AJP - Endo AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 260: E14-E20, 1991;
0193-1849/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dela, F.
Right arrow Articles by Galbo, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dela, F.
Right arrow Articles by Galbo, H.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 260, Issue 1 E14-E20, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of training on response to a glucose load adjusted for daily carbohydrate intake

F. Dela, K. J. Mikines, M. Von Linstow and H. Galbo
Department of Medical Physiology B, Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.

From responses to identical absolute glucose loads in trained (T) and untrained (UT) subjects, it has been inferred that training promotes health by reducing glucose levels and insulin secretion. To mimic daily living conditions, we studied responses to oral glucose loads making up identical fractions of daily carbohydrate intake (i.e., same relative glucose load) in seven T and eight UT males [maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) 76 +/- 2 vs. 48 +/- 1 (SE) ml.min-1.kg-1; age 24 +/- 1 vs. 25 +/- 1 yr]. Daily energy intake was higher in T than in UT subjects (18,607 +/- 835 vs. 12,493 +/- 720 kJ/day, P less than 0.05), reflecting a 2.3 times higher carbohydrate intake (678 +/- 34 vs. 294 +/- 18 g/day, P less than 0.05). After 1 g/kg body wt glucose, C-peptide and insulin responses were lower in T than in UT subjects (P less than 0.05). However, after identical relative glucose loads [high: 2.3 +/- 0.2 (T) vs. 1 (UT) g/kg; low: 1 (T) vs. 0.4 +/- 0.03 (UT) g/kg], glucose [incremental areas 300 +/- 56 (T) vs. 304 +/- 35 (UT) mM.180 min and 148 +/- 30 (T) vs. 124 +/- 22 (UT)] and C-peptide [181 +/- 18 (T) vs. 171 +/- 27 (UT) nM.180 min, and 100 +/- 13 (T) vs. 71 +/- 12 (UT)] responses did not differ between groups, while insulin responses were lower in T [at low relative load 15 +/- 4 (T) vs. 20 +/- 2 (UT) nM.180 min, P less than 0.05].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online