flow, capillary filtration coefficients, and the permeability surface-area product in the isolated perfused rat hindquarter, primarily indicating recruitment of capillaries (36). The cellular mechanism underlying this vasodilator effect of C-peptide has not been fully established, but preliminary evidence suggests that C-peptide, via an increase in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, stimulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity (30, 34, 37) (Fig. 4). Thus C-peptide (human) was found to increase NO release from bovine aortic endothelial cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The C-peptide-induced nitric oxide (NO) release was abolished by the addition of an NO synthase inhibitor (34). Further support for the notion that C-peptide administration may be accompanied by augmented NO formation is provided by the observation that forearm blood flow increments induced by C-peptide in type 1 diabetes patients can be inhibited by a NO synthase blocker (30). In agreement with the above findings, it has been reported that C-peptide induces a concentration-dependent dilatation of rat skeletal muscle arterioles and that this occurs via a NO-mediated mechanism (24).
| |
C-PEPTIDE AND RENAL FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients with type 1 diabetes frequently develop glomerular hyperfiltration early in the course of their disorder (39, 40). Adequate insulin therapy does not correct this phenomenon (46). In contrast, patients with type 2 diabetes, in whom insulin and C-peptide levels are within or above the normal range, do not show glomerular hyperfiltration or hypertrophy (12, 48). These considerations prompted studies of possible C-peptide effects on renal function in type 1 diabetes patients (31). A group of young patients without signs of late diabetic complications were studied under euglycemic conditions. C-peptide infusion for 3 h at a rate sufficient to raise its concentration to physiological levels (~0.9 nM) decreased the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by 7%, and renal plasma flow increased modestly. Infusion of C-peptide to reach higher concentrations (~2.1 nM) was not accompanied by further changes in GFR or renal plasma flow. Even though the observed effect was modest, it did establish a significant renal effect of C-peptide (31).
The influence of C-peptide on glomerular hyperfiltration, functional
reserve capacity, and renal protein leakage have been examined in
streptozotocin diabetic rats (50). Administration of C-peptide (human)
for 90 min was accompanied by diminished glomerular hyperfiltration
(-20%), improved functional reserve as evidenced by augmented GFR
after glycine loading, and a marked reduction (
70%) in protein
leakage compared with diabetic control animals. The specificity of the
C-peptide effects was evident from the observation that infusion of
scrambled C-peptide had no effect. Further evaluation of renal
C-peptide effects in patients with type 1 diabetes has been extended to
include more prolonged administration. In a double-blind, randomized
study, patients with type 1 diabetes received by subcutaneous pump
infusion for 4 wk either insulin plus equimolar amounts of C-peptide or
insulin alone (27). In the C-peptide-treated group, GFR decreased on average by 6%, whereas no changes in GFR were seen in the group receiving insulin only. Moreover, a significant reduction in the level
of urinary albumin excretion was seen in the C-peptide group but not in
the group given insulin only (27).
The above findings in patients have been further explored in a study
involving C-peptide administration for 3 mo (25). The aim was to
evaluate the possibility that C-peptide administration may reduce the
level of microalbuminuria in patients with early signs of diabetic
nephropathy. Patients were studied in a double-blind, randomized,
crossover design and received C-peptide plus insulin for 3 mo
and insulin only for 3 mo. All patients were normotensive and had
urinary albumin excretion rates between 25 and 220 µg/min before the
study. During the C-peptide study period, urinary albumin excretion
decreased progressively to significantly lower values than those found
during the control period (Fig. 5). The
albumin excretion had decreased by ~40% at the end of the 3-mo
period, whereas no significant change occurred during the control
period. A similar response was seen in the urinary
albumin-to-creatinine ratio. The patients remained normotensive
throughout the study, and glycemic control improved slightly but to the
same extent in the two treatment groups. Thus the diminished albumin
excretion during C-peptide administration could not be ascribed to a
reduction in arterial blood pressure or an amelioration of blood
glucose control (25). The mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of
C-peptide on renal function in diabetes is not known. However, it is
possible that C-peptide may have exerted a direct effect on the
glomerular handling of albumin, as suggested by the studies of renal
function in animals with experimental diabetes (50). As discussed
above, C-peptide has the capacity to stimulate both renal
Na+-K+-ATPase (42, 43) and eNOS (34), and it
may be hypothesized that C-peptide can influence glomerular membrane
permeability and transport, as well as regional blood flow of the
kidney, possibly leading to improvements in renal function in the
diabetic state.
