AJP - Endo Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 263: E748-E751, 1992;
0193-1849/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arbona, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvaney, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arbona, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvaney, D. R.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 263, Issue 4 E748-E751, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Differences in GH secretion from individual somatotropes in rats genetically selected for fast and slow growth

J. R. Arbona, C. H. Rahe, R. L. Kelley, Y. N. Sinha, D. R. Strength, D. N. Marple and D. R. Mulvaney
Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.

A reverse hemolytic plaque assay was used to examine effects of selection for fast (F) and slow (S) growth on growth hormone (GH) secretion by individual somatotropes. Anterior pituitaries (AP) from 32 male Charles River CD strain rats selected for F and S growth for 20 generations were used. Four rats per line were used at 4, 6, 8, or 10 wk of age. Body weight (P < 0.0001) of F rats was greater compared with S rats. AP (P < 0.05) were heavier at 8 and 10 wk of age in F compared with S line rats. Percentages of GH-secreting cells were unaffected by age (range = 32.7-35.5%) and line [F = 33.1 +/- 1.2% (SE) vs. S = 34.5 +/- 1.2%] or by human GH-releasing factor (hGRF). At 8 and 10 wk, mean plaque-forming area was greater (P < 0.0001) in F compared with S rats under both nonstimulated (2,704 +/- 202 vs. 1,648 +/- 202 microns2) and hGRF-stimulated secretion (4,503 +/- 202 vs. 2,682 +/- 202 microns2). Results indicate that differences in growth observed in the two lines may be due to a greater secretory capacity of individual somatotropes rather than to a greater percentage of somatotropes or sensitivity of somatotropes to secretagogue.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online