AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 242: E317-E322, 1982;
0193-1849/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taborsky, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Porte, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taborsky, G. J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Porte, D., Jr

AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 242, Issue 5 317-E322, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Morphine suppresses plasma catecholamine responses to laparotomy but not to 2-deoxyglucose

G. J. Taborsky Jr, J. B. Halter and D. Porte Jr

The increase of plasma catecholamines that occurs during surgery can be reduced by administration of morphine. To test the hypothesis that morphine specifically blocks nociceptive stimulation during surgery, we compared the effects of morphine administration on the plasma catecholamine response to a laparotomy in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs with the effect of morphine on the plasma catecholamine response to the neuroglucopenic agent, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG, 300 mg/kg iv). In control dogs, plasma epinephrine (Epi) and plasma norepinephrine (NE) both increased progressively with time following a midline laparotomy (delta Epi by 50 min, +133 +/- 42 pg/ml, P less than 0.01 and delta NE by 50 min, +108 +/- 38 pg/ml, P less than 0.01, mean +/- SE, n = 12). 2-Deoxy-D-glucose produced a similar increase of both plasma NE and Epi. In dogs that received the anesthesia alone, plasma catecholamines did not increase from base line during the experiment. The analgesic morphine (15 mg iv), given 15 min after the completion of laparotomy, not only prevented the progressive rise of plasma catecholamines after laparotomy, but also caused a small but significant decline (P less than 0.05). Naloxone (0.4 mg iv) totally reversed the suppressive effects of morphine, restoring both catecholamines to the levels of their time-related control. In marked contrast, neither morphine nor naloxone affected the plasma NE and Epi increases following the administration of 2DG. These data suggest that morphine suppression of plasma catecholamines during surgery is not due to a generalized attenuation of sympathetic outflow, but rather to a specific interaction with an opiate receptor that either mediates analgesia or lies within the neural pathway stimulated by laparotomy but not by 2DG.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online