AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270: E723-E732, 1996;
0193-1849/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berman, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ipp, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berman, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ipp, E.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 270, Issue 4 E723-E732, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Applications of segmented regression models for biomedical studies

N. G. Berman, W. K. Wong, S. Bhasin and E. Ipp
Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance 90502, USA.

In many biological models, a relationship between variables may be modeled as a linear or polynomial function that changes abruptly when an independent variable obtains a threshold level. Usually, the transition point is unknown, and a major objective of the analysis is its estimation. This type of model is known as a segmented regression model. We present two methods, Gallant and Fuller's (J Am. Stat. Assoc. 68: 144-147, 1973) method and Tishler and Zang's (J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 76: 980-987, 1981) method, using nonlinear least-squares techniques for estimating the transition point. We give the following three examples: a hypoglycemia study, a testosterone study, and an estimate of age-cortisol relationship. Simulation techniques are used to compare the two methods. We conclude that these models provide useful information and that the two methods studied produce essentially equivalent results. We recommend that both methods be used to analyze a data set if possible to avoid problems due to local minima and that if the results do not agree, then evaluation of the likelihood function in the range of the estimates be used to determine the best estimate.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online