|
|
||||||||
Digestive Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, Center for Ulcer Research and Education/Digestive Diseases Research Center and Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095
To prevent the blood-borne interference and reflex actions via neighboring organs and the central nervous system, the study was conducted in an in vitro isolated stomach-gastric vagus nerve preparation obtained from overnight-fasted, urethan-anesthetized rats. Afferent unit action potentials were recorded from the gastric branch of the vagus nerve. The left gastric artery was catheterized for intra-arterial injection. In vitro we found that 1) 55/70 gastric vagal afferents (GVAs) were polymodal, responding to CCK-8 and mechanical stimuli, 13 were mechanoreceptive, and 2 were CCK-responsive; 2) sequential or randomized intra-arterial injections of CCK-8 (0.1-200 pmol) dose-dependently increased firing rate and reached the peak rate at 100 pmol; 3) the action was suppressed by CCK-A (Devazepide) but not by CCK-B (L-365,260) receptor antagonist; 4) neither antagonist blocked the mechanosensitivity of GVA fibers. These results are consistent with corresponding in vivo well-documented findings. Histological data indicate that the layered structure of the stomach wall was preserved in vitro for 6-8 h. Based on these results, it seems reasonable to use the in vitro preparation for conducting a study that is usually difficult to be performed in vivo. For instance, because there was no blood supply in vitro, the composition of the interstitial fluid, i.e., the ambient nerve terminals, can be better controlled and influenced by intra-arterial injection of a defined solution. Here we report that acutely changing the ambient CCK level by a conditioning stimulus (a preceding intra-arterial injection of increasing doses of CCK-8) reduced the CCK sensitivity of GVA terminals to a subsequent test stimulus (a constant dose of CCK-8 intra-arterial injection).
vagus nerve; mechanoreceptive vagal afferent; cholecystokinin-responsive vagal afferent; cholecystokinin receptor antagonist
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Dufresne, C. Seva, and D. Fourmy Cholecystokinin and gastrin receptors. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 805 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. van der Lely, M. Tschop, M. L. Heiman, and E. Ghigo Biological, Physiological, Pathophysiological, and Pharmacological Aspects of Ghrelin Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 426 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-M. Kang, K. Bielefeldt, and G. F. Gebhart Sensitization of Mechanosensitive Gastric Vagal Afferent Fibers in the Rat by Thermal and Chemical Stimuli and Gastric Ulcers J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 1981 - 1989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J.-P. Miao, P. G. Green, and J. D. Levine Mechanosensitive duodenal afferents contribute to vagal modulation of inflammation in the rat J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 227 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Glatzle, Y. Wang, D. W Adelson, T. J Kalogeris, T. T Zittel, P. Tso, J.-Y. Wei, and H. E Raybould Chylomicron components activate duodenal vagal afferents via a cholecystokinin A receptor-mediated pathway to inhibit gastric motor function in the rat J. Physiol., July 15, 2003; 550(2): 657 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |