AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 243: E512-E521, 1982;
0193-1849/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruff, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruff, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. M.

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 243, Issue 6 512-E521, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Glucocorticoid-induced atrophy is not due to impaired excitability of rat muscle

R. L. Ruff, D. Martyn and A. M. Gordon

We explored the possibility that glucocorticoid-induced muscle weakness and atrophy resulted from impaired muscle membrane excitability. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received intramuscular injections of dexamethasone, cortisone acetate (equivalent anti-inflammatory doses), or saline for up to 28 days. Temporal patterns of change in muscle mass, twitch and tetanic tension, and membrane potential, cable parameters, and excitability were studied in vitro in the extensor digitorum longus (EDL), soleus (SOL), omohyoid (OMO), caudofemoralis (CF), and the sternomastoid muscles (membrane potential only). the membrane properties of EDL fibers were also studied in vivo (pentobarbital anesthesia). The relative severity of atrophy was OMO greater than CF greater than EDL greater than SOL. Reduction in twitch or tetanic tension never preceded atrophy. The twitch and tetanic tension (per g muscle) increased with glucocorticoid treatment. There were no significant changes in the time course of the twitch or tetanus. Dexamethasone produced more severe atrophy and force reduction than did cortisone acetate. Glucocorticoid treatment produced a depolarization of EDL muscle fibers measured in vitro at 23 degrees C, but this did not appear to be physiologically significant because EDL fibers studied in vivo were not depolarized and had normal action potential amplitudes and thresholds. Glucocorticoid treatment did not change the membrane resistance or capacitance. We conclude that glucocorticoid treatment did not produce muscle weakness by impairing sarcolemmal excitability or excitation-contraction coupling, but that the weakness resulted from muscle atrophy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online