AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 257: E617-E624, 1989;
0193-1849/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vallotton, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wuthrich, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vallotton, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wuthrich, R. P.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 257, Issue 5 E617-E624, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Interaction of vasopressin and angiotensin II in stimulation of prostacyclin synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells

M. B. Vallotton, C. Gerber-Wicht, W. Dolci and R. P. Wuthrich
Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

The effect of angiotensin II (ANG II) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) on prostacyclin production by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) has been examined. Cultured rat aortic VSMC were studied during either static incubation in multiwell plates or during dynamic incubation in superfusion columns. Prostacyclin synthesis was assessed by radioimmunoassaying one of its stable metabolites, 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha (6-keto-PGF1 alpha). Both ANG II and AVP stimulated the biosynthesis of prostacyclin in a concentration-dependent manner (10(-10) to 10(-5) M). ANG II (ED50 = 3 nM) displayed a higher potency than AVP (ED50 = 10 nM). ANG II was 4.4 times more potent than AVP at 10(-8) M. The effect of both peptides was inhibited selectively by antagonists. In the case of AVP (10(-8) M), a pure V1 antagonist (dEt2AVP) and the V2 agonist dDAVP, both at 10(-6) M, completely blocked the production of prostacyclin induced by AVP, whereas a mixed V1-V2 antagonist [d(CH2)5-D-Leu-VAVP] at 10(-6) M displaced the concentration-response curve by approximately two orders of magnitude to the right. Superfusion with a calcium-free medium containing ethylene glycol-bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid inhibited 89 +/- 3% of the ANG II- and 70 +/- 8% of the AVP-induced prostacyclin production, whereas nifedipine (10(-6) M) had no effect. A potentiating effect was observed when the stimulation with either ANG II or AVP was repeated two or three times. An even more marked potentiation resulted when the stimulation by ANG II (10(-8) M) followed stimulation by AVP (10(-8) M).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Ohnaka, K. Numaguchi, T. Yamakawa, and T. Inagami
Induction of Cyclooxygenase-2 by Angiotensin II in Cultured Rat Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 68 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online