AJP - Endo Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (January 22, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00720.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/4/E645    most recent
00720.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergouignan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergouignan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, S.
Submitted on November 14, 2007
Accepted on January 16, 2008

THE ACETATE RECOVERY FACTOR TO CORRECT TRACER DERIVED DIETARY FAT OXIDATION IN HUMANS

Audrey Bergouignan1, Dale Alan Schoeller2, Susanne Votruba3, Chantal Simon4, and Stephane Blanc1*

1 IPHC - DEPE, CNRS, Strasbourg, France
2 Nutritional Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
3 Obesity and Diabetes Research Section, NIH/NIDDK, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
4 Departement de Nutrition, Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephane.blanc{at}c-strasbourg.fr.

When using 13C tracer to measure plasma fat oxidation, an acetate recovery factor should be determined in every subject to correct for label sequestration. Less is known regarding the acetate recovery factor for dietary fatty acid oxidation. We compiled data from 6 studies to investigate the determinants of the dietary acetate recovery factor (dARF) at rest and after physical activity interventions, and compared the effects of different methods of dARF calculation on both the fat oxidation and its variability. In healthy lean subjects, dARF was 50.6 ± 5.4% dose (n=56) with an inter-individual coefficient of variation of 10.6% at rest and 9.2% after physical activity modifications. The physical activity interventions did not impact dARF and the intra-individual coefficient of variation was 4.6%. No major anthropological or physiological determinants were detected, except resting metabolic rate, which explains 7.4% of the dARF variability. Applying an individual or an average group dARF did not affect the mean and the variability of the derived dietary lipid oxidation at rest or after physical activity interventions. Using a mean dARF for a group leads to over- or under-estimation of fat oxidation of less than 10% in individual subjects. Moreover, the use of a group or individual correction did not affect the significant relationship found between fasting respiratory exchange ratio and dietary fat oxidation. These data indicate that an average dARF can be applied for longitudinal and cross-sectional studies investigating dietary lipid metabolism.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.