|
|
||||||||
Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, Brussels Free University, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate (1.7 and 8.5 mM) on insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon
secretion from isolated rat pancreases perfused in the presence of 8.3 mM D-glucose were compared with
those of unesterified
2-deoxy-D-glucose tested at the
same two concentrations. The unesterified glucose analog caused, in a
concentration-related manner, inhibition of glucose-induced insulin and
somatostatin release and augmentation of glucagon secretion. The two
anomers of 2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, however, increased the secretion rate of all three
hormones; this effect was also related to the concentration of the
esters. No obvious anomeric specificity of the secretory response to
2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate
was observed. These findings indicate that the insulinotropic action of
hexose esters cannot be accounted for solely by the metabolic effect of
their glucidic moieties. They suggest that the A, B, and D
cells of the endocrine pancreas are each equipped with a receptor
system responsible for the direct recognition of monosaccharide esters
as secretagogues. They further support the view that a paracrine effect
of insulin on glucagon-producing cells does not represent a major
component in the regulation of their secretory activity.
insulin secretion; glucagon secretion; somatostatin secretion; rat pancreas perfusion
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE RECENT INTRODUCTION of selected esters of
monosaccharides in biomedical research has allowed an increase in the
nutritional value or metabolic efficiency of several hexoses and their
antimetabolic analogs (10). For instance,
-D-glucose pentaacetate
augments glycolytic flux and insulin release in rat pancreatic islets
to a larger extent than unesterified
D-glucose tested at the same concentration as its ester (21, 27). Likewise,
D-mannoheptulose hexaacetate
inhibits D-glucose
phosphorylation in different cell types otherwise resistant to the
unesterified heptose (4, 17). Last,
2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate
is more efficient than the unesterified
D-glucose analog in inhibiting
cell growth in various lines of tumoral cells (1, 12, 13, 25). These
situations appear attributable to the fact that the monosaccharide
esters penetrate into intact cells without requiring the intervention of a specific carrier system and then undergo enzymatic hydrolysis inside the cells, so that large amounts of their carbohydrate moiety
then become available as either nutrient or metabolic inhibitor.
In the course of these investigations, however, esters of either
nonmetabolized hexoses, e.g.,
-L-glucose pentaacetate (21), or metabolic inhibitors, e.g.,
2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate (14), were unexpectedly found to also display positive insulinotropic action. This cannot be attributed to the catabolism of their acetate moieties, because other hexose esters, e.g.,
D-galactose pentaacetate, which
are as efficiently taken up and hydrolyzed in pancreatic islets (27,
29), fail to stimulate, and may even inhibit, insulin secretion (15,
21). It was speculated however that the paradoxical stimulation of
insulin release by the esters of nonmetabolized hexoses or metabolic
inhibitors might result from the direct interaction of the ester with a
receptor system, possibly displaying analogy with that involved in the
recognition of bitter compounds by taste buds (19). It was also
proposed that advantage could be taken of the positive or negative
insulinotropic action of esters of nonmetabolized or poorly metabolized
hexoses, such as
-L-glucose
pentaacetate or
-D-galactose
pentaacetate, in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus (16) or persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (15).
To gain further insight into the postulated direct action of monosaccharide esters on a specific receptor system, we have now compared the effects of the two anomers of 2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate and of unesterified 2-deoxy-D-glucose on the secretion of insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon by the isolated perfused rat pancreas. These experiments were conducted in the presence of 8.3 mM D-glucose to facilitate the detection of either an enhancing or inhibitory action of the tested agents on insulin release. Both unesterified 2-deoxy-D-glucose and its tetraacetate esters were used at either a 1.7 or 8.5 mM concentration to explore a possible dual effect, both positive and negative, of these agents on hormonal secretion by the endocrine pancreas (14).
