AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 274: E1002-E1008, 1998;
0193-1849/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, S.
Right arrow Articles by Subbiah, M. T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, S.
Right arrow Articles by Subbiah, M. T. R.
Vol. 274, Issue 6, E1002-E1008, June 1998

Mechanisms involved in the protective effect of estradiol-17beta on lipid peroxidation and DNA damage

Stacey Ayres1, William Abplanalp2, James H. Liu3, and M. T. Ravi Subbiah2

1 Interdisciplinary Graduate Studies Program and 2 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, and 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0540

Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that estrogens can protect against lipoprotein peroxidation and DNA damage. In this study, the mechanism of estradiol-17beta (E2) action was investigated by comparing E2 with selective scavengers of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in terms of inhibition of 1) human low-density lipoprotein (LDL) peroxidation (measured by the diene conjugation method) and 2) DNA damage (measured by the formation of strand breaks in supercoiled OX-174 RFI DNA). In addition, the direct effect of E2 on the generation of individual ROS was also measured. By use of ROS scavengers, it was determined that lipoprotein peroxidation was predominantly due to superoxide (39%), with some contributions from hydrogen peroxide (23%) and peroxy (38%) radicals. E2 was a more effective inhibitor of peroxidation than all the ROS scavengers combined. In DNA damage, scavengers of hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl, and superoxide radical offered significant protection (49-65%). E2 alone offered a similar degree of protection, and no additional effect was evident when it was combined with ROS scavengers. E2 caused a significant reduction (37%) in the production of superoxide radical by bovine heart endothelial cells in culture but had no effect on the formation of either hydrogen peroxide or hydroxyl radicals. These studies show that 1) the protection offered by E2 in terms of lipid peroxidation could be due to its ability to inhibit generation of superoxide radical and prevent further chain propagation, and 2) in DNA damage protection, E2 mainly appears to inhibit chain propagation.

reactive oxygen species


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
D. M. Attia, R. Goldschmeding, M. A. Attia, P. Boer, H. A. Koomans, and J. A. Joles
Male gender increases sensitivity to renal injury in response to cholesterol loading
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): F718 - F726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. M. Brooks-Asplund, A. A. Shoukas, S.-Y. Kim, S. A. Burke, and D. E. Berkowitz
Estrogen has opposing effects on vascular reactivity in obese, insulin-resistant male Zucker rats
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 2035 - 2044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online