AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 294: E451-E455, 2008. First published December 11, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00570.2007
0193-1849/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/2/E451    most recent
00570.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Barzilai, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Barzilai, N.

Accretion of visceral fat and hepatic insulin resistance in pregnant rats

Francine H. Einstein,1 Sigal Fishman,2 Radhika H. Muzumdar,3 Xiao Man Yang,2 Gil Atzmon,2 and Nir Barzilai2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, 2Department of Medicine and Molecular Genetics and the Institute for Aging Research, and 3Department of Pediatrics, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York

Submitted 4 September 2007 ; accepted in final form 5 December 2007

Insulin resistance (IR) is a hallmark of pregnancy. Because increased visceral fat (VF) is associated with IR in nonpregnant states, we reasoned that fat accretion might be important in the development of IR during pregnancy. To determine whether VF depots increase in pregnancy and whether VF contributes to IR, we studied three groups of 6-mo-old female Sprague-Dawley rats: 1) nonpregnant sham-operated rats (Nonpreg; n = 6), 2) pregnant sham-operated rats (Preg; n = 6), and 3) pregnant rats in which VF was surgically removed 1 mo before mating (PVF–; n = 6). VF doubled by day 19 of pregnancy (Nonpreg 5.1 ± 0.3, Preg 10.0 ± 1.0 g, P < 0.01), and PVF– had similar amounts of VF compared with Nonpreg (PVF– 4.6 ± 0.8 g). Insulin sensitivity was measured by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp in late gestation in chronically catheterized unstressed rats. Glucose IR (mg·kg–1·min–1) was highest in Nonpreg (19.4 ± 2.0), lowest in Preg (11.1 ± 1.4), and intermediate in PVF– (14.7 ± 0.6; P < 0.001 between all groups). During the clamp, Nonpreg had greater hepatic insulin sensitivity than Preg [hepatic glucose production (HGP): Nonpreg 4.5 ± 1.3, Preg 9.3 ± 0.5 mg·kg–1·min–1; P < 0.001]. With decreased VF, hepatic insulin sensitivity was similar to nonpregnant levels in PVF– (HGP 4.9 ± 0.8 mg·kg–1·min–1). Both pregnant groups had lower peripheral glucose uptake compared with Nonpreg. In parallel with hepatic insulin sensitivity, hepatic triglyceride content was increased in pregnancy (Nonpreg 1.9 ± 0.4 vs. Preg 3.2 ± 0.3 mg/g) and decreased with removal of VF (PVF– 1.3 ± 0.4 mg/g; P < 0.05). Accretion of visceral fat is an important component in the development of hepatic IR in pregnancy, and accumulation of hepatic triglycerides is a mechanism by which visceral fat may modulate insulin action in pregnancy.

triglyceride; free fatty acids; adipokines



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. H. Einstein, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, 1825 Eastchester Rd.-7th Floor, Bronx, NY 10461 (e-mail: feinstei{at}montefiore.org)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.