AJP - Endo AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 263: E935-E942, 1992;
0193-1849/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Supiano, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Halter, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Supiano, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Halter, J. B.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 263, Issue 5 E935-E942, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Hypertension and insulin resistance: role of sympathetic nervous system activity

M. A. Supiano, R. V. Hogikyan, L. A. Morrow, F. J. Ortiz-Alonso, W. H. Herman, R. N. Bergman and J. B. Halter
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that heightened sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity contributes to the mechanism by which hypertension is associated with insulin resistance in humans. We performed frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests to determine tissue sensitivity to metabolic effects of insulin (SI) and measured plasma norepinephrine (NE) levels in 21 normotensive and 14 hypertensive Caucasian subjects. Compared with the normotensive subjects, hypertensive subjects had decreased SI (5.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.0 +/- 0.7 x 10(-5) x min-1 x pM-1; P = 0.03) but similar plasma NE levels (normotensive: 1.82 +/- 0.12 vs. hypertensive: 1.73 +/- 0.16 nM; P = 0.23). In a multiple regression model, only body mass index (BMI) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) were significant independent predictors of SI [SI = (-0.513)(BMI) + (-0.058)(MABP) + 23.6; r = 0.748; P = 0.0001]; age, plasma glucose, epinephrine, and NE level did not enter this model. As an additional test of this hypothesis, seven hypertensive subjects were restudied after 10 days of guanadrel therapy to determine whether SI would increase during suppression of SNS activity by guanadrel. Despite a significant reduction in plasma NE levels with guanadrel (baseline: 1.63 +/- 0.18 vs. guanadrel: 0.99 +/- 0.14 nM; P = 0.01), there was no significant change in SI (baseline: 2.97 +/- 0.78 vs. guanadrel: 2.41 +/- 0.54 x 10(-5).min-1 x pM-1; analysis of variance P = 0.57). We conclude that, in the Caucasian population we studied, heightened SNS activity is not essential for the insulin resistance observed in hypertensive humans.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online