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
- and
-tetraacetate esters of
2-deoxy-D-glucose were
synthesized by a method adapted from that described elsewhere (30). 2-Deoxy-D-glucose was purchased
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Two female (B & K Universal, Hull, UK) and 10 male (Iffa Credo,
L'Arbresle, France) fed Wistar rats were used in the present study
(Table 1). The animals were anesthetized
with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (46 mg/kg),
and the pancreas was perfused without recirculation through both the
celiac and superior mesenteric arteries, as described elsewhere (18). A slight modification of this procedure was introduced. The duodenum was
not excluded during the surgical procedure, and the
secretions from the intestine and exocrine pancreas were diverted
through a plastic tubing that was secured in the upper part of the
duodenum.
|
The basal salt-balanced solution (18) contained D-glucose (8.3 mM), dextran (clinical grade; 40 g/l; Sigma), and bovine serum albumin (RIA grade; 5 g/l; Sigma). It was supplemented, as required, with 2-deoxy-D-glucose or its tetraacetate esters (1.7 and 8.5 mM), with separate reservoirs. All solutions were continuously gassed (95% O2-5% CO2), with a resulting pH of 7.4. They were directed to the pancreas-duodenum preparation at a temperature of 37°C with a peristaltic pump (Minipuls 3, Gilson, Villiers-le-Bel, France).
The techniques used for the measurement of plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, perfusion pressure, pancreatic insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin content and release were identical to those detailed previously (6, 9).
The oscillatory pattern of hormonal release was assessed by a procedure reported previously (5). The mean hormonal output in each individual experiment over a given period of time was computed by planimetry from all measurements made over that period.
The vertical dotted lines on Figs. 1-4 were corrected for the dead space of the perfusion device (7). To allow for a better comparison of the responses of insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon to 2-deoxy-D-glucose and its tetraacetate esters, the secretory rates recorded for each individual hormone were expressed with an identical scale (see Figs. 1-3). However, because the hormonal responses to 2-deoxy-D-glucose were in a lower range than those otherwise recorded, the results obtained with this glucose analog were additionally drawn with an extended scale (see Fig. 4).
The results (see Table 1 and Figs. 1-4) are presented as means ± SE together with the number of individual observations (n = 4 in each series of perfusions). The statistical significance of differences between mean values was assessed by use of Student's two-tailed paired or unpaired t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate (Instat 2, Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA). The null hypothesis was rejected for P values < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characteristics of the rats and perfusion parameters. None of the variables studied differed statistically among the three series of experiments. Their overall mean value (n = 12) averaged 376 ± 19 g for body weight; 4.9 ± 0.1 mM and 72.2 ± 6.9 µU/ml for the plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, respectively, measured before anesthesia; 1.14 ± 0.07 g for the pancreatic wet weight; 136.8 ± 10.4, 0.38 ± 0.03, and 5.8 ± 0.3 µg for the pancreatic content in insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon, respectively; 1.50 ± 0.03 ml/min for the flow rate; and 20.5 ± 0.9 and 20.4 ± 0.7 mmHg for the perfusion pressure at minutes 20 and 105, respectively.
Basal insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon release. During the basal period, the output of insulin in the presence of 8.3 mM D-glucose amounted to 9 ± 1, 8 ± 2, and 8 ± 2 ng/min in the
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate,
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, and
2-deoxy-D-glucose experiments,
respectively (Fig. 1; see Fig. 4,
top; Table 1, minutes
20-28).
These secretory rates were not statistically different from one another
(ANOVA, P = 0.896) and, when
pooled, averaged 8 ± 1 ng/min
(n = 12).
|
|
|
|
Effects of
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate,
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose
on insulin release.
Both the
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate esters stimulated, in a concentration-dependent
manner, the release of insulin (Fig. 1,
top and
middle; Table 1).
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate (Fig. 1, top), the
output of insulin increased to a mean value of 28 ± 3 ng/min
(minutes
28-43),
which represented 310 ± 13% of that recorded during the 5-min
prestimulatory period (minutes
23-28, 9 ± 1 ng/min). The pattern of release disclosed regular
oscillations. Thus, after a first peak at
minutes
33-34,
two further secretory cycles of 4.9 ± 0.4 min each were identified.
During the late part of the stimulatory period
(minutes
35-43),
the output of insulin averaged 32 ± 3 ng/min. The later
administration of 8.5 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate induced a rapid and prominent stimulation of insulin
release, the secretory rates reaching a value of 89 ± 6 ng/min
(minutes
68-83),
which represented 686 ± 82% of that recorded during the immediate
5-min prestimulatory period (minutes
63-68,
13 ± 1 ng/min). As was the case with the 1.7 mM concentration, the
pattern of release observed in response to 8.5 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate was oscillatory, three secretory cycles of 4.6 ± 0.2 min being identified after the initial peak at
minutes
70-71.