|
In summary, the present evidence demonstrates that C-peptide has the capacity to diminish glomerular hyperfiltration and reduce urinary albumin excretion in both experimental and type 1 clinical diabetes. Studies involving C-peptide administration of longer duration will be required to determine whether C-peptide may have a role in the prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy.
| |
C-PEPTIDE AND NERVE FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diabetic neuropathy is an important clinical feature of type 1 diabetes. Either the peripheral or the autonomic nerves, or both, may be involved. Autonomic nerve dysfunction is found in nearly 40% of the patients, even though just a few present with clear-cut symptoms. The etiology of diabetic neuropathy is not fully understood. In addition to the toxic effects of elevated blood glucose levels, the possible influence of vascular dysfunction involving the vasa nervorum has been implicated (56). Reduced levels of endoneurial Na+-K+-ATPase (19) and diminished nerve blood flow (3, 20) are reported for the diabetic state. The effect of C-peptide on nerve function in diabetes has been evaluated in animal studies (streptozotocin-diabetic rats). C-peptide (human) prevented the decreased caudal motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) in diabetic rats but did not affect MNCV in healthy control rats (19). In the same study, C-peptide administration prevented the diabetes-induced reduction of sciatic nerve Na+-K+-ATPase activity. Similar results have been reported for spontaneously diabetic insulin-deficient BB/W rats (54). Administration of homologous C-peptide for 2 mo resulted in significant improvements in MNCV and nerve Na+-K+-ATPase levels compared with untreated controls.
Data from nerve function studies in patients with type 1 diabetes are
also available. Patients with symptoms of diabetic polyneuropathy were
studied twice under euglycemic conditions and during a 3-h intravenous infusion of either human C-peptide or saline in a double-blind study (26). Plasma concentrations of C-peptide rose to
levels within the physiological range during C-peptide infusion. Heart
rate variability during deep breathing, an indicator of autonomic,
primarily vagal nerve activity, rose markedly (+50%) during C-peptide
infusion but did not change during saline administration (Fig.
6). A significant improvement was also seen
in the brake index during tilting in the patients who showed a reduced
index before the study; no response was observed during saline infusion (26). Indexes of motor or sensory nerve function did not change significantly during C-peptide infusion. Nerve function has also been
evaluated in a subgroup of the patients who received C-peptide for 3 mo
in studies of renal function (25). The patients showed signs of
autonomic nerve dysfunction before the study, and after 3 mo
of C-peptide administration their heart rate variability during deep
breathing had improved by 20%. In contrast, no change or a slight
deterioration was seen in the same patients during the control period
with insulin therapy only. Signs of sensory neuropathy were present
before the study in six of these patients; improved sensory nerve
function, as evidenced by significantly improved temperature threshold
discrimination, was observed after the 3-mo C-peptide treatment but not
after the control period (25). Metabolic control was similar during the
two study periods (25).
|
In summary, the combined experimental and clinical data provide evidence that C-peptide administration may ameliorate nerve dysfunction in type 1 diabetes. The stimulatory effect of C-peptide on nerve Na+-K+-ATPase activity (19, 54) and eNOS (34) may provide a background to the findings. The possibility that C-peptide may be beneficial in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy warrants further studies involving more prolonged periods of C-peptide administration. All of the above results relate to experimental and clinical type 1 diabetes. Whether C-peptide might exert a similar influence on nerve function in patients with type 2 diabetes, a disorder characterized by elevated levels of both insulin and C-peptide during its first phase, remains to be determined. However, there is preliminary evidence to indicate that there may be resistance to the action of C-peptide in muscle tissue from type 2 diabetes patients (66).
| |
C-PEPTIDE AND GLUCOSE UTILIZATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early studies of C-peptide effects demonstrated that supraphysiological concentrations of C-peptide increase and extend the hypoglycemic effect of insulin in alloxan-diabetic rats (64). At an early stage, a possible effect of C-peptide on blood glucose levels or the disposal of a glucose load was also investigated in healthy subjects and type 1 diabetes patients, but with negative results (14, 17). Direct examination of the influence of C-peptide on glucose transport in skeletal muscle under in vitro conditions has, however, shown that human C-peptide is capable of stimulating 3-O-methylglucose transport in incubated human muscle strips in a concentration-dependent manner (67). The effect was seen in muscle strips from both healthy subjects and type 1 diabetes patients and appears to occur via a mechanism that is independent of the insulin receptor and of receptor tyrosine kinase activation (68). The effects on glucose transport of supraphysiological concentrations of insulin and C-peptide were not additive (68), which raises the possibility that C-peptide may still stimulate muscle glucose transport via the insulin-stimulated rather than the exercise-mediated pathway.
The influence of C-peptide on glucose utilization in the in vivo situation has been studied using the clamp technique in streptozotocin diabetic rats (37, 65). Supraphysiological concentrations of human C-peptide were found to elicit marked increases in whole body glucose utilization, whereas scrambled C-peptide had no effect (65). Physiological concentrations of rat C-peptides 1 and 2 were found to be equally potent in stimulating whole body glucose utilization in the diabetic animals, but they had no effect in healthy, nondiabetic rats (37). A major proportion of the C-peptide-induced stimulation of glucose utilization could be blocked by treatment with N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), suggesting that the effect is elicited through a NO-mediated pathway. Although circulatory effects of L-NMMA need to be considered, it is noteworthy that the effect of C-peptide on glucose utilization also remained blocked when adenosine was co-administered with L-NMMA, in an attempt to overcome L-NMMA-induced reductions in blood flow (37).
Data on C-peptide and glucose utilization are also available from studies in humans. Type 1 diabetes patients have been examined under euglycemic conditions, by use of the clamp technique and C-peptide infusion, at two dose levels (31, 49). Whole body glucose turnover increased by 25% when C-peptide levels were raised to ~0.8 nM, but no further increase was observed when C-peptide concentrations rose to ~2.1 nM, in agreement with the concept that C-peptide binding to cell membranes becomes saturated already at ~0.9 nM (44). Direct measurements of forearm muscle glucose uptake during C-peptide administration in type 1 diabetes patients (28, 29) have confirmed that the augmented whole body glucose utilization observed in the euglycemic clamp study is a consequence of increased muscle glucose uptake rather than inhibition of hepatic glucose production. The question can be raised as to whether the observed short-term (2-h) effects of C-peptide on glucose utilization in type 1 diabetes patients (31, 49) will translate into lower blood glucose levels and/or diminished insulin requirements during long-term C-peptide administration. This does not seem to be the case, because in patients receiving C-peptide plus insulin for 3 mo, blood glucose levels, indexes of glycemic control, and insulin doses were all unchanged compared with the same patients given insulin only (25). In summary, C-peptide's relatively marked stimulatory effect on glucose utilization in in vitro experiments and animal studies, which may be NO mediated, appears to be less pronounced in humans and detectable in short-term studies but not during prolonged administration of C-peptide.
| |
SUMMARY: C-PEPTIDE IS A BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE PEPTIDE HORMONE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The currently available information establishes that C-peptide is not
as biologically inert as previously believed. Instead, it now emerges
as an active peptide hormone with potentially important physiological
effects. Even though C-peptide is formed from proinsulin and
co-secreted with insulin, we should consider the possibility that
C-peptide is a separate entity with biochemical and physiological characteristics that are different from those of insulin. New data now
demonstrate the presence of significant C-peptide-cell membrane
interactions, and there is direct evidence of stereospecific binding of
C-peptide to a cell surface receptor, different from that of insulin
and other related hormones (44). The COOH-terminal pentapeptide segment
is essential for binding (44) and constitutes an active site (43) in
similarity to other biologically active but unrelated peptides, such as
gastrin (13) and cholecystokinin (41). The nature of the C-peptide
receptor remains to be determined, but it is most likely G protein
coupled (42, 44). The Kass for C-peptide binding is
~3 · 109
M
1, and saturation of C-peptide binding
occurs already at physiological concentrations (44), which explains why
C-peptide effects have been difficult to observe in the past. These
findings all agree with the classic concept of ligand-receptor
interaction. There is also evidence of another type of interaction
localized to the glycine-rich midsegment of the molecule (19, 43), the
physiological importance of which remains to be established.
In addition to the binding data, the first outline of an intracellular signal transduction pattern for C-peptide emerges. It involves the activation of Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways, with subsequent stimulation of Na+-K+-ATPase (4, 19, 42, 43) and eNOS activities (24, 30, 34). Both of these enzyme systems are known to show attenuated activities in type 1 diabetes, particularly in renal and nerve tissue. There is now evidence to indicate that replacement of C-peptide in type 1 diabetes is accompanied by improved renal function, as evidenced by correction of glomerular hyperfiltration (27, 31, 50) and diminished urinary albumin excretion (25, 27), and amelioration of nerve dysfunction (25, 26). C-peptide replacement together with insulin administration, a therapy possibly closer to nature's own way, may thus be beneficial in type 1 diabetes patients.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The work discussed in this review has been supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (no. 11201), the Swedish Natural Science Research Council (no. 34115), the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, the European Commission (Bio4 CT972123), and Schwarz Pharma (Monheim, Germany).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Wahren, Section of Clinical Physiology A2:01, Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden (E-mail: john.wahren{at}ks.se).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aperia, A,
Holtbäck U, M,
Syrén-L L,
Svensson-B,
Fryckstedt J,
and
Greengard P.
