AJP - Endo Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 294: E645-E653, 2008. First published January 22, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00720.2007
0193-1849/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/4/E645    most recent
00720.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergouignan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergouignan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, S.

The acetate recovery factor to correct tracer-derived dietary fat oxidation in humans

Audrey Bergouignan,1 Dale A. Schoeller,2 Susanne Votruba,3 Chantal Simon,4 and Stéphane Blanc1

1Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien-Département d'Ecologie, Physiologie, Ethologie Université Louis Pasteur Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 7178, Strasbourg, France; 2Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; 3Obesity and Diabetes Research Section-National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, Arizona; and 4Département de Nutrition-Hôpital d'Hautepierre, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France

Submitted 14 November 2007 ; accepted in final form 16 January 2008

When using 13C tracer to measure plasma fat oxidation, an acetate recovery factor should be determined in every subject to correct for label sequestration. Less is known regarding the acetate recovery factor for dietary fatty acid oxidation. We compiled data from six studies to investigate the determinants of the dietary acetate recovery factor (dARF) at rest and after physical activity interventions and compared the effects of different methods of dARF calculation on both the fat oxidation and its variability. In healthy lean subjects, dARF was 50.6 ± 5.4% dose (n = 56) with an interindividual coefficient of variation of 10.6% at rest and 9.2% after physical activity modifications. The physical activity interventions did not impact dARF, and the intraindividual coefficient of variation was 4.6%. No major anthropological or physiological determinants were detected except for resting metabolic rate, which explains 7.4% of the dARF variability. Applying an individual or an average group dARF did not affect the mean and the variability of the derived dietary lipid oxidation at rest or after physical activity interventions. Using a mean dARF for a group leads to over- or underestimation of fat oxidation of less than 10% in individual subjects. Moreover, the use of a group or individual correction did not affect the significant relationship found between fasting respiratory exchange ratio and dietary fat oxidation. These data indicate that an average dARF can be applied for longitudinal and cross-sectional studies investigating dietary lipid metabolism.

exogenous fatty acid oxidation; stable isotopes; mass spectrometry



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Blanc: Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien-Département d'Ecologie, Physiologie, Ethologie UMR CNRS Université Louis Pasteur 7178, 23 rue Becquerel 67087, Strasbourg, France (e-mail: stephane.blanc{at}c-strasbourg.fr)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.