The output of insulin averaged 102 ± 6 ng/min at the end of the
stimulatory period (minutes
75-83).
The stimulatory effects of 1.7 and 8.5 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate were both rapidly reversible, the insulin secretory rates
returning to 12 ± 3 ng/min during the interstimulatory period
(minutes
50-68) and 17 ± 2 ng/min at the end of the experiments
(minutes
100-105). Although higher than those seen in the early basal period, the later
secretory rates were in the range of those that normally may be
expected during a constant exposure to 8.3 mM
D-glucose.
In response to 1.7 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate (Fig. 1, middle),
the output of insulin increased to a value of 21 ± 3 ng/min
(minutes
28-43),
which represented 278 ± 42% relative to the 5-min prestimulatory
period (minutes
23-28,
8 ± 2 ng/min). The secretory pattern, as in the case of 1.7 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate, disclosed oscillations, two secretory cycles of 4.6 ± 0.4 min being observed after the first peak value at
minutes 33-34.
The release of insulin reached a mean value of 24 ± 3 ng/min during
the late part of the stimulatory period. The stimulatory effect of 1.7 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, as that of 1.7 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, was readily reversible, the output of insulin decreasing
to 12 ± 3 ng/min during the interstimulatory period
(minutes
50-68).
At the higher 8.5 mM concentration,
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate, similarly to 8.5 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, provoked a rapid and prominent stimulation of insulin
release to a value of 109 ± 20 ng/min
(minutes
68-83),
which represented 925 ± 194% of the immediate 5-min prestimulatory
period (minutes 63-68,
8 ± 2 ng/min). However, in contrast to the pattern seen with 8.5 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, the secretory rates progressively increased throughout
the administration of 8.5 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, reaching the value of 132 ± 25 ng/min at the end of
the stimulatory period (minutes
75-83). An oscillatory pattern was still identified in three out of four individual experiments, with cycles of 4.5 ± 0.3 min after the first secretory peak at minute
71.7 ± 0.7.
There was a tendency for a slower reversibility in the experiments
conducted with 8.5 mM
- compared with
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, a higher rate of insulin release (39 ± 12 ng/min)
being recorded at the end of the perfusions
(minutes
100-105)
in the former experiments. This difference, however, was not
statistically significant, and the observed secretory pattern was
merely related to the very high insulin output recorded in response to
8.5 mM
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate in one of the four perfusions performed. As a whole, whether expressed in terms of absolute secretory rates or percentages, there was no statistically significant difference between the insulin
stimulatory effects of
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, whether at 1.7 or 8.5 mM. The mean 8.5 mM-to-1.7 mM ratio
in insulin output (ng/min, minutes
68-83
and minutes
28-43)
was somewhat higher, albeit not significantly so, in the
- (5.3 ± 0.9) compared with
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate experiments (3.2 ± 0.2).
At variance with its esters,
2-deoxy-D-glucose dose
dependently inhibited the secretion of insulin (Fig. 1,
bottom; Fig. 4, top; Table 1). The B cells appeared
exquisitely sensitive to 2-deoxy-D-glucose because,
already at the low 1.7 mM concentration, this glucose analog decreased
the 5-min prestimulatory insulin secretory rates
(minutes
23-28,
8 ± 2 ng/min) to a value of 5 ± 2 ng/min
(minutes
28-43,
P < 0.01). At the concentration of 8.5 mM, 2-deoxy-D-glucose
decreased the immediately preceding 5-min prestimulatory insulin
secretory rates (minutes
63-68,
9 ± 3 ng/min) to the value of 2 ± 1 ng/min
(minutes
68-83,
P < 0.05). In terms of percentages,
the secretion of insulin was inhibited 38 ± 15 and 79 ± 1% by
1.7 and 8.5 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose, respectively. Those inhibitions were rapidly reversed upon the arrest of the 2-deoxy-D-glucose infusions, the
secretory rates returning in a biphasic manner to values of 9 ± 3 ng/min during the interstimulatory period
(minutes
50-68)
and 8 ± 2 ng/min at the end of the experiments (minutes
100-105).
It may be noted that the regular insulin oscillations seen in the
presence of 8.3 mM D-glucose were not abolished by the low
1.7 mM concentration of
2-deoxy-D-glucose. Thus two
secretory cycles of 4.9 ± 0.8 min were identified after the first
nadir value for insulin output was recorded at
minute
32.0 ± 0.4. However, at 8.5 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose, only one long
cycle of 9.3 ± 0.9 min could be detected after the initial nadir at
minutes
72-73.
Effects of
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate,
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose
on somatostatin release.
The
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate esters concentration dependently stimulated the
release of somatostatin (Fig. 2, top
and middle; Table 1).
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate on somatostatin release were comparable. Thus 1.7 mM
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate increased the output of somatostatin to values of 44 ± 10 and 41 ± 9 pg/min (minutes
28-43),
respectively, which represented 255 ± 36 and 546 ± 243% of
those recorded during the 5-min prestimulatory basal period
(minutes
23-28,
19 ± 7 and 13 ± 5 pg/min, respectively). The secretory rates of
somatostatin progressively increased during the stimulation, reaching
values of 58 ± 11 and 55 ± 10 pg/min at the end of the
stimulatory period (minutes
35-43)
for the
- and
-esters, respectively. In response to
the higher 8.5 mM
- and
-ester concentrations, the output of
somatostatin increased to 87 ± 8 and 85 ± 9 pg/min
(minutes 68-83),
which represented 839 ± 263 and 1,073 ± 405% relative to that
recorded during the immediate 5-min prestimulatory period (minutes
63-68,
16 ± 7 and 15 ± 7 pg/min, respectively). The secretory rates
stabilized at values of 92 ± 7 and 97 ± 12 pg/min,
respectively, at the end of the stimulatory period
(minutes
75-83).
The 8.5 mM-to-1.7 mM ratios in somatostatin output (pg/min,
minutes
68-83 and minutes
28-43)
were comparable in the
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate experiments, amounting to 2.2 ± 0.3 and 2.3 ± 0.4, respectively. Oscillations in somatostatin output were apparent as in
the case of insulin release. Thus, in at least three of four individual
experiments, a single secretory cycle of 4.3 ± 0.4 min was observed
during exposure to 1.7 mM
- or
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate after the first peak at
minutes
37-38,
whereas two cycles of 4.9 ± 0.2 min were identified during
administration of 8.5 mM
- or
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate after a more rapid first peak at
minutes
71-72,
i.e., 6 min earlier than in response to the low concentration (1.7 mM)
of the same esters. However, some differences in the secretory patterns
of somatostatin and insulin were noteworthy. First, the rates of
somatostatin release, in contrast to those of insulin, rose steadily in
the presence of the low, but not the high, concentration of the esters. Second, the 8.5 mM-to-1.7 mM ratios in output were, for both the
-
and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate esters, lower in the case of somatostatin than in that of
insulin (P < 0.05). Last, a poor reversibility of the secretory responses was noted upon the arrest of
the high 8.5 mM
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate infusions, an "off response" even being observed in
three of the four experiments performed with the
-ester. As a
result, the secretory rates at the end of the perfusions performed with
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate remained at a value of 76 ± 25 pg/min
(minutes
100-105),
which was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that seen at a comparable time in the
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate experiments.
As was the case for insulin,
2-deoxy-D-glucose dose
dependently inhibited the secretion of somatostatin (Fig. 2,
bottom; Fig. 4,
middle; Table 1). Thus the
concentration of 1.7 mM decreased the 5-min prestimulatory somatostatin
secretory rates (minutes 23-28,
16 ± 7 pg/min) to 10 ± 4 pg/min
(minutes
68-83).
In response to 8.5 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose, the 5-min
prestimulatory secretory rates
(minutes
63-68,
15 ± 7 pg/min) were reduced to 4 ± 1 pg/min (minutes
68-83).
Such inhibitions amounted to 42 ± 7 and 61 ± 11%,
respectively. Regular oscillations in secretory rates were present,
which persisted in the presence of
2-deoxy-D-glucose. Thus two
secretory cycles of 4.8 ± 0.6 min were observed at the low
concentration of
2-deoxy-D-glucose (1.7 mM) after
the first nadir recorded at minute
33.3 ± 0.9,
and one to two secretory cycles of 4.0 ± 0.6 min were
identified at the high concentration of
2-deoxy-D-glucose (8.5 mM) after
the initial nadir at minute 74.0 ± 0.4.
The secretory pattern of somatostatin differed from that of insulin,
mainly in that the reversal from inhibition, upon the arrest of either
the 1.7 or 8.5 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose infusions, was
not accompanied by any early phase of somatostatin secretion.
Effects of
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate,
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose
on glucagon release.
Both
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate stimulated the secretion of glucagon, but such a
stimulation was only prominent in the presence of the higher 8.5 mM
concentration of the esters (Fig. 3,
top and
middle; Table 1).
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate increased the output of glucagon to a value of 107 ± 12 pg/min (minutes
28-43),
which only represented 123 ± 10% relative to that recorded during
the 5-min prestimulatory period
(minutes 23-28,
87 ± 8 pg/min). The 1.7 mM concentration of
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate did not influence the secretion of glucagon, the secretory
rates of 90 ± 7 pg/min (minutes
28-43)
being comparable with those recorded during the 5-min prestimulatory
period (minutes 23-28,
94 ± 6 pg/min). The glucagon responses to the 8.5 mM concentration of
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate were comparable, the secretory rates being increased to
values of 365 ± 46 and 405 ± 82 pg/min
(minutes
28-43),
respectively, which represented 588 ± 100 and 670 ± 158%
relative to those recorded during the immediate 5-min prestimulatory
period (minutes
63-68,
64 ± 4 and 63 ± 4 pg/min, respectively). The secretory pattern
of glucagon release was, to some extent, comparable with that of
insulin. Thus the secretory rates at the end of the 8.5 mM stimulatory
period stabilized at a value of 471 ± 69 pg/min in the presence of
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate, whereas they steadily increased to a value of 575 ± 135 ng/min in the presence of
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate (minutes
75-83).
Also, the 8.5 mM-to-1.7 mM ratios in glucagon output, which amounted to
3.5 ± 0.6 and 4.6 ± 0.9 in the
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate experiments (pg/min,
minutes 68-83
and minutes
28-43),
respectively, were comparable with those obtained in the case of
insulin. However, the glucagon release pattern differed in two respects
from both the insulin and somatostatin patterns. First, the onset of
the response to 8.5 mM
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate was clearly slower in the case of glucagon compared with that of insulin or somatostatin. Second, the stimulatory effects
of both
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate were readily and entirely reversed upon the arrest of the
8.5 mM ester infusion.
Depending on its concentration,
2-deoxy-D-glucose either did not
influence or did stimulate the secretion of glucagon (Figs. 3 and 4,
bottom; Table 1). Thus,
in the presence of 1.7 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose, the output of
glucagon amounted to a value of 72 ± 8 pg/min
(minutes 28-43),
which was comparable with that recorded during the 5-min prestimulatory
period (minutes
23-28,
74 ± 6 pg/min). Upon the administration of 8.5 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose, the secretion
of glucagon was significantly increased to values of 69 ± 7 (minutes
68-83) and 75 ± 7 pg/min (minutes
75-83),
which represented 114 ± 2 and 123 ± 3% relative to that
recorded during the immediate 5-min prestimulatory period
(minutes
63-68,
61 ± 7 pg/min, P < 0.01). The
stimulation of glucagon release was rapidly and fully reversed upon the
arrest of the 8.5 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose infusion.
Effects of
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate,
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose
on perfusion pressure.