Activation/deactivation of renal Na+,K+-ATPase: a final common pathway for regulation of natriuresis.
FASEB J
8:
436-439,
1994[Abstract].
2.
Bessalle, R,
Kapitkovsky A,
Gorea A,
Shalit I,
and
Fridkin M.
All-D-magainin: chirality, antimicrobial activity and proteolytic resistance.
FEBS Lett
274:
151-155,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Cameron, N,
Cotter M,
Basso M,
and
Hohman T.
Comparison of the effects of inhibitors of aldose reductase and sorbitol dehydrogenase on neurovascular function, nerve conduction and tissue polyol pathway metabolites in streptozotocin-diabetic rats.
Diabetologia
40:
271-281,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Djemli, A,
Gallice P,
Coste T,
Jannot M,
Dufayet D,
Raccah D,
and
Vague P.
Ex vivo and in vitro effects of insulin and C-peptide on Na/K ATPase activity in red blood cell membranes of type 1 diabetic patients (Abstract).
Diabetologia
42, Suppl1:
A154,
1999.
5.
Doucet, A,
Katz AI,
and
Morel F.
Determination of Na-K-ATPase activity in single segments of the mammalian nephron.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
237:
F105-F113,
1979.
6.
Dryburgh, J,
Hampton S,
and
Marks V.
Endocrine pancreatic control of the release of gastic inhibitory polypeptide.
Diabetologia
19:
397-401,
1980[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Dufayet de la Tour, D,
Raccah D,
Jannot M,
Coste T,
Rougerie C,
and
Vague P.
Erythrocyte Na/K ATPase activity and diabetes: relationship with C-peptide level.
Diabetologia
41:
1080-1084,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Dunbar, J,
McLaughlin W,
Walsh M-F,
and
Foà P.
Insulin secretion and glucose uptake by isolated islets of the hamster. Effects of insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide.
Horm Metab Res
8:
1-6,
1976[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Eigen, M,
and
Rigler R.
Sorting single molecules: application to diagnostics and evolutionary biotechnology.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
5740-5747,
1994
10.
Flatt, PR,
Swanston-Flatt SK,
Hampton SM,
Bailey CJ,
and
Marks V.
Specific binding of the C-peptide of proinsulin to cultured B-cells from a transplantable rat islet cell tumor.
Biosci Rep
6:
193-199,
1986[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Forst, T,
Kunt T,
Pohlmann T,
Goitom K,
Engelbach M,
Beyer J,
and
Pfützner A.
Biological activity of C-peptide on the skin microcirculation in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
J Clin Invest
101:
2036-2041,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Friedman, E,
Sheih S-D,
Hirsch S,
and
Boshell B.
No supranormal glomerular filtration (GFR) in type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes (Abstract).
Am Soc Nephrol
14:
102A,
1981.
13.
Gregory, R,
and
Tracy H.
The constitution and properties of two gastrins extracted from hog antral mucose.
Gut
5:
103-117,
1964.
14.
Hagen, C,
Faber O,
Binder C,
and
Alberti K.
Lack of metabolic effect of C-peptide in normal subjects and juvenile diabetic patients (Abstract).
Acta Endocrinologica
85:
29,
1977.
15.
Hamm, HE.
The many faces of G protein signaling.
J Biol Chem
273:
669-672,
1998
16.
Henriksson, M,
Shafqat J,
Liepinsh E,
Tally M,
Wahren J,
Jörnvall H,
and
Johansson J.
Unordered structure of proinsulin C-peptide in aqueous solution and in the presence of lipid vesicles.
Cell Mol Life Sci
57:
337-342,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Hoogwerf, B,
Bantle J,
Gaenslen H,
Greenberg B,
Senske B,
Francis R,
and
Goetz F.
Infusion of synthetic human C-peptide does not affect plasma glucose, serum insulin, or plasma glucagon in healthy subjects.
Metabolism
35:
122-125,
1986[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Ibarra, F,
Aperia A,
Svensson L-B,
Eklöf A-C,
and
Greengard P.
Bidirectional regulation of Na+,K+-ATPase activity by dopamine and
-adrenergic agonist.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:
21-24,
1993
19.
Ido, Y,
Vindigni A,
Chang K,
Stramm L,
Chance R,
Heath W,
DiMarchi R,
Cera ED,
and
Williamson J.
Prevention of vascular and neural dysfunction in diabetic rats by C-peptide.
Science
277:
563-566,
1997
20.
Jack, A,
Cameron N,
and
Cotter M.
Effects of the diacylglycerol complexing agent, cremophor, on nerve-conduction velocity and perfusion in diabetic rats.
J Diabetes Complications
13:
2-9,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Jansson, L.
Effects of C-peptide on splanchnic blood flow in anaesthetised rats.
Med Sci res
23:
157-158,
1995.
22.
Jehle, PM,
Fussgänger RD,
Angelus NKD,
Jungwirth RJ,
Saile B,
and
Lutz MP.
Proinsulin stimulates growth of small intestinal crypt-like cells acting via specific receptors.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
276:
E262-E268,
1999
23.
Jehle, P,
Lutz M,
and
Fussgänger R.
High affinity binding sites for proinsulin in human IM-9 lymphoblasts.
Diabetologia
39:
421-432,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Jensen, ME,
and
Messina EJ.
C-peptide induces a concentration-dependent dilation of skeletal muscle arterioles only in presence of insulin.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
276:
H1223-H1228,
1999
25.
Johansson, B-L,
Borg K,
Fernqvist-Forbes E,
Kernell A,
Odergren T,
and
Wahren J.
Beneficial effects of C-peptide on incipient nephropathy and neuropathy in patients with type I diabetes
a three-month study.
Diabetic Med
17:
181-189,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
26.
Johansson, B-L,
Borg K,
Fernqvist-Forbes E,
Odergren T,
Remahl S,
and
Wahren J.
C-peptide improves autonomic nerve function in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetologia
39:
687-695,
1996[Medline].
27.
Johansson, B-L,
Kernell A,
Sjöberg S,
and
Wahren J.
Influence of combined C-peptide and insulin administration on renal function and metabolic control in diabetes type 1.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
77:
976-981,
1993[Abstract].
28.
Johansson, B-L,
Linde B,
and
Wahren J.
Effects of C-peptide on blood flow, capillary diffusion capacity and glucose utilization in the exercising forearm of type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients.
Diabetologia
35:
1151-1158,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
29.
Johansson, B-L,
and
Pernow J.
C-peptide potentiates the vasoconstrictor effect of neuropeptide Y in insulin dependent diabetic patients.
Acta Physiol Scand
165:
39-44,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Johansson, B-L,
Pernow J,
and
Wahren J.
Muscle vasodilatation by C-peptide is NO-mediated (Abstract).
Diabetologia
42 Suppl1:
A324,
1999.
31.
Johansson, B-L,
Sjöberg S,
and
Wahren J.
The influence of human C-peptide on renal function and glucose utilization in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients.
Diabetologia
35:
121-128,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
32.
Kaneto, T,
Kaneto A,
Yanihara N,
Yasuda H,
Suzuki S,
Oka H,
and
Oda T.
Proinsulin, Insulin and C-Peptide, edited by Baba S,
Kaneto T,
and Yanihara N.. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1979, p. 138-147.
33.
Kitabchi, A.
Proinsulin and C-peptide.
Metabolism
26:
547-587,
1977[Web of Science][Medline].
34.
Kunt, T,
Forst T,
Closs E,
Wallerath U,
Förstermann R,
Lehmann R,
Pfützner A,
Harzer O,
Engelback M,
and
Beyer J.
Activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) by C-peptide (Abstract).
Diabetologia
41:
A176,
1998.
35.
Kunt, T,
Schneider S,
Pfützner A,
Goitum K,
Engelbach M,
Schauf B,
Beyer J,
and
Forst T.
The effect of human proinsulin C-peptide on erythrocyte deformability in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetologia
42:
465-471,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
36.
Lindström, K,
Johansson C,
Johnsson E,
and
Haraldsson B.
Acute effects of C-peptide on the microvasculature of isolated perfused skeletal muscle and kidneys in rat.
Acta Physiol Scand
156:
19-25,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
37.
Ling, L,
Oshida Y,
Kusunoki M,
Yamanouchi K,
Johansson B,
Wahren J,
and
Sato Y.
