AJP - Endo Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 260: E238-E242, 1991;
0193-1849/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Jonge, L.
Right arrow Articles by Garrel, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Jonge, L.
Right arrow Articles by Garrel, D. R.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 260, Issue 2 E238-E242, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Decreased thermogenic response to food with intragastric vs. oral feeding

L. De Jonge, I. Agoues and D. R. Garrel
Department of Nutrition, University of Montreal Medical School, Quebec, Canada.

To examine the effects of sensory stimulations associated with eating on postprandial energy expenditure, thermogenic response to food (TRF) was measured in nine subjects after ingestion of a test meal and after intragastric injection of the same pureed meal through a nasogastric tube. A third measure was made after ingestion of water and a fourth after chewing the meal without deglutition. Each measurement lasted 6 h. Intragastric injection of the meal elicited a lower TRF than oral ingestion in every subject, and this difference was seen whether TRF was calculated from the pretest energy expenditure (PTEE) or from energy expenditure measured after water ingestion (EEW) (175 +/- 57 vs. 83 +/- 32 and 209 +/- 68 vs. 106 +/- 45 kJ for PTEE and EEW, respectively; P less than 0.05 for each test). In both tests, changes in respiratory quotient, plasma glucose, and insulin were similar. Sensory stimulation by the meal without deglutition did not induce a significant change in energy expenditure. These results suggest that TRF has two components in humans, one of which is dependent on preabsorptive sensory stimulations. Lack of change in substrate oxidations between oral and intragastric feeding suggests that TRF related to preabsorptive stimulations does not depend on the preferential use of fatty acids or glucose as a source of fuel.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Lopez, M. Ledoux, and D. R. Garrel
Increased thermogenic response to food and fat oxidation in female athletes: relationship with VO2 max
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2000; 279(3): E601 - E607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
J. Levine, P. Baukol, and I. Pavlidis
The Energy Expended in Chewing Gum
N. Engl. J. Med., December 30, 1999; 341(27): 2100 - 2100.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online