- And
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate at 1.7 mM and
2-deoxy-D-glucose did not modify
the perfusion pressure (data not shown). At the concentration of 8.5 mM,
- and
-2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate induced a transient increase in perfusion pressure. The
increase was comparable for the
- and
-esters and, at its peak
value at minute
74, did not exceed 1.4 ± 0.3 and
1.1 ± 0.6 mmHg, respectively.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present results confirm prior observations on a concentration-related inhibitory action of 2-deoxy-D-glucose on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (20, 21). This suppressing action coincides with and is probably attributable to inhibition of D-glucose metabolism in pancreatic islet cells (27). Our results also document that unesterified 2-deoxy-D-glucose inhibits somatostatin secretion and enhances glucagon release by isolated perfused rat pancreases exposed to 8.3 mM D-glucose, and these effects are concentration related. A partial relief by 2-deoxy-D-glucose from the inhibitory action of D-glucose on glucagon release was already reported in either rat pancreatic islets exposed to 10 mM L-arginine (3) or the isolated perfused rat pancreas (31). To our knowledge, no information is available on the effect of 2-deoxy-D-glucose on somatostatin release. The present results are compatible with the view that D-glucose metabolism stimulates hormonal release from both B and D cells, while it inhibits glucagon secretion from A cells (2, 22, 23).
Both the
- and
-anomer of
2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate,
however, augmented insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon secretion from
the pancreases exposed to 8.3 mM
D-glucose. This positive tropic
action of the tetraacetate esters failed to display any obvious
anomeric specificity and was, in all cases, more pronounced at a high
(8.5 mM), rather than a low (1.7 mM), concentration of the esters.
Under vastly different experimental conditions, namely in isolated
pancreatic islets concomitantly, but not sequentially, exposed
throughout a prolonged incubation of 90 min to 8.3 mM D-glucose and
2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate,
the ester was found to enhance insulin release, when tested at a low
concentration of 1.7 mM, and to inhibit glucose-stimulated insulin
output, when tested at a much higher concentration of 10.0 mM, both the
enhancing and inhibitory action of the ester displaying
-anomeric
preference (14).
The apparent disparity between the two series of experiments is
probably accounted for, in part at least, by the fact that the rate of
2-deoxy-D-glucose
tetraacetate hydrolysis in islet homogenates, which indeed displays
preference for the
-anomer, requires prolonged exposure of intact
islet cells to the ester to generate an amount of the unesterified
D-glucose analog sufficient to
inhibit glycolysis (24). The present results are likely, therefore, to
refer mainly to the postulated direct action of the esters themselves
on hormonal release, thought to be mediated by activation of a specific
receptor system.
If so, the present findings suggest that the three major cell types of the endocrine pancreas, despite their different responsiveness to unesterified D-glucose, are all equipped with the previously mentioned receptors for 2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate. Because the latter ester augments glucagon secretion, as well as insulin and somatostatin output, the second messenger(s) generated by such receptors should, at the first glance, belong to those few coupling factors that may exert a comparable positive secretory effect in A, B, and D cells. Alternatively, the binding of 2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate to its receptor could conceivably lead to the production of distinct messengers in these three cell types.
Whatever the identity of such messengers, the present comparison between the effects of 2-deoxy-D-glucose and its ester on insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon release convincingly documents, in our opinion, that the functional response of the endocrine pancreas to monosaccharide esters cannot be fully accounted for by the metabolism of or metabolic response to their carbohydrate moiety. Moreover, the finding that 2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate augmented glucagon release, despite concomitant stimulation of insulin release, provides further support to our contention that the paracrine effect of insulin plays little, if any, role in the regulation of glucagon secretion (8, 28).
The receptor system postulated to be activated by the esters of
2-deoxy-D-glucose remains to be
identified. The effects of these esters on insulin, somatostatin, and
glucagon release are comparable with those of
-L-glucose pentaacetate in
the perfused rat pancreas (7). In the latter case, it was proposed that the stimulation of insulin release may result from the direct interaction of the ester itself with a receptor system similar to that
involved in the recognition of bitter compounds by taste buds. Indeed,
-L-glucose pentaacetate
displays a bitter taste (19). It causes depolarization of the plasma
membrane and resulting spike activity in single isolated rat B cells,
in a manner comparable with that documented in taste buds exposed to
bitter compounds (11). Moreover, purified islet B cells were recently
found to express the
-gustducin G protein involved in the
recognition of such bitter compounds by taste buds (J. Rasschaert and W. J. Malaisse, unpublished observations). The
-anomer of L-glucose also
increases cytosolic Ca2+
concentration in mouse islets (26). The sequence of cationic and
secretory events evoked by
-L-glucose pentaacetate, and
presumably other esters of nonmetabolized monosaccharides, in islet B
cells is thus reminiscent of that operative in response to stimulation by D-glucose. This analogy could
conceivably account for the present finding that the anomers of
2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate
did not suppress the oscillatory pattern of insulin release previously documented in rat pancreases perfused in the sole presence of 8.3 mM
D-glucose (5).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to J. Marchand for technical assistance and C. Demesmaeker for secretarial help.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by a Concerted Research Action (94/99-183) of the French Community of Belgium.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: W. J. Malaisse, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, Brussels Free University, 808 Route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium (E-mail: malaisse{at}med.ulb.ac.be).