Rat C-peptide I and II stimulates utilization in STZ-induced diabetic rats.
Diabetologia
42:
958-964,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
38.
Maiti, S,
Haupts U,
and
Webb W.
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: diagnostics for sparse molecules.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
11753-11757,
1997
39.
Mogensen, C,
and
Andersen M.
Increased kidney size and glomerular filtration rate in early juvenile diabetes.
Diabetes
22:
707-712,
1973.
40.
Mogensen, C,
and
Andersen M.
Increased kidney size and glomerular filtration rate in untreated juvenile diabetes. Normalisation by insulin treatment.
Diabetologia
11:
221-224,
1975[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Mutt, V,
and
Jorpes J.
Structure of porcine cholecystokinin-pancreozymin.
Eur J Biochem
6:
156-162,
1968[Web of Science][Medline].
42.
Ohtomo, Y,
Aperia A,
Sahlgren B,
Johansson B-L,
and
Wahren J.
C-peptide stimulates rat renal tubular Na+,K+ATPase activity in synergism with neuropeptide Y.
Diabetologia
39:
199-205,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
43.
Ohtomo, Y,
Bergman T,
Johansson B-L,
Jörnvall H,
and
Wahren J.
Differential effects of proinsulin C-peptide fragments on Na+,K+-ATPase activity of renal tubule segments.
Diabetologia
41:
287-291,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
44.
Rigler, R,
Pramanik A,
Jonasson P,
Kratz G,
Jansson O,
Nygren P-Å,
Ståhl S,
Ekberg K,
Johansson B-L,
Uhlén S,
Uhlén M,
Jörnvall H,
and
Wahren J.
Specific binding of proinsulin C-peptide to human cell membranes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:
1318-1323,
1999.
45.
Rubenstein, A,
Clark J,
Melani F,
and
Steiner D.
Secretion of proinsulin, C-peptide by pancreatic beta cells and its circulation in blood.
Nature
224:
697-699,
1969.
46.
Sandahl-Christiansen, J,
Frandsen M,
and
Parving H.
The effect of intravenous insulin infusion on kidney function in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Diabetologia
20:
199-204,
1981[Web of Science][Medline].
47.
Schlesinger, P,
Ido Y,
and
Williamsson J.
Conductive channel properties of human C-peptide incorporated into planar lipid bilayers (Abstract).
Diabetes
47:
A29,
1998.
48.
Schmitz, A,
Gundersen H,
and
Österby R.
Glomerular morphology by light microscopy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes
37:
38-43,
1988[Abstract].
49.
Sjöberg, S,
Johansson B-L,
Östman J,
and
Wahren J.
Renal and splanchnic exchange of human biosynthetic C-peptide in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus.
Diabetologia
34:
423-428,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
50.
Sjöquist, M,
Huang W,
and
Johansson B-L.
Effects of C-peptide on renal function at the early stage of experimental diabetes.
Kidney Int
54:
758-764,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
51.
Steiner, D,
Bell G,
and
Tager H.
Chemistry and biosynthesis of pancreatic protein hormones.
In: Endocrinology, edited by DeGroot L. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1995, p. 1296-1328.
52.
Steiner, D,
Cunningham D,
Spigelman L,
and
Aten B.
Insulin biosynthesis: evidence for a precursor.
Science
157:
697-700,
1967
53.
Steiner, D,
and
Oyer P.
Biosynthesis of insulin and a probable precursor of insulin by a human islet cell adenoma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
57:
473-481,
1967
54.
Sugimoto, K,
Zhang W-X,
Xu G,
Wahren J,
and
Sima A.
Expression of insulin and IGF-I receptors' mRNAs in peripheral nerve of type 1 diabetic BB/W-rat: effects of C-peptide (Abstract).
Diabetologia
42 Suppl1:
A291,
1999.
55.
Tager, H,
and
Steiner D.
Primary structures of the proinsulin connecting peptides of the rat and the horse.
J Biol Chem
247:
7936-7940,
1972
56.
Thomas, P.
Diabetic neuropathy: epidemiology and pathogenesis.
In: Textbook of Diabetes, edited by Pickup J,
and Williams G. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, p. 613-622.
57.
Toyota, T,
Abe K,
and
Kudo A.
Inhibitory action of rat insulin and synthetic rat C-peptide on insulin secretion in the perfused rat pancreas.
Acta Diabetol Lat
14:
250-256,
1977[Web of Science][Medline].
58.
Toyota, T,
Abe K,
Kudo M,
Kimura K,
and
Goto Y.
Inhibitory effects of synthetic rat C-peptide 1 on insulin secretion in the isolated perfused rat pancreas.
Tohoku J Exp Med
117:
79-83,
1975[Web of Science][Medline].
59.
Wahlestedt, C,
Håkansson R,
Vaz C,
and
Zukowska-Grojec Z.
Norepinephrine and neuropeptide Y: vasoconstrictor cooperation in vivo and in vitro.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
258:
R736-R742,
1990
60.
Wahren, J,
Bertorello A,
Johansson B-L,
Halban P,
and
Jörnvall H.
Fragments of rat C-peptide stimulate
-cell Na+K+ATPase activity (Abstract).
Eur J Endocrinol
136, Suppl1:
16,
1997.
61.
Wahren, J,
Owada S,
Johansson B-L,
Berggren P-O,
and
Bertorello A.
C-peptide stimulates
-cell Na+K+ATPase activity: a negative feedback mechanism on insulin secretion? (Abstract)
Diabetologia
39, Suppl1:
A71,
1996.
62.
White, J,
Olchovsky D,
Kershaw M,
and
Berelowit M.
Increased hypothalamic content of preproneuropeptide-Y messenger ribonucleic acid in streptozotocin-diabetic rats.
Endocrinology
126:
765-772,
1990
63.
Wójcikowski, C,
Fussgänger R,
and
Pfeiffer E.
Inhibition of insulin and glucagon secretion of the isolated rat pancreas by synthetic human and rat C-peptide.
In: C-Peptide, edited by Beyer J,
Krause U,
and Naegele W.. Konstanz: Schnetzor-Verlag, 1977, p. 75-88.
64.
Wójcikowski, C,
Maier V,
Dominiak K,
Fussgänger R,
and
Pfeiffer E.
Effects of synthetic rat C-peptide in normal and diabetic rats.
Diabetologia
25:
288-290,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
65.
Wu, W,
Oshida Y,
Yang W-P,
Ohsawa I,
Sato J,
Iwao S,
Johansson B-L,
Wahren J,
and
Sato Y.
Effect of C-peptide administration on whole body glucose utlilization in STZ-induced diabetic rats.
Acta Physiol Scand
157:
253-258,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
66.
Zierath, J.
In vitro studies of human skeletal muscle: hormonal and metabolic regulation of glucose transport.
Acta Physiol Scand
155, Suppl626:
66,
1995.
67.
Zierath, J,
Galuska D,
Johansson B-L,
and
Wallberg-Henriksson H.
Effect of human C-peptide on glucose transport in in vitro incubated human skeletal muscle.
Diabetologia
34:
899-901,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
68.
Zierath, J,
Handberg A,
Tally M,
and
Wallberg-Henriksson H.
C-peptide stimulates glucose transport in isolated human skeletal muscle independent of insulin receptor and tyrosine kinase activation.
Diabetologia
39:
306-313,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. E. Hills, N. Al-Rasheed, N. Al-Rasheed, G. B. Willars, and N. J. Brunskill C-peptide reverses TGF-{beta}1-induced changes in renal proximal tubular cells: implications for treatment of diabetic nephropathy Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): F614 - F621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Panero, G. Novelli, C. Zucco, P. Fornengo, M. Perotto, O. Segre, G. Grassi, P. Cavallo-Perin, and G. Bruno Fasting Plasma C-Peptide and Micro- and Macrovascular Complications in a Large Clinic-Based Cohort of Type 1 Diabetic Patients Diabetes Care, February 1, 2009; 32(2): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ludvigsson, M. Faresjo, M. Hjorth, S. Axelsson, M. Cheramy, M. Pihl, O. Vaarala, G. Forsander, S. Ivarsson, C. Johansson, et al. GAD Treatment and Insulin Secretion in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes N. Engl. J. Med., October 30, 2008; 359(18): 1909 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Krishnan, C. S.-Y. Lin, and M. C. Kiernan Activity-dependent excitability changes suggest Na+/K+ pump dysfunction in diabetic neuropathy Brain, May 1, 2008; 131(5): 1209 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Choi and E. S. Ford Haemoglobin A1c, fasting glucose, serum C-peptide and insulin resistance in relation to serum uric acid levels--the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Rheumatology, May 1, 2008; 47(5): 713 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Polska, J. Kolodjaschna, F. Berisha, M. M. Malec, C. Simader, M. Bayerle-Eder, M. Roden, and L. Schmetterer C-Peptide does not affect ocular blood flow in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, September 1, 2006; 29(9): 2034 - 2038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kitazawa, Y. Shibata, S. Hashimoto, Y. Ohizumi, and T. Yamakuni Proinsulin C-Peptide Stimulates a PKC/I{kappa}B/NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathway to Activate COX-2 Gene Transcription in Swiss 3T3 Fibroblasts J. Biochem., June 1, 2006; 139(6): 1083 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stadler, C. Anderwald, T. Karer, A. Tura, T. Kastenbauer, M. Auinger, C. Bieglmayer, O. Wagner, F. Kronenberg, P. Nowotny, et al. Increased Plasma Amylin in Type 1 Diabetic Patients After Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation: A sign of impaired {beta}-cell function? Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 1031 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Al-Rasheed, G. B. Willars, and N. J. Brunskill C-Peptide Signals via G{alpha}i to Protect against TNF-{alpha}-Mediated Apoptosis of Opossum Kidney Proximal Tubular Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 986 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fiorina, M. Venturini, F. Folli, C. Losio, P. Maffi, C. Placidi, S. La Rosa, E. Orsenigo, C. Socci, C. Capella, et al. Natural History of Kidney Graft Survival, Hypertrophy, and Vascular Function in End-Stage Renal Disease Type 1 Diabetic Kidney-Transplanted Patients: Beneficial impact of pancreas and successful islet cotransplantation Diabetes Care, June 1, 2005; 28(6): 1303 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fiorina, C. Gremizzi, P. Maffi, R. Caldara, D. Tavano, L. Monti, C. Socci, F. Folli, F. Fazio, E. Astorri, et al. Islet Transplantation Is Associated With an Improvement of Cardiovascular Function in Type 1 Diabetic Kidney Transplant Patients Diabetes Care, June 1, 2005; 28(6): 1358 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wu, W. C. Willett, S. E. Hankinson, and E. Giovannucci Caffeinated Coffee, Decaffeinated Coffee, and Caffeine in Relation to Plasma C-Peptide Levels, a Marker of Insulin Secretion, in U.S. Women Diabetes Care, June 1, 2005; 28(6): 1390 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A.F. Sima and Z.-g. Li The Effect of C-Peptide on Cognitive Dysfunction and Hippocampal Apoptosis in Type 1 Diabetic Rats Diabetes, May 1, 2005; 54(5): 1497 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Krishnan and M. C. Kiernan Altered nerve excitability properties in established diabetic neuropathy Brain, May 1, 2005; 128(5): 1178 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Stevens, W. Zhang, F. Li, and A. A. F. Sima C-peptide corrects endoneurial blood flow but not oxidative stress in type 1 BB/Wor rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2004; 287(3): E497 - E505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx, D. Walcher, C. Raichle, M. Aleksic, H. Bach, M. Grub, V. Hombach, P. Libby, A. Zieske, S. Homma, et al. C-Peptide Colocalizes with Macrophages in Early Arteriosclerotic Lesions of Diabetic Subjects and Induces Monocyte Chemotaxis In Vitro Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2004; 24(3): 540 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B.-L. Johansson, J. Sundell, K. Ekberg, C. Jonsson, M. Seppanen, O. Raitakari, M. Luotolahti, P. Nuutila, J. Wahren, and J. Knuuti C-peptide improves adenosine-induced myocardial vasodilation in type 1 diabetes patients Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2004; 286(1): E14 - E19. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. J. Shapiro Islet Transplants and Impact on Secondary Diabetic Complications: Does C-Peptide Protect the Kidney? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 2214 - 2216. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fiorina, F. Folli, F. Bertuzzi, P. Maffi, G. Finzi, M. Venturini, C. Socci, A. Davalli, E. Orsenigo, L. Monti, et al. Long-Term Beneficial Effect of Islet Transplantation on Diabetic Macro-/Microangiopathy in Type 1 Diabetic Kidney-Transplanted Patients Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 1129 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ekberg, T. Brismar, B.-L. Johansson, B. Jonsson, P. Lindstrom, and J. Wahren Amelioration of Sensory Nerve Dysfunction by C-Peptide in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes, February 1, 2003; 52(2): 536 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Karpe, B. A Fielding, J.-L. Ardilouze, V. Ilic, I. A Macdonald, and K. N Frayn Effects of insulin on adipose tissue blood flow in man J. Physiol., May 1, 2002; 540(3): 1087 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |