AJP - Endo  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (January 22, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00184.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/4/E768    most recent
00184.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cherrington, A. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cherrington, A. D.
Submitted on March 22, 2007
Accepted on January 20, 2008

Hepatic portal venous delivery of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor enhances net hepatic glucose uptake

Mary Courtney Moore1*, Catherine A DiCostanzo1, Marta S Smith1, Ben Farmer1, Tiffany D Rodewald1, Doss W Neal1, Phillip E Williams2, and Alan D. Cherrington3

1 Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
2 Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
3 Diabetes Research & Training Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: genie.moore{at}vanderbilt.edu.

Hepatic portal venous infusion of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors causes muscle insulin resistance, but the effects on hepatic glucose disposition are unknown. Conscious dogs underwent a hyperinsulinemic (4-fold basal), hyperglycemic (hepatic glucose load 2-fold basal) clamp, with assessment of liver metabolism by arteriovenous difference methods. After 90 min (P1), dogs were divided into two groups: Control (n=8), receiving intraportal saline infusion, and LN (n=11), receiving L-NAME, a NOS inhibitor, intraportally at 0.3 mg·kg-1·min-1 for 90 min (P2). During the final 60 min (P3), L-NAME was discontinued, and five LN dogs received the NO donor SIN-1 intraportally at 6 µg·kg-1·min-1 while six received saline (LN/SIN-1 and LN/SAL, respectively). Net hepatic fractional extraction of glucose (NHFE) in Control was 0.034±0.016, 0.039±0.015, and 0.056±0.019 in P1, P2, and P3, respectively. NHFE in LN was 0.045±0.009 and 0.111±0.007 during P1 and P2 (P<0.05 vs Control during P2), and 0.087±0.009 and 0.122±0.016 (P<0.05) in P3 in LN/SIN-1 and LN/SAL, respectively. During P2, arterial glucose was 204±5 vs 138±11 mg/dl (P<0.05) in LN vs Control. Therefore another group (LNlow, n=4) was studied as was LN/SAL, except that the arterial glucose was clamped at the same concentrations as in Control, and L-NAME infusion was reduced 75%. NHFE in LNlow was 0.052±0.008, 0.093±0.023, and 0.122±0.021 in P1-P3, respectively (P<0.05 vs Control in P2-P3) and glycogen synthesis was enhanced 38% (P=0.16). Thus, NOS inhibition enhanced NHFE, an effect partially reversed by SIN-1.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.