Received 12 August 1998; accepted in final form 15 December 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Delvaux, A.,
M. M. Kadiata,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Cytotoxicity of 2-deoxy-D-glucose and its tetraacetate ester in tumoral cell lines.
Oncol. Res.
4:
1295-1299,
1997.
2.
Gorus, F. K.,
W. J. Malaisse,
and
D. G. Pipeleers.
Differences in glucose handling by pancreatic A- and B-cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
259:
1196-1200,
1984
3.
Hahn, H.-J.,
and
M. Ziegler.
Investigations on isolated islets of Langerhans in vitro. 16. Modification of the glucose-dependent inhibition of glucagon secretion.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
499:
362-372,
1977[Medline].
4.
Ladrière, L.,
M. M. Kadiata,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Comparison between the effects of D-mannoheptulose and its hexaacetate ester upon D-glucose metabolism in rat erythrocytes.
Horm. Metab. Res.
30:
244-245,
1998[Medline].
5.
Leclercq-Meyer, V.,
R. V. Considine,
A. Sener,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Do leptin receptors play a functional role in the endocrine pancreas?
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
229:
794-798,
1996[Medline].
6.
Leclercq-Meyer, V.,
L. Ladrière,
J. Fuhlendorff,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Simulation of insulin and somatostatin release by two meglitinide analogs.
Endocrine
7:
311-317,
1997.[Medline]
7.
Leclercq-Meyer, V.,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Dual mode of action of glucose pentaacetates upon hormonal secretion from the isolated perfused rat pancreas.
Am. J. Physiol.
275 (Endocrinol. Metab. 38):
E610-E617,
1998
8.
Leclercq-Meyer, V.,
J. Marchand,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Role of glucose and insulin in the dynamic regulation of glucagon release by the perfused rat pancreas.
Diabetologia
24:
191-194,
1983[Medline].
9.
Leclercq-Meyer, V.,
J. Marchand,
M.-C. Woussen-Colle,
M.-H. Giroix,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Multiple effects of leucine on glucagon, insulin, and somatostatin secretion from the perfused rat pancreas.
Endocrinology
116:
1168-1174,
1985[Abstract].
10.
Malaisse, W. J.
Monosaccharide esters: new tools in biomedical research.
In: Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. San Diego, CA: Academic, 1998, p. 129-142.
11.
Malaisse, W. J.,
L. C. Best,
A. Herchuelz,
M. Hiriart,
H. Jijakli,
M. M. Kadiata,
E. Larrieta-Carasco,
A. Laghmich,
K. Louchami,
D. Mercan,
E. Olivares,
C. Sánchez-Soto,
O. Scruel,
A. Sener,
I. Valverde,
M. L. Villanueva-Peñacarrillo,
C. Viñambres,
and
W. S. Zawalich.
Insulinotropic action of
-L-glucose pentaacetate.
Am. J. Physiol.
275 (Endocrinol. Metab. 38):
E993-E1006,
1998
12.
Malaisse, W. J.,
and
A. Delvaux.
Cytostatic effect of 2-deoxy-D-glucose and its tetraacetate ester in transformed mouse fibroblasts.
Med. Sci. Res.
25:
727-728,
1997.
13.
Malaisse, W. J.,
A. Delvaux,
J. Rasschaert,
and
M. M. Kadiata.
Cytotoxic action of 2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate in tumoral pancreatic islet cells.
Cancer Lett.
125:
45-49,
1998[Medline].
14.
Malaisse, W. J.,
L. E. Flores,
and
M. M. Kadiata.
Dual effect of 2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate upon glucose-induced insulin release.
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
45:
429-434,
1998[Medline].
15.
Malaisse, W. J.,
and
M. M. Kadiata.
Inhibition of insulin release by
- and
-D-galactose pentaacetate.
Int. J. Mol. Med.
2:
331-332,
1998[Medline].
16.
Malaisse, W. J.,
and
M. M. Kadiata.
Stimulation of insulin release by esters of non-insulinotropic hexoses.
Med. Sci. Res.
26:
847-848,
1998.
17.
Malaisse, W. J.,
M. M. Kadiata,
O. Scruel,
and
A. Sener.
Esterification of D-mannoheptulose confers to the heptose inhibitory action on D-glucose metabolism in parotid cells.
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
44:
625-633,
1998[Medline].
18.
Malaisse, W. J.,
V. Leclercq-Meyer,
and
F. Malaisse-Lagae.
Methods for the measurement of insulin secretion.
In: Peptides Hormones: A Practical Approach, edited by J. C. Hutton,
and K. S. Siddle. Oxford: IRL, 1990, p. 211-231.
19.
Malaisse, W. J.,
and
F. Malaisse-Lagae.
Bitter taste of monosaccharide pentaacetate esters.
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
43:
1367-1371,
1997[Medline].
20.
Malaisse, W.,
F. Malaisse-Lagae,
and
P. H. Wright.
A new method for the measurement in vitro of pancreatic insulin secretion.
Endocrinology
80:
99-108,
1967[Medline].
21.
Malaisse, W. J.,
C. Sánchez-Soto,
M. E. Larrieta,
M. Hiriart,
H. Jijakli,
C. Viñambres,
M. L. Villanueva-Peñacarrillo,
I. Valverde,
O. Kirk,
M. M. Kadiata,
and
A. Sener.
Insulinotropic action of
-D-glucose pentaacetate: functional aspects.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Endocrinol. Metab. 36):
E1090-E1101,
1997
22.
Mercan, D.,
J.-P. Delville,
V. Leclercq-Meyer,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Preferential stimulation by D-glucose of oxidative glycolysis in pancreatic islets: comparison between B and non-B cells.
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
29:
475-481,
1993[Medline].
23.
Mercan, D.,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Glucose-induced changes in the redox state of pancreatic non-B islet cells.
Med. Sci. Res.
24:
31-33,
1996.
24.
Olivares, E.,
M. M. Kadiata,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Isomeric and anomeric specificity of hexose pentaacetate hydrolysis in rat pancreatic islet homogenates.
Med. Sci. Res.
26:
489-490,
1998.
25.
Reinhold, U.,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Cytotoxic action of 2-deoxy-D-glucose tetraacetate upon human lymphocytes, fibroblasts and melanoma cells.
Int. J. Mol. Med.
1:
427-430,
1998[Medline].
26.
Ropero, A. B., R. Pomares, J. V. Sánchez-Andrés, A. Nadal, B. Soria, and W. J. Malaisse. Both
-D-glucose and
-L-glucose pentaacetates
potentiates electrical activity and cytosolic
Ca2+ in mouse pancreatic islets
(Abstract). Diabetologia 41, Suppl. 1: A143, 1998.
27.
Sener, A.,
N. Welsh,
F. Malaisse-Lagae,
M. M. Kadiata,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Insulinotropic action of
-D-glucose pentaacetate: metabolic aspects.
Mol. Gen. Metab.
64:
135-147,
1998[Medline].
28.
Sorenson, R. L.,
and
R. I. Elde.
Dissociation of glucose stimulation of somatostatin and insulin release from glucose inhibition of glucagon release in the isolated perfused rat pancreas.
Diabetes
32:
561-567,
1983[Abstract].
29.
Vanhoutte, C.,
A. Sener,
and
W. J. Malaisse.
Hydrolysis of hexose pentaacetate esters in rat pancreatic islets.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1405:
78-84,
1998[Medline].
30.
Vogel, A. I.
A Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry (3rd ed.). London: Longmans Green, 1956, p. p.383.
31.
Weir, G. C.,
S. D. Knowlton,
and
D. B. Martin.
Glucagon secretion from the perfused rat pancreas.
J. Clin. Invest.
54:
1403-1412,
1974.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Ladriere, V. Leclercq-Meyer, and W. J. Malaisse Assessment of islet {beta}-cell mass in isolated rat pancreases perfused with D-[3H]mannoheptulose Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2001; 281(2): E298 - E303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |